This week, The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruled that businesses can not fire employees for using medical marijuana if they have a legal prescription. Under the ruling, employees will be able to sue for handicap discrimination if they are fired for their medical marijuana use.
The ruling came in the case of Christina Barbuto, a former employee of Advantage Sales and Marketing, who said she was fired because she tested positive for marijuana, despite the fact that she was legally allowed to use the drug under state law. Barbuto was prescribed cannabis by her doctor to help with complications caused by Crohns disease.
When Barbuto was fired, she was told that even though cannabis was legal in her state, she was still going to be let go because it is illegal under federal law.
The ruling stated that, Even if the accommodation of the use of medical marijuana were facially unreasonable, which it is not, the employer here still owed the plaintiff an obligation under (Massachusetts law) before it terminated her employment, to participate in the interactive process to explore with her whether there was an alternative, equally effective medication she could use that was not prohibited by the employers drug policy. This failure to explore a reasonable accommodation alone is sufficient to support a claim of handicap discrimination.
Chief Justice Ralph Gants concluded that if a medical marijuana patient tests positive for the drug an exception to an employers drug policy to permit its use is a facially reasonable accommodation. The fact that the employees possession of medical marijuana is in violation of federal law does not make it per se unreasonable as an accommodation.
The judge said that since it is only the employee who faces legal danger under federal law, the employer cant claim that they have a liability in the matter. If the employee happens to be using the drug at work, the employer could potentially have a case to fire them, but not if the drug is taken while the employee is off-duty.
Matthew Fogelman, Barbutos lawyer, pointed out that since marijuana is legal, it is no different from any other prescription drug.
This is the highest court in Massachusetts recognizing that the use of medically prescribed marijuana is just as lawful as the use of any prescribed medication, he said.
Before this there was no protection in Massachusetts for employers firing them for a drug test even if they were using it for medicinal purposes, he added.
In addition to Massachusetts and Pennsylvania, laws have also been passed in Arizona, Delaware, and Minnesota, which protect the rights of employees who have been prescribed medical marijuana.
Go ahead and try it - I don't believe the court has ruled that alcohol is a medicine.
And who says that smoked marijuana is?
Her argument was that her medical marijuana was legal, not that it was medicinal. So is alcohol. If she can smoke dope before going to work, then why can't she drink alcohol before going to work?
If she can smoke dope before going to work, then why can't she drink alcohol before going to work?
Define "before going to work."
She,or anyone else can drink or get buzzed before going to work as long as there is time for the effects to disappear before they get to work. Which is MUCH longer under alcohol intoxication than whacky tobaccy intoxication.
Being intoxicated at work from pretty much ANY source is ground for being fired unless it is a government job. I once worked at a Naval Shipyard a few decades ago,and the retired drunks from the Navy that got jobs there seemed to be exempt from being fired if they enrolled in a "program". I've seen some that had to be helped off the buses they rode to work and then go to the shop they worked out of to pass out and sleep half the day not get fired. The union would protect them as long as they were enrolled in a "program". One guy that ran a special paint booth that took in large pieces of sheet steel for carriers even kept paint buckets full of vodka at the booth,and would go in there and curl up under masking paper and sleep until around 9 AM. No work there got done until he woke up,either. Union rules.
My job was to travel around from shop to shop to grease and oil equipment. I once sat in that same paint booth for 3 days from 8 am to 4 PM waiting for another drunk,this one an electrician,to come in and throw a switch to shut down power to the booth so a bearing could be replaced on a roller and I could grease it. When I complained to the union rep,he threatened to have me fired if I cut the power off myself because I would be "taking a job from a union member."