United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: These Teens Kept Their Sexting Private, But Cops Found Out. Now They Face Sex Offender Registry, Jail.
Source:
Reason
URL Source: http://reason.com/blog/2015/09/01/t ... s-kept-their-sexting-private-b
Published: Sep 1, 2015
Author: Robby Soave
Post Date: 2015-09-02 10:24:48 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 2769
Comments: 83
Fayetteville, North Carolina, cops have charged 17-year-old Cormega Copening with sexual exploitation of a minor—his girlfriend, who is the same age—because the couple sent each other nude photos of themselves during their relationship. There’s no evidence the photos were ever sent to anyone else, and police only became aware of them because they searched Copening’s phone for unrelated reasons that haven't been specified. Even so, the teen—formerly the starting quarterback at his high school—faces decades on the Sex Offender Registry and up to ten years behind bars if convicted. He’s also been benched from the team while Jack Britt High School investigates the matter. Copening’s girlfriend—who remains unnamed in the news articles—is also facing charges, ABC11 reported. These teen-sexting witch hunts are almost always outrageous; they conflate child pornography with something far less sinister. It’s perfectly normal—and wildly common—for kids to express an interest in sex. Should authority figures discourage underage sexting? Sure. Should they ruin kids’ lives for doing it anyway? Absolutely not. But Copening’s situation is more outrageous than most. As far as I can tell, the pictures weren’t shared with anyone else—this isn’t a case where a boy texted a girl’s nude photos to all of his friends and caused her some considerable public humiliation. The photos were private, and remained that way, until the cops got hold of them. If there’s public humiliation here, police intervention is the cause. Consider as well that Copening reciprocated with photos of his own. Does not a mutual, voluntary exchange of photos undercut the notion that “sexual exploitation” is a factor here? It’s more than a little ridiculous to accuse these two of exploiting each other—although this is precisely what the authorities are doing, I presume (the specific charges against the girlfriend were not reported). Lastly, it bears repeating that these teens were 17. If they had waited until they were 18 to send the photos, no crime would have occurred. Eighteen-year-olds are recognized as fully-autonomous sexual adults. Kylie Jenner, who just turned 18, has been inundated with requests to make a sex tape (indeed, filmmakers began making these requests even before she turned 18). The law, by its very nature, permits no nuance: you are 18, or you’re not. But it’s ridiculous to think that teens are magically transformed into adults on their 18th birthday. Many of them—perhaps Copening and his girlfriend—might be ready for mature relationships that involve sex (or, at least, sexy pictures) prior to the government’s randomly-selected date. There’s one more disturbing angle to this story. If Copening is too young to send pictures of his own body, is he not also too young to be made a social pariah? Don’t news agencies often withhold publication of the names of crime victims when they are underage? Copening is a crime victim, according to the police, but multiple local news agencies reported his name and the full situation. They reported on his suspension from the high school football team. They showed his headshot. They pointed out the likelihood that he will have to register as a sex offender. The criminal charges and possible jail time are the worst consequences of the police investigation, but the smearing of Copening’s name and ruining of his high school experience are also unfortunate outcomes—each of them much worse than the harm from a nude photo swap that would have never come to light if the cops had minded their own business. 
Dreamstime
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 18.
#12. To: Deckard (#0)
Copening’s girlfriend—who remains unnamed in the news articles—is also facing charges, The publicity of this throughout their school, along with the potential legal issues, will certainly be far more harmful to them then whatever direct consequences of the activities themselves. And if the teen school population agrees that the legal repercussions are extreme and unjust, there may well be protesting and sympathies expressed in their favor creating an atmosphere of sexting as a form of protest from kids that otherwise might never do it. Respect for the "law" will take a hit which is bad for society.
Respect for the "law" will take a hit which is bad for society. Of course many of the school's teens will do what they do at that age -- protest/rebel by sexting....and worse. It'll be so cool! "Hey LaQueesha -- here is a pic of my %#$@! Now you send ME a pic of your hot %$#@! We'll show those %$#@!s that WE'LL decide what %$#@! rules and laws we deem &%#@! fair!" NOT a noble hill to die on. If kids who ordinarily wouldn't do it WILL indeed DO it, it would say more about just how our perverse society regards any code of morality to begin with. Even so, the teen—formerly the starting quarterback at his high school—faces decades on the Sex Offender Registry and up to ten years behind bars if convicted. NOT happening. Just a propagandist scenario and scare tactics from the author. There is more to this story than meets the eye. And who cares that the perp is a HS QB? As though he's any MORE special than anyone else??
When I was a teen, the only way one could send naked pics of oneself is to buy a camera and film, set it up with a timer and hope you had the focus correct, pose then pay some stranger to develop it, and then give the only copies away. That's far, far, far more difficult, time consuming and costly than it is in today's digital age. I don't think it's fair to compare the actions of today's teens with any prior generation in history. They aren't the ones who invented cell phone cameras either.
#23. To: Pinguinite (#18)
Aaaah, those were the days. If only we'd had darkrooms :-) That's far, far, far more difficult, time consuming and costly than it is in today's digital age. I don't think it's fair to compare the actions of today's teens with any prior generation in history. They aren't the ones who invented cell phone cameras either. Again, I believe there's way more to this story than what being divulged. We have only ONE side to this story. Best case scenario -- there are two minor-aged love birds flirting and teasing each other with XXX rated stuff. Worst case...could be anything more ominous.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestEven so, the teen—formerly the starting quarterback at his high school—faces decades on the Sex Offender Registry and up to ten years behind bars if convicted. He’s also been benched from the team while Jack Britt High School investigates the matter.
#15. To: Pinguinite (#12)
(Edited)
....If the teen school population agrees that the legal repercussions are extreme and unjust, there may well be protesting and sympathies expressed in their favor creating an atmosphere of sexting as a form of protest from kids that otherwise might never do it.
#18. To: Liberator (#15)
If kids who ordinarily wouldn't do it WILL indeed DO it, it would say more about just how our perverse society regards any code of morality to begin with.
Replies to Comment # 18. When I was a teen, the only way one could send naked pics of oneself is to buy a camera and film, set it up with a timer and hope you had the focus correct, pose then pay some stranger to develop it, and then give the only copies away.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 18.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]