[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Officer in nurse arrest was reprimanded for sex harassment

Is anybody wathching Trump on TV?

Hillary Clinton: Women Only Voted For Trump Because Their Husbands Told Them To

Entire Volume of CIA Files On Lee Harvey Oswald, Set to Be Released in October, Has ‘Gone Missing’

Cops Execute Student for Holding a “Tiny” Multi-tool

7 Best Video Sites, YouTube Alternatives

Hobby Lobby’s ‘offensive’ decoration

America's Broken System: Left & Right Authoritarianism

Workmen Allegedly Find Bone Fragments of Saint Peter Inside Medieval Altar in Rome

"Shut down ICE!": Amnesty activists shout down Pelosi over DREAM deal with Trump

Hillary Clinton still wants to challenge election results

An Unworthy Pope

Hollywood is finished - TV ... in the sense they influence - steer the public --- for the exception of the uninformed zombie radical left communists Antifa types.

Video shows purse snatching from elderly woman in scooter at Burbank Ralphs

Profs: Boys are better at physics because they play ‘pee games’

NO AMNESTY IS A GOOD AMNESTY(Ann Coulter)

Trump Let a Kid Mow the White House Lawn. Idiot Asks: What About Child Labor Laws?

Kim Jong Un - Rocketman

Catholic Internet poster -God raised a lizard and a mouse from the dead because I said please. Claims God healed his broken neck and spine. Also says Christ does not treat Christians' diabetes or cancer. He let's them bear that cross, die

Biblical prophecy claims the world will end on Sept. 23, Christian numerologists claim

Should You Tell the Cops You Have a Gun?

WHY "FAITH ALONE" SALVATION IS WRONG! (From a Protestant)

83-Year-Old Grandpa Saves the Day By Pushing Suspect Off Roof

Liberals sick of the alt-left are taking 'the red pill'

My Father Died This Morning

Another Reason for the Electric Car Push?

The 28 States Where a Little Pot Can Still Send You to Jail

When cops commit armed robbery

How Bullwinkle Taught Kids Sophisticated Political Satire

Seeing Is Not Believing: Steel and Concrete Became Mid-Air Dust on 9/11

Rosie O’Donnell’s ex Michelle Rounds dead in apparent suicide

Praying repetitive words using Rosary beads is forbidden

Trump Extends Post-9/11 State of Emergency

The commie push leaves standing what it will

15 September 2017 Charles Spurgeon Devotion

Shapiro to Antifa: America is laughing at your inferior intellect, you know

Sweden Releases Sex Guide for Migrants Explaining Why Rape Is Wrong

Mayor: Investigation found arrest of nurse broke policies

Police culture questioned after phone recordings come to light

Tucker Carlson on DACA and Shamnesty

Trump Backpedals on Amnesty Deal After Massive Blowback from Base

Rand Worries Trump Has Caught ‘Potomac Fever’ in Pursuit of DACA Deal

A "Read-My-Lips" Moment for Trump?

"WHO AM I TO JUDGE A GAY PERSON?" says Pope Francis

Old Think

Janet Reno, American Saint

Curse of the Woke Conservatives

isn't time we put a stop to this?

NFL TV Ratings Slump Again

Report: Trump Caves on DACA, Wants ‘Quick’ Amnesty for 800K Illegal Aliens


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Cult Watch
See other Cult Watch Articles

Title: The GOP’s moral rot is the problem, not Donald Trump Jr.
Source: Compost
URL Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/blog ... ump-jr/?utm_term=.fc1f7a6d49a1
Published: Jul 14, 2017
Author: Jennifer Rubin
Post Date: 2017-07-16 22:53:58 by Anthem
Keywords: Jew-0-Con, panic, attack
Views: 387
Comments: 32

The key insight from a week of gobsmacking revelations is not that the Russia scandal may finally have an underlying crime but that, as David Brooks suggests, “over the past few generations the Trump family built an enveloping culture that is beyond good and evil.” (Remember when the media collectively oohed and ahhed that, “Say what you will about Donald Trump, but his kids are great!”? Add that to the heap of inane media narratives that helped normalize Trump to the voters.) We now see that, sure enough, the Trump legal team (the fastest-growing segment of the economy) has trouble restraining its clients, explaining away initial, false explanations and preventing self-incriminating statements. (The biggest trouble, of course, is that the president lied that this is all “fake news” and arguably committed obstruction of justice to hide his campaign team’s misdeeds.)

Let me suggest the real problem is not the Trump family, but the GOP. To paraphrase Brooks, “It takes generations to hammer ethical considerations out of a [party’s] mind and to replace them entirely with the ruthless logic of winning and losing.” Again, to borrow from Brooks, beyond partisanship the GOP evidences “no attachment to any external moral truth or ethical code.”

Let’s dispense with the “Democrats are just as bad” defense. First, I don’t much care; we collectively face a party in charge of virtually the entire federal government and the vast majority of statehouses and governorships. It’s that party’s inner moral rot that must concern us for now. Second, it’s simply not true, and saying so reveals the origin of the problem — a “woe is me” sense of victimhood that grossly exaggerates the opposition’s ills and in turn justifies its own egregious political judgments and rhetoric. If the GOP had not become unhinged about the Clintons, would it have rationalized Trump as the lesser of two evils? Only in the crazed bubble of right-wing hysteria does an ethically challenged, moderate Democrat become a threat to Western civilization and Trump the salvation of America.

Indeed, for decades now, demonization — of gays, immigrants, Democrats, the media, feminists, etc. — has been the animating spirit behind much of the right. It has distorted its assessment of reality, giving us anti-immigrant hysteria, promulgating disrespect for the law (how many “respectable” conservatives suggested disregarding the Supreme Court’s decision on gay marriage?), elevating Fox News hosts’ blatantly false propaganda as the counterweight to liberal media bias and preventing serious policy debate. For seven years, the party vilified Obamacare without an accurate assessment of its faults and feasible alternative plans. “Obama bad” or “Clinton bad” became the only credo — leaving the party, as Brooks said of the Trump clan, with “no attachment to any external moral truth or ethical code” — and no coherent policies for governing.

We have always had in our political culture narcissists, ideologues and flimflammers, but it took the 21st-century GOP to put one in the White House. It took elected leaders such as House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.) and the Republican National Committee (not to mention its donors and activists) to wave off Trump’s racists attacks on a federal judge, blatant lies about everything from 9/11 to his own involvement in birtherism, replete evidence of disloyalty to America (i.e. Trump’s “Russia first” policies), misogyny, Islamophobia, ongoing potential violations of the Constitution’s emoluments clause (along with a mass of conflicts of interests), firing of an FBI director, and now, evidence that the campaign was willing to enlist a foreign power to defeat Clinton in the presidential election.

Out of its collective sense of victimhood came the GOP’s disdain for not just intellectuals but also intellectualism, science, Economics 101, history and constitutional fidelity. If the Trump children became slaves to money and to their father’s unbridled ego, then the GOP became slaves to its own demons and false narratives. A party that has to deny climate change and insist illegal immigrants are creating a crime wave — because that is what “conservatives” must believe, since liberals do not — is a party that will deny Trump’s complicity in gross misconduct. It’s a party as unfit to govern as Trump is unfit to occupy the White House. It’s not by accident that Trump chose to inhabit the party that has defined itself in opposition to reality and to any “external moral truth or ethical code.”


Poster Comment:

What is this Neocon schtick? They are all on it.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Anthem (#0)

I wonder if her pimp is McAuliffe,or Soros himself?

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2017-07-17   6:03:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: sneakypete (#1) (Edited)

I wonder if her pimp is McAuliffe,or Soros himself?

I'd say Satan. (although McAuliffe and Soros are worthy mentions who ought to be serving life-sentences at Devil's Island.)

Jennifer Rubin is one shameless whoring liar. And quite the Drama Queen, isn't she? This is one of the most bizarre alternative-universe/reverse-reality rants I've ever seen.

First, this pathological liar demands an exemption and immunity from ANY and all responsibility on behalf of the Democrat Party after having just FUBARed America under 0bammy during the last 8 years as a Saboteur-in-Chief. So missing from Rubin's rant are ANY and ALL of the Democrats usual crimes AND PROVEN attempt to hijack the Primary process against Sanders (SUCCESS!) and Presidential Election process (FAIL!)

Get a load of this buzz-word crapola:

Trump’s racists attacks on a federal judge, blatant lies about everything from 9/11 to his own involvement in birtherism, replete evidence of disloyalty to America (i.e. Trump’s “Russia first” policies), misogyny, Islamophobia,...[blah, blah].

Typical of her ilk, Rubin conveniently ignores ALL of the murders orchestrated by Clinton/0Bammy Inc to hide incriminating evidence of treason, the In-Your-Face Deep State collusion with Rubin's seditious whoring cohorts in the Media, their general FUBARing and division of America and our military, AND the ongoing Coup against a duly elected standing President of the USA. AND managed to blame the Republican Party (for I guess NOT succeeding in beating Trump with its lineup of Globalist Crash-Dummes during the Primary.)

Liberator  posted on  2017-07-17   12:27:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Liberator (#2)

for I guess NOT succeeding in beating Trump with its lineup of Globalist Crash-Dummes during the Primary.

Scott Walker and Rand Paul were neither globalists nor dummies. And I think Jindal was decent. There was an exceptionally good lineup of Republican candidates in '15 before Fox and the rest Trumped them all.

Anthem  posted on  2017-07-17   12:49:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Anthem (#3)

There was an exceptionally good lineup of Republican candidates in '15

Name them.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2017-07-17   17:37:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: sneakypete (#4)

There was an exceptionally good lineup of Republican candidates in '15

Name them.

Every crackpot shit for brains politician with a flag in his lapel and a big grin. They didn't need names. They were interchangeable.

rlk  posted on  2017-07-17   19:00:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: rlk (#5) (Edited)

There was an exceptionally good lineup of Republican candidates in '15

Name them.

Every crackpot shit for brains politician with a flag in his lapel and a big grin. They didn't need names. They were interchangeable.

That was pretty close to my impression,also.

One would be better than the others on one issue,and then suck on everything else,and then another would be better than the others on one issue and suck on everything else,etc,etc,etc.

Flush,wash,rinse.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2017-07-17   19:23:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: sneakypete (#4)

I named three already. That's more than we usually get.

Anthem  posted on  2017-07-17   20:04:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Anthem (#7)

I named three already. That's more than we usually get.

We haven't had a candidate with depth, maturity, and consistency since Ross Perot. His Televised lectures were thoughtful and worth their weight in Gold. Unfortunately he could not adapt to the childishness of American politics.

rlk  posted on  2017-07-17   20:34:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: rlk (#8)

I voted Perot in 92, Dole on 96.

A K A Stone  posted on  2017-07-17   20:52:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: rlk (#8)

I thought his ads and speeches were good. When he came on TV with a 30 minute purchased air-time speech to make the case against going to war in Iraq the first time I thought he made his case.

Perot was an autocrat, not much different than Lyndon LaRouche. You say "consistency" yet he dropped out of the race, then tried to re-up. Earlier in the '80s his merger with GM, then attempted breakup, then loss of his company to them demonstrated to me that he was not capable of handling the corporate crooks of this world. So I always took him with a grain of salt.

I don't think Trump is going to run in '20. I'd like to see Rand Paul in the race.

Anthem  posted on  2017-07-17   21:00:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: A K A Stone (#9)

I voted Perot in 92

Honestly, you voted for Ross?

buckeroo  posted on  2017-07-17   21:06:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: buckeroo (#11)

I voted Perot in 92

Honestly, you voted for Ross?

So did I.

RLK

rlk  posted on  2017-07-17   21:29:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: buckeroo (#11)

Yes proudly.

BUSH 88 Perot 92 DOLE 96 hesitantly BUSH 2000 Peroutka 2004 Palin 2012 Trump 2016

A K A Stone  posted on  2017-07-17   21:36:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: A K A Stone, RLK (#13)

I voted for Perot, too. But all the later GOP SCUM were liars from the starting gate; in other words,they were and are LOSERS, even if they have the keys to the White House.

buckeroo  posted on  2017-07-17   21:39:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: A K A Stone (#13)

Yes proudly.

BUSH 88 Perot 92 DOLE 96 hesitantly BUSH 2000 Peroutka 2004 Palin 2012 Trump 2016

You should be embarrassed with both of those BUSH SOBs. But "Palin 2012?" You are lying to us. You voted for that SCUM GOP John McCain. <--loser

buckeroo  posted on  2017-07-17   21:56:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: buckeroo (#15)

You should be embarrassed about your involvement in money fraud with the federal government.

A K A Stone  posted on  2017-07-17   22:16:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: A K A Stone (#16)

Where in the world (or outer space) do you come up with the bullshit? Smokin' the pipe tonite wit da good stuf??

buckeroo  posted on  2017-07-17   22:18:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Anthem (#0)

The key insight from a week of gobsmacking revelations is not that the Russia scandal may finally have an underlying crime....

What, pray tell, was this imaginary crime? Mopery?

I doubt Rubin talks of the only crime evident: lobbying by an agent of a foreign principal without being registered as an agent pursuant to the Foreign Agent Registration Act. Failure to file is a felony carrying "a fine of not more than $5,000 or imprisonment for not more than six months, or both."

http://legisworks.org/sal/52/stats/STATUTE-52-Pg631.pdf

52 Stat. 631, P.L. 583, 22 USC 611-621; Foreign Agent Registration Act of June 8, 1938

Registration at 22 USC 612. Penalties at 22 USC 618.

[Excerpts]

§ 611 Definitions

[...]

(b) The term "foreign principal" includes—

(1) a government of a foreign country and a foreign political party;

(2) a person outside of the United States, unless it is established that such person is an individual and a citizen of and domiciled within the United States, or that such person is not an individual and is organized under or created by the laws of the United States or of any State or other place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States and has its principal place of business within the United States; and

(3) a partnership, association, corporation, organization, or other combination of persons organized under the laws of or having its principal place of business in a foreign country.

- - - - - - - - - -

§612. Registration statement

(a) Filing; contents

No person shall act as an agent of a foreign principal unless he has filed with the Attorney General a true and complete registration statement and supplements thereto as required by subsections (a) and (b) of this section or unless he is exempt from registration under the provisions of this subchapter. Except as hereinafter provided, every person who becomes an agent of a foreign principal shall, within ten days thereafter, file with the Attorney General, in duplicate, a registration statement, under oath on a form prescribed by the Attorney General. The obligation of an agent of a foreign principal to file a registration statement shall, after the tenth day of his becoming such agent, continue from day to day, and termination of such status shall not relieve such agent from his obligation to file a registration statement for the period during which he was an agent of a foreign principal.

- - - - - - - - - -

§618. Enforcement and penalties

(a) Violations; false statements and willful omissions

Any person who—

(1) willfully violates any provision of this subchapter or any regulation thereunder, or

(2) in any registration statement or supplement thereto or in any other document filed with or furnished to the Attorney General under the provisions of this subchapter willfully makes a false statement of a material fact or willfully omits any material fact required to be stated therein or willfully omits a material fact or a copy of a material document necessary to make the statements therein and the copies of documents furnished therewith not misleading, shall, upon conviction thereof, be punished by a fine of not more than $10,000 or by imprisonment for not more than five years, or both, except that in the case of a violation of subsection (b), (e), or (f) of section 614 of this title or of subsection (g) or (h) of this section the punishment shall be a fine of not more than $5,000 or imprisonment for not more than six months, or both.

(b) Proof of identity of foreign principal

In any proceeding under this subchapter in which it is charged that a person is an agent of a foreign principal with respect to a foreign principal outside of the United States, proof of the specific identity of the foreign principal shall be permissible but not necessary.

(c) Removal

Any alien who shall be convicted of a violation of, or a conspiracy to violate, any provision of this subchapter or any regulation thereunder shall be subject to removal pursuant to chapter 4 of title II of the Immigration and Nationality Act [8 U.S.C. 1221 et seq.].

(d) Repealed. Pub. L. 104–65, §9(8)(B), Dec. 19, 1995, 109 Stat. 700

(e) Continuing offense

Failure to file any such registration statement or supplements thereto as is required by either section 612(a) or section 612(b) of this title shall be considered a continuing offense for as long as such failure exists, notwithstanding any statute of limitation or other statute to the contrary.

nolu chan  posted on  2017-07-18   0:17:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: buckeroo (#17)

Your company was fined for fraud with the government.

A K A Stone  posted on  2017-07-18   0:45:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: A K A Stone (#19)

Well there is good news. I wasn't.

buckeroo  posted on  2017-07-18   7:39:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Anthem (#7)

I named three already.

Scott Walker and Rand Paul were neither globalists nor dummies.

Not that familiar with Walker,and Rand ain't nothing to get excited over.

And I think Jindal was decent.

There are a lot of people that are decent,but that doesn't mean they would be effective presidents. In fact,it indicates they would get their lunches taken away from them and eaten by someone else more often than not.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2017-07-18   9:54:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: A K A Stone (#9)

I voted Perot in 92, Dole on 96.

I am proud to say I didn't vote for the man most responsible for Bubba being elected,or for Bob Dolt.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2017-07-18   9:55:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: Anthem (#10)

I thought his ads and speeches were good. When he came on TV with a 30 minute purchased air-time speech to make the case against going to war in Iraq the first time I thought he made his case.

All true. So good in fact that they put him in danger of losing the contract to digitize the SS records for his company,EDS,so he had to drop out of the race.

Then Bush started coming back in the polls,so he decided to run again.

Perot hated the Bush Crime Family almost as much as I do,and ran to try to prevent Bush from being elected.

Too bad aliens from Outer Space were trying to kidnap his family,making him drop out,huh?

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2017-07-18   10:00:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: Anthem (#10)

Perot was an autocrat, not much different than Lyndon LaRouche.

What's an autocrat? How was Perot like Lyndon LaRouche? How were they different?

rlk  posted on  2017-07-18   20:32:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: sneakypete (#23) (Edited)

So good in fact that they put him in danger of losing the contract to digitize the SS records for his company,EDS,so he had to drop out of the race.

Not so! Chicago air traffic control center had one of the biggest computers in the word. In the daytime it was used for air traffic control. At night it was used by the IRS during the seventies.

Perot was worth 4 1/2 billion dollars. There comes a point in a sane man's life were he says I don't need more money. What can I do with it, buy more trinkets? He lived a simple life style. He simply quit. He had enough to suit his needs for a lifetime. He was never in danger of losing anything or being pressured.

rlk  posted on  2017-07-18   21:31:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: rlk (#25)

Agreed, Ol

buckeroo  posted on  2017-07-18   22:32:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: rlk (#24) (Edited)

What's an autocrat?

Self driving man.

How was Perot like Lyndon LaRouche?

They both payed to show charts on TV.

How were they different?

LaRouche didn't have enough money to pay off the black mariah guys.

Anthem  posted on  2017-07-18   23:05:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: Anthem (#27)

How was Perot like Lyndon LaRouche?

They both payed to show charts on TV.

Who's lectures were more detailed and relevant?

rlk  posted on  2017-07-18   23:36:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: Anthem (#0)

Indeed, for decades now, demonization — of gays, immigrants, Democrats, the media, feminists, etc. — has been the animating spirit behind much of the right. It has distorted its assessment of reality, giving us anti-immigrant hysteria, promulgating disrespect for the law (how many “respectable” conservatives suggested disregarding the Supreme Court’s decision on gay marriage?), elevating Fox News hosts’ blatantly false propaganda as the counterweight to liberal media bias and preventing serious policy debate. For seven years, the party vilified Obamacare without an accurate assessment of its faults and feasible alternative plans. “Obama bad” or “Clinton bad” became the only credo — leaving the party, as Brooks said of the Trump clan, with “no attachment to any external moral truth or ethical code” — and no coherent policies for governing.

Well put.

"we are tartets from evil doers!!!" [ and ] U looked up birfer on the dcitionary. It isn't a movie.

"Listen piece of shit. Call me anti American again and your're banned. I don't like you." - aka stoned -

Jameson  posted on  2017-07-19   12:59:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: rlk (#25)

Not so! Chicago air traffic control center had one of the biggest computers in the word. In the daytime it was used for air traffic control. At night it was used by the IRS during the seventies.

I don't know who told you that,but they lied. MIT and CAL Tech had larger computing systems. So did NASA.

Perot was worth 4 1/2 billion dollars.

Yeah,and we all know the last thing rich people want is more money,right?

There comes a point in a sane man's life were he says I don't need more money. What can I do with it, buy more trinkets? He lived a simple life style. He simply quit. He had enough to suit his needs for a lifetime. He was never in danger of losing anything or being pressured.

Complete and total HorseHillary. He hated the Bush Crime Family almost as much as I hate them,and what could possibly be better than to "Earn" another billion or so by making sure his enemy isn't re-elected?

And it is a FACT that practically one of the first things Bubba did after taking office was to invite Perot to the WH for the signing of the contract to EDS to digitize all the SS records. He sold EDS and bought a BUNCH of GM stock after that,and hasn't been heard from since he tried to take over GM and failed.

Then again,maybe it was the space aliens that kept him from taking over GM?

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2017-07-19   16:45:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: sneakypete (#30) (Edited)

Perot didn't own EDS in '93. He married GM in '84, broke up in '85 and they bought him out completely in '86.

He started Perot Systems, Inc. in '88 and GM sued him over a 3 year no-compete agreement. It was PSI that he and his son ran in the '90s.

Perot endorsed "W" in 2000.

Anthem  posted on  2017-07-19   17:04:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: Anthem (#31)

Perot didn't own EDS in '93. He married GM in '84, broke up in '85 and they bought him out completely in '86.

He started Perot Systems, Inc. in '88 and GM sued him over a 3 year no-compete agreement. It was PSI that he and his son ran in the '90s.

Perot endorsed "W" in 2000.

I believe you are wrong about this,and will check on it all as soon as I have time.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2017-07-19   21:54:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com