[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
United States News Title: U.S. Supreme Court Nominee Neil Gorsuch: ‘A Fetus Is Not a Person’ Under the Law WASHINGTON On Wednesday, Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., asked Gorsuch about a sentence in his book The Future of Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia, in which he concluded that [a]ll human beings are intrinsically valuable, and the intentional taking of human life by private persons is always wrong. How could you square that statement with legal abortion? Durbin inquired. Gorsuch, currently a judge with the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, posited that abortion is different because the unborn are not legally recognized as people. Senator, as the book explains, the Supreme Court of the United States has held in Roe v. Wade that a fetus is not a person for purposes of the Fourteenth Amendmentand that book explains that, Gorsuch replied. Do you accept that? Durbin asked. Thats the law of the land. I accept the law of the land, Senator, yes, Gorsuch answered firmly. As previously reported, on Tuesday, Gorsuch told Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley that he believes Roe v. Wade is precedent and has been repeatedly reaffirmed, and that a good judge should treat it accordingly. I think the case most people are thinking about right now and the case that every nominee gets asked about [is] Roe v. Wade. Can you tell me whether Roe was decided correctly? Grassley asked. Senator,
I would tell you that Roe versus Wade, decided in 1973, is the precedent of the United States Supreme Court. It has been reaffirmed, Gorsuch replied emphatically. The reliance interest considerations are important there, and all of the other factors that go into analyzing precedent have to be considered. It is a precedent of the United States Supreme Court. It was reaffirmed in Casey in 1992, and in several other cases, he repeated. So a good judge will consider it as precedent of the United States Supreme Court, worthy as treatment of precedent like any other. When asked by Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., to expound on his views regarding precedent, he explained that once a case is settled, that adds to the determinacy of the law. What was once a hotly contested issue is no longer a hotly contested issue. We move forward, Gorsuch said. Feinstein then inquired if he considers Roe v. Wade to be super-precedent, meaning that it is so ingrained into the legal system that it would be significantly difficult to overturn. It has been reaffirmed 44 times. I can say that, Gorsuch, known for ruling in favor of the popular craft chain Hobby Lobby, replied. Hoefling While some have stated that Gorsuch had to answer in such a manner in order to be confirmed, 2016 Americas Party presidential candidate Tom Hoefling wrote on social media on Thursday that those who claim the name of Christ should proclaim truth no matter the cost. The way I look at it, no job is worth having for which you have to hitch your wagon to genocide, and dehumanize tens of millions of innocent little boys and girls, and defy God and nature and the Constitution, and support a coup detat by pretending that we live in a judicial oligarchy instead of in a free constitutional republic, he said. Hoefling pointed to Christs words in Mark 8:36, For what shall it profit a man if he shall gain the whole world and lose his own soul? A wink and a nod for the continued mass murder of millions, tens of millions, of little boys and girls is required for confirmation, he lamented. A wink and a nod for the continued destruction of the natural family, the way God created it, is now required. The founders of this republic wouldnt recognize what these people have created, Hoefling added. Its a national disgrace. And it is going to destroy us, and our posterity, if we dont combat and defeat it. As previously reported,Gorsuch is an Episcopalian, and attends St. Johns Episcopal Church in Boulder, Colorado. St. Johns identifies itself as inclusive on its website and is led by female minister Susan Springer. In 2013, Springer expressed her support for same-sex marriage. Many Christians stated that their primary reason for voting for Trump as president was because they believed he would appoint justices that would overturn Roe v. Wade. Some had remarked that they desired a judge similar to the late Antonin Scalia. Scalia, however, noted during his tenure that he opposed both the complete abolition of abortion, as well as requiring legalization. He said that the Constitution does not require a state to ban abortion as he believes the 14th Amendment only applies to those who have been born. I will strike down Roe v. Wade, but I will also strike down a law that is the opposite of Roe v. Wade, Scalia outlined in a 2002 Pew Forum. You know, both sides in that debate want the Supreme Court to decide the matter for them. One [side] wants no state to be able to prohibit abortion and the other one wants every state to have to prohibit abortion, and theyre both wrong. And indeed, there are anti-abortion people who think that the Constitution requires a state to prohibit abortion. They say that the equal protection clause requires that you treat a helpless human being thats still in the womb the way you treat other human beings. I think thats wrong, Scalia further explained in a 2008 60 Minutes interview. I think when the Constitution says that persons are entitled to equal protection of the laws, I think it clearly means walking-around persons. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Orwellian Nightmare (#0)
Well, if a fetus was a person then abortion would be murder, correct?
A liberal a soulless human is not a person either love If you ... don't use exclamation points --- you should't be typeing ! Commas - semicolons - question marks are for girlie boys !
Yes, it would be !! Come Judgement Day, there will be quite a few standing in front of God trying to argue the opposite. They will lose the argument ! Si vis pacem, para bellum Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God. There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn't an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag... We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language... and we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people."Theodore Roosevelt-1907. I am concerned for the security of our great nation; not so much because of any threat from without, but because of the insidious forces working from within." -- General Douglas MacArthur
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|