[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin

How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End?

What on EARTH is going on in Acts 16:11? New Discovery!

2023 Hottest in over 120 Million Years

2024 and beyond in prophecy

Questions

This Speech Just Broke the Internet

This AMAZING Math Formula Will Teach You About God!

The GOSPEL of the ALIENS | Fallen Angels | Giants | Anunnaki

The IMAGE of the BEAST Revealed (REV 13) - WARNING: Not for Everyone

WEF Calls for AI to Replace Voters: ‘Why Do We Need Elections?’

The OCCULT Burger king EXPOSED

PANERA BREAD Antichrist message EXPOSED

The OCCULT Cheesecake Factory EXPOSED

Satanist And Witches Encounter The Cross

History and Beliefs of the Waldensians

Rome’s Persecution of the Bible

Evolutionists, You’ve Been Caught Lying About Fossils

Raw Streets of NYC Migrant Crisis that they don't show on Tv

Meet DarkBERT - AI Model Trained On DARK WEB

[NEW!] Jaw-dropping 666 Discovery Utterly Proves the King James Bible is God's Preserved Word

ALERT!!! THE MOST IMPORTANT INFORMATION WILL SOON BE POSTED HERE


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

International News
See other International News Articles

Title: Paris Muslim who killed policeman, shot two others just days before French election was released EARLY from 20-year sentence for trying to kill cops
Source: Pamela Geller
URL Source: http://pamelageller.com/2017/04/dra ... entence-trying-kill-cops.html/
Published: Apr 21, 2017
Author: Pamela Geller
Post Date: 2017-04-21 08:26:52 by HomerBohn
Keywords: None
Views: 5390
Comments: 31

Dramatic video captures French police shooting dead terrorist who killed officer and wounded two others just days before French election – as it’s revealed he was released EARLY from 20 year sentence for trying to kill cops

(By Abe Hawken and Amie Gordon For Mailonline and Peter Allen In Paris for MailOnline, 20 April 2017)

A policeman was shot dead while two other officers were seriously injured by a Kalashnikov-wielding gunman on the Champs Elysees in central Paris – just three days before the French presidential election.

The alleged ISIS gunman, identified as 39-year-old Karim C – who was jailed for 20 years for trying to kill officers in 2001 – parked his Audi and opened fire after police stopped at a red light on the world famous avenue.

French police said the attack was probably a ‘terrorist act’ and dramatic video footage captured the moment police shot at the assailant, who later died.

Police have now launched a desperate manhunt for a second suspect after heavily armed officers flooded the area in the heart of the French capital.

Officers have been searching the home of the alleged shooter – who was known to security services and had been flagged as an ‘extremist’ – in east Paris and he had previously said that he ‘wanted to kill police’.

The fatal incident unfolded as presidential candidates, including National Front party leader Marine Le Pen, debated on a TV show nearby before Sunday’s election.

French presidential election candidate Jean-Luc Melenchon took part in the TV show as the nearby attack happenedFrench newspaper Le Parisien named the attacker as Karim C, who used the alias ‘Abu Yousuf the Belgian’, and reportedly made threats to kill police using the social media app Telegram, an instant messaging service.

Karim was born in France and lived in Chelles, a commuter town close to Paris and was jailed for the 2001 attack – but is believed to have been released early in 2016.

The gunman has been identified by police but they will not officially reveal his name until investigators determine whether he had accomplices, according to the Paris prosecutor.

Francois Molins said: ‘The identity of the attacker is known and has been checked. I will not give it because investigations with raids are ongoing.

‘The investigators want to be sure whether he had or did not have accomplices.’

The Interior Ministry spokesman said the officers were deliberately targeted and the police union added that the policeman was killed while sat in a car at a red light.

US President Donald Trump said: ‘It looks like another terrorist attack. What can you say? It never ends.’

ISIS claimed responsibility for the attack and dramatic video footage showed the immediate aftermath of the incident which left one policeman dead.

In the video, posted on Twitter, several figures can be seen moving around next to a police van on the Champs Elysees.

One of the figures then appeared to fall to the ground and a silver car – believed to have been used by the suspects – can be seen parked next to the van.

Police have issued an arrest warrant for a second suspect – a man understood to have arrived in France by train from Belgium.

French President Francois Hollande said the attack was ‘terrorist related’ and scheduled an emergency meeting following the shootings on Thursday evening. French prosecutors have opened a terrorism investigation.

Mr Hollande said a national tribute will be paid to the policeman and added that a ‘passerby was hit’ before the ‘assailant was neutralised’.


Poster Comment:

Heinous butchery like this will insure Marine LePen's victory which will be a victory for the French people and another death knell for Merkel's EU.

US and Europe's Muslim murderers are 'under surveillance' or known to 'security services' who do nothing until the vile piece of Muslim filth murders people.

By now it should be evident that at some point they will murder someone, so why not find a pretext to lock him up or get them out of the country? What a pity rogue elements don't arise within police ranks, who quietly 'take out' a Muslim on police radar.

By now if even the most bleeding of hearts doesn't see what a danger ALL Muslims are to a society then we are, indeed, lost. Moderate Muslims? No such thing. They all read the same damned book that instructs them to kill us. While the terrorist is sawing off our heads with a scimitar, the 'moderate' is holding down our feet so we don't wiggle around and spoil the cut.(1 image)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 22.

#1. To: HomerBohn, Vicomte13 (#0) (Edited)

Heinous butchery like this will insure Marine LePen's victory which will be a victory for the French people and another death knell for Merkel's EU.

You would think so.

I think the fear of a Le Pen win will drive up voter turnout to vote for one of the two "moderate" candidates. Without France, the EU falls apart. And the Euro too. And without the EU and the Euro, the French are just a powerless unimportant little tourist stop.

Le Pen's only hope is that the commie candidate (recently surging) can end up in the runoff with her. Faced with an impractical loon communist in the final round, she would win.

Otherwise, it will be the usual Lucy-grabbing-the-football outcome for Le Pen.

After Trump's big win, never say never. But a Le Pen win would be a bigger surprise to me than the Brexit outcome.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-04-21   9:14:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Tooconservative (#1)

I think the fear of a Le Pen win will drive up voter turnout to vote for one of the two "moderate" candidates. Without France, the EU falls apart. And the Euro too. And without the EU and the Euro, the French are just a powerless unimportant little tourist stop.

Without the EU and the Euro, GERMANY collapses utterly - their economy is literally BUILT on exports. France's is not.

Le Pen will not simply tear up the European Union. She will SUBORDINATE the EU to the democracies that compose it.

The current "European Union" is a Lincolnian model.

Le Pen's model is a "European Confederacy", not a return to 1913.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-04-21   9:48:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Vicomte13 (#2)

Le Pen's model is a "European Confederacy", not a return to 1913.

Maybe. But I don't see the French voters giving her a chance to.

French voters almost never turn to the Right in the last century. They never had a Thatcher and even Sarkozy was no Thatcher type. Le Pen is bigger now than her dad ever was but I don't see anything here to help her over the top. And FN has underperformed in regional elections, leaving a Le Pen presidency very weak, perhaps helpless, in the French parliament.

A big massacre, like the truck attack in Nice, just before the second-round election might put her over the top though.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-04-21   10:13:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Tooconservative (#3)

leaving a Le Pen presidency very weak,

Article 16.

Terror attack - respond with Article 16.

Then the President becomes the King, with absolute power.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-04-21   10:38:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Vicomte13 (#4)

Then the President becomes the King, with absolute power.

But are French voters ready for that?

The record of French elections doesn't support it. I would argue it supports an opposite view.

Even after 9/11 and passing the Patriot Act, Americans weren't willing to go that far. You'd have to have something like 9/11, like an attack that destroyed the Louvre and killed thousands, for the French to go for it.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-04-21   10:44:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Tooconservative (#5)

On the other hand, are they ready for LE PEN?

That's hard for them.

It's like asking Americans to embrace...Al Gore again, or Romney, or Hillary Clinton.

Once the public has well and truly REJECTED somebody as a shit sandwich, it's really, really hard to get them to accept having that person shoved down their throat later.

That's the problem so many had with Trump. They so virulently opposed him that they cannot accept him now that he won. Everybody else moves on.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-04-21   11:21:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Vicomte13 (#8)

Once the public has well and truly REJECTED somebody as a shit sandwich, it's really, really hard to get them to accept having that person shoved down their throat later.

She has cleaned up the party a lot, dumped the antisemites and some others.

But she is still a perennial candidate like her father. Voters never like that. And it is quite rare for a perennial candidate to finally win.

Even Nigel Farrage, the main figure associated with Brexit, never managed to win more than a few seats in Parliament. And Geert Wilders can't do much better in the Netherlands.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-04-21   11:52:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Tooconservative (#10) (Edited)

dumped the antisemites

The whole anti-Semitism business bores me. People don't like Jews? Well, more Americans don't like Catholics than don't like Jews.

Suck it up and move on.

I dislike seeing opposition to Israel morphed into "anti-Semitism".

I dislike seeing the history of World War II morphing into it being essentially all about the Jews.

I've never thought the Jews were important enough to hate, and I don't think most people spend a lot of time thinking about them.

But thanks to all of the ENDLESS parade of overwrought claims of anti- Semitism, I certainly have to pay more attention to Jews than I want to, and that causes me to think that maybe they DO warrant more attention, because they have the power to keep shoving these issues in front of my face and the media, and get so much money for Israel.

I would say that the endless parade of "anti-Semitism" issues has had the effect of making me markedly less sympathetic to Israel and to Jewish causes. I think they are whiny, arrogant, and a lot more powerful than I thought they were.

And why, exactly, should THEY have that power?

The answer, in America, is the lunacy of the fundamentalist far Right, who in their zeal to burn witches seem to have missed the whole New Testament.

The thing that Jean-Marie Le Pen said that got him PROSECUTED was merely that the Holocaust was a "mere detail" of World War II.

But actually, that's right. That's true. The MAIN EVENT of World War II was a whole bunch of countries putting massive armies in the field to stop Nazi Germany from conquering Europe and Imperial Japan from conquering China and the Western Pacific. It was not ABOUT the Jews. They suffered and died, as did millions of others, because the Nazis and Japs and Fascists were evil bastards. The Nazis had a particular hard-on for the Jews, which caused them particular suffering. And that's too bad. It's one of the reasons why it's a good thing we destroyed Nazi Germany.

But it's not THE REASON we fought the war, and it was not the PRIMARY suffering of the war. 100 million people died in World War 2. The Jews were 6% of that. And that really is a detail of history.

And it's not anti-Semitism to say it.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-04-21   12:08:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Vicomte13 (#13) (Edited)

The whole anti-Semitism business bores me. People don't like Jews? Well, more Americans don't like Catholics than don't like Jews.

Yeah but it isn't the same in France.

Ever since the Dreyfus affair, politics in France changed forever. And not just politics with regard to the treatment and status of Jews.

They worry a lot now that if all the Jews finally leave (due to Muslim persecution), that France will no longer be the France they've always known.

They have a point there. The Dreyfus affair shaped a lot of bits and pieces in subsequent French politics, a touchstone that has shaped countless other issues.

I would point out that importing tons of hostile Third World Muslims is the much bigger problem and it contributes directly to the flight of Jews from France.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-04-21   12:16:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Tooconservative (#14)

I would point out that importing tons of hostile Third World Muslims is the much bigger problem and it contributes directly to the flight of Jews from France.

Yes. And as I perennially point out, Nature abhors a vacuum. THe Western World as a whole has decided that sex is a recreational behavior that should be separated from reproduction, and has done so through contraception.

This has been done primarily for economic reasons: salaries and benefits are insufficient for people to maintain their standard of living and provide the living they would like to provide their children if they have 3 children, which most families must have in order for the population to maintain its size. (Population stability requires 2.1 children per woman, but given that children only come in whole units, and many women do not marry or have none, that means that most families need to have three in order for the population to remain stable or grow slightly.)

Raising three children without losing one's standard of living, and being able to guarantee those children the same or better standard of living, is not possible under the current wage and benefits structure in any Western country. France and Denmark get the closest, and have the highest middle class white native birth rates in the Western World, but it is still below replacement levels. The white population is nowhere close to replacement level in any other country. In the USA, white women have about 1.8 children, which puts the US white population on the same demographic death spiral as Europe.

Because of class-based thinking, and a stubborn "fight the last war" mentality of most working people, to provide the sufficient benefits for actually promote middle class population stability is not acceptable policy ANYWHERE in the world.

Indeed, environmentalists think that population decline is a virtue.

Trouble is, fianciers, economists and businessmen, and the consuming public, DO NOT.

In order to keep vegetables cheap, and services cheap, and construction cheap, large numbers of bodies are needed.

Large numbers of bodies are needed OR ELSE wages will skyrocket, as will the prices of food, services and construction. This is inevitable - an iron law of economics.

Someday, robots may replace some tasks, but those days are far off.

The WHITES are not producing the bodies needed to man an economy that maintains this level of middle class living. THEREFORE more bodies are needed.

Nature abhors a vacuum: those bodies are imported. In most cases, they self-import. And once in the new country, the transplants, now going into the second and third generations, do NOT simply become more middle class people. That happened in America in the late 19th and early 20th Centuries, because of unusual circumstances related to a frontier. But TODAY those conditions do not exist. TODAY the native white middle class population is physically dying out everywhere in the world: they are not having babies, their children do not have the same prospects. Their numbers are shrinking, due to economic pressures, which FURTHER depresses the birth rate.

And so the foreign labor is imported from the nearest source of poor, cheap bodies. In America, that's Latin America. They have lots of babies down there. They move here and have lots of babies too - so not only is the demographic death spiral of whites moving its inexorable path on internal numbers, but the whites are being REPLACED through immigration, and juiced further by HIGH birth rates among Latinos.

When I first moved to California in 1985, Latinos were about 5% of the US population, and perhaps 20% of the California population. Today, a mere generation - 30 years - later, Hispanics outnumber blacks, they are 18% of the population, and outnumber the whites in California.

NOTHING will reverse these trends other than Whites having babies. And THAT WILL NEVER HAPPEN without a fundamental restructuring of our economy and society.

Having spoken with so many people on the Right (on boards like this), and on the Left elsewhere, I know that people do NOT see this, do NOT perceive it as a problem, and are completely unwilling to consider the sort of complete overhaul required to save the population. Right Wingers think that putting up a Wall and stopping illegal immigration will keep America "America", but it won't, because WITHIN the Wall the White population is reproducing well under replacement, and the Latinos are reproducing at well over replacement - and that means that America will be Latino ANYWAY, in time. It'll take longer, but the path is set, the cow is already in the chute.

This is driven by pure demographics, and NOTHING can stop it. No amount of handwaving or political jawboning (or abusive language) will do one goddamned thing to change the INEVITABLE course of history. Demographics is destiny. Accept the truth, or be an idiot, but either way, that's the future.

In Europe it's the same way, but things are bleaker for the Whites there, because the nearest burgeoning population isn't Latino Catholics but Arab and African Muslims and Turks. In Russia it is the same thing: the Muslims are vastly outstripping the Orthodox or secular Whites in birth rates.

I have had nationalists and religionists dispute those facts with me. They are living on fantasy and don't know their asses from a hole in the ground. Facts are stubborn things, and these demographic facts are the facts of life, and of extinction.

So, France is indeed dying. As is Italy, Germany, Russia, Canada, America - EVERY WHITE COUNTRY ON EARTH.

Japan is SAID to have chosen a different course, because they are dying out too. But it's a lie. The Japanese have restrictive immigration, so the country is literally depopulating. But they STILL need the backs to crack, and the Koreans are the largest growing segment of the Japanese population. Japan can slow down the process, but in 100 years Japan will be a third ethnically Korean. And 100 years after that, should the trend continue, the Japanese race will have ceased to exist and Japan will be the Korean Islands.

No amount of bristling about religious, or ethnic, or intellectual, or cultural superiority matters a good goddamn here. The Romans were MUCH superior in every intellectual and technical aspect to the Goths and Franks. They were nevertheless overwhelmed by sheer numbers and replaced in the land.

That's the way it is, and it cannot be changed in any way, except by having babies, which will not happen under our current economic configuration.

Given what I see in human nature and American character, I recognize that the future is to become a part of Latin America. I've already accepted that, learned quite a bit of Spanish, and found things that are good about that. Of the different cultures I could choose to emphasize, the Catholic one is the one I favor most, so for me the primary change is really just one of the skin color and accent of the people I will be seeing as I age. And I think Latinas are hot, so the Latin future of America is an inevitability I accept with equanimity.

I mourn for Europe though. I could live quite happily in most of Latin America, but there is no Muslim country I even want to visit, let alone live in. Islam is religious Naziism. It's ugly, evil, relentless and unappeasable. It's also unreformable, on its own terms. The only successful mass-converstion of Muslims to Christianity in history was the Reconquest of Spain (so perhaps the tenaciously Catholic and rather high- spirited - and heavy-drinking - Latino nation will eventually be the antidote to Islam. Or maybe Latin America will simply secularize and collapse like the White North.

In any case, Islam is the mortal threat that will kill Europe. Now, in the same vein as with things Spanish, I have read the Koran and learned the religion and aspects of the culture. But whereas I like Latin culture, and live in and among it with ease and comfort, even happiness, Islamic culture is ugly and vicious.

I don't want to live in that, and neither does any white person in Europe. But the things required to save Europe are so broad reaching, such a fundamental reshaping of economics and the structure of society, that Europe very probably will just continue to die out and be replaced.

That's sad, but it's the way it is.

America's future is Los Estados Unidos Norte Americanos. Europe's future is Sharia 2100.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-04-21   13:08:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Vicomte13 (#15) (Edited)

The WHITES are not producing the bodies needed to man an economy that maintains this level of middle class living.

Maybe our population is too big and simply unsustainable.

There are also problems with people even wanting to have more kids. Most of those having the most kids now come from the largest families in the last generation.

When was the last time you saw a Prot family with five kids? Or a Catholic family with eight? You and I are old enough to recall when it wasn't unusual, especially in rural areas.

I think the sharpest dropoff in birth rate comes from contracepting Catholics, more so than from Prots not having kids. I can hardly find Catholics with more than two kids now and my Prot niece with her five is the largest family I know personally (her husband is inheriting well from a rich clan). Even you, with your opinions, haven't ever mentioned more than one child in your household. And you are at least comfortable financially and in a stable household.

Or maybe Latin America will simply secularize and collapse like the White North.

I think the signs are already apparent.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-04-21   13:39:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Tooconservative (#16)

Or maybe Latin America will simply secularize and collapse like the White North.

I think the signs are already apparent.

In which case the Americas will be Muslim in 300 years.

Adjusting to Islam is not so hard for men. You can have four wives, and they cannot divorce you for it.

It'd be a bitch for the current crop of women, but future women, growing up with it, will resign themselves to it. Too bad for them, I guess.

If I were suddenly empowered as King, I would simply make the societal changes necessary to save the society. The Left and Right would scream, and within 5 years most people would say "He was right".

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-04-21   14:00:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Vicomte13 (#18)

In which case the Americas will be Muslim in 300 years.

Adjusting to Islam is not so hard for men. You can have four wives, and they cannot divorce you for it.

I tend to think Islam will run out of steam too. They're just behind the curve at present because they are such backward countries.

Look at the dim financial outlook for even the richest of the oil kingdoms in the Mideast.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-04-21   14:14:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: Tooconservative (#20)

I tend to think Islam will run out of steam too. They're just behind the curve at present because they are such backward countries.

Look at the dim financial outlook for even the richest of the oil kingdoms in the Mideast.

I doubt it. There's a demonic energy there.

Islam never reformed. We're 500 years into the modern era, and the Muslims are becoming more medieval, not less.

Yes, the oil wealth and structures of the modern world are running out. But that changes considerably as the Muslims gain a greater and greater share of Europe and the Americas.

Islamic men share in common their religious culture, which exceeds the power of nationalism for them, and which makes them share in the brotherhood of mastery of women.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-04-21   14:35:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 22.

        There are no replies to Comment # 22.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 22.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com