[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

[FULL VIDEO] Police release bodycam footage of Monroe County District Attorney Sandra Doorley traffi

Police clash with pro-Palestine protesters on Ohio State University campus

Joe Rogan Experience #2138 - Tucker Carlson

Police Dispersing Student Protesters at USC - Breaking News Coverage (College Protests)

What Passover Means For The New Testament Believer

Are We Closer Than Ever To The Next Pandemic?

War in Ukraine Turns on Russia

what happened during total solar eclipse

Israel Attacks Iran, Report Says - LIVE Breaking News Coverage

Earth is Scorched with Heat

Antiwar Activists Chant ‘Death to America’ at Event Featuring Chicago Alderman

Vibe Shift

A stream that makes the pleasant Rain sound.

Older Men - Keep One Foot In The Dark Ages

When You Really Want to Meet the Diversity Requirements

CERN to test world's most powerful particle accelerator during April's solar eclipse

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin

How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End?

What on EARTH is going on in Acts 16:11? New Discovery!

2023 Hottest in over 120 Million Years

2024 and beyond in prophecy

Questions


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: Carly Fiorina camp goes to war with the RNC
Source: Politico
URL Source: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/ ... nc-main-debate-cnn-121757.html
Published: Aug 26, 2015
Author: Steven Shepard
Post Date: 2015-08-27 12:56:44 by nolu chan
Keywords: None
Views: 4597
Comments: 55

Carly Fiorina camp goes to war with the RNC

The Republican businesswoman is crying foul over possibly being left off the next main debate stage. The RNC’s response — tough luck.

By Steven Shepard

8/26/15 8:38 AM EDT Updated 8/26/15 10:41 PM EDT

The first GOP presidential candidate to go to war publicly with the Republican National Committee is not Donald Trump. It’s Carly Fiorina.

Faced with the very real possibility that she will again be relegated to a lower-tier debate, Fiorina’s campaign is going after the RNC and the news organization the committee picked to host the next debate, CNN.

What has ensued is a tense back-and-forth, with Fiorina’s camp charging that the RNC should be doing more to ensure that the debate stage represents the true top 10 candidates, and the RNC saying tough luck, the rules are set.

Fiorina, the only female candidate in the GOP field, has surged in the polls since a widely praised performance in the “happy hour” debate earlier this month. But she has a problem: There haven’t been enough polls to catapult Fiorina from 14th place, where she stood going into that debate, into the top 10 ranking for CNN’s Sept. 16 debate.

That’s because CNN — unlike Fox News, which used only the final five polls released before its debate — outlined criteria this spring in which it said it would average the results of polls released between July 16 and Sept. 10. And of the 10 polls that currently qualify for inclusion in CNN’s average, eight were conducted before the first debate.

The Fiorina campaign’s solution? Since CNN has already said it will use all the polls, it should weight down the older surveys and weight up the post-debate polls — and the RNC should make sure that happens.

“The RNC should ask CNN to treat the polling in July the same as the polling that comes after,” said Sarah Isgur Flores, Fiorina’s deputy campaign manager, in a Medium post. “Because there were nine polls released in the three weeks before the last debate, one would expect 18 polls released in the six weeks between the two debates. If that does not happen, the polling average of those six weeks should be treated as the equivalent of 18 polls. Assuming the numbers remain consistent with current polling, Carly would easily place in the top 10 for the main debate.”

[snip]

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 43.

#5. To: nolu chan (#0)

That’s because CNN ... outlined criteria this spring in which it said it would average the results of polls released between July 16 and Sept. 10.

And she agreed. Now she wants to change the rules (though I'm sure she'd scream bloody murder if another candidate tried this).

That's real Presidential, Carly. No wonder they kicked you out at HP.

misterwhite  posted on  2015-08-27   13:39:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: misterwhite (#5)

Now she wants to change the rules

That's what a politician does for a living: lawmaking is merely the process of writing new rules.

Vicomte13  posted on  2015-08-27   13:53:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Vicomte13 (#6)

"That's what a politician does for a living: lawmaking is merely the process of writing new rules."

1) Laws are written by Congress. She's running for President.

2) Laws are written according to the will of the people, not the will of the politicians.

3) Writing new rules in mid-stream which favor the rule-writer is not lawmaking. It's cheating.

misterwhite  posted on  2015-08-27   14:39:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: misterwhite (#11)

1) Laws are written by Congress. She's running for President.

2) Laws are written according to the will of the people, not the will of the politicians.

3) Writing new rules in mid-stream which favor the rule-writer is not lawmaking. It's cheating.

(1) Laws - things that have the force of law - have always been created by courts - that is what the Common Law is. Statutory law is written by Congress. Regulatory law is written by the Executive branch. It's all law.

(2) Laws always have been, and always will be, nothing more than the opinions of the legislator. In America, the people choose the legislators, but the legislators legislate according to their own opinions. If the people don't like what they've done, they can replace them in the next election. Other than in ballot initiatives at the state level, the people never write laws directly, and the laws are only "by their will" through a very attenuated pretense.

(3) All changes to all rules is always mid-stream.

Vicomte13  posted on  2015-08-27   16:53:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: Vicomte13 (#16)

(1) Laws - things that have the force of law - have always been created by courts

Nope. Common Law is simply stare decisis -- a court decision made on case law or precedent. Our courts do not write new laws.

That said, a judge can certainly reinterpret statutory law or existing common law (eg., the Kelo decision), but that is usually looked upon negatively as judicial activism.

"Regulatory law is written by the Executive branch."

Executive orders are limited to the implementation and enforcement of statutory laws written by Congress.

misterwhite  posted on  2015-08-28   9:52:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: misterwhite (#33)

Nope. Common Law is simply stare decisis -- a court decision made on case law or precedent. Our courts do not write new laws.

All of our original law came from Common Law. It was codified later by statutes that sometimes changed it. The equitable power of courts makes the law for the case, and makes the law for the lower courts.

How the courts rule determines what the law actually is.

The Supreme Court made the current abortion law of America. Legislatures and Executives have no power to override the Supreme Court's imposition of abortion law. They have tried, and the Supreme Court has struck them down and cleared off their competing law every time.

Law doesn't work according to the simplistic lines in civics books. It's more complicated than that.

Vicomte13  posted on  2015-08-28   10:53:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: Vicomte13 (#35)

"The Supreme Court made the current abortion law of America."

Just the opposite. They told legislators across the country that writing laws banning abortion violated a woman's right to privacy protected by the U.S. Constitution.

This is the judicial activism I was referring to.

misterwhite  posted on  2015-08-28   11:01:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#43. To: misterwhite (#38)

This is the judicial activism I was referring to.

The American Constitution lends itself to an activist Supreme Court, and the American system is structured around that. Judges make laws here.

Vicomte13  posted on  2015-08-28   13:19:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 43.

#52. To: Vicomte13 (#43)

"The American Constitution lends itself to an activist Supreme Court, and the American system is structured around that. Judges make laws here."

The U.S. Constitution created three co-equal branches of government. It wasn't until 1803, in Marbury v. Madison, that the U.S. Supreme Court assigned itself sole responsibility for interpreting the constitution.

misterwhite  posted on  2015-08-29 11:08:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 43.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com