[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
International News Title: The Fire Rises…Germany Calls for Other EU States To Take in “Refugees” Angela Merkel is not a very popular person in much of the European Union, and with the refugee crisis, there are challenges to her popularity even within the Fatherland. Recently, she visited a Muslim colony within Germany, or what is called a refugee center. While there, like most contemporary German leaders, she paused to condemn her own people. [M]rs Merkel was booed and denounced as a traitor by far-Right protesters as she visited the government migrant shelter in the small town of Heidenau, outside Dresden. More than 30 police officers were injured in three nights of running battles with protesters trying to stop asylum-seekers from entering the shelter over the weekend. Germany will help where help is needed. This will require still more strength, Mrs Merkel said. We cannot operate as if we were in a normal situation. We shall succeed only if we break new ground together. Germany takes in by far the most asylum-seekers of any EU state, and expects to host 800,000 this year. [Angela Merkel booed at refugee centre in Germany following far-Right attacks, by Justin Huggler, Telegraph, August 26, 2015] Of course, as you can probably tell from most of the media coverage surrounding the refugee crisis, the moral position the Main Stream Media wants us to take is that every Western nation (and only Western nations, oddly enough) has a responsibility to accept an unlimited number of Syrian refugees. If you question the wisdom of this endeavor, you are on the far Right. Not surprisingly, this stance has made Merkel a hero to many Syrians. In the past few days, glorifying images of German Chancellor Angela Merkel have spread online through Syrian communities. Syrian poet Lukman Derky shared a number of images that praised Merkel, including the one below, which superimposed Merkels face over a romantic poem. [We love you: Angela Merkel becomes an unlikely hero to Syrians online, by Adam Taylor, Washington Post, August 27, 2015] The irony of all of this is that it is Western leaders like Merkel, David Cameron, Francois Hollande, and Barack Obama who are largely responsible for the crisis in Syria because of their stubborn support of a nonexistent moderate democratic opposition to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. Incredibly, Merkel still maintains that Germany and other nations should not even open talks with al-Assad, even after everything that has happened [Merkel aide rules out working with Assad despite rise of Islamic State, Reuters, November 11, 2014]. In Syria and of course in Libya, events have largely played out just as the isolationist far Right predicted, and the so called democratic idealists have enabled incalculable suffering to millions in the Arab world. Meanwhile, back in Europe, signaling virtue, appealing to the MSM, and moral preening is all very well, but no one actually believes the core nation of the European Union is actually going to benefit by the addition of hundreds of thousands of Muslim refugees. Even Merkel doesnt really believe it. Germany called on Sunday for other European Union states to take in more refugees, saying it could not go on absorbing a disproportionate share of the thousands of asylum seekers arriving in the bloc. Germany expects the number of asylum seekers it receives to quadruple to about 800,000 this yeara figure confirmed by Interior Minister Thomas de Maiziere on Sunday. However, two state premiers said the total could hit 1 million in 2015. Some European governments have refused to take in refugees and resisted EU proposals to agree a common plan to do more to deal with the crisis, which is intensifying due to a surge in migrants fleeing war and poverty in Africa, Asia and the Middle East. If Europe has solidarity and we have also shown solidarity towards others, then we need to show solidarity now, Chancellor Angela Merkel told reporters in Berlin. [Germany seeks more European solidarity on refugee crisis, Newsweek, August 30, 2015] But I thought this was a simple moral question? Arent these refugees a blessing to the German people anyway? And even if theyre not, they are poor and desperate and Germany is rich and safe, so shouldnt Germans just let in as many as need help? Implicit in all of this is the admission that refugees are a liability to the host country, and the more refugees, the greater the liability. And there are signs that Merkel and other leaders may be planning to use the refugee crisis they helped (deliberately?) create to force even more centralization in the dysfunctional European Union. Germanys Thomas de Maiziere, Britains Theresa May and Frances Bernard Cazeneuve held talks on Saturday on the issue, on the sidelines of a meeting in Paris on transport security. The trio underlined the necessity to take immediate action to deal with the challenge from the migrant influx. They also called for reception centres to be set up urgently in Italy and Greece in order to register new arrivals, and for a common EU list of safe countries of origin to be established. [EU to hold crisis talks on refugees, Al Jazeera, August 31, 2015] During the early years of the American Republic, Alexander Hamilton used the issue of the federal debt to bind the disparate states together into a more centralized federal government. It appears the European Union is trying the same trick, only with human liabilities and with far less promise of a beneficial outcome. The European Union is becoming a suicide pact. The countries that will survive into the next century are those who ignore the Brussels bureaucracys attempt to yoke all of Europe together into a demographic death spiral. Luckily, some nations, such as Hungary, are already showing such resistance. On the other hand, Czech president Milos Zeman has an idea about how European unity would actually be useful in confronting the invasion. Speaking to Czech ambassadors at Prague castle, Zeman regretted that Frontex, the EU border-control agency, has only three unarmed ships and a few armed ships to patrol the Mediterranean. The EUs fundamental lack is a lack of will for a common border protection, Zeman said. Today, a common European army would come in handy to address the issue, he added. [Czech Republic advocates use of army to protect borders, by Eric Maurice, EU Observer, August 25, 2015] If people like Zeman were in charge, maybe a strong European Union wouldnt be such a bad idea. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest
#1. To: nativist nationalist (#0)
Refugees should be taken by the countries that overthrew regimes in Libya, Iraq, Kosovo, Ukraine, Syria etc ... In proportion to their input.
I wonder how many the U.S. has already taken from those places? Si vis pacem, para bellum
European politicians insist on taking their nations in directions destructive to the people and the nations that elected them. It sounds like what is happening in America.
Ok,so take that label and OWN it as something to be proud of,and then start hammering the appeasers as "Far Leftists" and "Traitors to national sovereignty" People who play kissy-face with their natural enemies NEVER win. Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
Easy to answer. "Too damn many". We should send them back with a gun in their hands and tell them if they don't like the conditions in their homeland,to change it there and not come to OUR homeland and expect US to change to suit them. Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
Only because that IS what is happening in America. It's the globalist bankers that are behind this because in order for them to take over the world they MUST first destroy all independent forms of government. Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
Solidarity... Solidarity toward what? Solidarity toward achieving cultural and political suicide!
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|