[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin

How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End?

What on EARTH is going on in Acts 16:11? New Discovery!

2023 Hottest in over 120 Million Years

2024 and beyond in prophecy

Questions

This Speech Just Broke the Internet

This AMAZING Math Formula Will Teach You About God!

The GOSPEL of the ALIENS | Fallen Angels | Giants | Anunnaki

The IMAGE of the BEAST Revealed (REV 13) - WARNING: Not for Everyone

WEF Calls for AI to Replace Voters: ‘Why Do We Need Elections?’

The OCCULT Burger king EXPOSED

PANERA BREAD Antichrist message EXPOSED

The OCCULT Cheesecake Factory EXPOSED

Satanist And Witches Encounter The Cross

History and Beliefs of the Waldensians

Rome’s Persecution of the Bible

Evolutionists, You’ve Been Caught Lying About Fossils

Raw Streets of NYC Migrant Crisis that they don't show on Tv

Meet DarkBERT - AI Model Trained On DARK WEB

[NEW!] Jaw-dropping 666 Discovery Utterly Proves the King James Bible is God's Preserved Word

ALERT!!! THE MOST IMPORTANT INFORMATION WILL SOON BE POSTED HERE


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

politics and politicians
See other politics and politicians Articles

Title: Jeff Sessions' Terrible Truth About Drugs Is a Lie
Source: Reason
URL Source: https://reason.com/archives/2017/03 ... ons-terrible-truth-about-drugs
Published: Mar 22, 2017
Author: Jacob Sullum
Post Date: 2017-03-23 06:22:19 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 3008
Comments: 32

The attorney general stages a revival of the "Just Say No" show.

"Our nation needs to say clearly once again that using drugs will destroy your life," Attorney General Jeff Sessions declared last week. The main problem with that message: It isn't true.

Yes, using drugs, both legal and illegal ones, can destroy your life, but typically it doesn't. By arguing that drug education should proceed from a false premise, Sessions reminds us what was wrong with the Just Say No propaganda he would like to revive.

Sessions, a former senator who was the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of Alabama in the 1980s, looks back proudly at his efforts, alongside Nancy Reagan, to "create a hostility to drug use." For Sessions as for Reagan, tolerance is a dirty word.

"We must create an atmosphere of intolerance for drug use in this country," the first lady wrote in a 1986 Washington Post op-ed piece. "Each of us has a responsibility to be intolerant of drug use anywhere, anytime, by anybody."

Sessions likewise emphasizes the importance of "preventing people from ever taking drugs in the first place," even if "this may be an unfashionable belief in a time of growing tolerance of drug use." The "prevention" Sessions favors is not simply unfashionable; it is fundamentally dishonest.

Among other things, Sessions said at a Senate hearing last April, prevention aims to teach teenagers that "good people don't smoke marijuana." According to the National Survey on Drug Use and Health, something like 118 million Americans have used marijuana, 36 million of them in the last year. Does Sessions honestly think all those people are bad, or that anyone would believe they are?

"Educating people and telling them the terrible truth about drugs and addiction will result in better choices," Sessions says. But his terrible truth sounds a lot like a lie.

Sessions claims marijuana is "only slightly less awful" than heroin, and in 2014 he strenuously objected after President Obama conceded that marijuana is less dangerous than alcohol. "I'm heartbroken," Sessions said. "It's stunning to me. I find it beyond comprehension."

Judging from his response, Sessions literally did not comprehend Obama's point. Sessions tried to rebut Obama's statement about the relative hazards of marijuana and alcohol by declaring that "Lady Gaga says she's addicted to [marijuana] and it is not harmless."

Let's put aside the merits of treating Lady Gaga as an expert on the effects of marijuana, or of extrapolating from this sample of one to the experiences of cannabis consumers generally. The most disturbing aspect of Sessions' argument was his failure to grasp that one substance can be less dangerous than another without being harmless.

Saying marijuana is less hazardous than alcohol by several important measures—including impairment of driving ability, the risk of a fatal overdose, and the long-term damage caused by heavy use—is not the same as saying marijuana is 100 percent safe. Sessions not only has no patience for such nuance; he considers it a menace to the youth of America.

Sessions is especially offended by the suggestion that marijuana legalization could reduce opioid-related harm by providing a safer alternative. "Give me a break," he said in a recent speech to the National Association of Attorneys General. "It's just almost a desperate attempt to defend the harmlessness of marijuana or even its benefits."

Uncharacteristically, Sessions conceded that "maybe science will prove I'm wrong." If he bothered to research the subject, he would discover that several studies have found an association between medical marijuana laws and reductions in opioid prescriptions, opioid-related deaths, and fatally injured drivers testing positive for opioids.

Sessions plainly is not interested in what the evidence shows. Although he says law enforcement officials have a duty to "speak truth as best we can," he seems to view truth as the enemy in the war on drugs. Nancy Reagan, who said drug use "isn't fun" and insisted "you cannot separate drug use that 'doesn't hurt anybody' from drug use that kills," would have been proud.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Deckard (#0)

"Our nation needs to say clearly once again that using drugs will destroy your life," Attorney General Jeff Sessions declared last week. The main problem with that message: It isn't true. Yes, using drugs, both legal and illegal ones, can destroy your life, but typically it doesn't.

Reason, the libertarian magazine is at it again where yet another of their so called “drug experts” says that “using drugs, both legal and illegal ones, doesn’t typically destroy your life,” and there is nothing to worry about here folks.

While the analysis from the National Safety Council, a nonprofit and nongovernmental agency promoting safety in the workplace, declares that America’s prescription drug epidemic is a growing problem at work causing workers with substance use disorders to miss nearly 50% more days than their peers and up to six weeks of work annually.

Furthermore, it is important to carefully consider that drug overdoses has eclipsed car crashes as the leading cause of preventable deaths among adults and also killed more people than guns and falling.

But these facts are relegated to being unimportant by Reason since “using legal and illegal drugs typically doesn’t destroy your life.”

And, good old Reason promotes that ”prohibition kills” and ”drugs are made more dangerous by banning them.”

Gatlin  posted on  2017-03-23   8:12:39 ET  (2 images) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Gatlin (#1) (Edited)

And, good old Reason promotes that ”prohibition kills” and ”drugs are made more dangerous by banning them.”

Can't handle the truth, can you?

Drug warriors such as yourself refuse to learn that lesson from alcohol prohibition in the 20's and early 30's.

Alternate text if image doesn't load

“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul

Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.

Deckard  posted on  2017-03-23   8:28:53 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Gatlin (#1)

And, good old Reason promotes that ”prohibition kills” and ”drugs are made more dangerous by banning them.”

I suspect that you read the headline and ignored the facts laid out in the article.

Deliberate Suicide

During alcohol prohibition, when the federal government required that industrial ethanol be poisoned with methanol to discourage diversion, defenders of that policy said people could easily avoid the hazard, which caused hundreds of deaths a year in New York City alone, by eschewing black-market booze. "The Government is under no obligation to furnish the people with alcohol that is drinkable when the Constitution prohibits it," said the legendary dry lobbyist Wayne Wheeler. "The person who drinks this industrial alcohol is a deliberate suicide." 

Antiprohibitionists took a different view. "Only one possessing the instincts of a wild beast would desire to kill or make blind the man who takes a drink of liquor, even if he purchased it from one violating the Prohibition statutes," said Sen. James Reed (D-Mo.). Sen. Edward Edwards (D-N.J.) called the methanol mandate "legalized murder."

The government's role in drug-related deaths today is not quite as direct as its role in alcohol-related deaths in the 1920s. While it required producers of industrial alcohol to add the methanol that blinded and killed drinkers, it does not require drug dealers to sell products of unpredictable quality and potency. But it does allow them to do so by placing the entire industry in the hands of criminals, depriving consumers of the protections they would enjoy in a legal market. Confronted by the resulting casualties, you can either join Wayne Wheeler in blaming the victims or join James Reed in wondering how any man who supports such a policy can call himself civilized.

“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul

Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.

Deckard  posted on  2017-03-23   8:37:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Deckard (#3)

I suspect that you read the headline and ignored the facts laid out in the article.

I ignore nothing.

I am however greatly intrigued that libertarian asshole idiots can “factually” believe that doing away with the prohibition of all drugs will completely solve the enormous drug problem so many face in America today.

I am patient with stupidity….but not with those libertarians who, like yourself. are proud of it and constantly display it.

Gatlin  posted on  2017-03-23   9:01:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Deckard (#2)

Drug warriors such as yourself refuse to learn that lesson from alcohol prohibition in the 20's and early 30's.

And libertarian assholes like yourself are stupid to believe that legalizing all drugs does not pose an even greater problem where the risks are tremendously stupefying.

You are completely benumb to the lack of faculties that continually cause you to be put in the constant stupor you live you live your daily life with.

It is a problem well know to recovering drug addicts …

Gatlin  posted on  2017-03-23   9:14:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Deckard (#2)

There is no such thing as a drug warrior. There really are losers though. You promote a loser philisophy. The drugs we talk about don't make you better they make you a worse person. If people take your advice we will have more losers, more addicts under control of a substance.

You do know that the reptilian brought these drugs to earth so that they could weaken our minds and conquer earth.

You are probably a reptilian or on their payroll.

A K A Stone  posted on  2017-03-23   9:22:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Deckard (#0) (Edited)

"Yes, using drugs, both legal and illegal ones, can destroy your life, but typically it doesn't."

Wow. By that logic, driving drunk can destroy your life and the lives of others, but typically it doesn't. So let's legalize drunk driving.

This is from a magazine called "Reason"? They should change their name to "Illogical".

misterwhite  posted on  2017-03-23   9:31:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: misterwhite (#7)

By that logic, driving drunk can destroy your life and the lives of others, but typically it doesn't. So let's legalize drunk driving.

Uh, no.

Drunk driving is not the same as drinking responsibly.

But you already knew that.

“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul

Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.

Deckard  posted on  2017-03-23   9:40:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Deckard (#2) (Edited)

You bring up the Bill of Rights …

You say the Bill of Rights protects you and permits you to use all drugs anytime you desire.

Does the Bill of Right also protect me against you driving head on into my vehicle while you are high on those drugs and killing me?

Gatlin  posted on  2017-03-23   9:42:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Deckard (#8)

Spoken like a true reptillian.

A K A Stone  posted on  2017-03-23   9:42:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Deckard (#0)

"something like 118 million Americans have used marijuana, 36 million of them in the last year."

36 million people tried marijuana at least once in the past year? What kind of useless statistic is that?

The truth is, about 18 million people, age 12+, smoked marijuana in the past 30 days. "Past 30 Days" is the most common statistic for drug use.

That means that of the 118 million Americans who have tried marijuana, 100 million quit. Yet the author tries to convince us that smoking marijuana is "fashionable". F**k him.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-03-23   9:43:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Deckard (#8)

"Drunk driving is not the same as drinking responsibly."

I see. People are willing to risk losing their jobs, their family, their friends, their health, and their freedom simply to use illegal recreational drugs responsibly?

Peddle that fiction elsewhere.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-03-23   9:49:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: A K A Stone (#6)

You do know that the reptilian brought these drugs to earth so that they could weaken our minds and conquer earth.

Seriously? Sure thing psycho.

You promote a loser philisophy.

Right - because after the trillions spent on the War on Drugs, nothing has changed, other than more rights (of non-drug users as well) are being eviscerated every day.

How many non-drug users have been SWAT-teamed in wrong house raids or because cops thought they had drugs or relied on a lying confidential informant? Too frigging many. How many motorists have had their cash siezed by badged highway robbers - because they could?.

Your drug war insanity has done nothing to stop drug usage and in addition has enabled the police state even more so, targeting innocent citizens in their zeal to catch some kid with a joint.

What we have been doing is the very definition of insanity - doing the same thing over and over, expecting different results.

Seems to me we should try a new approach.

“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul

Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.

Deckard  posted on  2017-03-23   9:49:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: misterwhite (#12)

At least be honest paulsen and just say that alcohol should be illegal as well.

“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul

Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.

Deckard  posted on  2017-03-23   9:51:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Gatlin (#5) (Edited)

It is a problem well know to recovering drug addicts …

If I were a recovering drug addict as you so sinisterly imply, wouldn't I be in favor of killing all the druggies like you apparently are in favor of?

BTW - for the record, I do not use any drugs. Like I told stone, after the trillions of dollars wasted, your drug war hasn't done a damn thing to stop drug use.

World Leaders Aggressively Call To Legalize All Drugs And End The Failed Drug War

Leaders around the world have surged, in speaking about legalizing drugs.  The Global Commission on Drug Policy has released their annual report and stated that we must end both civil and criminal penalties for drug use and possession.

The war on drugs has failed, they say, causing more disruption than ever intended.  The number of drug users have increased by almost 20 per cent between 2006 and 2013, to 246 million people and, says the report, the prohibition of drugs has resulted in mass incarceration and executions in direct violation of international law.  The report also warns that a blanket prohibition drives human rights abuses by those who supply the drugs.

“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul

Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.

Deckard  posted on  2017-03-23   9:55:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Deckard (#13)

More people have overdosed from the drugs you reptilians brought here than have been mistakenly killed by the police.

Those are two separate issues anyway.

Yes harmful addictive soul killing drugs should remain illegal.

Yes the police should be held accountable when they get things wrong.

A K A Stone  posted on  2017-03-23   9:58:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: Deckard (#0)

"Sessions is especially offended by the suggestion that marijuana legalization could reduce opioid-related harm by providing a safer alternative."

What a stupid statement! The people who use opioids today can certainly access marijuana. Yet they choose opioids.

Besides, I thought the author wanted to legalize ALL drugs. No?

misterwhite  posted on  2017-03-23   9:58:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Deckard (#15)

direct violation of international law.

You support world government pretend international laws. Just like the antichrist. Satan wants legalized soul crushing mind weakening drugs God wants his people of sober mind.

So it would be accurate to say you are doing Satan's work.

But that is what the reptilian libertines are all about. Do what though wilt. Right out of the "satanic bible".

A K A Stone  posted on  2017-03-23   10:02:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: Deckard (#0)

"Let's put aside the merits of treating Lady Gaga as an expert on the effects of marijuana"

Why? The pro-marijuana crowd is always eager to trot out their group of successful people who smoke dope, expecting us to believe they're experts.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-03-23   10:02:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Deckard (#14)

"At least be honest paulsen and just say that alcohol should be illegal as well."

Why? We tried that once and it didn't work. That doesn't mean we should compound the problem by legalizing even more recreational drugs.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-03-23   10:06:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Deckard (#15)

"The Global Commission on Drug Policy has released their annual report and stated that we must end both civil and criminal penalties for drug use and possession."

The Global Commission on Drug Policy is a group of self-important, like-minded, washed-up political blowhards who got together in 2011 to summarize their opinions about drugs.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-03-23   10:23:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: Deckard (#14) (Edited)

At least be honest paulsen and just say that alcohol should be illegal as well.

Some alcohol is illegal….just as some drugs are illegal.

Different laws state where and when alcohol can be dispensed and consumed….just as different laws also do for drugs.

So, what’s your problem….Bubba?

I know, it’s the problem all you asshole libertarians have….you can’t do anything and everything you want to, anytime you want to do it.

That’s a problem for you that’s not going away.

So, learn to live with it …

Or, keep on pissing and moaning about it on LF …

Gatlin  posted on  2017-03-23   10:29:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: Deckard, A K A Stone (#15)

BTW - for the record, I do not use any drugs. Like I told stone,

You also said "ANYMORE." Try to stay honest....damnit.

Gatlin  posted on  2017-03-23   10:36:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: A K A Stone (#18)

So it would be accurate to say you are doing Satan's work.

Should Christians Support the ‘War on Drugs’?

“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul

Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.

Deckard  posted on  2017-03-23   10:43:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: Deckard (#14)

Alcohol prohibition was a failure and we do not have alcohol prohibition today. We do however have federal, state and local laws that control the distribution and consumption of alcohol.

Likewise, there is no Amendment of the United States Constitution that effectively establishes the prohibition of drugs in the United States by declaring the production, transport, and sale of drugs illegal. we do however have federal, state and local laws that control the distribution and consumption of drugs.

The analogy between having the Eighteenth Amendment that prohibited alcohol and having NO Amendment that prohibits drugs is a slippery slope argument that is absolutely unsustainable….the argument is also formally invalid.

Gatlin  posted on  2017-03-23   11:39:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: Deckard, A K A Stone (#24)

Should Christians Support the War on Drugs?
That is a complex question fallacy [a loaded question] that contains a controversial and unjustified assumption….so typical of the crap coming from lewrockwell.com, a discredited source you continually post from..

Change the wording of the question to: “Should Christians Support the Use of Illegal Drugs?”

Then see what replies you get from Christians …

Gatlin  posted on  2017-03-23   11:50:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: Gatlin (#26)

That is a complex question fallacy [a loaded question] that contains a controversial and unjustified assumption

Obviously you didn't bother to read the article - the headline was "scary" enough to cause you to flee in fear of what Vance might have to say.

As a believer in moral absolutes, I consider the use of any drug for any reason other than because of a medical necessity to be dangerous, destructive, and immoral, but I also consider the government’s war on drugs to be dangerous, destructive, and immoral.

As an adherent to the ethical principles of the New Testament, I regard drug abuse to be a vice, a sin, and an evil that Christians should avoid even as they avoid supporting the government’s war on drugs.

As a Christian, I oppose root and branch every facet of the government’s war on drugs just as much as I oppose the use of drugs themselves.

Yes, I know I am being redundant. But that’s because some Christians still just don’t get it. So let me make myself perfectly clear: drugs are bad. Smoking crack is evil. Getting high on marijuana cigarettes or brownies is a vice. Snorting cocaine is destructive. Shooting up with heroin is sinful. Swallowing ecstasy is immoral. Injecting yourself with crystal meth is dangerous. But none of these things means that there should be a law against doing any of them. And it is a myth that those who favor marijuana legalization or drug decriminalization just want to get high without being hassled by the police. Pat Robertson certainly doesn’t. And I certainly don’t either.

There are many reasons why Christians should not support the war on drugs.

Constitutionally, the federal government has no authority whatsoever to regulate drugs, let alone criminalize their manufacture, sale, and use. Just like the government has no authority to control what Americans choose to eat, drink, smoke, inject, absorb, snort, sniff, inhale, swallow, or otherwise ingest into their bodies.

Philosophically, it is not the purpose of government to be a nanny state that monitors the behavior of its citizens. It is simply not the purpose of government to protect people from bad habits or harmful substances or punish people for risky behavior or vice. Drug prohibition is impossible to reconcile with a limited government.

Pragmatically, the war on drugs should be ended because it is a complete and total failure. As I have pointed out many times, the war on drugs has failed to prevent drug abuse, reduce drug trafficking, or reduce the demand for drugs. It has ruined more lives than drugs themselves.

Practically, the war on drugs should be ended because all it does is clog the judicial system, unnecessarily swell prison populations, foster violence, corrupt law enforcement, hinder legitimate pain treatment, and unreasonably inconvenience retail shopping.

Medically, the war on drugs is misguided. In a study by the Independent Scientific Committee on Drugs published in the prestigious medical journal The Lancet, it was alcohol that ranked as the "most harmful drug," beating out heroin, crack cocaine, and ecstasy. And then there is the fact that tens of thousands of people die every year from prescription drugs and reactions to over-the-counter drugs like aspirin.

Financially, the costs of drug prohibition far outweigh the benefits. According to a 2010 study by the Cato Institute, spending on the drug war tops $41 billion a year. What have we gotten for this except the militarization of the police, the erosion of civil liberties, and the destruction of financial privacy?

Theologically, and most importantly, there is no warrant in the New Testament for Christians to support a war on drugs by the government. And it is the theological reason that I wish to focus on.

“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul

Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.

Deckard  posted on  2017-03-23   12:49:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: Deckard, booze the gateway drug, tater drunk (#27)

In a study by the Independent Scientific Committee on Drugs published in the prestigious medical journal The Lancet, it was alcohol that ranked as the "most harmful drug," beating out heroin, crack cocaine, and ecstasy. And then there is the fact that tens of thousands of people die every year from prescription drugs and reactions to over-the-counter drugs like aspirin.

Prohibition increases profits, and promotes sales & usage.

They started with illegal booze.


The D&R terrorists hate us because we're free, to vote second party

"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul

Hondo68  posted on  2017-03-23   13:56:04 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: Deckard (#27)

Obviously you didn't bother to read the article ...

Not obviusly....DEFINITELY.

I never read anything from lwerockwell.com

Just another exercise in futility for you.

You do have lots of those, ya know ...

Gatlin  posted on  2017-03-23   14:14:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: Gatlin (#29)

I never read anything from lwerockwell.com

Gatlin, the "truthseeker"!

Another a disgustingly yukon-esque admission that you are not interested in any opposing views that make you uncomfortable.

Doubleplusgood comrade - and extra ration of chocolate for you!

“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul

Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.

Deckard  posted on  2017-03-24   5:43:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: Deckard (#30)

lewrockwell.com

Truth?

ROTFLMAO ...

Gatlin  posted on  2017-03-24   7:50:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: Gatlin (#31)

The name of the website alone causes you to piss your Depends in fear.

“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul

Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.

Deckard  posted on  2017-03-24   10:03:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com