[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
The Establishments war on Donald Trump Title: Fred Fleitz: ‘Whistleblower’ Checked Firsthand Evidence Boxes, ‘Confirms’ He ‘Is a Liar’ Fred Fleitz: Whistleblower Checked Firsthand Evidence Boxes, Confirms He Is a Liar by Robert Kraychik An anonymous bureaucrat marketed as a whistleblower by news media outlets such as CNN who filed a complaint alleging misconduct on the part of President Donald Trumps dealings with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky falsely claimed to have firsthand information, said Fred Fleitz, president and CEO of the Center for Security Policy. The whistleblower checked boxes saying he had both firsthand and hearsay evidence for his complaint, noted Fleitz of the bureaucrats submitted complaint form, offering his analysis in a Monday interview on SiriusXMs Breitbart News Tonight with host Rebecca Mansour and special guest host Haris Alic. Fleitz served as Trumps deputy assistant and as former National Security Adviser John Boltons chief of staff. He previously worked for the CIA, the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), the Department of State, and the House Intelligence Committee staff. Fleitz addressed a policy change regarding whistleblower complaint forms made between May and August, removing a previous requirement for bureaucrats filing such complaints to have firsthand knowledge of alleged improprieties. The inspector general of the intelligence community put out a statement explaining [the policy change] today which was trying to disprove these charges, and actually raised new questions, stated Fleitz. The inspector general said
that, first of all, the law does not require firsthand information, and
no matter what the whistleblower had put forward whether it was firsthand or not, it didnt matter. Fletiz continued, Second, they confirmed that the whistleblower did use a 2018 form that made it difficult to file the complaint unless you had firsthand information, but the whistleblower checked boxes saying he had both firsthand and hearsay evidence for his complaint. Fleitz added, The whistleblower has actually opened up a new can of worms in that he said in the whistleblower complaint he had firsthand and secondhand information on this, and we know he didnt have firsthand information
For me, this confirms that this whistleblower is a liar. This whistleblower is pursuing a partisan campaign to undermine this president
and despite the intelligence communitys efforts to cover for him, theyve actually made it worse. The anonymous bureaucrats identity should be known, stated Fleitz, speculating on coordination between the bureaucrat and House Democrats such as Adam Schiff. Some whistleblowers are legitimate, remarked Fleitz. A lot of them are disgruntled individuals. Theyre low performers that had security problems. Thats why we need to know who this person is [and] what was motivating them. Typically and I was on the House Intelligence Committee staff for five years theyre not supposed to come directly to the intelligence committees, but a lot of them do, and I think this guy came to the intelligence committee, met with Schiff and his attorneys, and theyve been orchestrating this, or maybe this whistleblower had his attorneys meet with Schiff and Schiffs attorneys. But clearly there was some orchestration here. This complaint was very well written, and it was written in a professional way to harm the president as much as possible. And this guy, supposedly according to the New York Times is a typical political analyst who handles Ukraine? Im sorry, this guy guy did not write this complaint alone. I think its cowardly, said Fleitz of the bureaucrats anonymity. I think you have to stand up for your principles. If doing the right thing means that youre going to lose your job, well look, youre not entitled to a federal job, and the American people need to know whos making this accusation. The president has a right to face his accusers, and making anonymous accusations like this is not the American way. I know lots of whistleblowers who put their names on the line. They sign their complaints. They send it to senior officials at the CIA and Congress. Why is this person hiding? Whats really going on here? Is he a partisan? Is he somebody the CIA was about to fire? We need to find out. Left-wing and partisan Democrat ubiquity across academia, news media, and non-profit foundations incentivize and reward bureaucrats to undermine the Trump administration, explained Fleitz. This is a temptation to people in the foreign policy [and] intelligence fields to basically slant their thinking and analysis to maybe curry favor, to get themselves jobs when they leave at Georgetown and Harvard and Columbia and some of these big foundations. MSNBC is preparing the contract [for the anonymous bureaucrat], quipped Fleitz. Breitbart News Tonight airs Monday through Friday on SiriusXMs Patriot channel 125 from 9:00 p.m. to midnight Eastern (6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Pacific). Follow Robert Kraychik on Twitter @rkraychik.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread |
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|