LEFT WING LOONS
See other LEFT WING LOONS Articles
Title: Questions Rage Over Connecticut Boy Competing in High School Sports as a Girl
Source:
Breitbart
URL Source: http://www.breitbart.com/sports/201 ... eting-high-school-sports-girl/
Published: Jun 9, 2017
Author: Warner Todd Huston
Post Date: 2017-06-09 17:39:44 by cranky
Keywords: None
Views: 7221
Comments: 52
Andraya Yearwood has become a girl’s team track star for Cromwell High School in New Britain, Connecticut. It is no surprise, since the runner is a tall, strong, powerful biological boy who is posing as a girl despite not yet making any move to transition as a girl. The mustachioed Yearwood, who competed as a boy in middle school, now claims to be a transgender girl and has been allowed to join the girl’s track team despite his imposing size and muscle mass that far exceeds that of his teammates and—more importantly—all his opponents on other school teams. School officials, parents, and girls on opposing teams have bent themselves into pretzels to appear “accepting” and “tolerant” of Yearwood’s gender proclamations. But, even as everyone walks on eggshells to grapple with the situation, Yearwood is racking up a record of wins in girl’s track, easily blowing away all competitors. Yearwood seems both arrogant and defiant celebrating the wins as if they are deserved and even expected. “It feels really good. I’m really happy to win both titles,” Yearwood recently bragged to the media after winning the Class M contest. “I kind of expected it. I’ve always gotten first, so I expected it to some extent. … I’m really proud of it.” Yearwood’s lopsided wins have at last caused many to wonder if the teenager’s overpowering male physical capabilities makes competing against girls unfair. These easy wins against biological girls have raised questions in New Britain. There is no better voice to these worries than Hartford Courant columnist Jeff Jacob who raised the questions in a June 1 column, saying that “on a biologically competitive basis,” Yearwood’s victories are not fair to the competitors. Yearwood seems both arrogant and defiant celebrating the wins as if they are deserved and even expected. “It feels really good. I’m really happy to win both titles,” Yearwood recently bragged to the media after winning the Class M contest. “I kind of expected it. I’ve always gotten first, so I expected it to some extent. … I’m really proud of it.” Yearwood’s lopsided wins have at last caused many to wonder if the teenager’s overpowering male physical capabilities makes competing against girls unfair. These easy wins against biological girls have raised questions in New Britain. There is no better voice to these worries than Hartford Courant columnist Jeff Jacob who raised the questions in a June 1 column, saying that “on a biologically competitive basis,” Yearwood’s victories are not fair to the competitors. Ultimately, Jacobs felt that the results of the competitions are tainted. “Humanity counts. So does biology,” Jacobs wrote. But, he went on saying, “For me, somebody who has observed sports and written about all kinds of athletes for four decades, the integrity of the state competition for these two races Tuesday was compromised.” Now, another voice has been added to Jacobs’ as USA Today columnist Cam Smith raised Jacob’s points and added that he also sees how murky this situation really is. Like others, Smith bent over backward to appear “accepting” of the teen’s gender choices, but he echoed Jacobs in wondering if it was fair to have a physically stronger boy competing against weaker and slower girls. Without specifically coming down on any side of the issue, Smith nonetheless pointed out that the situation in Connecticut raises some vexing questions: We can’t encourage you enough to read Jacobs’ entire piece, and to think about it’s larger implications. The state of Connecticut is clearly stuck in a delicate tap dance, and perhaps the most significant takeaway is how well everyone seems to be putting an awkward and potentially explosive situation into broader perspective. Of course, the situation is only “delicate” if you think honoring Yearwood’s desire to be a girl is more important than fair treatment for the literally hundreds of girls in the school’s competition district who are denied any fair chance of winning a track meet in which Yearwood competes. 
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: cranky (#0)
An unappreciated strategy. Under the new gender norms, a man can just call himself a woman, make some token effort like wearing makeup or a feminine article of clothing and will then 'pass' as a woman and qualify to win national sports scholarships. And the Left will be ready to pounce on anyone who questions it. I think that is what this punk is going to try to do. He seems to have no particular interest in being a woman but he will be hanging out in women's locker rooms and easily winning women's athletics. So a very mediocre male will likely make himself into the champion of the women's sport he chooses, maybe more than one.
Heterosexual males have finally seemed to crack the code of liberal madness by gaining full access to females and having it celebrated. What a way to have such idiocy back fire. Now girls and women's sports will be dominated by boys and men who just state they are female.
Now as identified as a "female" he can claim he is lesbian and date his fellow new found girl friends. Quite a coup.
I don't think any college is going to give him a scholarship to run as a girl. The public high schools may have to put up with this. but college coaches don't. And when there's money at stake, I will bet they won't.
More power to him. I hope he is imitated far and wide!
Bet you wish you could have tried that back in high school.
I think you wouldn't bet cash on that.
Strategery!
You're probably right about that.
The current NCAA information : The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), which organizes competition in 23 sports at over 1,000 colleges and universities, does not require gender confirming surgery or legal recognition of a player's transitioned sex in order for transgender players to participate on a team which matches their identity. However, things become a bit more complicated when hormones are used. The recommended NCAA policy requires one year of hormone treatment as a condition prior to competing on a female team. Conversely, athletes assigned female at birth remain eligible to compete in women’s sports unless or until that athlete begins a physical transition using hormones (testosterone). https://www.transathlete.com/policies-college
It doesn't require it - but the NCAA does not dictate who will receive athletic scholarships - the coaches decide. At the high school level, decisions can be taken against common sense without any real repercussions, but at the collegiate level people can vote with their feet and with their money. Collegiate level female athletes will be PISSED if men are brought on board with scholarships intended for women, and they and the professors that back them will hurt the colleges that do it. It won't happen. You won't see any collegiate coach giving a women's athletic scholarship to a boy under these circumstances.
Sex is "assigned" at conception and at no other time. Even their language is quite biased.
In some colleges, men have already played (as men) for some years on some women's teams. It will happen with some Title IX lawsuits. Within a year. Count on it.
This will be interesting to observe. Liberals have fought for Title IX scholarships to be competitive with male scholarships. When the first transgender male to female sues as a female because Title IX does not apply, it will be interesting how the various advocacy groups break on this. It's going to happen.
Even their language is quite biased. Or shortly after. It's not like most of these transgender claims are do to the rare cases of intersex during fetal development.
Republicans have actually been pretty accommodating toward the intersexed in recent years. Not that anyone gives them any credit for it or even seems to notice really.
Yes Red, not a bad scam...in *this* case. Still hard to believe it's not regarded as a prank. Unbelievable that parents are tolerating this charade. Especially alarming is court sanction. It means...blatant lies are now backed by LAW. That assuredly means vigilante justice is only a matter of time. As well as Martial Law (THE PTB has been pushing every and any button to get us there.) What if this group-think progressive Zombie-ism and legal precedence spreads across the country? The real "coup" was in convincing school and state authoritahs to quash ANY sanity, logic, and reason to humoring this type of comical charade and lie. RHETORICAL: Any idea who has the final say-so on validating "identity" claims? Are there ANY official parameters or standardized tests? Is validation a matter of psy-eval? Wow. The anti-Christ Era of UP = DOWN, EVIL = GOOD, and INSANE = SANE is upon us.
NOT surprising since the GOP leadership and those within its ranks have been practicing political/literal transvestism since Poppy Bush claimed he was a member of the "Republican Party" instead of NWO-Vampire Party. Just think of the roster off the top of your head of GOP "leaders" and stealth homos once Poppy Bush took over the reins: Cheerleaders Trent Lott and Dubya (Jeff Gannon) Bush. Bill Frist. Dennis Hastert. Mitch McConnell. Lindsey Graham. Jim Kolbe. Robert Bauman. Mark Foley. Larry (Wide-Stance) Craig. And on and on. See a pattern? That big fat (R) is a license to steal. THE TRUTH. At least the Dems do it in broad daylight.
You have voted for these assholes all your life.
Even if we presume I have, YOU on the other hand have now signaled you've voted for Democrats and Anarchists, and LOSERS etal. When sliding along the political fence, how have you managed to avoid impaling your anal gland?
You assume the opposite of your own guilt in the (R) party. For decades, I'm Independent and exonerated of the BS you buy.
"Independent"? Is that like "Opting-Out" of your responsibility to vote for the Lesser-of-Evils? Opting out of reporting a crime in progress? Unless you live in a cave or igloo, your self-exoneration of a civic duty is negligence and a lame exercise in blaming others.
...The state of Connecticut is clearly stuck in a delicate tap dance. HUH?? Somebody please help me understand WHO there is to fear from proclaiming THE truth of this matter. Is it the ACLU? The SPLC? The usual descending LBTQXYZ Army of Insane, Angry Perves?? WHY EXACTLY is the State of Connecticut "clearly stuck in a delicate tap dance."? WHY must ANYONE be "walking on eggshells"..."tolerant" and "accepting" of a giant LIE and mockery of common sense and nature? How much is the racial component playing into this?
Only a signature of the left-right party, such as yourself would continue to applaud the total destruction of the USA. You "Opting-Out" voting for the elimination of the US Constitution wrt tot the (R) or (D) party is the very reason WHY America is at the brink of war each and every day of our lives while the nation is the most heavily indebted nation in the entire history of mankind.
Maybe you two should find a happier way to spend Saturday evening.
Another "self proclaimed" asshole speaks up. You folks don't realize what is happening in America; yet, you applaud fascism.
Maybe you can explain it all to us.
There are few standards anymore. And you buy into the bullshit as opposed to "pushing" back.
Had a unit in for training last week who gave a DoD transgender awareness unit brief. Not on our contract menu but the unit asked my boss if they could give the brief in our classroom as they were already there for our operations training. So the answer to the question above is something called "gender markers." Overheard that in the brief. Like all liberal garbage these markers are so subjective in nature and vary state to state. However the Zero DoD policy is one only needs a letter from a doctor to declare your status. The brief had some of us old timer retirees in tears (laughter and pain) when we heard some of the situational training. For example, they gave a situation where you see a male soldier who has not met their female marker yet but is downtown in a bar wearing a dress and wearing makeup. What do you do? Well you can't report him/her nor can you come back to the unit and deride and ridicule them. Such would be punishable under UCMJ. The "correct" DoD answer is to say nothing and be considerate. Yeah that's going to happen. The next situation they discussed was: you are in the shower area and see someone who does not have your genitalia or what looks like it but not exactly so. What do you do? Well this one got weird. You could report such to the command group but it was incumbent on the commander to ensure the transgender soldier was made comfortable on where they wanted to take a shower. Basically the soldiers who were normal and uncomfortable just have to accept it. Weirdo world we live in.
Out the weirdos here.
Welcome to our new all-gay, all-transgender, all-the-time military. Aunt Sam wants you! Real bad. I guess we can continue losing every war with transgender troops as well as with normal ones.
Some of us do realize what is happening in America, and what is happening is to our advantage. We are willing to be fair, all the way to the bottom. But we're not willing to be fair just down through the middle class, and leave the bottom to rot. That's why the rich tend to skew liberal.
Probably better that way, since we haven't won anything since World War II but we've killed and maimed about a million Americans losing a bunch of wars. Since we're going to lose anyway, we may as well take those who are already psychologically crippled and send them out to get killed and physically maimed.
It will. Because those who deride and ridicule will be punished and drummed out of the service. The contradictions of the American system and way have finally become absurd. Can a sexually tolerant military fight and win? Sure. Why not? In the process we'll have to throw out all of the intolerants and people who can't hold their tongues. Oh well, we'll have a very tolerant and self-disciplined military...to throw away as cannon fodder and lose again on various battlefields around the world. Since World War II the US military has a worse win-loss record than the French. We never (ever) win. At best we fight to a draw, that goes on and on and on. Eventually we lose all of those. Who really won the Cold War? Fidel Castro did. He died in bed, a respected world leader, and the American capitalist class is crawling over itself to curry favor with Raul Castro in a reopened Cuba. KGB Putin won the Cold War also - he's on top of a pretty united country. We had a great victory in 1991 - like Napoleon at Austerlitz. But the Chinese are also Communist, and they are systematically buying out Asia and reorienting Africa, and more and more South America. And the American capitalists do not dare cross the Chinese. So, the USSR lost the Cold War, the USA won a temporary victory. But in the end the Communists look to finally win it: for China is Communist. And Lenin was right too: the capitalists sold the Communists the rope that the Communists used to hang them. We have a hugely expensive military that never wins any wars, and are in full economic retreat against the "inevitable" rise of Communist China. And we don't have babies. And the whole country is going bisexual. The religion is in perdition - fewer snd fewer really believe it, and the believers in each sect mostly hate each other. Nobody has babies but the Muslims. So, essentially, the contradictions in our society proved to be a fatal disease, we have never had the will to face them honestly or do anything to fix them, and they have grown to the point, and we have shrunk to the point, that we can't even conceive of fixing them. We decay, and hate, and decay some more. The military is now a stockjobbing enterprise: a place where contractors make a fortune, where individuals are mercenaries seeking education and a steady job, where the things demanded are political and pointless. And where periodically an unlucky set of sorry sods get sent out to lose another war that doesn't matter, because it's completely detached from national security. This will continue until we're too broke to pay the soldiers, and then it will all go the way of SPQR.
You hit in several themes in which I had a long chat with a retired General last year. It was revealing what he was willing to discuss with me as he has been an insider for quite some time. It was general chit chat on trends and the history of our country since WW2. He hit on quite a few of your points and was brutally honest as someone who experienced this history from the inside.
The elite uber rich left use the poor as useful idiots. They don't care for the poor. They want them unemployed and beholden to the idol created by liberalism---government. Notice I did not make this D and R. This uber rich elite use these useful idiots to preserve their uber richness. That is why Trump won. Everyone else in the middle are getting screwed and dismissed. The very people who made the ubers uber rich and the very people who fund the uber "Soma" programs. Well that's politics. The theological aspects of what is happening in the West is "you will know them by their fruits." Uber rich amass wealth because they reject God and don't believe there is another life after this one. The rest follow that lead. Amass wealth so we can all be comfortable in our waning years. A distinct denial of God's design because they believe it's this life and that's it. And the lower income folks follow the same lead as do the middle class. They want to get what's coming to them. Across the spectrum of wealth or lack of it, we have billions bowing to Baal the government god created by uber rich hands.
...These markers are so subjective in nature and vary state to state. However the Zero DoD policy is one only needs a letter from a doctor to declare your status. Thanks, Red. You are right there at Ground-Zero (no pun intended.) As much as I both feared and suspected: "Identity" and official status of $3 Bills are validated from ambiguous/subjective "markers," totally arbitrary. IOW, Queer Doctor: "My decision basis? Because I-FEEL-LIKE-IT! And because I don't like your Judeo-Christian system of ethics and traditions." So Red -- ACLU Puppet-Superiors may well be the official "reason" perved-out trannie can sports dresses and use the lady's lounge? And fear of losing rank and promotions from those beneath these "Superior" freaks. Ostensibly, troop morale and our national defense are now jeopardized and undermined on the whims of PC-appointed political saboteurs. How entrenched are these saboteurs already in place at key positions of decision-making? (more rhetoric than anything else.) LOGIC, COMMON SENSE, TRADITION and especially NATURE are turned on their head. This is Anarchy on so many levels. And absolute Evil.
For example, they gave a situation where you see a male soldier who has not met their female marker yet but is downtown in a bar wearing a dress and wearing makeup. What do you do? Well you can't report him/her nor can you come back to the unit and deride and ridicule them. Such would be punishable under UCMJ. The "correct" DoD answer is to say nothing and be considerate. Yeah that's going to happen. Insane. So in a particular situation where there are NO official "markers," there IS sanction of trannies, nor can one comment negatively to the freak? I guess "considerate" would also be relative to the political lean of a JAG -- most of whom by now are freaks and terminal anarchists and ideologues at heart themselves. The next situation they discussed was: You are in the shower area and see someone who does not have your genitalia or what looks like it but not exactly so. What do you do? Well this one got weird. You could report such to the command group but it was incumbent on the commander to ensure the transgender soldier was made comfortable on where they wanted to take a shower. Basically the soldiers who were normal and uncomfortable just have to accept it. Weirdo world we live in. How much "WEIRD" must the rest of us be coerced into tolerating? Q: Why does the degree of comfort/discomfort of STRAIGHT/NORMAL men superseded by the degree of comfort/discomfort of the Freak and Anarchist-of-Normal? Doesn't that jeopardize morale and create a hostile environment? (More rhetorical Questions): WHO is actually running the military and tasked with authority to change and alter policy so that it mirrors CIVILIAN living?? What forces have wielded so much clout that everything is upside down -- even in the military? Who has been behind this coercion that deprives us of our FREE SPEECH? Our Equal Protections? Is it threats from the ACLU? Queer PACs? The Judiciary? Sure we can blame one man -- 0blaba. But that's too easy. There is heavy-duty muscle behind this. HOMOFASCISTS. They are also the organized the source and force leading the over-the-top Trump-Hatred, and obviously, our Judeo-Christian heritage, traditions, and NORMALCY.
Don't confuse sex with gender. In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
Comments (41 - 52) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestAndraya Yearwood has become a girl’s team track star for Cromwell High School in New Britain, Connecticut. It is no surprise, since the runner is a tall, strong, powerful biological boy who is posing as a girl despite not yet making any move to transition as a girl.
#2. To: cranky (#0)
Andraya Yearwood has become a girl’s team track star for Cromwell High School in New Britain, Connecticut. It is no surprise, since the runner is a tall, strong, powerful biological boy who is posing as a girl despite not yet making any move to transition as a girl.
#3. To: Tooconservative (#1)
#4. To: Tooconservative (#1)
hanging out in women's locker rooms and easily winning women's athletics.
#5. To: Tooconservative (#1)
#6. To: redleghunter, Tooconservative (#2)
Heterosexual males have finally seemed to crack the code of liberal madness
#7. To: redleghunter (#4)
Now as identified as a "female" he can claim he is lesbian and date his fellow new found girl friends. Quite a coup.
#8. To: Vicomte13 (#5)
The public high schools may have to put up with this. but college coaches don't. And when there's money at stake, I will bet they won't.
#9. To: Anthem (#6)
More power to him. I hope he is imitated far and wide!
#10. To: Tooconservative (#8)
#11. To: Vicomte13, TooConservative (#5)
#12. To: redleghunter (#11)
#13. To: redleghunter (#11)
"Conversely, athletes assigned female at birth remain eligible to compete in women’s sports"...
#14. To: Vicomte13 (#12)
Collegiate level female athletes will be PISSED if men are brought on board with scholarships intended for women, and they and the professors that back them will hurt the colleges that do it.
It won't happen. You won't see any collegiate coach giving a women's athletic scholarship to a boy under these circumstances.
#15. To: Vicomte13 (#12)
#16. To: Tooconservative (#13)
Sex is "assigned" at conception and at no other time.
#17. To: redleghunter (#16)
#18. To: redleghunter (#4)
Now as identified as a "female" he can claim he is lesbian and date his fellow new found girl friends. Quite a coup.
#19. To: Tooconservative, redleghunter, sneakypete (#17)
(Edited)
Republicans have actually been pretty accommodating toward the intersexed in recent years. Not that anyone gives them any credit for it or even seems to notice really.
#20. To: Liberator (#19)
That big fat (R) is a license to steal.
#21. To: buckeroo (#20)
#22. To: Liberator (#21)
#23. To: buckeroo (#22)
#24. To: cranky, ALL (#0)
School officials, parents, and girls on opposing teams have bent themselves into pretzels to appear “accepting” and “tolerant” of Yearwood’s gender proclamations. But, even as everyone walks on eggshells to grapple with the situation...
#25. To: Liberator (#23)
"Opting-Out"
#26. To: buckeroo, Liberator (#25)
#27. To: Tooconservative, Liberator (#26)
#28. To: buckeroo (#27)
Another "self proclaimed" asshole speaks up. You folks don't realize what is happening in America; yet, you applaud fascism.
#29. To: Tooconservative (#28)
#30. To: Liberator (#18)
RHETORICAL: Any idea who has the final say-so on validating "identity" claims? Are there ANY official parameters or standardized tests? Is validation a matter of psy-eval?
#31. To: redleghunter (#30)
For example, they gave a situation where you see a male soldier who has not met their female marker yet but is downtown in a bar wearing a dress and wearing makeup. What do you do? Well you can't report him/her nor can you come back to the unit and deride and ridicule them. Such would be punishable under UCMJ. The "correct" DoD answer is to say nothing and be considerate. Yeah that's going to happen.
#32. To: redleghunter, A K A Stone (#30)
#33. To: buckeroo (#27)
Another "self proclaimed" asshole speaks up. You folks don't realize what is happening in America; yet, you applaud fascism.
#34. To: Tooconservative (#32)
I guess we can continue losing every war with transgender troops as well as with normal ones.
#35. To: redleghunter (#30)
The "correct" DoD answer is to say nothing and be considerate. Yeah that's going to happen.
#36. To: Vicomte13 (#35)
#37. To: Vicomte13 (#33)
Some of us do realize what is happening in America, and what is happening is to our advantage. We are willing to be fair, all the way to the bottom. But we're not willing to be fair just down through the middle class, and leave the bottom to rot. That's why the rich tend to skew liberal.
#38. To: redleghunter (#30)
[T]he answer to the question above [validating "identity" claims? ANY official parameters or standardized tests?] is something called "gender markers."
#39. To: redleghunter (#30)
The brief had some of us old timer retirees in tears (laughter and pain) when we heard some of the situational training.
#40. To: Tooconservative (#13)
Sex is "assigned" at conception and at no other time.
.
.
.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]