[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Joe Rogan Experience #2138 - Tucker Carlson

Police Dispersing Student Protesters at USC - Breaking News Coverage (College Protests)

What Passover Means For The New Testament Believer

Are We Closer Than Ever To The Next Pandemic?

War in Ukraine Turns on Russia

what happened during total solar eclipse

Israel Attacks Iran, Report Says - LIVE Breaking News Coverage

Earth is Scorched with Heat

Antiwar Activists Chant ‘Death to America’ at Event Featuring Chicago Alderman

Vibe Shift

A stream that makes the pleasant Rain sound.

Older Men - Keep One Foot In The Dark Ages

When You Really Want to Meet the Diversity Requirements

CERN to test world's most powerful particle accelerator during April's solar eclipse

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin

How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End?

What on EARTH is going on in Acts 16:11? New Discovery!

2023 Hottest in over 120 Million Years

2024 and beyond in prophecy

Questions

This Speech Just Broke the Internet

This AMAZING Math Formula Will Teach You About God!


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Corrupt Government
See other Corrupt Government Articles

Title: Police Can Take Your Stuff for No Reason — And the Practice Is on the Rise
Source: VICE News
URL Source: https://news.vice.com/article/polic ... nd-the-practice-is-on-the-rise
Published: Nov 11, 2015
Author: Olivia Becker
Post Date: 2015-11-12 08:28:44 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 473
Comments: 6

In addition to a lot of other things police have the power to do, they can take your cash, cars, and other personal property even if you've never been charged or convicted of a crime  — a practice that has been on the rise in recent years.

This controversial practice is known as civil asset forfeiture. Not only does it allow cops to take your stuff pretty much when they feel like it, the revenue from what they take goes toward those very local law enforcement agencies seizing it. Over the past decade, this practice has gone up nearly sixfold, according to a report released Tuesday by the Institute for Justice, a legal non-profit that focuses on civil liberties protection.

Between 2001 and 2014, the funds from federal forfeitures in the Departments of Justice and Treasury surged 1,000 percent, to a total of $29 billion, according to the IJ report. This happens at both the state and federal level. The federal government and 25 states direct 100 percent of the funds seized in forfeitures to local law enforcement, usually the very ones that carried out the forfeiture. Forty-three states in the US direct almost half of the value seized in forfeitures to funding local law enforcement agencies. Other recipients of the seized funds include education and the federal government.

Forfeiture has been around since the 1700s, when the US did not have an established income tax system, and the government largely relied on the mechanism to fund itself, said David Smith, an attorney and leading expert on asset forfeitures. But it wasn't until the passage of a 1984 law, and subsequent state measures that followed, that allowed the proceeds of forfeitures to go back into law enforcement. Ever since then, "the overall trend is definitely upward," said Smith.

'We don't do that in this country, we don't punish people until we've proven that they're guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.'

This is compounded especially when the budgets of local governments are slashed, prompting law enforcement departments to search elsewhere for funding. Forfeiture is an easy way to do that. For example, Smith pointed toward small municipalities around Los Angeles, such as Pomona and Beverly Hills that "have dramatically increased their forfeiture efforts to make up for tightened law enforcement budgets."

Unlike criminal forfeiture, which only allows the government to take someone's stuff after they have been convicted, civil forfeiture does not require law enforcement to convict or even charge someone with a crime before seizing their property.

"Law enforcement's argument is that this is the way to punish criminals," said Lisa Knepper, a co-author of the IJ report. This would be fine, Knepper added, if we proved that they were criminals already, which is not the case in civil forfeitures. "We don't do that in this country, we don't punish people until we've proven that they're guilty beyond a reasonable doubt."

Watch Is the War on Drugs Working? - The People Speak:

Public reporting on the practice is essentially nonexistent. Only 11 states make information on forfeiture cases publicly available and many do not even collect data on it at all, which means the details of where, how, and when it's used are difficult to come by. But groups like IJ have detected trends on forfeiture based on the information that is made public, Knepper says. For instance, the average amount of cash seized in forfeiture cases is low, usually less than $500.

Smith says forfeiture is especially common in low-income neighborhoods and communities of color, where it is often accompanied by practices like New York City's controversial stop-and-frisk.

When police stop people they've deemed suspicious, "they just take their money and get away with it, because who's stopping them?" said Smith. "Certainly not the police chiefs, who are glad to have the money."

Once someone's property has been seized, "owners must navigate a confusing, complex and often expensive legal process to try to win it back," according to the IJ report. But cases fighting forfeiture are rare, since hiring a lawyer to fight the case often costs far more than the initial amount seized. 

There have been some efforts to limit forfeiture abuse, including reform attempts in Missouri and New Mexico, but they have done little to reign in the practice. In 2000, Congress passed a law that sought to make it easier for people to fight civil asset forfeiture cases but it did not bar law enforcement departments from profiting off the amounts seized, which Smith and Knepper both pointed to as the crux of the problem.

Smith says that if the profit incentive aspect of asset forfeitures was removed, it could be a useful tool for law enforcement. But, he added, the likelihood of that happening, considering the weight of the political power of the district attorney and law enforcement in many of these municipalities, is slim. 

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Deckard (#0)

"Not only does it allow cops to take your stuff pretty much when they feel like it"

Anyone believe that ignorant and ridiculous statement?

misterwhite  posted on  2015-11-12   9:05:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Deckard (#0)

civil forfeiture does not require law enforcement to convict or even charge someone with a crime before seizing their property.

It is theft under a different name. Renaming it licenses it and prohibits its prosecution. It's one of the benefits of living in a society too influenced and entangled by words.

rlk  posted on  2015-11-12   9:10:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: misterwhite (#1) (Edited)

"Not only does it allow cops to take your stuff pretty much when they feel like it"

Anyone believe that ignorant and ridiculous statement?

Man, you really don't fucking get it, do you coplicker?

Cops can pretty much steal anything they want, thanks to state-sanctioned highway robbery.

“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul

In a Cop Culture, the Bill of Rights Doesn’t Amount to Much

Americans who have no experience with, or knowledge of, tyranny believe that only terrorists will experience the unchecked power of the state. They will believe this until it happens to them, or their children, or their friends.
Paul Craig Roberts

Deckard  posted on  2015-11-12   9:12:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Deckard (#3)

"Caps can pretty much steal anything they want, thanks to state-sanctioned highway robbery."

What do you mean "pretty much"? Can they steal anything they want or not?

misterwhite  posted on  2015-11-12   9:21:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: misterwhite (#4)

“Stop & Frisk” Turns in to “Stop & Rob” Cop Caught on Camera Stealing $1,300 From Man

Police Steal $16,000 from Farmer to Finance a Larger Operation to Rob More People

SAPD Cop Caught on His Own Dashcam Stealing Weed, Rifle, & Cash from Couple

Cops Steal $18,000 from a Man, Who Broke NO LAW, Because a Drug Dog Alerted to Cash

“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul

In a Cop Culture, the Bill of Rights Doesn’t Amount to Much

Americans who have no experience with, or knowledge of, tyranny believe that only terrorists will experience the unchecked power of the state. They will believe this until it happens to them, or their children, or their friends.
Paul Craig Roberts

Deckard  posted on  2015-11-12   9:36:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Deckard (#5)

So they were allowed to do that?

misterwhite  posted on  2015-11-12   9:50:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com