LF: DEA Approves First-Ever Trial of Medical Cannabis for PTSD in Vets, Including Smoking It

Title: DEA Approves First-Ever Trial of Medical Cannabis for PTSD in Vets, Including Smoking It
Source: Activist Post
URL Source: http://www.activistpost.com/2016/04 ... cannabis-for-ptsd-in-vets.html
Published: Apr 22, 2016
Author: Claire Bernish
Post Date: 2016-04-23 17:54:55 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 5305
Comments: 41

In a groundbreaking move, the Drug Enforcement Administration has now approved a study of whole-plant cannabis — including its smoked form — as a treatment for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) suffered by U.S. military veterans.

Non-profit organization MAPS, the Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies, announced Thursday it will receive a grant of over $2.1 million from the State of Colorado to study the whole cannabis plant — the first time any such study has been approved by federal agencies.

“We have been working towards approval since we opened the Investigational New Drug Application (IND) with the FDA in 2010,” explained Amy Emerson, Executive Director and Director of Clinical Research for the MAPS Public Benefit Corporation. “We are thrilled to see this study overcome the hurdles of approval so we can begin gathering the data. The study is a critical step in moving our botanical drug development program forward at the federal level to gather information on the dosing, risks, and benefits of smoked marijuana for PTSD symptoms.”

According to MAPS, smoked cannabis with varying levels of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) will be administered in the placebo-controlled trial to evaluate efficacy and safety for 76 veterans with treatment-resistant PTSD.

As common with typical medicinal trials, the study will examine potential side effects, dosages, and the like, in order to provide clinicians and legislators with data they may need to institute cannabis treatment and effective policy.

Founded in 1986, MAPS — as its full name suggests — has produced groundbreaking research into psychedelics and cannabis as treatments for a number of ailments. Known for exacting precise standards in its research, MAPS works closely with government agencies in the U.S. and abroad in order to maintain its ability to study drugs that might otherwise be considered illegal.

Two years ago, MAPS lamented its lack of channels — especially government grants — for funding research, though the organization predicted shifting public perception would eventually facilitate a change.

According to its website, despite previously lacking government funding, MAPS has raised $36 million since its founding for psychedelic and cannabis research.

MAPS conducts ongoing research with psychedelics such as psilocybin — found in ‘magic’ mushrooms — and LSD, which has yielded incredibly promising results for the treatment of PTSD, anxiety, and a number of other conditions.

Ultimately, through the grant-funded study, MAPS seeks to “evaluate the safety and efficacy of botanical marijuana as a prescription medicine for specific medical uses approved by the FDA.”

Sadly, paranoid stigmatization of cannabis has dictated drug policy and law for decades through the utterly failed war on drugs — but MAPS has been helping to annihilate the stereotypes. If government funding an official cannabis study can be any indication, perhaps there will be a shift away from strictures regarding the miracle plant that is cannabis.

"Smoked cannabis provides excellent relief for those with PTSD. It also cures cancer and warts."

MAPS and it's founder, Rick Doblin‎, is a pro-marijuana group. They're also studying the use of Ecstasy, LSD, magic mushrooms, and other psychedelics for PTSD, depression and anxiety. They're a 30-year-old non-profit that sucks up millions in contributions, conducts hundreds of trials and studies, and has come up with zero results.

BUT, if you're looking for someone to say what you want them to say (for a price, of course), they're the ones.

BOYCOTT PAYPAL AND CLOSE YOUR PP ACCOUNTS NOW! ENCOURAGE OTHERS TO DO SO,TOO!

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

American Indians had open borders. Look at how well that worked out for them.

If it were up to you and your repulsive ilk, doctors would still be using leeches and drilling holes in patient's heads.

Americans who have no experience with, or knowledge of, tyranny believe that only terrorists will experience the unchecked power of the state. They will believe this until it happens to them, or their children, or their friends.

The "E" in DEA stands for enforcement. They have nothing to do with research. The research received approval from the federal Health and Human Services Department.

Right. One joint is 22% THC Kosher Kush and the other is the placebo -- 0% THC ditchweed hemp.

Now, we're not allowed to tell you which is which, but you tell us which one makes you feel better.

"while it [MAPS] received the OK from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2011 and from the U.S. Public Health Service in 2014, it still had to wait for the DEA’s approval in order to proceed." - fortune.com/2016/04/22/dea-medical-marijuana/

A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.

Approval to allow federally grown marijuana to be used for the study. You left that out.

Oh, and you also apparently missed (deliberately or otherwise) the following from the article you linked. "So far, DEA has not rejected any research studies involving marijuana products that met FDA standards, the agency’s spokesperson added."

Far from being the first-ever DEA approval of marijuana research, it turns that the DEA has NEVER rejected an FDA compliant pot study.

I included the part relevant to misterwhite's implication that DEA approval wasn't required and omitted what wasn't.

It would have been, had I ever claimed or implied otherwise, which I haven't. How embarrassing for ya.

A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.

But it is cute how you try to obscure your little buddy's misstatements in clouds of tangential bullshit. Hope he gives you a beer ... or something.

A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.

Are you really so dim? The Drug Enforcement Administration oversees the federal government's production of marijuana used for research.

Facts. You know, those things you're always fleeing from while gibbering ad hominem evasions.

For me to "leave it out" it must have been in the article - go ahead and quote the text that states the DEA approved the use of federally grown marijuana.

A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.

Are you really so dim? What is the relevance to misterwhite's claim of the reason WHY the research couldn't proceed as planned without DEA approval?

A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.

The Fortune link says the opposite - feel free to provide evidence for your claim as I've provided evidence against it.

A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.

The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) regulates the cultivation of marijuana for research purposes and does background checks on FDA research applicants.

Here's what MAPS stated, "Our efforts to initiate medical marijuana research have been hindered by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) and the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) since our founding in 1986. NIDA's monopoly on the supply of marijuana for research and the DEA's refusal to allow researchers to grow their own has restricted medical marijuana research for decades."

The same Fortune link states that the DEA is considering rescheduling marijuana. They don't have the authority to do that.

The DEA might approve the marijuana used in the study, but they don't approve the study.

So their approval was required to conduct the study, contrary to misterwhite's claim.

Not in the posted article nor my link so I didn't "leave it out" contrary to your lie.

A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.

So it's your position that MAPS could have conducted the study without the marijuana?

A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.

Our two paranoid buttbuddies have been trying to be cute together for years now, on these sites since freerepublic.

Now all readers of this thread know better than to believe your lie, "You left that out."

A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.

MAPS has already completed the study. They are a pro-legalization group and will conclude that smoked marijuana is God's miracle drug for PTSD.

You did leave that out. You've been reduced to claiming you did so solely out of ignorance. That's your best defense.

What a pathetically feeble dodge - a predetermined conclusion as you allege is NOT the same as a completed study.

A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.

Well, they could have done their "research" overseas without any federally grown marijuana. Maybe in some Amsterdam coffee shops next to the red-light district.

You've been reduced to pretending that to not declare a tangential and previously unstated fact is to "leave it out."

A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.

Your $3 bills? A study is an activity - the two by definition can't be the same. So whatever MAPS' conclusion and whenever they determine it, they can't complete a study of marijuana's effect on PTSD without marijuana - so approval for the use of marijuana WAS required to conduct the study, and that approval had to come from the DEA.

A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.

“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul

Americans who have no experience with, or knowledge of, tyranny believe that only terrorists will experience the unchecked power of the state. They will believe this until it happens to them, or their children, or their friends.

“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul

Americans who have no experience with, or knowledge of, tyranny believe that only terrorists will experience the unchecked power of the state. They will believe this until it happens to them, or their children, or their friends.

“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul

Americans who have no experience with, or knowledge of, tyranny believe that only terrorists will experience the unchecked power of the state. They will believe this until it happens to them, or their children, or their friends.