United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Palin Says Marked-Out McCain Visor Wasn't a Political Statement
Source:
Politics Daily
URL Source: http://www.politicsdaily.com/2009/1 ... r-wasnt-a-political-statement%
Published: Dec 17, 2009
Author: David Sessions
Post Date: 2009-12-17 15:41:49 by sneakypete
Ping List: *Politics and Politicians* Subscribe to *Politics and Politicians*
Keywords: None
Views: 61255
Comments: 413
On Wednesday, paparazzi captured photos of Sarah Palin relaxing on a Hawaii beach with her husband and children, and wearing a McCain campaign visor -- with her former running mate's name scribbled over with a black marker. TMZ called the visor a "searing political statement," but Palin tells Politico that she was just trying to keep a low profile. "I am so sorry if people took this silly incident the wrong way," Palin said in a statement. "I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago. So much for trying to be incognito." A Palin friend said that the hotel where the family was staying ..... Continued at link with photo.
Poster Comment: " "I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." Ok,there is just no excuse for that. Screw her and the horse she rode in on.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-358) not displayed.
.
.
.
#359. To: sneakypete (#356)
touche. ;)
She is a private citizen with no power to do that. There are those right now working on amnesty that get a 100% pass from the "What's Sarah Wearing Crowd" here. Because their concern about amnesty is 100% fake.
----------------------------------------------------------- Didn't you used to post at FR as Dane?
Th thread is about Sarah's Visor and McCain's name being crossed out? What are you talking about?
______________________________________________________________ tag ... you're it.
Sorry It's too complicated for you to follow. It's about your juvenile need to be the Mod here and define the discussion.
----------------------------------------------------------- I didn't say those were the only options. What do you suggest?
What's the difference between Racism_Boot's mouth and anal pore? There isn't any, they both spew gas and feces.
Were you ever married?
What's the difference between Racism_Boot's mouth and anal pore? There isn't any, they both spew gas and feces.
Blew a fart right at you, fookin pedophile dunce! What's the difference between Racism_Boot's mouth and anal pore? There isn't any, they both spew gas and feces.
Hmmmm....sounds like you're just covering up for your mistake. Whatever. I proved my point. You had to explain yourself. Ha! You lose!
Deflection won't get you amnesty, dunce. What's the difference between Racism_Boot's mouth and anal pore? There isn't any, they both spew gas and feces.
Now think aobut it, how could anyone who loves the Republic support Capt mccain and not either be lying about their support for mccain or love of the Republic. Can't be both a mccain supporter and a Republic lover. Unless the person is an imbecile.
How about deportations? No,we can't catch and deport them ALL,but we CAN deport the ones we can catch. Then all we have to do is eliminate ALL public funding for illegals including anything but emergency lifesaving health care,and the rest will go back to where they came from. They don't come here because they want to be Americans,and they don't come here because they want to "re-Conquer Atzlan". Most come here for the easy living in comparison to where they are from,either through work or public aid. Remove the easy living and they will remove themselves. The truth is that thanks to the economic and political decisions of Boy Jorge and Bubba Barry,a lot of them have already removed themselves and gone back home because there is very little work for them to find here anymore. Remove the free schooling,free medical care,and the instant citizenship given to anchor babies,and the rest of them will leave.
Were you ever married? No,but I do recognize your point.
There's the difference between you and I right there. See, there is black and white and there is also right and wrong. I have a defined set of core values and I don't waiver from them. My core values don't change when the wind blows or my candidate changes from briefs to panties. I am a conservative and I see things in black and white. You either are or you are not. And you, my neoconservative/leftist friend, are not. You are pushing for, supporting and defending a candidate who is not conservative, who supports a path to citizenship, McCain, climate change BS and bailouts. Those 'shades of gray' have brought us to where we are right now and we'll continue down this road until pretend conservatives like you find your core values and stick to them. You can claim to be against these things, and still support a candidate who is for them all, but that makes you full of shit and your comments will be viewed in the light, and given the weight that they deserve. Sorry.
OOh..Those guys in the House and Senate have those positions for so many years that eat newcomers up for lunch and spit them. If they don't know any better they pick people like Karl Rove to *ahem* help them out...Like W did. As a hand-picked NWO-Elite puppet, of course Dubya was going to led by the hand by the likes of Rove, Rumsfeld and Cheney to *ahem* "help" steer the NWO-ship. And it's because OF these Elitist NWO-SOBs that we suddenly found ourselves in the "Get-Bin Laden" quagmire and fake war in Iraq. Not happy with that, they helped demolish the conservative wing of the GOP and common sense which aided greatly in ushering one Marxist President. Just a reminder - as a supposed political neophyte (and ex-Texas Guv) Dubya's daddy was CIA director, Reagan's NWO-VP, and President - remember? Sonny-boy, Poppy and the Saudis were business partners. Now how could he have possibly have been that naive and unfamiliar with gubmint? Answer: He wasn't. RECOMMENDED READING: 'House of Bush, House of Saud: The Secret Relationship Between the World's Two Most Powerful Dynasties' Just go and check out Dana- you might like him. :) I still like Tancredo-Pat Toomey-JC Watts. Diva, I like Toomey but the guy is fighting just for a chance as PA Senator. JC Watts is a RINO and 0bama-voter, and I've yet to closely examine Dana Rohrabacher track record. Palin STILL possesses enough conservative bonafides, and rattles the cages of the political/Elites establishment to warrant serious consideration - regardless of the naysaying speculation here. But that is JMHO.
If it doesn't,she should come right out and say so. As for me,I am done with making excuses for her. She is no longer McLunatics running mate,and she is supposed to be out from under his shadow now and on her own. Politics being what it is, Palin is NOT going to clarify exactly what "100%" meant...maybe because SHE doesn't even know. But I believe it was a statement made in support of the guy who nominated her as VP. Call it a "loyalty" courtesy. To what extent did she mean it? We'll have to wait. But despite that she and McCain have a lot of differences. Whether you want to characterize support of Palin as making "excuses for Palin," get on her case, support her a la carte or whatever is your prerogative, but there is NO way she is a McCain-RINO or the equivalent of 0bama, or just another NWO-Puppet. No way. Once again,HOW is it possible to have a "path to citizenship" WITHOUT amnesty? IT IS ILLEGAL FOR A ILLEGAL ALIEN TO BE GRANTED CITIZENSHIP. A amnesty is REQUIRED before any can become US citizens. And AGAIN, we'll have to wait instead of speculating the worst. "Path to citizenship" does NOT mean "Amnesty." If a Dem or RINO said what she'd said, I'd be more concerned. Palin: "We need to close the borders. They are called illegal aliens for a reason and if they are not going to follow the rules they should not be in our country. It’s pretty simple I ratcheted that one down to the simple answer because its an easier answer than some politicians want it to make it be. You close the borders. You get more aggressive about cracking down on the illegal aliens and we take it serious what our border patrol officers are trying to do." NOT exactly 0bama or Bush, is it? I remember hoping that Boy Jorge was going to be a conservative,too. Actually I knew he was never going to be a "conservative." I supported her in the first place because I had a sense from some of the things that she said that she MIGHT be a genuine conservative at heart. Or maybe I was just so desperate for a conservative to show up that I hoped she was. I still believe in Palin for the same reasons as you. You blew out a tire on the McCain comment. I understand - I didn't like it either - but it still doesn't define her thousand and one politic positions. Check this interview out: The only good news is there is still a year left to go before the 2012 elections start getting into full swing,and I can just hope that Walter Jones or another actual conservative throws his or her hat into the ring....If not,I'm back to voting for local and state candidates in 2012,and casting another write-in ballot for president. Never heard of Jones. As conservative as he may or may not be or anyone else, will he or they have a shot?? I think I'll vote for Cheech Wizard this time. Of Cheech and Chong? How many "Cheech's" are out there?
They understand. It just conflicts with there lust for cheap labor and GOP worship.
You both support the man that voted 9x against putting National Guard on the Border. You dislike the man that did. You are a good open border Libertarians.
----------------------------------------------------------- There's the difference between you and I right there. See, there is black and white and there is also right and wrong. I have a defined set of core values and I don't waiver from them. My core values don't change when the wind blows or my candidate changes from briefs to panties. Save me the sanctimonious "I'm principled, you're not" crap. The "difference" is in accepting reality instead of delusion, the possible instead of IMpossible. We're talking about candidates for the office of Presidency, NOT who we're marrying. Do you really believe there's going to be a candidate that mirrors your "core beliefs" in 2012? If you're going to play this silly game, then Jesus Christ is MY ideal candidate because he mirrors MY "core beliefs." What's that? he isn't available to run? Looks like I've got to go to PLAN "B." Who's your Plan A or B?? I am a conservative and I see things in black and white. You either are or you are not. The issue isn't about what you or I believe; It's about politics, and the nature of politics has always been about shades of gray; Conservatives just hope their candidate represents a shade of gray that is far closer to white then black. And you, my neoconservative/leftist friend, are not. You are pushing for, supporting and defending a candidate who is not conservative, who supports a path to citizenship, McCain, climate change BS and bailouts. Those 'shades of gray' have brought us to where we are right now and we'll continue down this road until pretend conservatives like you find your core values and stick to them. NOW, you've got me LMAO. No really....my Tooth Fairy Conservative Party friend. Your idealism is commendable, but engaging in half-truths, speculations, assumptions don't help convince me that you have ANY grasp of political nuance or reality. You can claim to be against these things, and still support a candidate who is for them all, but that makes you full of shit and your comments will be viewed in the light, and given the weight that they deserve. Sorry. Wait...Is this where the Laugh-Track throttle is shoved to the max?
No. Mostly because he's not running. If he DID decide to run,he would be a serious contender,though. A married Catholic from the south that is a traditional small government conservative that leans very heavily towards being a social conservative also (he seems to be serious about being a Catholic),he was barred from the White House under Boy Jorge,and he is honest and fearless enough he gave a anti-Iraq war speech at Camp Lejune right before a election a couple of cycles ago. A anti-war speech to Marines that got him a standing ovation. As far as I know there is no scandal in his background and he is what women would call a attractive man who has charisma. Yeah,I'd say he would be a contender. If somebody can get him to run. I think I'll vote for Cheech Wizard this time. Of Cheech and Chong? No,although Cheech Marin would be a decided improvement over what we have had to suffer through since Reagan left office. How many "Cheech's" are out there? At least one. Cheech Wizard. The Wizard in Vaugh Bode's cartoons from the 60's that is always surrounded by double-breasted sweeties,and kicks anybody in the nuts that crosses him. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cheech_Wizard
No, this is where I repeat myself: You can claim to be against these things, and still support a candidate who is for them all, but that makes you full of shit and your comments will be viewed in the light, and given the weight that they deserve. Sorry. Go ahead and navigate your way through all your 'nuances' and your 'shades of gray' right to a candidate who supports a path to citizenship, McCain and bailouts. You may also enjoy pondering the definition of 'is'. Like I said, your comments will be viewed in the light, and given the weight that they deserve. Sorry, but I'll probably ignore most of them.
LOL! I'm shocked! Shocked I tell you!
No. Mostly because he's not running. If he DID decide to run,he would be a serious contender,though. A married Catholic from the south that is a traditional small government conservative that leans very heavily towards being a social conservative also (he seems to be serious about being a Catholic),he was barred from the White House under Boy Jorge,and he is honest and fearless enough he gave a anti-Iraq war speech at Camp Lejune right before a election a couple of cycles ago. A anti-war speech to Marines that got him a standing ovation. As far as I know there is no scandal in his background and he is what women would call a attractive man who has charisma. Yeah,I'd say he would be a contender. If somebody can get him to run. Getting barred from the Bush WH puts him in the rarified company of Tom Tancredo. That's a plus. Small gubmint...anti-war...charismatic...sounds principled...But it doesn't help us at a national level unless he busts a move. Cheech Marin would be a decided improvement over what we have had to suffer through since Reagan left office. Wouldn't he? 8^D Cheech Wizard. The Wizard in Vaugh Bode's cartoons from the 60's that is always surrounded by double-breasted sweeties,and kicks anybody in the nuts that crosses him. I read the comic at the link. Yeah, it was pretty funny.
IF you had a clue to begin with I might feel a bit chastised. You're locked and sealed into an intellectual vacuum.
The Paths trailhead is in Mexico. Pauls Amnesty votes (plural) as well as Gutierrez's H.R. 4321 put the trail head here in the US. Paul voted in 1997, 2001( H.R. 1885) and 2002 (H RES 365) to grant, extend or continue Section 245-i amnesties for illegal aliens
----------------------------------------------------------- Is Ron Paul Weep's guy?
I like Paul. I also like Walter Jones, which means you'd probably not. Neoconservatives think conservatives are nuts. Jones endorsed Ron Paul in 2008.
So you're NOT feeling a bit chastised? Is that why you're grilling whitey about who MY guy is? Are you looking for revenge libby? LOL!
I like Paul. I do too. But he was faaaar from perfect, has ZERO charisma, has ZERO chance of being President, and refused to run as the Independent he is. Oh, and I defended him when he accepted earmarks after having voted against earmarks.
Jones endorsed Ron Paul in 2008. WHO?? Why should I be surprised still fantasizing about a 'Tooth Fairy' Conservative Party and candidate?
"Amused" is the word. Is that why you're grilling whitey about who MY guy is? You call that simple question "grilling"?? LOL, ok - have it your way. Are you looking for revenge libby? LOL! "Revenge"?? You're not my enemy Weeps. We just disagree on the definition of "reality."
He IS far from perfect, but he's the closest thing to an actual conservative that we have in American government and light-years to the right of Palin. I don't care about charisma. I don't support a politician because he has or doesn't have charisma. I support him because his views most closely resemble my own. I don't fall for the whole cult of personality BS that is shoved down the throats of Americans today. I don't care about his 'chance' of being President. I don't support a politician because he has or doesn't have a chance of being elected. I support him because his views most closely resemble my own. If everyone today did this, we wouldn't be electing leftists no matter what letter comes after their name. I don't care what party he runs under. I don't support a politician because of his party affiliation. I support him because his views most closely resemble my own. Because neither party has my or my country's best interest at heart. That's part of that whole 'core values' thing I was talking about earlier.
Hyperbole-Ad Nauseam, thy name is We The People. I know personally people who are more "conservative" than Ron Paul, yet the odds of them becoming President is the same as with Ron Paul. I don't care about charisma. I don't support a politician because he has or doesn't have charisma. I support him because his views most closely resemble my own. I don't fall for the whole cult of personality BS that is shoved down the throats of Americans today. Possessing "charisma" is important because it leads. People are NOT inspired by whiny, apologetic, little gnomes - even if they are knowledge, honest and sincere about their ideology. Your Human-Nature IQ is ZERO. "I don't care about his 'chance' of being President. I don't support a politician because he has or doesn't have a chance of being elected. I support him because his views most closely resemble my own. If everyone today did this, we wouldn't be electing leftists no matter what letter comes after their name." Ok, so you've established the fact that you "don't care" if the odds of your candidate (like Paul) are a million-1 AGAINST.... And who cares if in the next election against 0bama, your write-in vote is a vote for stupidity, masochism, and slavery - just as long as YOU retain your "core values," eh? I don't care what party he runs under. I don't support a politician because of his party affiliation. I support him because his views most closely resemble my own. Because neither party has my or my country's best interest at heart...That's part of that whole 'core values' thing I was talking about earlier. Ummm...I think I get it. It's "because his views mostly resemble" your own. (Acccckkk! Polly wanna cracker??) The issue here is NOT about either "Party" [remember, Ron Paul (R)]; It's about the reality of who can best lead this country and steer it back towards actual conservatism. Right now the best one to fit that bill is Sarah Palin. I don't care what party he runs under. I don't support a politician because of his party affiliation. I support him because his views most closely resemble my own. Because neither party has my or my country's best interest at heart. Is that really the 4th time you've penned the same exact phrase? Tell me something I already don't know about Party apathy and indifference to the American people... ONE candidate breaks the mold: Sarah Palin. Now step away from the bong.
That's something I'm sure you'll never understand. I thought you wanted to be done with this?
Hey yukon, can you see Russia from your house? LOLAY!
LMAO! Very inspired Lib. Very sincere too. But very dumb. Let me ask you this: What are you going to do if she stumps for McCain in 2010? Will you STILL defend and support her?
Hey yukon, can you see Russia from your house? LOLAY!
I thought I could squeeze out a few more laughs from you about it....along with the obligatory methane. So sue me.
Legitimate question. Bravo... I will cringe and puke and be disappointed...BUT yes, I will still defend and support her for her "core values." We will be the recipient of that same loyalty from her when she defends and supports the American People as President.
I hope you're joking. I can never tell.
Open border/free trader. http://www.ronpaul.com/2009-10-05/ron- paul-free-trade-instead-of-bombs-and-bribes/ Paul had the same view as Bush on embryonic research!
What's the difference between Racism_Boot's mouth and anal pore? There isn't any, they both spew gas and feces.
You are so full of shit I'm surprised you ever get off the toilet! Do you have a laptop in the bathroom right now? Did you even READ that article? Everything in that article could have been written by George Washington. It's the exact same views.
You are in need of a psychiatrist, lunatic!
What's the difference between Racism_Boot's mouth and anal pore? There isn't any, they both spew gas and feces.
Comments (400 - 413) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#360. To: diva betsy ross (#359)
(Edited)
Toss: ADL,CAIR and the Vatican into the pit they belong in.
#361. To: WhiteSands, AKA Dane (#360)
#362. To: WhiteSands (#357)
Is this allowed?
#363. To: Wood_Chopper (#362)
(Edited)
Toss: ADL,CAIR and the Vatican into the pit they belong in.
#364. To: sneakypete (#330)
Oh,yeah. And those are the only options,right?
#365. To: sneakypete (#334)
I saw and heard her say them back during the campaign.
#366. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#338)
So who is this Butarsky that you blew?
#367. To: Ibluafartsky (#366)
So who is this Butarsky that you blew? Blew a fart right at you, fookin pedophile dunce!
#368. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#367)
sounds like you're just covering up for your mistake.
#369. To: Ibluafartsky (#266)
Well, I guess that means Palin is ashamed of having supported McClame?
#370. To: Ibluafartsky (#364)
I didn't say those were the only options. What do you suggest?
#371. To: Ibluafartsky (#365)
I saw and heard her say them back during the campaign.
#372. To: Liberator (#281)
Look - between black and white are shades of gray.
#373. To: diva betsy ross (#327)
I understand the passion, but- but....
#374. To: sneakypete (#328)
Given her statements as McLunatics running mate,which I was willing to overlook BECAUSE she was his running mate at that time,and given her "I support 100%" statement of yesterday,I have no choice but to believe it means the same thing to her that it means to McLuntic.
#375. To: sneakypete (#316)
This is such a simple concept to understand the typical 8th grader would be insulted if you suggested they couldn't understand it,yet these people insist it doesn't mean what it means.
#376. To: Moderate Mammal, Sneaky Pete (#375)
Toss: ADL,CAIR and the Vatican into the pit they belong in.
#377. To: We The People (#372)
Look - between black and white are shades of gray.
#378. To: Liberator (#374)
Never heard of Jones. As conservative as he may or may not be or anyone else, will he or they have a shot??
#379. To: Liberator (#377)
Wait...Is this where the Laugh-Track throttle is shoved to the max?
#380. To: Liberator (#374)
Never heard of Jones.
#381. To: sneakypete (#378)
Never heard of Jones. As conservative as he may or may not be or anyone else, will he or they have a shot??
#382. To: We The People (#379)
Go ahead and navigate your way through all your 'nuances' and your 'shades of gray' right to a candidate who supports a path to citizenship, McCain and bailouts. You may also enjoy pondering the definition of 'is'.
#383. To: Liberator (#382)
(Edited)
Toss: ADL,CAIR and the Vatican into the pit they belong in.
#384. To: WhiteSands, We The People (#383)
#385. To: Liberator (#384)
Is Ron Paul Weep's guy?
#386. To: Liberator (#382)
IF you had a clue to begin with I might feel a bit chastised.
#387. To: We The People (#385)
Is Ron Paul Weep's guy?
#388. To: We The People (#385)
I also like Walter Jones, which means you'd probably not. Neoconservatives think conservatives are nuts.
#389. To: We The People, WhiteSands (#386)
So you're NOT feeling a bit chastised?
#390. To: Liberator (#387)
But he was faaaar from perfect, has ZERO charisma, has ZERO chance of being President, and refused to run as the Independent he is.
#391. To: We The People (#390)
He [Ron Paul] IS far from perfect, but he's the closest thing to an actual conservative that we have in American government and light-years to the right of Palin.
#392. To: Liberator (#391)
just as long as YOU retain your "core values," eh?
#393. To: Liberator (#391)
ONE candidate breaks the mold: Sarah Palin.
#394. To: We The People (#392)
I thought you wanted to be done with this?
#395. To: We The People (#393)
Let me ask you this: What are you going to do if she stumps for McCain in 2010? Will you STILL defend and support her?
#396. To: Liberator (#395)
I will cringe and puke and be disappointed...BUT yes, I will still defend and support her for her "core values."
#397. To: We The People, Liberator (#390)
I support him because his views most closely resemble my own
#398. To: Ibluafartsky (#397)
Open border/free trader. http://www.ronpaul.com/2009-10-05/ron- paul-free-trade-instead-of-bombs-and-bribes/
#399. To: We The People (#398)
Everything in that article could have been written by George Washington.
.
.
.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]