[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"Analysis: The Final State of the Presidential Race"

He’ll, You Pieces of Garbage

The Future of Warfare -- No more martyrdom!

"Kamala’s Inane Talking Points"

"The Harris Campaign Is Testament to the Toxicity of Woke Politics"

Easy Drywall Patch

Israel Preparing NEW Iran Strike? Iran Vows “Unimaginable” Response | Watchman Newscast

In Logansport, Indiana, Kids are Being Pushed Out of Schools After Migrants Swelled County’s Population by 30%: "Everybody else is falling behind"

Exclusive — Bernie Moreno: We Spend $110,000 Per Illegal Migrant Per Year, More than Twice What ‘the Average American Makes’

Florida County: 41 of 45 People Arrested for Looting after Hurricanes Helene and Milton are Noncitizens

Presidential race: Is a Split Ticket the only Answer?

hurricanes and heat waves are Worse

'Backbone of Iran's missile industry' destroyed by IAF strikes on Islamic Republic

Joe Rogan Experience #2219 - Donald Trump

IDF raids Hezbollah Radwan Forces underground bases, discovers massive cache of weapons

Gallant: ‘After we strike in Iran,’ the world will understand all of our training

The Atlantic Hit Piece On Trump Is A Psy-Op To Justify Post-Election Violence If Harris Loses

Six Al Jazeera journalists are Hamas, PIJ terrorists

Judge Aileen Cannon, who tossed Trump's classified docs case, on list of proposed candidates for attorney general

Iran's Assassination Program in Europe: Europe Goes Back to Sleep

Susan Olsen says Brady Bunch revival was cancelled because she’s MAGA.

Foreign Invaders crisis cost $150B in 2023, forcing some areas to cut police and fire services: report

Israel kills head of Hezbollah Intelligence.

Tenn. AG reveals ICE released thousands of ‘murderers and rapists’ from detention centers into US streets

Kamala Harris Touts Mass Amnesty Offering Fast-Tracked Citizenship to Nearly Every Illegal Alien in U.S.

Migration Crisis Fueled Rise in Tuberculosis Cases Study Finds

"They’re Going to Try to Kill Trump Again"

"Dems' Attempts at Power Grab Losing Their Grip"

"Restoring a ‘Great Moderation’ in Fiscal Policy"

"As attacks intensify, Trump becomes more popular"

Posting Articles Now Working Here

Another Test

Testing

Kamala Harris, reparations, and guaranteed income

Did Mudboy Slim finally kill this place?

"Why Young Americans Are Not Taught about Evil"

"New Rules For Radicals — How To Reinvent Kamala Harris"

"Harris’ problem: She’s a complete phony"

Hurricane Beryl strikes Bay City (TX)

Who Is ‘Destroying Democracy In Darkness?’

‘Kamalanomics’ is just ‘Bidenomics’ but dumber

Even The Washington Post Says Kamala's 'Price Control' Plan is 'Communist'

Arthur Ray Hines, "Sneakypete", has passed away.

No righT ... for me To hear --- whaT you say !

"Walz’s Fellow Guardsmen Set the Record Straight on Veep Candidate’s Military Career: ‘He Bailed Out’ "

"Kamala Harris Selects Progressive Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as Running Mate"

"The Teleprompter Campaign"

Good Riddance to Ismail Haniyeh

"Pagans in Paris"

"Liberal groupthink makes American life creepy and could cost Democrats the election".


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

LEFT WING LOONS
See other LEFT WING LOONS Articles

Title: GOP Debate: ABC - New Hampshire LIVE
Source: ABC NWO GOP
URL Source: http://abcnews.go.com/Live?stream=1
Published: Feb 6, 2016
Author: D&R Crime Syndicate
Post Date: 2016-02-06 20:20:50 by Hondo68
Keywords: None
Views: 10335
Comments: 57


ABC Breaking News | Latest News Videos

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-17) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#18. To: sneakypete, A K A Stone, Roscoe, BobCeleste, redleghunter, Pericles (#15)

Especially the second one,which I had completely overlooked and ignored. I would only add "TAKE their oil"?

He's mentioned it before in at least one other debate. He's said it in interviews, he's said it to rallies.

He said it several times, just in last night's debate.

If we are going to become the Viking States of America and pirate the world's oil with our military under the Trump Doctrine (and we'll torture anyone we need to in order to get that oil), then it seems to me it is perfectly legit to ask The Amazing Donaldo for the details of exactly how he intends to do these things.

Tooconservative  posted on  2016-02-07   10:10:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: TooConservative (#18)

Especially the second one,which I had completely overlooked and ignored. I would only add "TAKE their oil"?

He's mentioned it before in at least one other debate. He's said it in interviews, he's said it to rallies.

He said it several times, just in last night's debate.

I don't doubt it. I just don't go out of my way to pay any attention to anything he is saying because I know he is almost always either lying,nor not really serious.

If we are going to become the Viking States of America and pirate the world's oil with our military under the Trump Doctrine (and we'll torture anyone we need to in order to get that oil), then it seems to me it is perfectly legit to ask The Amazing Donaldo for the details of exactly how he intends to do these things.

Absolutely.

ISLAM MEANS SUBMISSION!

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

American Indians had open borders. Look at how well that worked out for them.

sneakypete  posted on  2016-02-07   10:21:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: TooConservative (#18)

world's oil

How globalist of ya.

Roscoe  posted on  2016-02-07   10:31:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: hondo68 (#0) (Edited)

Just finished listening to the debate . Rubio looked foolish when he used a prepared answer ;Christie challenged him for using the canned answer ,and Rubio repeated his response almost verbatim in his rebuttal .

Trump tried to finesse the answer on eminent domain . I guess he equates building the keystone pipeline with building parking garages for casinos. The rest of the candidates missed an opportunity on hitting Trump harder on a number of the things he said.

If I was to give scores to the debate I would say that the governors all had their A game going . Rubio looked the worse of the rest and Cruz the best of the rest . His emotional response to the drug issues was well done ,tying it to federalism and the border issue. Ben Carson was his usual invisible self .

"If you do not take an interest in the affairs of your government, then you are doomed to live under the rule of fools." Plato

tomder55  posted on  2016-02-07   11:17:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: sneakypete (#19)

I don't doubt it. I just don't go out of my way to pay any attention to anything he is saying because I know he is almost always either lying,nor not really serious.

The Germans didn't think Hitler was serious either.

Trump has spoken about this for years. It's way beyond some lone mention in a speech. He's written about it, spoken about it at least a dozen times, probably more. It's striking in that, unlike immigration (deport but then let 90% back in) or Cruz's eligibility (a Canucki anchor baby but Trump might pick him for VP anyway), Trump has been very consistent about saying we need to take the oil from these countries, Iraq in particlar but also Libya and Syria. And Trump doesn't limit his scope of action to just those countries. He's wide open on taking other countries' oil as well.

Tooconservative  posted on  2016-02-07   11:23:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: Roscoe, sneakypete, tomder55 (#20)

How globalist of ya.

As Seinfeld once said:

Tooconservative  posted on  2016-02-07   11:26:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: TooConservative (#18)

"then it seems to me it is perfectly legit to ask The Amazing Donaldo for the details of exactly how he intends to do these things."

We'll sit down with the conquered leaders and negotiate a deal behind closed doors. When the deal is done, it turns out that they wholeheartedly agreed to give us all their oil as compensation.

That's how.

misterwhite  posted on  2016-02-07   11:32:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: tomder55 (#21)

Trump tried to finesse the answer on eminent domain . I guess he equates building the keystone pipeline with building parking garages for casinos.

Of course he does. In HIS mind,EVERYTHING is about "Me,ME,ME,DAMMIT!"

ISLAM MEANS SUBMISSION!

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

American Indians had open borders. Look at how well that worked out for them.

sneakypete  posted on  2016-02-07   11:54:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: misterwhite (#24)

We'll sit down with the conquered leaders

Leftists and cuckservatives would shower our enemies with billions of American tax dollars.

Roscoe  posted on  2016-02-07   12:20:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: misterwhite (#24)

We'll sit down with the conquered leaders and negotiate a deal behind closed doors. When the deal is done, it turns out that they wholeheartedly agreed to give us all their oil as compensation.

That's how.

The sad thing is that you probably actually believe this.

Tooconservative  posted on  2016-02-07   12:21:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: hondo68 (#0)

Watched Everest instead.

For when we were still without strength, in due time Christ died for the ungodly. For scarcely for a righteous man will one die; yet perhaps for a good man someone would even dare to die. But God demonstrates His own love toward us, in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us. (Romans 5:6-8)

redleghunter  posted on  2016-02-07   12:28:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: TooConservative (#27)

"The sad thing is that you probably actually believe this."

You asked for details on how Trump will do this. This is how it will be done.

We don't have to believe this is what happened behind closed doors. The end result, however, is we get the oil.

After that, maybe those mideast countries will think twice about getting us involved.

misterwhite  posted on  2016-02-07   14:41:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: misterwhite (#29)

After that, maybe those mideast countries will think twice about getting us involved.

I guess the entrapment that Israel imposes upon the USA doesn't count, 'eh?

buckeroo  posted on  2016-02-07   14:53:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: hondo68 (#4)

" Cris Christie told a moving story of ordering pizza and drinking beer. "

Yeah. I immediately phoned in an order, and picked up a 12 pack at the same time. LOL

Si vis pacem, para bellum

Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who don't

Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God.

There are no Carthaginian terrorists.

President Obama is the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people. --Clint Eastwood

Stoner  posted on  2016-02-07   16:33:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: tomder55 (#21)

" Ben Carson was his usual invisible self "

He was there ?

Si vis pacem, para bellum

Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who don't

Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God.

There are no Carthaginian terrorists.

President Obama is the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people. --Clint Eastwood

Stoner  posted on  2016-02-07   16:40:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: TooConservative (#18)

Viking States of America and pirate the world's oil with our military under the Trump Doctrine

The internet is amazing.

For when we were still without strength, in due time Christ died for the ungodly. For scarcely for a righteous man will one die; yet perhaps for a good man someone would even dare to die. But God demonstrates His own love toward us, in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us. (Romans 5:6-8)

redleghunter  posted on  2016-02-07   17:19:55 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: TooConservative, sneakypete, A K A Stone, Roscoe, BobCeleste, redleghunter (#18)

f we are going to become the Viking States of America and pirate the world's oil with our military under the Trump Doctrine (and we'll torture anyone we need to in order to get that oil), then it seems to me it is perfectly legit to ask The Amazing Donaldo for the details of exactly how he intends to do these things.

Trump is just talking in the way the rubes can understand. Also, Kasich said he wanted to punch Putin in the nose and Christie said he wanted to shoot down Russian jets in Syria. But let's go after Trump who said he does not have an itchy trigger finger for starting wars in the middle east like the neocons and urges for cooperation with a nuclear power rather than confrontation. Trump's answer about using China to pressure North Korea was spot on.

Pericles  posted on  2016-02-07   17:20:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: Pericles (#34)

Do you really think China has much say about what happens in NK ? Whatever influence they have left with the un-Kim is diminishing and most likely already applied .

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/a-snub-for-china-north-koreas-reported- nuclear-test-shows-beijings-waning-influence/2016/01/06/b0d309e9-a5a4-4cd4-b12a- ab352a53c0cc_story.html Development of its nuclear program has given the NORKS a measure of strategic independence from China. China has to be very careful here . They have some economic influence on the NORKS . But if they push that too far and cause a regime collapse ,they will have a failed state on their border with the probable refugee disaster that Europe is experiencing . .

"If you do not take an interest in the affairs of your government, then you are doomed to live under the rule of fools." Plato

tomder55  posted on  2016-02-07   17:52:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: Pericles (#34)

Whatever flaws and shortcomings he might have, he scares the cuckservatives spitless.

Roscoe  posted on  2016-02-07   19:09:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: redleghunter (#33)

The internet is amazing.

That or the world is full of useless eaters.

I like Viking Donald #4. Seems to capture him well, so stylish that Bernie Sanders will start pining for Denmark. Bernie has fond memories of the Viking era.

Tooconservative  posted on  2016-02-07   20:24:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: tomder55, Pericles (#35)

But if they push that too far and cause a regime collapse ,they will have a failed state on their border with the probable refugee disaster that Europe is experiencing . .

I'm fed up with hearing this particular line.

China already has a "failed state" on their border. It's been there for decades. Surely they have noticed by now.

I think China would find a way to muzzle their dog if we informed them that, barring immediate action on their part, we would be forced to help our allies in Japan and South Korea (and Taiwan) to implement their own nuclear weapons programs to defend themselves against the Norks.

Tooconservative  posted on  2016-02-07   20:28:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: Pericles (#34)

Trump is just talking in the way the rubes can understand.

It's way more than that. Trump has said it for at least a decade on a steady basis, emphasized this point over anything else he says about the Mideast.

Tooconservative  posted on  2016-02-07   20:30:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: buckeroo (#30)

"I guess the entrapment that Israel imposes upon the USA doesn't count, 'eh?"

They're the first one we sever all ties with.

misterwhite  posted on  2016-02-07   20:34:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#41. To: misterwhite (#40)

I have never read your opinion(s) about this consideration, before. I am totally surprised by your perspective. Although, I don't agree with Israel being the first for US severence, they certainly are on the horizon.

I have to admit, that I shall read more of your posts from now on.

buckeroo  posted on  2016-02-07   20:50:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#42. To: TooConservative (#38)

I think China would find a way to muzzle their dog if we informed them that, barring immediate action on their part, we would be forced to help our allies in Japan and South Korea (and Taiwan) to implement their own nuclear weapons programs to defend themselves against the Norks.

We are going to do end up doing that that anyway as a result of aggressive actions taken by China in recent years . It won't take Japan long to nuke up . If we had kept the pressure on the NORKS ,they would not have crossed the threshold ,and China would've done nothing to stop us.

"If you do not take an interest in the affairs of your government, then you are doomed to live under the rule of fools." Plato

tomder55  posted on  2016-02-07   20:52:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#43. To: tomder55 (#42)

It won't take Japan long to nuke up .

Japan has so much plutonium on hand that they could be a bigger nuclear power than the U.S. and Russia combined.

Tooconservative  posted on  2016-02-07   21:43:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#44. To: tomder55 (#35)

Do you really think China has much say about what happens in NK ? Whatever influence they have left with the un-Kim is diminishing and most likely already applied .

Yes, China does not want what happened in Eastern Europe to happen in Korea - let us say North Korea fell - the USA would now have a base right up to the Chinese border. So they keep NK around as a buffer state. 99% of NK's food comes from China who send it just enough to not starve. If the USA made a deal saying they would leave South Korea and not be based there and get SK to sign some sort of neutrality treaty then NK would be be done.

Pericles  posted on  2016-02-08   0:01:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#45. To: TooConservative (#38)

China does not want what happened in Eastern Europe to happen in Korea - let us say North Korea fell - the USA would now have a base right up to the Chinese border. So they keep NK around as a buffer state. 99% of NK's food comes from China who send it just enough to not starve. If the USA made a deal saying they would leave South Korea and not be based there and get SK to sign some sort of neutrality treaty then NK would be be done.

Pericles  posted on  2016-02-08   0:01:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#46. To: Pericles (#45)

If the USA made a deal saying they would leave South Korea and not be based there and get SK to sign some sort of neutrality treaty then NK would be be done.

I agree it would make sense.

Agreeing by treaty among the major powers that Korea will be a neutral country would be a smart solution for Ukraine too.

Tooconservative  posted on  2016-02-08   0:38:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#47. To: TooConservative (#46) (Edited)

If the USA made a deal saying they would leave South Korea and not be based there and get SK to sign some sort of neutrality treaty then NK would be be done. I agree it would make sense.

Agreeing by treaty among the major powers that Korea will be a neutral country would be a smart solution for Ukraine too.

It makes no sense at all. South Korea cannot be neutral so long as North Korea exists. Should they become neutral NOrth Korea will march across the border as they did before. You obviously don't understand the intent of a stalinist regime, for them an enemy is to be trampled underfoot and subjected and made slaves of. I heard one nut today suggest that if North Korea would abandon thier nuclear progam they could be brought back into the international community. Obviously doesn't understand that in world terms NK is a stone age society, it isn't their nuclear program that is the problem, it is their ideology. without reunification with Korea as a democracy, a western aligned democracy there can be no peace.

There are 22 million brain washed individuals in North Korea, if the wall comes down and by the wall I mean the demilitarised zone there would be a rush to freedom but there would be a large hard core, the military, who would be loosing their privilages who would fight

North Korea is not East Germany and comparisons are false. It took the collapse of the soviet union for sense to prevail in East Germany becuase they were a captive nation but North Korea isn't a captive nation.

paraclete  posted on  2016-02-08   1:20:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#48. To: Pericles (#34)

Trump is just talking in the way the rubes can understand.

I've never been called a Rube before, your credentials are?

Eli, Eli, nai erchomai Kurios Iesous.

BobCeleste  posted on  2016-02-08   19:48:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#49. To: paraclete, TooConservative, Pericles (#47)

If the USA made a deal saying they would leave South Korea and not be based there and get SK to sign some sort of neutrality treaty then NK would be be done. I agree it would make sense. Agreeing by treaty among the major powers that Korea will be a neutral country would be a smart solution for Ukraine too.

It makes no sense at all. South Korea cannot be neutral so long as North Korea exists. Should they become neutral NOrth Korea will march across the border as they did before. You obviously don't understand the intent of a stalinist regime, for them an enemy is to be trampled underfoot and subjected and made slaves of. I heard one nut today suggest that if North Korea would abandon thier nuclear progam they could be brought back into the international community. Obviously doesn't understand that in world terms NK is a stone age society, it isn't their nuclear program that is the problem, it is their ideology. without reunification with Korea as a democracy, a western aligned democracy there can be no peace.

There are 22 million brain washed individuals in North Korea, if the wall comes down and by the wall I mean the demilitarised zone there would be a rush to freedom but there would be a large hard core, the military, who would be loosing their privilages who would fight

North Korea is not East Germany and comparisons are false. It took the collapse of the soviet union for sense to prevail in East Germany becuase they were a captive nation but North Korea isn't a captive nation.

Korea will be united either under a dicatorship or a hard transition to a democratic state . Don't know how China feels about that . But if the NORKs are persuaded to behave ,it won't come from intervention from Beijing . The real power broker behind the NORK nuke and missile program is in Tehran.

"If you do not take an interest in the affairs of your government, then you are doomed to live under the rule of fools." Plato

tomder55  posted on  2016-02-09   6:43:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#50. To: paraclete, TooConservative (#47) (Edited)

If the USA made a deal saying they would leave South Korea and not be based there and get SK to sign some sort of neutrality treaty then NK would be be done. I agree it would make sense. Agreeing by treaty among the major powers that Korea will be a neutral country would be a smart solution for Ukraine too.

It makes no sense at all. South Korea cannot be neutral so long as North Korea exists.

You misread paraclete - China would work to fold up and end North Korea and back a unified Korea if and only if Korea emerges as a neutral country with no US bases.

Pericles  posted on  2016-02-09   7:43:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#51. To: tomder55 (#49)

The real power broker behind the NORK nuke and missile program is in Tehran.

I don't think Iran is this superpower the neocons make it out to be.

Pericles  posted on  2016-02-09   7:44:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#52. To: BobCeleste (#48)

Hayseed?

Pericles  posted on  2016-02-09   7:45:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#53. To: Pericles (#50)

Thre can be no doubt China would like american bases further away from their borders, Their intervention in the Korean war was because of the threat posed my that american meglomaniac McArthur, But SK has no aggressive intentions towards China so thier alignment is an academic and economic question. like China, Korea depends on favourable trade terms with the US but american trade is worth more to Korea than trade with China

paraclete  posted on  2016-02-09   8:16:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#54. To: paraclete, Pericles (#53)

Perhaps the real obstacle is that the South Koreans have good reason not to want to be reunited with the Norks. You can't really blame them. It would be a far more traumatic reunification than Germany had. South Korea's got it good and it would take a long time to benefit much from unification with the North. So, in the short-term, the Sorks have no real interest in a unified Korea, even a neutral Korea with treaty guarantees from China/Russia/America and others.

Tooconservative  posted on  2016-02-09   9:15:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#55. To: TooConservative (#54)

I agree there is no upside to taking on 22 million poor relations, NK agriculture is a shambles, infrastructure non existant, all they would gain is a well trained if obsolete army

paraclete  posted on  2016-02-09   9:27:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#56. To: paraclete (#55)

If the South Koreans had a few years to prepare, it might be doable.

Trying to reduce the Nork military and create enough jobs would be the biggest problem. Korea would run big deficits for some time.

Tooconservative  posted on  2016-02-09   9:29:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#57. To: paraclete, TooConservative (#53)

Thre can be no doubt China would like american bases further away from their borders, Their intervention in the Korean war was because of the threat posed my that american meglomaniac McArthur, But SK has no aggressive intentions towards China so thier alignment is an academic and economic question. like China, Korea depends on favourable trade terms with the US but american trade is worth more to Korea than trade with China

After the US said it would not expand eastward towards Russia and did so anyway the Chinese don't trust the USA to not move forces from SK to the north if ever unified. I also do think SK may not want to unify right off the bat but as non Koreans we may be missing emotional and nationalistic issues involved.

Pericles  posted on  2016-02-11   0:13:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com