United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Where’s the NRA on Philando Castile?
Source:
Reason
URL Source: http://reason.com/blog/2016/07/07/b ... s-matter-and-so-do-their-gun-r
Published: Jul 7, 2016
Author: Robby Soave
Post Date: 2016-07-10 00:21:25 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 3450
Comments: 19
The Second Amendment exists, and it isn't just for white Americans. In the wake of the Philando Castile shooting, the police need reminding of that. But perhaps some gun rights advocates need reminding of that as well. As reported at Reason and elsewhere, Castile was shot by a police officer near St. Paul, Minnesota, after he reached for his wallet in order to produce his concealed carry permit. Cops then detained his girlfriend and her young daughter—who were in the car at the time—as Castile bled to death. Other officers comforted the cop who shot Castile, but no one bothered to assist the dying man, or even check his pulse. During a subsequent press conference, Diamond Reynolds—Castile's girlfriend—insisted that he had done nothing wrong. And she's right. They were stopped because their car had a broken tail light. That's it. In Minnesota, citizens are allowed to carry firearms if they have a permit to do so. Castile was merely exercising his Second Amendment rights. His decision to inform the officer about his weapon was courteous, but not legally required. Permit holders in Minnesota do not need to tell cops that they are carrying firearms unless specifically asked. It seems fairly clearly, then, that Castile is in some sense a Second Amendment martyr: He was killed by a police officer because he was exercising his rights. We know, of course, that these kinds of things are more likely to happen to black Americans, regardless of whether they were doing anything wrong. I would think it would be the easiest thing in the world for gun rights advocates to condemn this senseless killing. And yet, as I write this, the most important gun rights organization in the country hasn't said a word. The NRA's Twitter feed makes no mention of the Castile shooting, even though it's been a trending topic all day. National Review's Charles Cooke cautions against instinctively blaming the NRA whenever there's a shooting, and of course he's right. But I would expect the organization to at last express some outrage that an agent of the state killed a man, in no small part because the man was carrying a legal firearm. Cooke also observes: In my view, too many conservatives react to these stories by presuming that the police must have got it right. I understand how irritating it is to hear the argument that "cop X was bad, therefore cops are generally bad," but it is equally fallacious to contend that "cops are generally good, so cop X must have been good." There is, I'm afraid, some truth in the charge that conservatives are skeptical of government up until the point that the police or the army are involved. The Castile shooting—as horrible as it is—provides a perfect opportunity for civil liberties advocates on the right and left to come together and condemn government overreach that resulted in the death of a man who did nothing wrong. It's a moment to reaffirm that Constitutional rights should be enjoyed by all people equally, regardless of race. NRA Members Furious, Lash Out After Organization Defends Cops But Not Philando Castile As Fusion.com points out, the fact the NRA has commented on the Dallas police officers’ deaths but not the death of a black man licensed to carry a gun is not surprising. Second Amendment protections have often been denied to black citizens. Martin Luther King, Jr. couldn’t even get a concealed carry permit after his life was threatened. The NRA has historically not commented on individual or mass shootings, but the NRA does have a close if fraught relationship with American police forces. The only person closely related to the NRA to speak out for Philando Castile was Cam Edwards, host of the Cam&Co NRA podcast, who told listeners on Thursday: ‘What we know does not look good. Our right to keep and bear arms is not based on the color of our skin.’ After news of its members becoming outraged over their silence, the NRA released a statement Friday afternoon that resembles more of a police department statement than anything else. 
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 4.
#1. To: Deckard (#0)
My thought on this is to move cautiously. Wait till the facts are known not just hearsay. If it is to be found that the officer fucked up then the NRA should speak out but premature speculation should be avoided. Every citizen has a right to protect themselves even officers. To me from just the little reading I have done because im really sick of this shit! The officer was nervous for some reason and the Philando really did not understand what to do when identifying he has a CHL. Here in Texas they say have both license out with both hands on steering wheel or dash as to help the officer know you are no threat to him.
The reasons being that the driver matched the description of the individual who was a) involved in an armed robbery four days earlier, b) had a gun in his lap, and c) was reaching for it.
As far as the police officers knew, it could have been one of those trick guns that's actually a cigarette lighter, and he could have been just reaching for it to light up a stolen Newport. The officers should have waited for him to fire on them to be sure.
There are no replies to Comment # 4. End Trace Mode for Comment # 4.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#3. To: Justified (#1)
"The officer was nervous for some reason ..."
#4. To: misterwhite (#3)
a) involved in an armed robbery four days earlier, b) had a gun in his lap, and c) was reaching for it.
Replies to Comment # 4.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]