Title: TRUE ZERO Opens the LARGEST Hydrogen NETWORK in the World with Unprecedented Speed Source:
TrueZero.com URL Source:http://www.truezero.com/ Published:Apr 23, 2016 Author:True Zero Post Date:2016-04-23 07:00:09 by Operation 40 Keywords:renewable energy, hydrogen, jobs Views:2164 Comments:11
IRVINE, Calif., April 22, 2016 /PRNewswire/ -- Significantly larger numbers of electric fuel-cell cars will go on sale in California this year following decades of hard work by thousands of automotive engineers, policymakers, and government-agency personnel. The simultaneous launch of the True Zero (www.truezero.com) Network, a series of hydrogen-charge stations being established by start-up FirstElement Fuel Inc. (www.firstelementfuel.com), will help eliminate the major roadblock facing these types of cars: anxiety over finding a reliable place to charge.
"In the past the lack of a fueling network kept fuel-cell vehicles off the road, and has been hampering activity in recent years," explained Joel Ewanick, chief executive officer of Irvine-based FirstElement Fuel. "Soon, a short stop for a four-minute charge of True Zero hydrogen will enable drivers of all-electric fuel-cell cars to confidently get to their destination without the worry of range anxiety."
The first 15 True Zero stations (photos at www.truezero.com/images/) were brought online at an unprecedented speed and scale throughout Silicon Valley, the greater Los Angeles area, Lake Tahoe area, and Harris Ranch in the San Joaquin Valley. An additional four stations are expected to be online by year's end. The projects are being funded in large part by grants from the California Energy Commission, South Coast AQMD and Bay Area AQMD, as well as partnerships with automotive firms Toyota and Honda who are first to market with fuel-cell electric vehicles. This network gives confidence to the hydrogen community that the industry can quickly bring on line the required stations to meet the demand and timing of the OEM's.
Helping to cut the ribbon (April 21st) at the recently opened True Zero hydrogen-fuel station in the San Joaquin Valley are (from l): Commissioner Janea Scott of the California Energy Commission; Mary Nichols, Chair of the California Air Resources Board; Joel Ewanick, CEO of First Element Fuel, True Zero's parent; Dr. Shane Stephens, First Element CDO; Ghassan Sleiman, First Element VP; John Harris, owner of Harris Ranch Co. and Tyson Eckerle, Deputy Dir. for ZEV Infrastructure, Office of Gov. Jerry Brown.
"We owe a special thanks to the State of California and to the automakers committed to fuel-cell vehicles for their persistence and support," said Ewanick. "It goes well beyond the financial assistance; the technical assistance has also been critical. We knew building out this network was going to be challenging. Having completed 15 stations in 18 months is an unprecedented achievement."
True Zero represents the world's largest network of hydrogen-charge ports ready for retail consumers. Customers are now able to charge their vehicles at stations throughout California.
"These 15 stations are on the verge of being open for the first wave of hydrogen-electric vehicle customers," said Ewanick. "Even though we are achieving 99 percent uptime we strive to perfect the stations we don't want to leave anyone stranded. As with any new technology we continue to work through glitches surrounding the launch of a product that is cutting-edge. Opening a True Zero charging station is not the finish line, it's the starting line. It's all about the customer experience and 100 percent reliability."
This generation of electric vehicles powered by fuel cells will be able to travel more than 300 miles on a single charge and a "fill up" of True Zero will take four minutes or less. "So customers will be able to drive an electric fuel cell car seamlessly throughout California, through the San Joaquin Valley and out to Lake Tahoe, just like they drive a gasoline, car thanks to the True Zero Network," added Ewanick.
The brand name True Zero speaks to the benefit that fuel cell vehicles will achieve.
"True Zero symbolizes the ultimate goal a vehicle fuel with zero pollution, zero use of fossil fuels and zero greenhouse gases in both its production and use," explained Ewanick. "It's about the drive towards zero emissions from well to wheels; towards zero impact on the environment from a motor vehicle."
As a fuel, hydrogen is similar to electricity in that it is produced from a variety of sources. In California one third of the hydrogen produced today comes from renewable sources, with the remaining two thirds incorporating natural gas and water. An electric vehicle powered by hydrogen uses its fuel cell to convert the hydrogen into electricity to run the motor. The only emission coming from the vehicle is water.
Once its 19 initial charging ports are completed, it is estimated the True Zero Network will have the capacity to replace 2.5 million gallons of gasoline with domestically sourced hydrogen and reduce CO2 emissions by 34 million pounds each year,* or the equivalent to planting a forest nearly the size of San Francisco.
" do we have operating cost comparisons for these vehicles? "
Yeah, I would like to see those as well.
Si vis pacem, para bellum
Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who don't
Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God.
There are no Carthaginian terrorists.
President Obama is the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people. --Clint Eastwood
"I am concerned for the security of our great nation; not so much because of any threat from without, but because of the insidious forces working from within." -- General Douglas MacArthur
Once the solar panels or windmills have paid for themselves
But in the meantime? Noone is going to supply hydrogen for nothing, it is a volitile dangerous substance requiring a high level of safety engeneering.
So let us get real and answer the question do they cost more to operate or less? Do they cost more to buy or less? Hybrids and electric cars cost more so I'm expecting this technology will be more also
a volitile dangerous substance requiring a high level of safety engeneering.
No more volatile or dangerous than natural gas or propane. In fact, it's safer- if hydrogen escapes it flies up into space at 14 mph whereas natural gas and propane sink and collect, waiting to explode.
A Hydrogen car is safer than every gas car on the roads right now- see:
Hydrogen Car Fire Surprise Video documents results of hydrogen and gasoline car fires
If it was so dangerous would many huge companies like Wal Mart and BMW be switching their battery powered forklifts to hydrogen fuel cells? See: http://www.plugpower.com/customer/whos-using-gendrive/ These hydrogen forklifts are fueled on site. So much for those who say it can't be stored.
So let us get real and answer the question do they cost more to operate or less? Do they cost more to buy or less? Hybrids and electric cars cost more so I'm expecting this technology will be more also
How much did a 486 Mhz computer cost in the early 90's? Mass production will bring down all costs- fuel cells, hydrogen equipment and the electrolyzers. The important thing is no oil is required. None. Not a drop. We can forget about the Middle East. The US can be totally self sufficient in a matter of a few years, if it wanted. But the US doesn't want to be energy independent.
How much did a 486 Mhz computer cost in the early 90's?
That isn't the question, the automobile industry is a muture industry, not a startup therefore costs can be compared with the existing technology you expect it to replace. You can run these strawman arguments to avoid the answer, is it because you don't know the answer?
As to US energy independence the US as an independent now as it needs to be. It no longer needs to depend upon the middle east
That isn't the question, the automobile industry is a muture industry, not a startup therefore costs can be compared with the existing technology you expect it to replace.
It is "mature" in the sense that its present model seems to be in a dead end street, nearing perfections as the last beautiful sailing ships did.
Yet the ships started to put more metals, engines etc, and today mature sailboats are used for recreation in simplified forms.
The first global superpower - Spain, became self-confident in her exceptionality, wealth and military superiority until tiny predatory upstarts like Dutch and English cut Spain down to the size.
No, better stick to the old trusty 1950s designs when America was at the top. Let Toyota, Honda and other freaks waste their money.
Are you kidding? Anyone that buys a Toyota, Honda or other such "freaks" as you call them are paying for it. In my lifetime there has been tens if not hu8ndreds of billions of dollars wasted on chasing useless technologies. I was aware of theses hydrogen technologies in my senior year of college in 1964/65. Very little of these have proven to be economically viable in over 50 years of R&D and some commercialization. I don't have another 50 years to wait around to watch them continue to fail to live up to the hype.
"What were the operating costs of the first car or airplanes? "
LMAO. It didn't take 50 years to have a fully commercialized auto industry or aviation industry. But nice try, Boris.