[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Police clash with pro-Palestine protesters on Ohio State University campus

Joe Rogan Experience #2138 - Tucker Carlson

Police Dispersing Student Protesters at USC - Breaking News Coverage (College Protests)

What Passover Means For The New Testament Believer

Are We Closer Than Ever To The Next Pandemic?

War in Ukraine Turns on Russia

what happened during total solar eclipse

Israel Attacks Iran, Report Says - LIVE Breaking News Coverage

Earth is Scorched with Heat

Antiwar Activists Chant ‘Death to America’ at Event Featuring Chicago Alderman

Vibe Shift

A stream that makes the pleasant Rain sound.

Older Men - Keep One Foot In The Dark Ages

When You Really Want to Meet the Diversity Requirements

CERN to test world's most powerful particle accelerator during April's solar eclipse

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin

How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End?

What on EARTH is going on in Acts 16:11? New Discovery!

2023 Hottest in over 120 Million Years

2024 and beyond in prophecy

Questions

This Speech Just Broke the Internet


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Watching The Cops
See other Watching The Cops Articles

Title: Video: Ohio cop indicted on murder charge in shooting Officer has said he was dragged by suspect's car and was forced to shoot
Source: Associated Press
URL Source: [None]
Published: Jul 30, 2015
Author: By Lisa Cornwell Associated Press
Post Date: 2015-07-30 10:39:43 by GrandIsland
Keywords: None
Views: 33732
Comments: 189

CINCINNATI — A University of Cincinnati officer who shot a motorist during a traffic stop over a missing front license plate was indicted Wednesday on a murder charge, with a prosecutor saying the officer "purposely killed him" and "should never have been a police officer." Hamilton County Prosecutor Joe Deters announced the grand jury indictment at a news conference to discuss developments in the investigation into the July 19 shooting of 43-year-old motorist Samuel DuBose by Officer Ray Tensing. Authorities have said Tensing spotted a car driven by DuBose and missing the front license plate, which is required by Ohio law. They say Tensing stopped the car and a struggle ensued after DuBose refused to provide a driver's license and get out of the car. Tensing, 25, has said he was dragged by the car and forced to shoot at DuBose. He fired once, striking DuBose in the head. But Deters dismissed Tensing's claim that he was dragged by the car and suggested that he shouldn't have pulled DuBose over to begin with. "He fell backward after he shot (DuBose) in the head," Deters said, adding that it was a "chicken crap" traffic stop. On footage released from the body-camera video Wednesday, the officer could be heard asking for DuBose's driver's license several times with DuBose at one point saying he had one. Later, DuBose said, "But I don't think I have it on me." Tensing asks DuBose to unbuckle his seat belt. About that time Tensing pulls on the door handle, and DuBose puts his hand on the door to keep it closed. Then the video becomes shaky, but a gunshot can be heard and DuBose appears to be slumped in the seat before the car rolls away, coming to stop at a nearby corner. The University of Cincinnati said it fired Tensing after his indictment. Tensing turned himself in Wednesday afternoon at the Hamilton County Justice Center and was processed on charges of murder and voluntary manslaughter. Tensing's attorney, Stewart Mathews, didn't return phone messages seeking comment after the indictment announcement. Mathews said earlier Wednesday that he thought an indictment was likely "given the political climate" and comments made by city officials. But Mathews said given the evidence he's seen, he doesn't believe there should be an indictment. DuBose's death comes amid months of national scrutiny of police dealings with African-Americans, especially those killed by officers. DuBose was black. Tensing is white. Authorities haven't indicated whether race was a part of the investigation. Body-camera video of the shooting was also released Wednesday. DuBose's family had been pressing for its release, and news organizations including The Associated Press had sued Deters to get it released under Ohio open records law, but Deters released it before any ruling had been made. Deters called the shooting "senseless" and "asinine." "He purposely killed him," Deters said. "He should never have been a police officer." The prosecutor also said he thought it was time to reconsider the UC police department's role. "I don't think a university should be in the policing business," Deters said. A message for comment was left Wednesday with the police department. The university said earlier this week it plans an independent review of its police department's policies. The UC officer made the traffic stop near the university's main campus, and UC police have said the intersection was within the campus police's jurisdiction. The University of Cincinnati on Wednesday closed its main campus in anticipation of grand jury action in the case. Mark O'Mara, attorney for DuBose's family, called for a "peaceful and nonaggressive" response from the community after the officer's indictment. O'Mara said the family wanted a peaceful reaction because "Sam was a peaceful person." Tensing has more than five years of experience in law enforcement and has worked as a University of Cincinnati police officer since April 2014, said Jason Goodrich, UC police chief. His annual performance review this April noted that he was extremely strong in the traffic area and maintains control of his weapons and of "situations he is involved in." Tensing formerly worked as an officer in the small Cincinnati suburban village of Greenhills. Deters said when he saw the video of the shooting, he was shocked. "I feel so sorry for this family and what they lost," Deters said. "And I feel sorry for the community, too." If convicted, Tensing could face up to life in prison.


Poster Comment:

Deckard is losing his mind. He spends time posting garbage by Free Thought Project, where most of the shit he posts has to be written in such a bias way to give the appearance of police misconduct, AND HERE IS A CLEAR CASE OF A BAD OFFICER INVOLVED SHOOTING... and Deckard doesn't post it. Well I will. This officer should be wood chipped. Hopefully someone here can post the VIDEO... you'll cringe watching it.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 63.

#4. To: GrandIsland (#0)

AND HERE IS A CLEAR CASE OF A BAD OFFICER INVOLVED SHOOTING... and Deckard doesn't post it.

Yeah, I was going to post a thread, thinking the same thing.

You suppose FreeThoughtProject is going to feature this story? I think it will fall into a dusty corner of their newsroom and never be heard from again.


Tooconservative  posted on  2015-07-30   11:24:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: TooConservative (#4)

Here's the full video. Listen to the exchange at 4:20 (just three minutes after the shooting) -- "He was dragging me. Yeah, I saw that."

Another officer's body cam shows him (at :55) knocked to the ground:

The truth? I don't know. But there's enough just in the video for reasonable doubt. If he gets a fair trial with an impartial jury.

But white-cop-black-victim? I agree with his attorney. Everyone is throwing him under the bus.

misterwhite  posted on  2015-07-30   11:48:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: misterwhite (#7)

Another officer's body cam shows him (at :55) knocked to the ground:

It shows him getting up off the ground. "Knocked to the ground" it does not show. At least in this video. He may have simply lost his balance in the scuffle and in firing his weapon.

The window seems to be wide open. How then, did he managed to be dragged? Further, at the instant of shooting, it seems the camera was to the front left of the driver. If he was already being dragged at that point, I'd expect the camera angle to reflect that. As it is, it appears he fired before the car even started moving, and certainly before any dragging, if any, occurred.

As for his being "thrown under the bus", due to the national politics surrounding white on black police shootings, that's very possible. Though the opposite bias has also occurred quite frequently, where police killings are exonerated out of probably legal reasons of avoiding or reducing the risk of civil payouts.

But indicted does not mean guilty. Just means there will be a trial to closely examine everything. When there is doubt as to someone's innocence, what is wrong with that?

Pinguinite  posted on  2015-07-30   13:43:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Pinguinite (#11)

"It shows him getting up off the ground. "Knocked to the ground" it does not show. At least in this video. He may have simply lost his balance in the scuffle and in firing his weapon."

Perhaps. But it is consistent with his story. I'm sure the jurors will discuss that.

"How then, did he managed to be dragged?"

Don't know. Caught in the steering wheel? Perhaps the driver grabbed his arm?

"As it is, it appears he fired before the car even started moving, and certainly before any dragging, if any, occurred."

That's the main problem with body cams. Suddenly they're the final word and common sense goes out the window.

Because he's so close to the car, the camera is only focused on the car. If he's being dragged, he and the camera and the car are all moving together at the same speed. That's what the camera shows. He fires, then frees himself of the car.

On the video I posted he tells the other cop he was dragged. The other cop says, "Yeah. I saw that." You're saying we should ignore that exchange?

misterwhite  posted on  2015-07-30   14:07:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: misterwhite (#12)

Perhaps. But it is consistent with his story.

Which means he should stick with it.

Caught in the steering wheel? Perhaps the driver grabbed his arm?

It is, IMO, quite disingenuous for a cop to place himself in a dangerous situation, and then use that situation to justify killing someone to get him out of the dangerous situation he put himself into.

What would he reasonably hope to accomplish by sticking his arm into the car, especially when dealing with only a traffic violation?

That's the main problem with body cams. Suddenly they're the final word and common sense goes out the window.

Common sense went out the window long before body cams came around. It's just that with body & dash cams, people are less likely to simply accept the officer's word on what happened, as it should be. This is not saying they should ignore the cop's version of events. It just shouldn't be presumed to be gospel.

Because he's so close to the car, the camera is only focused on the car. If he's being dragged, he and the camera and the car are all moving together at the same speed. That's what the camera shows. He fires, then frees himself of the car.

At the moment of shooting, the camera is quite obviously higher than the top of the door. If this is a chest cam, it's apparent then that the cop's chest is also above the level of the door. If he was literally being "dragged" that by definition means the cop was not standing on his feet, in which case the camera would have been below the top of the door, and would not have caught footage of the shooting as it did.

Ergo, I think it's plain to see that he could not have been in the process of being dragged at the time of the shooting. Perhaps he was briefly after the shooting, but not before and not at the time of shooting. No way.

On the video I posted he tells the other cop he was dragged. The other cop says, "Yeah. I saw that." You're saying we should ignore that exchange?

No, don't ignore it. But the cop is not even stating what he saw in his own words, and 2) As at least an associate of the cop in question, personal bias exists tainting his agreement. In such situations, there's the temptation to play CYA (Cover Your Ass) and making such comments when recorded is a great way to start doing that, both for you and your friends.

Pinguinite  posted on  2015-07-30   21:15:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: Pinguinite, misterwhite, GrandIsland (#32)

On the video I posted he tells the other cop he was dragged. The other cop says, "Yeah. I saw that."

If someone is actually being dragged by a car, you don't have to ask them.

You'll notice that this alibi cop is now nowhere to be found. Meaning that someone made him back off the alibi. So that means he was just agreeing to collude in an alibi for a bad shooting or the powers-that-be (local police chief, prosecutor) have threatened him to perjure himself and go along with throwing the shooter cop to the wolves. Which doesn't sound all that likely to me.

The exchange between the shooter cop and the alibi cop sounds more like colluding on an alibi after shooting someone in the head over a missing front plate.

His first thought after only a few seconds was an alibi for himself. It may not prove consciousness of guilt but it certainly makes the cop sound more suspicious, not less.

Exactly how was this cop being dragged while at arm's length from the driver's door? Was his wristwatch hooked over the door lock post? Did he get a hangnail caught in the door handle? What?

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-07-31   7:57:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: TooConservative (#33)

"If someone is actually being dragged by a car, you don't have to ask them."

He didn't. He told him what happened and the cop said, "Yeah. I saw that."

"So that means he was just agreeing to collude in an alibi for a bad shooting"

Really? Jeopardizing his career for a campus cop? He didn't have to say anything.

"after shooting someone in the head over a missing front plate."

That's why he was shot? For a missing front plate? I thought that's why he was pulled over.

misterwhite  posted on  2015-07-31   12:48:56 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: misterwhite (#37)

That's why he was shot? For a missing front plate? I thought that's why he was pulled over.

Are you suggesting the cop would have shot him anyway just for driving past?

Of course not. And, yes, he did get shot as a direct result of being stopped for a missing front plate.

If there was an outstanding warrant for a serious crime, maybe that would have justified shooting him when he attempted to flee, like an armed robbery or murder warrant. But the crime would have to be serious to allow for such a shooting of a driver for whom the cop/executioner had no actual ID to search for warrants on.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-07-31   13:34:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#41. To: TooConservative (#39)

You would not believe how many cars I see on a daily basis in Ohio that don't have a front license plate, I counted over 30 on my way home from work yesterday.

CZ82  posted on  2015-07-31   14:03:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#49. To: CZ82, Too Conservative (#41)

"You would not believe how many cars I see on a daily basis in Ohio that don't have a front license plate"

Given that none of Ohio's border states requires a front license plate, it could very well be that those cars were from a neighboring state.

misterwhite  posted on  2015-07-31   15:12:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#63. To: misterwhite, Too Conservative (#49)

Given that none of Ohio's border states requires a front license plate, it could very well be that those cars were from a neighboring state.

All but 2 had Ohio plates on the back of the car and most of them didn't even have a place to mount a front plate.

CZ82  posted on  2015-07-31   20:30:59 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 63.

        There are no replies to Comment # 63.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 63.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com