Were nearing the end of the day, and as promised earlier, I did want to talk about the interview the New York Times Magazine conducted with itinerant abortionist, Willie Parker.
Position 9
Not in use
As you need to know about the magazines motivation is in the headline: Willie J. Parker Changed His Mind About Abortion. Of course, it goes without saying (since Ana Marie Cox is writing for the New York Times Magazine), Parkers conversion is from someone who, for religious reasons, didnt want to provide abortion to becoming a practicing abortionist who flies into a location and takes the lives of up to 45 babies in a single day.
The name of his book? Lifes Work: A Moral Argument for Choice.
So why is Parker so popular with pro-abortion publications and pro-abortion writers? He is African-American, which allows him to analogize (falsely and maliciously) opposition to feminism, reproductive justice and gender equality to support for slavery. (Parker tells us he comes from a heritage of people who know what its like to have your life controlled by somebody else.)
That the unborn child has his or her life controlled by someone else; and that (when the baby is a girl) she has no gender equality is too mundane for the saintly Mr. Parker.
What else? Parkers a spiritual sort of guy whose reverse Road to Damascus experience came when he overcame a religious understanding that left me unable to help women when I felt deeply for their situation.
Indeed lopping off the heads and crushing the torsos of tiny babies allowed him to overcome a kind of paralysis. It is fair to conclude that becoming an abortionist was a kind of second, second birth: It felt as life-altering for me to move from being unable to do abortions to being able to do them as it did to move from being a nonbeliever to becoming a believer.
Take that all you crazy Christians who oppose abortion!
Click for Full Text!
Poster Comment: