[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin

How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End?

What on EARTH is going on in Acts 16:11? New Discovery!

2023 Hottest in over 120 Million Years

2024 and beyond in prophecy

Questions

This Speech Just Broke the Internet

This AMAZING Math Formula Will Teach You About God!

The GOSPEL of the ALIENS | Fallen Angels | Giants | Anunnaki

The IMAGE of the BEAST Revealed (REV 13) - WARNING: Not for Everyone

WEF Calls for AI to Replace Voters: ‘Why Do We Need Elections?’

The OCCULT Burger king EXPOSED

PANERA BREAD Antichrist message EXPOSED

The OCCULT Cheesecake Factory EXPOSED

Satanist And Witches Encounter The Cross

History and Beliefs of the Waldensians

Rome’s Persecution of the Bible

Evolutionists, You’ve Been Caught Lying About Fossils

Raw Streets of NYC Migrant Crisis that they don't show on Tv

Meet DarkBERT - AI Model Trained On DARK WEB

[NEW!] Jaw-dropping 666 Discovery Utterly Proves the King James Bible is God's Preserved Word

ALERT!!! THE MOST IMPORTANT INFORMATION WILL SOON BE POSTED HERE


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: Entire Student Section Detained, Forced to Have Blood/Urine Tests After Beer Can Found at Football Game
Source: Activist Post
URL Source: https://www.activistpost.com/2017/0 ... r-can-found-football-game.html
Published: Sep 10, 2017
Author: Matt Agorist
Post Date: 2017-09-11 08:36:37 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 1548
Comments: 31

Randolph, NJ — Parents of high school teenagers were outraged this weekend after dozens of their children were ordered to undergo forced blood and alcohol tests because officials found a beer can under the stadium during a football game. As parents tried to refuse the tests, they were told their children would be suspended for noncompliance.

Naturally, school officials are claiming that the forced blood and urine samples, taken under the threat of suspension, were done in the name of child safety.

According to a letter from Randolph Superintendent Jennifer Fano, the school is charged with enforcing the policy of mass drug tests for suspicion of drug or alcohol use among students.

The law requires that we send students out to be tested when it appears that they may be under the influence of drugs or alcohol. Given the events in question, the students in this area of the stadium were brought in to the school, separated into classrooms, and parents were contacted to pick their child up and have them screened. District policy and regulation states that failure to comply with a screening is deemed a positive test result and will result in a suspension from school.

After the can of beer was found, roughly 75 students were taken from the game and detained in classrooms where their parents were called and told they must comply with the tests. Noncompliance meant that the student would be automatically assumed guilty and face the consequences of a crime that they may or may not have actually committed.

According to a public Facebook post by Randolph High School student and Class of 2018 President Nate Pangaro,

Before the game could begin, an administrator went to the front and told everyone to be quiet. He announced that he found an opened beer can on the ground that rolled to him, and that someone should confess to (whose) it was before everyone was taken in for a breathalyzer test. No one confessed, so people went into the school each row at a time to be tested.

Some parents were outraged by the incident, according to DailyRecord.com.

“Everybody was just so confused, miscommunication,” said parent Stephanie Pangaro. “As a parent, you’re going to defend your child to the fullest when you know they’re innocent.”

The sheer number of students having to go out and get blood and urine tests overwhelmed the medical systems in town.

“Students then proceeded to emergency rooms in Dover, Denville, Morristown and Livingston,” Christopher C. Treston, a school board candidate, posted on his campaign Facebook page. “The emergency departments at Dover and at Morristown were not given any warning of what was coming, and were overwhelmed.”

As the Daily Record reports, Sheryll Lynne Penney, a former Randolph PTO president and mother of a 2017 Randolph High graduate, spoke exclusively in that capacity with the Daily Record. Penney said she had been contacted by several parents who expressed similar confusion and anger. Those parents said they believed their constitutional rights, as well as the rights of their children, had been violated.

“The students sign a code of conduct and they need to be held accountable, but so does the administration for handling the situation professionally,” Penney said.

In spite of forcing all 75 students to submit to unconstitutional blood and urine tests, only five students were found to have had alcohol in their bloodstream.

“Let me be very clear: teenage drinking is a serious problem, and it did in fact occur at our school on Friday night,”  Treston wrote. “Our process of preventing backpacks, bottles and cans from entering the stadium broke down. In addition, some number of students arrived intoxicated. We owe it to the community to identify such students, and to protect them and the community. But, we also need to do it in a way that protects the rights and dignity of the student body. When the accused-but-innocent outnumber the guilty 16 to one, we probably did it wrong.”

What this policy does is condition students to think that it’s okay to violate the rights of the innocent in order to catch a few people who may be breaking the rules—a dangerous path—and one the U.S. has been traveling down for far too long.

Matt Agorist is an honorably discharged veteran of the USMC and former intelligence operator directly tasked by the NSA. This prior experience gives him unique insight into the world of government corruption and the American police state. Agorist has been an independent journalist for over a decade and has been featured on mainstream networks around the world. Agorist is also the Editor at Large at the Free Thought Project. Follow @MattAgorist on Twitter, Steemit, and now on Facebook. This article first appeared at The Free Thought Project.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 11.

#2. To: Deckard (#0)

In spite of forcing all 75 students to submit to unconstitutional blood and urine tests, only five students were found to have had alcohol in their bloodstream.

So the parents are upset and outraged? Well, I hope all that anger is directed at the five students who brought this on. They were given the opportunity to take responsibility for their action (thereby sparing the rest of the students) but they chose to hide like cowards, forcing the school to test everyone.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-09-11   9:57:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: misterwhite (#2) (Edited)

Well, I hope all that anger is directed at the five students who brought this on.

No the students did not "bring this on" - it was an empty beer can that caused the school to go full-blown totalitarian on the kids. Someone found an empty fucking beer can! EMPTY - it could have been there for months.

WTF man? I can't say I'm surprised that you applaud this.

The law requires that we send students out to be tested when it appears that they may be under the influence of drugs or alcohol.

The presence of an empty beer can does not prove anyone had been drinking and thus does not give the school the right to conduct this massive invasion of privacy.

Deckard  posted on  2017-09-11   10:12:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Deckard (#3)

The presence of an empty beer can does not prove anyone had been drinking and thus does not give the school the right to conduct this massive invasion of privacy.

Correct. But is does provide reasonable suspicion, doesn't it? And testing showed that 5 students WERE drinking.

Poor you.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-09-11   11:08:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: misterwhite (#4)

And testing showed that 5 students WERE drinking.

Five students drank that one beer?

As the article said, most of them had been drinking prior to the game.

And if that is true, then we can't rule out that all of them had drank prior to the game and that the beer can was there for a longer period, was dropped by an adult, etc. Meaning you can't justify testing the students at all.

I don't see where the five students who were caught with alcohol in their blood gave any probable cause for a blood draw.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-09-11   11:32:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Tooconservative (#6)

The presence of an empty beer can does not prove anyone had been drinking and thus does not give the school the right to conduct this massive invasion of privacy.

Does not prove? If the empty beer can proved anything there would be no need to test the students. Putting the cart before the horse again?

The empty beer can provided reasonable suspicion -- a suspicion which proved right.

"As the article said, most of them had been drinking prior to the game."

That might be relevant if school policy only covered drinking AT the game. According to the article, "The law requires that we send students out to be tested when it appears that they may be under the influence of drugs or alcohol."

But that's not my point. My point was at the time they knew everyone was going to be tested, these five cowards refused to to to do the right thing, step forward, and take personal responsibility for their actions. By their refusal, THEY were the ones responsible for the testing.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-09-11   12:21:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: misterwhite (#7)

The empty beer can provided reasonable suspicion -- a suspicion which proved right.

School officials later claimed they had found a few other beverage containers. Also, that they had found Facebook posts showing that some of the students who were caught drinking had photos of them at a house party prior to the game.

It will be interesting to see what the ACLU can make of this case in court. They're trolling for plaintiffs now and have some bites. Also, what about the two Court decisions on warrantless blood draws? I'd like to see those brought into play.

In addition, the school policy only calls for urinalysis, not blood draws. It was the hospital emergency rooms that decided to take blood when the school never asked for blood. So what is the hospital liability for drawing blood when no one requested it?

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-09-11   12:43:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Tooconservative (#9)

Also, what about the two Court decisions on warrantless blood draws?

Different rules for schools. New Jersey v. T.L.O., 469 U.S. 325 (1985). The Court held that while the Fourth Amendment's prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures applies to public school officials, they may conduct reasonable warrantless searches of students under their authority notwithstanding the probable cause standard that would normally apply to searches under the Fourth Amendment."

"It was the hospital emergency rooms that decided to take blood when the school never asked for blood. So what is the hospital liability for drawing blood when no one requested it?"

Don't know.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-09-11   14:37:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: misterwhite (#10) (Edited)

Don't know.

I know the hospitals drew blood without a warrant and without any request for blood and without probable cause for any given student in their care.

I'd expect a swarm of scum-sucking ambulance chasers to descend upon them. But it is New Jersey, notorious for over a century as the most fascist state in the entire union. NJ has long opposed civil rights of any kind, more so than any state in the old Confederacy.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-09-11   15:28:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 11.

#13. To: Tooconservative (#11)

I know the hospitals drew blood without a warrant and without any request for blood and without probable cause for any given student in their care.

Uh, the custodial parents volunteered. They could have said no.

[Article] As parents tried to refuse the tests, they were told their children would be suspended for noncompliance.

Naturally, school officials are claiming that the forced blood and urine samples, taken under the threat of suspension, were done in the name of child safety.

School policy was cited and parental consent was given.

[Article] After the can of beer was found, roughly 75 students were taken from the game and detained in classrooms where their parents were called and told they must comply with the tests. Noncompliance meant that the student would be automatically assumed guilty and face the consequences of a crime that they may or may not have actually committed.

Leave it to Matt Agorist. NOT a crime. A violation of school policy resulting in a suspension.

[Article] parents were contacted to pick their child up and have them screened.

It sounds like the parents took them to get screened.

nolu chan  posted on  2017-09-12 22:05:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 11.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com