[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Israel Attacks Iran, Report Says - LIVE Breaking News Coverage

Earth is Scorched with Heat

Antiwar Activists Chant ‘Death to America’ at Event Featuring Chicago Alderman

Vibe Shift

A stream that makes the pleasant Rain sound.

Older Men - Keep One Foot In The Dark Ages

When You Really Want to Meet the Diversity Requirements

CERN to test world's most powerful particle accelerator during April's solar eclipse

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin

How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End?

What on EARTH is going on in Acts 16:11? New Discovery!

2023 Hottest in over 120 Million Years

2024 and beyond in prophecy

Questions

This Speech Just Broke the Internet

This AMAZING Math Formula Will Teach You About God!

The GOSPEL of the ALIENS | Fallen Angels | Giants | Anunnaki

The IMAGE of the BEAST Revealed (REV 13) - WARNING: Not for Everyone

WEF Calls for AI to Replace Voters: ‘Why Do We Need Elections?’

The OCCULT Burger king EXPOSED

PANERA BREAD Antichrist message EXPOSED

The OCCULT Cheesecake Factory EXPOSED


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

U.S. Constitution
See other U.S. Constitution Articles

Title: Our Republican Constitution: Securing the Liberty and Sovereignty of We the People
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: May 15, 2016
Author: Randy E. Barnett
Post Date: 2016-05-15 00:25:26 by tpaine
Keywords: None
Views: 2474
Comments: 9

Our Republican Constitution: Securing the Liberty and Sovereignty of We the People

Randy E. Barnett

Released: Apr 19, 2016. 325 pages.

A concise history of the long struggle between two fundamentally opposing constitutional traditions, from one of the nation’s leading constitutional scholars—a manifesto for renewing our constitutional republic.

The Constitution of the United States begins with the words: “We the People.” But from the earliest days of the American republic, there have been two competing notions of “the People,” which lead to two very different visions of the Constitution.

Those who view “We the People” collectively think popular sovereignty resides in the people as a group, which leads them to favor a “democratic” constitution that allows the “will of the people” to be expressed by majority rule. In contrast, those who think popular sovereignty resides in the people as individuals contend that a “republican” constitution is needed to secure the pre-existing inalienable rights of “We the People,” each and every one, against abuses by the majority.

In Our Republican Constitution, renowned legal scholar Randy E. Barnett tells the fascinating story of how this debate arose shortly after the Revolution, leading to the adoption of a new and innovative “republican” constitution; and how the struggle over slavery led to its completion by a newly formed Republican Party. Yet soon thereafter, progressive academics and activists urged the courts to remake our Republican Constitution into a democratic one by ignoring key passes of its text. Eventually, the courts complied.

Drawing from his deep knowledge of constitutional law and history, as well as his experience litigating on behalf of medical marijuana and against Obamacare, Barnett explains why “We the People” would greatly benefit from the renewal of our Republican Constitution, and how this can be accomplished in the courts and the political arena.

View this title on Amazon.com

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: tpaine (#0)

http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=45874

Title: Our Republican Constitution
Source: Amazon
URL Source: [None]
Published: Apr 21, 2016
Author: Randy Barnett
Post Date: 2016-04-21 18:54:18 by tpaine

nolu chan  posted on  2016-05-15   4:22:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: tpaine (#0)

View this title on Amazon.com
Your link does not work. I found it here at
https://www.harpercollins.com/9780062412287/our-republican-constitution
Copyright © 2016 HarperCollins Publishers. All rights reserved.

Gatlin  posted on  2016-05-15   4:42:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: tpaine (#0)

I doubt if there is anything terribly new about the subject in this book .The divide over the Constitution has shaped the political debate since the founding. Barnett is a libertarian so I think I know where he stands . But I'll give it a try .

Oh, miserable mortals! Oh wretched earth! Oh, dreadful assembly of all mankind! Eternal sermon of useless sufferings! Deluded philosophers who cry, “All is well,” Hasten, contemplate these frightful ruins, (Voltaire)

tomder55  posted on  2016-05-15   6:15:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: nolu chan (#1) (Edited)

This is part of my comments in the original OP.

When Madison examined the deficiencies of the Confederation before the Constitutional Convention he concluded that the fault lies in the people themselves . In Sec 11 of 'Injustice of the laws of States.' He writes :"If the multiplicity and mutability of laws prove a want of wisdom, their injustice betrays a defect still more alarming: more alarming not merely because it is a greater evil in itself, but because it brings more into question the fundamental principle of republican Government, that the majority who rule in such Governments, are the safest Guardians both of public Good and of private rights."

Madison wrote that we must be more realistic about popular majorities. The largest factions of special interests can always outvote the people of smaller special interests . But there is no safeguard for the rights of the minority or individuals in that system .

The Constitution that was crafted by the founders attempted to address this. "To secure the public goods and private rights against the danger of such a faction ,and at the same time to preserve the spirit and the form of popular government, is then the great object to which our inquiries are directed."(Madison Federalist Papers #10)

Oh, miserable mortals! Oh wretched earth! Oh, dreadful assembly of all mankind! Eternal sermon of useless sufferings! Deluded philosophers who cry, “All is well,” Hasten, contemplate these frightful ruins, (Voltaire)

tomder55  posted on  2016-05-15   9:29:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: tomder55 (#4)

"The Constitution that was crafted by the founders attempted to address this."

They should have put in term limits for Congress.

Far too many career politicians spend the vast majority of their time seeking re-election and fundraising rather than doing their job. And this is compounded by the fact that the big sources of campaign cash are the PACS, special interests, and lobbyists -- whose desires often compete with the people's.

misterwhite  posted on  2016-05-15   9:47:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: tpaine (#0)

Are you selling books?

buckeroo  posted on  2016-05-15   11:21:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: misterwhite (#5)

They should have put in term limits for Congress.

Far too many career politicians spend the vast majority of their time seeking re-election and fundraising rather than doing their job. And this is compounded by the fact that the big sources of campaign cash are the PACS, special interests, and lobbyists -- whose desires often compete with the people's.

Yes they probably should've . Congress addressed President term limits with an amendment . But they will never amend it to limit their own terms. Lucky for us ,the founders put in a provision for the Constitution to be amended by another process that bypassed Congress initiating the process.

Oh, miserable mortals! Oh wretched earth! Oh, dreadful assembly of all mankind! Eternal sermon of useless sufferings! Deluded philosophers who cry, “All is well,” Hasten, contemplate these frightful ruins, (Voltaire)

tomder55  posted on  2016-05-15   13:41:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: misterwhite (#5)

They should have put in term limits for Congress.

Or at least have explicitly recognized the rights of the people of each State to proscribe eligibility requirements for the candidates who seek to represent them in Congress.

"The dissent, written by Justice Thomas and joined by Justices Rehnquist, O'Connor, and Scalia, argued that nothing in the Constitution deprives the people of each State the power to proscribe eligibility requirements for the candidates who seek to represent them in Congress."

https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CRPT-104srpt158/html/CRPT-104srpt158.htm

Roscoe  posted on  2016-05-15   13:57:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: buckeroo (#6)

Are you selling books?

No, -- I'm selling a republican form of government, and the constitution that supports it..

How bout you?

tpaine  posted on  2016-05-15   14:39:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com