LEFT WING LOONS
See other LEFT WING LOONS Articles
Title: GOP Debate: ABC - New Hampshire LIVE
Source:
ABC NWO GOP
URL Source: http://abcnews.go.com/Live?stream=1
Published: Feb 6, 2016
Author: D&R Crime Syndicate
Post Date: 2016-02-06 20:20:50 by Hondo68
Keywords: None
Views: 9466
Comments: 57
ABC Breaking News | Latest News Videos
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-11) not displayed.
.
.
.
#12. To: TooConservative (#7)
My friend, You need to go sit in a VA hospital for a week or two. Find away to get up into the mental ward, ask why those girls are wearing helmets. Do not under any circumstances ask any of the kids with missing body parts what they lost those parts for. I think you will rapidly come to the conclusion that only what Donald says makes sense. Eli, Eli, nai erchomai Kurios Iesous.
Your right Bob !
Si vis pacem, para bellum Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who don't Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God. There are no Carthaginian terrorists. President Obama is the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people. --Clint Eastwood
Of course not. We should give them bacha bazi boys, soccer fields, volleyball courts, marinated chicken with orange sauce, and rice pilaf.
Excellent points. Especially the second one,which I had completely overlooked and ignored. I would only add "TAKE their oil"? Are we armed robbers,or a nation that believes in the rule of law and thinks might makes right,and we can just steal their property? Are you talking about international eminent domain,now?" ISLAM MEANS SUBMISSION! Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012) American Indians had open borders. Look at how well that worked out for them.
The rantings of a dying breed of Sanders hell burners. Off your meds again? ISLAM MEANS SUBMISSION! Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012) American Indians had open borders. Look at how well that worked out for them.
Bob,he is spot on. We don't need their damn oil,and those boys in the VA hospitals lost their limbs to protect the Saud family,who are the very people financing the terrorists in the west. We don't need to steal their oil from them,but what we need to do is quit buying it so they have to start spending their money on their own people to keep them from revolting instead of spending it to keep terrorists setting off bombs in the west. I think you will rapidly come to the conclusion that only what Donald says makes sense. Not one chance in hell of Trump actually believing most of the stuff he is saying unless he is talking about taxes or eminent domain. He's a carnie,telling the rubes whatever they need to hear for him to make the sale. ISLAM MEANS SUBMISSION! Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012) American Indians had open borders. Look at how well that worked out for them.
He's mentioned it before in at least one other debate. He's said it in interviews, he's said it to rallies. He said it several times, just in last night's debate. If we are going to become the Viking States of America and pirate the world's oil with our military under the Trump Doctrine (and we'll torture anyone we need to in order to get that oil), then it seems to me it is perfectly legit to ask The Amazing Donaldo for the details of exactly how he intends to do these things.
He's mentioned it before in at least one other debate. He's said it in interviews, he's said it to rallies. He said it several times, just in last night's debate. I don't doubt it. I just don't go out of my way to pay any attention to anything he is saying because I know he is almost always either lying,nor not really serious. If we are going to become the Viking States of America and pirate the world's oil with our military under the Trump Doctrine (and we'll torture anyone we need to in order to get that oil), then it seems to me it is perfectly legit to ask The Amazing Donaldo for the details of exactly how he intends to do these things. Absolutely. ISLAM MEANS SUBMISSION! Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012) American Indians had open borders. Look at how well that worked out for them.
How globalist of ya.
Just finished listening to the debate . Rubio looked foolish when he used a prepared answer ;Christie challenged him for using the canned answer ,and Rubio repeated his response almost verbatim in his rebuttal . Trump tried to finesse the answer on eminent domain . I guess he equates building the keystone pipeline with building parking garages for casinos. The rest of the candidates missed an opportunity on hitting Trump harder on a number of the things he said. If I was to give scores to the debate I would say that the governors all had their A game going . Rubio looked the worse of the rest and Cruz the best of the rest . His emotional response to the drug issues was well done ,tying it to federalism and the border issue. Ben Carson was his usual invisible self . "If you do not take an interest in the affairs of your government, then you are doomed to live under the rule of fools." Plato
The Germans didn't think Hitler was serious either. Trump has spoken about this for years. It's way beyond some lone mention in a speech. He's written about it, spoken about it at least a dozen times, probably more. It's striking in that, unlike immigration (deport but then let 90% back in) or Cruz's eligibility (a Canucki anchor baby but Trump might pick him for VP anyway), Trump has been very consistent about saying we need to take the oil from these countries, Iraq in particlar but also Libya and Syria. And Trump doesn't limit his scope of action to just those countries. He's wide open on taking other countries' oil as well.
As Seinfeld once said:
We'll sit down with the conquered leaders and negotiate a deal behind closed doors. When the deal is done, it turns out that they wholeheartedly agreed to give us all their oil as compensation. That's how.
Of course he does. In HIS mind,EVERYTHING is about "Me,ME,ME,DAMMIT!" ISLAM MEANS SUBMISSION! Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012) American Indians had open borders. Look at how well that worked out for them.
Leftists and cuckservatives would shower our enemies with billions of American tax dollars.
That's how. The sad thing is that you probably actually believe this.
Watched Everest instead.
For when we were still without strength, in due time Christ died for the ungodly. For scarcely for a righteous man will one die; yet perhaps for a good man someone would even dare to die. But God demonstrates His own love toward us, in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us. (Romans 5:6-8)
You asked for details on how Trump will do this. This is how it will be done. We don't have to believe this is what happened behind closed doors. The end result, however, is we get the oil. After that, maybe those mideast countries will think twice about getting us involved.
I guess the entrapment that Israel imposes upon the USA doesn't count, 'eh?
Yeah. I immediately phoned in an order, and picked up a 12 pack at the same time. LOL Si vis pacem, para bellum Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who don't Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God. There are no Carthaginian terrorists. President Obama is the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people. --Clint Eastwood
He was there ? Si vis pacem, para bellum Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who don't Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God. There are no Carthaginian terrorists. President Obama is the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people. --Clint Eastwood
The internet is amazing. For when we were still without strength, in due time Christ died for the ungodly. For scarcely for a righteous man will one die; yet perhaps for a good man someone would even dare to die. But God demonstrates His own love toward us, in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us. (Romans 5:6-8)
Trump is just talking in the way the rubes can understand. Also, Kasich said he wanted to punch Putin in the nose and Christie said he wanted to shoot down Russian jets in Syria. But let's go after Trump who said he does not have an itchy trigger finger for starting wars in the middle east like the neocons and urges for cooperation with a nuclear power rather than confrontation. Trump's answer about using China to pressure North Korea was spot on.
Do you really think China has much say about what happens in NK ? Whatever influence they have left with the un-Kim is diminishing and most likely already applied . https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/a-snub-for-china-north-koreas-reported- nuclear-test-shows-beijings-waning-influence/2016/01/06/b0d309e9-a5a4-4cd4-b12a- ab352a53c0cc_story.html Development of its nuclear program has given the NORKS a measure of strategic independence from China. China has to be very careful here . They have some economic influence on the NORKS . But if they push that too far and cause a regime collapse ,they will have a failed state on their border with the probable refugee disaster that Europe is experiencing . . "If you do not take an interest in the affairs of your government, then you are doomed to live under the rule of fools." Plato
Whatever flaws and shortcomings he might have, he scares the cuckservatives spitless.
That or the world is full of useless eaters. I like Viking Donald #4. Seems to capture him well, so stylish that Bernie Sanders will start pining for Denmark. Bernie has fond memories of the Viking era.
I'm fed up with hearing this particular line. China already has a "failed state" on their border. It's been there for decades. Surely they have noticed by now. I think China would find a way to muzzle their dog if we informed them that, barring immediate action on their part, we would be forced to help our allies in Japan and South Korea (and Taiwan) to implement their own nuclear weapons programs to defend themselves against the Norks.
It's way more than that. Trump has said it for at least a decade on a steady basis, emphasized this point over anything else he says about the Mideast.
They're the first one we sever all ties with.
I have never read your opinion(s) about this consideration, before. I am totally surprised by your perspective. Although, I don't agree with Israel being the first for US severence, they certainly are on the horizon. I have to admit, that I shall read more of your posts from now on.
We are going to do end up doing that that anyway as a result of aggressive actions taken by China in recent years . It won't take Japan long to nuke up . If we had kept the pressure on the NORKS ,they would not have crossed the threshold ,and China would've done nothing to stop us. "If you do not take an interest in the affairs of your government, then you are doomed to live under the rule of fools." Plato
Japan has so much plutonium on hand that they could be a bigger nuclear power than the U.S. and Russia combined.
Yes, China does not want what happened in Eastern Europe to happen in Korea - let us say North Korea fell - the USA would now have a base right up to the Chinese border. So they keep NK around as a buffer state. 99% of NK's food comes from China who send it just enough to not starve. If the USA made a deal saying they would leave South Korea and not be based there and get SK to sign some sort of neutrality treaty then NK would be be done.
China does not want what happened in Eastern Europe to happen in Korea - let us say North Korea fell - the USA would now have a base right up to the Chinese border. So they keep NK around as a buffer state. 99% of NK's food comes from China who send it just enough to not starve. If the USA made a deal saying they would leave South Korea and not be based there and get SK to sign some sort of neutrality treaty then NK would be be done.
I agree it would make sense. Agreeing by treaty among the major powers that Korea will be a neutral country would be a smart solution for Ukraine too.
Agreeing by treaty among the major powers that Korea will be a neutral country would be a smart solution for Ukraine too. It makes no sense at all. South Korea cannot be neutral so long as North Korea exists. Should they become neutral NOrth Korea will march across the border as they did before. You obviously don't understand the intent of a stalinist regime, for them an enemy is to be trampled underfoot and subjected and made slaves of. I heard one nut today suggest that if North Korea would abandon thier nuclear progam they could be brought back into the international community. Obviously doesn't understand that in world terms NK is a stone age society, it isn't their nuclear program that is the problem, it is their ideology. without reunification with Korea as a democracy, a western aligned democracy there can be no peace. There are 22 million brain washed individuals in North Korea, if the wall comes down and by the wall I mean the demilitarised zone there would be a rush to freedom but there would be a large hard core, the military, who would be loosing their privilages who would fight North Korea is not East Germany and comparisons are false. It took the collapse of the soviet union for sense to prevail in East Germany becuase they were a captive nation but North Korea isn't a captive nation.
I've never been called a Rube before, your credentials are? Eli, Eli, nai erchomai Kurios Iesous.
It makes no sense at all. South Korea cannot be neutral so long as North Korea exists. Should they become neutral NOrth Korea will march across the border as they did before. You obviously don't understand the intent of a stalinist regime, for them an enemy is to be trampled underfoot and subjected and made slaves of. I heard one nut today suggest that if North Korea would abandon thier nuclear progam they could be brought back into the international community. Obviously doesn't understand that in world terms NK is a stone age society, it isn't their nuclear program that is the problem, it is their ideology. without reunification with Korea as a democracy, a western aligned democracy there can be no peace. There are 22 million brain washed individuals in North Korea, if the wall comes down and by the wall I mean the demilitarised zone there would be a rush to freedom but there would be a large hard core, the military, who would be loosing their privilages who would fight North Korea is not East Germany and comparisons are false. It took the collapse of the soviet union for sense to prevail in East Germany becuase they were a captive nation but North Korea isn't a captive nation. Korea will be united either under a dicatorship or a hard transition to a democratic state . Don't know how China feels about that . But if the NORKs are persuaded to behave ,it won't come from intervention from Beijing . The real power broker behind the NORK nuke and missile program is in Tehran. "If you do not take an interest in the affairs of your government, then you are doomed to live under the rule of fools." Plato
It makes no sense at all. South Korea cannot be neutral so long as North Korea exists. You misread paraclete - China would work to fold up and end North Korea and back a unified Korea if and only if Korea emerges as a neutral country with no US bases.
I don't think Iran is this superpower the neocons make it out to be.
Hayseed?
Comments (53 - 57) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#13. To: BobCeleste (#12)
#14. To: TooConservative (#7)
Should we rip out their fingernails?
#15. To: TooConservative (#7)
#16. To: A K A Stone (#10)
I don't think anyone would be soliciting the advice of Oscar the grouch. I mean you live in a trash can.
#17. To: BobCeleste, TooConservative (#12)
(Edited)
#18. To: sneakypete, A K A Stone, Roscoe, BobCeleste, redleghunter, Pericles (#15)
Especially the second one,which I had completely overlooked and ignored. I would only add "TAKE their oil"?
#19. To: TooConservative (#18)
Especially the second one,which I had completely overlooked and ignored. I would only add "TAKE their oil"?
#20. To: TooConservative (#18)
world's oil
#21. To: hondo68 (#0)
(Edited)
#22. To: sneakypete (#19)
I don't doubt it. I just don't go out of my way to pay any attention to anything he is saying because I know he is almost always either lying,nor not really serious.
#23. To: Roscoe, sneakypete, tomder55 (#20)
How globalist of ya.
#24. To: TooConservative (#18)
"then it seems to me it is perfectly legit to ask The Amazing Donaldo for the details of exactly how he intends to do these things."
#25. To: tomder55 (#21)
Trump tried to finesse the answer on eminent domain . I guess he equates building the keystone pipeline with building parking garages for casinos.
#26. To: misterwhite (#24)
We'll sit down with the conquered leaders
#27. To: misterwhite (#24)
We'll sit down with the conquered leaders and negotiate a deal behind closed doors. When the deal is done, it turns out that they wholeheartedly agreed to give us all their oil as compensation.
#28. To: hondo68 (#0)
#29. To: TooConservative (#27)
"The sad thing is that you probably actually believe this."
#30. To: misterwhite (#29)
After that, maybe those mideast countries will think twice about getting us involved.
#31. To: hondo68 (#4)
" Cris Christie told a moving story of ordering pizza and drinking beer. "
#32. To: tomder55 (#21)
" Ben Carson was his usual invisible self "
#33. To: TooConservative (#18)
Viking States of America and pirate the world's oil with our military under the Trump Doctrine
#34. To: TooConservative, sneakypete, A K A Stone, Roscoe, BobCeleste, redleghunter (#18)
f we are going to become the Viking States of America and pirate the world's oil with our military under the Trump Doctrine (and we'll torture anyone we need to in order to get that oil), then it seems to me it is perfectly legit to ask The Amazing Donaldo for the details of exactly how he intends to do these things.
#35. To: Pericles (#34)
#36. To: Pericles (#34)
#37. To: redleghunter (#33)
The internet is amazing.
#38. To: tomder55, Pericles (#35)
But if they push that too far and cause a regime collapse ,they will have a failed state on their border with the probable refugee disaster that Europe is experiencing . .
#39. To: Pericles (#34)
Trump is just talking in the way the rubes can understand.
#40. To: buckeroo (#30)
"I guess the entrapment that Israel imposes upon the USA doesn't count, 'eh?"
#41. To: misterwhite (#40)
#42. To: TooConservative (#38)
I think China would find a way to muzzle their dog if we informed them that, barring immediate action on their part, we would be forced to help our allies in Japan and South Korea (and Taiwan) to implement their own nuclear weapons programs to defend themselves against the Norks.
#43. To: tomder55 (#42)
It won't take Japan long to nuke up .
#44. To: tomder55 (#35)
Do you really think China has much say about what happens in NK ? Whatever influence they have left with the un-Kim is diminishing and most likely already applied .
#45. To: TooConservative (#38)
#46. To: Pericles (#45)
If the USA made a deal saying they would leave South Korea and not be based there and get SK to sign some sort of neutrality treaty then NK would be be done.
#47. To: TooConservative (#46)
(Edited)
If the USA made a deal saying they would leave South Korea and not be based there and get SK to sign some sort of neutrality treaty then NK would be be done. I agree it would make sense.
#48. To: Pericles (#34)
Trump is just talking in the way the rubes can understand.
#49. To: paraclete, TooConservative, Pericles (#47)
If the USA made a deal saying they would leave South Korea and not be based there and get SK to sign some sort of neutrality treaty then NK would be be done. I agree it would make sense. Agreeing by treaty among the major powers that Korea will be a neutral country would be a smart solution for Ukraine too.
#50. To: paraclete, TooConservative (#47)
(Edited)
If the USA made a deal saying they would leave South Korea and not be based there and get SK to sign some sort of neutrality treaty then NK would be be done. I agree it would make sense. Agreeing by treaty among the major powers that Korea will be a neutral country would be a smart solution for Ukraine too.
#51. To: tomder55 (#49)
The real power broker behind the NORK nuke and missile program is in Tehran.
#52. To: BobCeleste (#48)
.
.
.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]