[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin

How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End?

What on EARTH is going on in Acts 16:11? New Discovery!

2023 Hottest in over 120 Million Years

2024 and beyond in prophecy

Questions

This Speech Just Broke the Internet

This AMAZING Math Formula Will Teach You About God!

The GOSPEL of the ALIENS | Fallen Angels | Giants | Anunnaki

The IMAGE of the BEAST Revealed (REV 13) - WARNING: Not for Everyone

WEF Calls for AI to Replace Voters: ‘Why Do We Need Elections?’

The OCCULT Burger king EXPOSED

PANERA BREAD Antichrist message EXPOSED

The OCCULT Cheesecake Factory EXPOSED

Satanist And Witches Encounter The Cross

History and Beliefs of the Waldensians

Rome’s Persecution of the Bible

Evolutionists, You’ve Been Caught Lying About Fossils

Raw Streets of NYC Migrant Crisis that they don't show on Tv

Meet DarkBERT - AI Model Trained On DARK WEB

[NEW!] Jaw-dropping 666 Discovery Utterly Proves the King James Bible is God's Preserved Word

ALERT!!! THE MOST IMPORTANT INFORMATION WILL SOON BE POSTED HERE


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

911
See other 911 Articles

Title: CIA Agent Confesses On Deathbed: 'We Blew Up WTC7 On 9/11'
Source: Your News Wire
URL Source: http://yournewswire.com/cia-911-wtc7/
Published: Jul 15, 2017
Author: Baxter Dmitry
Post Date: 2017-07-15 11:46:40 by Hondo68
Keywords: Follow the money, classic controlled demolition, many loose ends
Views: 44581
Comments: 108

CIA agent confesses to blowing up WTC7 on 9/11

79-year-old retired CIA agent, Malcom Howard, has made a series of astonishing claims since being released from hospital in New Jersey on Friday and told he has weeks to live. Mr. Howard claims he was involved in the “controlled demolition” of World Trade Center 7, the third building that was destroyed on 9/11.

Mr. Howard, who worked for the CIA for 36 years as an operative, claims he was tapped by senior CIA agents to work on the project due to his engineering background, and early career in the demolition business.

Trained as a civil engineer, Mr. Howard became an explosives expert after being headhunted by the CIA in early 1980s. Mr. Howard says has extensive experience in planting explosives in items as small as cigarette lighters and as large as “80 floor buildings.

The 79-year-old New Jersey native says he worked on the CIA operation they dubbed “New Century” between May 1997 and September 2001, during a time he says the CIA “was still taking orders from the top.” Mr. Howard says he was part of a cell of 4 operatives tasked with ensuring the demolition was successful.

Mr. Howard says the World Trade Center 7 operation is unique among his demolitions, as it is the only demolition that “we had to pretend wasn’t a demolition job”. He claims he had no problem going through with the deception at the time, because “when you are a patriot, you don’t question the motivation of the CIA or the White House. You assume the bigger purpose is for a greater good. They pick good, loyal people like me, and it breaks my heart to hear the shit talk.

[John Kerry Admits WTC 7 Was Brought Down By Controlled Demolition]

But even he admits that now, looking back, “Something wasn’t right.”

No good has come from this. This isn’t the America we envisioned.”

Explaining how the building was bought down, Mr. Howard says, “It was a classic controlled demolition with explosives. We used super-fine military grade nanothermite composite materials as explosives. The hard part was getting thousands of pounds of explosives, fuses and ignition mechanisms into the building without causing too much concern. But almost every single office in the Building 7 was rented by the CIA, the Secret Service, or the military, which made it easier.

Mr. Howard explains that WTC 7 was “loaded with explosives in strategic places” in the month leading up to the day that changed the course of American history. On September 11th, while the North and South towers burned, fuses were ignited in World Trade Center 7, and nanothermite explosions hollowed out the building, destroying the steel structure, removing the reinforcements, and allowing the office fires to tear through the rest of the building, hollowing it out like a shell.

World Trade Center 7 collapsed into its own footprint at 5:20pm, seven hours after the destruction of WTC 1 and 2. The building shocked witnesses by coming down at the speed of freefall, indicating that it encountered zero resistance on the way down.

Mr. Howard and his colleagues had done their job.

When the building came down, it was such a rush. Everything went exactly to plan. It was so smooth. Everybody was evacuated. Nobody was hurt in WTC 7. We were celebrating. We kept watching replays of the demolition, we had the whiskey and cigars out, and then all of a sudden the strangest thing happened. We all started to worry that it looked a bit too smooth. We watched the tape again and again and again and we started to get paranoid. It looked like a controlled demolition. We thought shit, people are going to question this. And then we heard that people from the street were reporting that they heard the explosions during the afternoon. When we were told that the BBC botched their report and announced to the world that the building collapsed 20 minutes before it actually did… At that point we really thought the gig was up.”

According to the official 9/11 report issued by the government, WTC 7 collapsed due to “uncontrolled fires” that were caused by debris that floated over from WTC 1 and 2, which had been hit by passenger planes. If the official narrative was true, WTC 7 would be the first tall building in the world to ever collapse due to uncontrolled fires, and the only steel skyscraper in the world to have collapsed into itself, due to “office fires.”

Mr. Howard and his colleagues feared the public would see through the official narrative and rise up against the government, demanding to be told the truth.

There were so many loose ends, so much evidence left behind. We thought the public would be all over it. We thought there would be a public uprising that the media couldn’t ignore. They’d be funding investigations and demanding to know why they were being lied to. We thought they’d find chemical composites in the area that would prove Building 7 was blown up.

“We thought there would be a revolution. It would go all the way to the top, to President Bush. He’d be dragged out of the White House.

“But none of that happened. Almost nobody questioned anything. The media shot down anyone who dared question anything they were told.”

Follow the money

Mr. Howard claims he has “no direct knowledge” about the destruction of North and South Towers of the World Trade Center, explaining that “CIA operations are very specific” and that it is common to be working on a larger project while only understanding a small piece of the puzzle.

[9/11: Larry Silverstein Designed New WTC-7 One Year Before Attacks]

But he has advice for investigators seeking to understand the entire puzzle and work out who was behind the most devastating attack on American soil in history.

Follow the money.”

When you want to find out who is behind something, just follow the money. Look at the trades made just before 9/11. These are the guys that knew what was coming. The sons of CIA agents, government officials. Close relatives of the most powerful men in America. Cheney, Rumsfeld. They all got rich. It wasn’t just the contracts awarded to their friends in the construction business and the wars and the kickbacks.”

“It was insider trading.”

Many countries including Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Japan and Monaco launched insider trading investigations in the wake of the 9/11 attacks, believing that if they could prove Al-Qaeda operatives profited on the stock market then they could prove the terror organization was behind the attacks.

And all the evidence pointed to heavy insider trading around 9/11.

Italy’s foreign minister, Antonio Martino, said: “I think that there are terrorist states and organizations behind speculation on the international markets.” German central bank president, Ernst Welteke, said his researchers had found “almost irrefutable proof of insider trading.”

Even CNN reported that regulators were seeing “ever-clearer signs” that someone “manipulated financial markets ahead of the terror attack in the hope of profiting from it.

Mr. Howard says that a serious study of who profited on the stock market from 9/11 would “tear the heart out of the oligarchy in America.

There is only one organization that spans the entire world, and let me tell you now, it isn’t and it never was al-Qaeda.

It’s the CIA.

There could never be a real investigation. The entire shadow government, as you call them now, are implicated.”

The 79-year-old, spending his final weeks at home, said he doesn’t expect to be taken into custody following his confession because “then they’d have to go after everyone else. They will just use the media to attack me. They are all on the payroll to suppress everything around 9/11.” (1 image)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 22.

#2. To: hondo68 (#0)

I notice a complete lack of details. No named co-conspirators, no sources for the explosives, no indication of any knowledge about the structure of WTC 7, etc.

For that matter, this guy tells us nothing about his CIA career at all. Assuming he even had one.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-07-15   12:53:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Tooconservative (#2)

I notice a complete lack of details. No named co-conspirators, no sources for the explosives, no indication of any knowledge about the structure of WTC 7, etc.

The important mission was/is to make the intention and presence of islamic jihadists flying airplanes full of people into buildings irrelevant.

rlk  posted on  2017-07-15   22:52:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: slaves, rlk, Tooconservative, BorisY, blue pill, Orwellian Nightmare, A Pole, Anthem, Deckard, *Neo-Lib Chickenhawk Wars* (#7)

The important mission was/is to make the intention and presence of islamic jihadists flying airplanes full of people into buildings irrelevant.

It seems that a few here took the blue pill!

Hondo68  posted on  2017-07-16   0:30:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: hondo68 (#8)

It seems that a few here took the blue pill!

It seems to me that some of you have just taken too many pills, period.

I think your fascination with the Matrix is because you wish there really was a magic pill that you could persuade people to take so they would finally agree with your crackpot theories and ideas.

And that just is not going to happen. No one is going to take your crazy pills or subscribe to your ignorant debunked crackpot conspiracy theories.

That is why it Sucks To Be You.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-07-16   1:03:59 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Tooconservative (#9)

you wish there really was a magic pill that you could persuade people to take so they would finally agree with your crackpot theories and ideas

I tried for years to figure out why the third tower collapsed. Any ideas?

Or is it a figment of my imagination?

A Pole  posted on  2017-07-16   3:26:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: A Pole (#10)

I tried for years to figure out why the third tower collapsed. Any ideas?

Fire, I think.

I've always suspected that the materials in the towers were not up to spec, that that is what doomed all three when they were supposed to withstand fire and aircraft crashes.

A little like the Titanic being an unsinkable ship. Until it suddenly sank and killed a thousand people.

Who knows, maybe They sank the Titanic too and blamed it on that innocent iceberg that happened to be drifting past. You know, Them. It's always Them, isn't it?

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-07-16   7:53:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Tooconservative (#11)

"I tried for years to figure out why the third tower collapsed. Any ideas?"

Fire, I think.

Interesting theory even if a little wild. Some sort of fire?

And why the buildings 6 and 5 that were in between and much closer suffered much less damage (mostly by debris and demolished later in the cleanup)? Were they fireproof?

A Pole  posted on  2017-07-16   8:06:43 ET  (1 image) Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: A Pole (#12)

And why the buildings 6 and 5 that were in between and much closer suffered much less damage (mostly by debris and demolished later in the cleanup)? Were they fireproof?

They were no more fireproof than WTC 7 or the two big towers. But they were very small buildings compared to the towers.

Surely you recognize these are fundamentally different types of buildings from the three towers.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-07-16   8:47:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Tooconservative (#13)

They were no more fireproof than WTC 7 or the two big towers. But they were very small buildings compared to the towers.

Surely you recognize these are fundamentally different types of buildings from the three towers.

Well, you mean that smaller buildings that are much closer to the source of your fire are more resistant?

Very interesting theory. Why would it be so?

A Pole  posted on  2017-07-16   9:00:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: A Pole (#16)

Very interesting theory. Why would it be so?

Meh. Soon I'll end up with my own unprovable CT theories, like the Truther nuts.

I tend to accept the official explanations mostly because I'm sick of the Truther nutjobs and their endless novel theories and their "experts" out to make a quick buck off these mentally ill misfits.

I am most skeptical of the claims that the buildings were of impeccable construction with all materials up to spec. I've never had that much confidence in the promises of perfect designs and even less confidence in the corrupt NYC building trades.

Maybe the towers would have stood if the designs were executed to the architect's specs and they actually had the materials of the quality they were supposed to have. But if they didn't...

Don't be too shocked. We find out on a regular basis that suppliers cheat on materials or that bridges or buildings were not properly assembled as they should have been. And those big towers, if ever collapsing even a few inches, would then pancake downward inevitably, just from the momentum and their sheer mass.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-07-16   9:20:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Tooconservative, Anthem, A Pole, Stoner, hondo 68, rlk, Boris Y (#17)

I tried for years to figure out why the third tower collapsed. Any ideas?

Fire, I think.

Seriously?

Preliminary Results of WTC7 Study Show Fire Could Not Have Caused Collapse

I am most skeptical of the claims that the buildings were of impeccable construction with all materials up to spec.

Maybe the towers would have stood if the designs were executed to the architect's specs and they actually had the materials of the quality they were supposed to have.

Yeah - I guess the QC on these buildings was much better than here.

Raging Fire Engulfs Two Skyscrapers In United Arab Emirates, No Collapse

The Madrid Skyscraper Fire/Building didn't collapse although fire was hotter and burned for over 10 hours

Raging Fire Engulfs Two Skyscrapers In United Arab Emirates, No Collapse

Oh, and WTF is up with this?

BBC Reporting Building 7 Collapse before it happened. (If this does't wake you up nothing will)

Deckard  posted on  2017-07-16   10:37:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: Deckard (#18)

Yes, I know you are equipped with endless lists of links. No doubt, you're scouring them now so you can start posting them all again in a Truthy linkfest.

You've done it to death.

BBC Reporting Building 7 Collapse before it happened. (If this does't wake you up nothing will)

Not really. You don't bother to check your old links before you post them or you would know that that video has been pulled from YouBoob. Maybe it's Them, silencing another profound Truthery.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-07-16   10:50:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Tooconservative (#19)

You don't bother to check your old links before you post them or you would know that that video has been pulled from YouBoob.

Some folks go for the "official stories," which leak like a sieve, like a virgin goes for her panties.

Whatever goes down the memory hole, what the BBC did lives for all time as a monumental goof. You'll never outlive that.

randge  posted on  2017-07-16   11:18:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: randge (#20)

Whatever goes down the memory hole, what the BBC did lives for all time as a monumental goof. You'll never outlive that.

Judging by that defunct video link, I have already outlived the alleged BBC video. Deal with it.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-07-16   11:53:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: Tooconservative, CNN Wolf Blitzer, Situation Room (#21)

the alleged BBC video

If Wolf Blitzer didn't verify it from the Situation Room, it never happened!

Hondo68  posted on  2017-07-16   12:20:46 ET  (1 image) Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 22.

        There are no replies to Comment # 22.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 22.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com