[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Israel Attacks Iran, Report Says - LIVE Breaking News Coverage

Earth is Scorched with Heat

Antiwar Activists Chant ‘Death to America’ at Event Featuring Chicago Alderman

Vibe Shift

A stream that makes the pleasant Rain sound.

Older Men - Keep One Foot In The Dark Ages

When You Really Want to Meet the Diversity Requirements

CERN to test world's most powerful particle accelerator during April's solar eclipse

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin

How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End?

What on EARTH is going on in Acts 16:11? New Discovery!

2023 Hottest in over 120 Million Years

2024 and beyond in prophecy

Questions

This Speech Just Broke the Internet

This AMAZING Math Formula Will Teach You About God!

The GOSPEL of the ALIENS | Fallen Angels | Giants | Anunnaki

The IMAGE of the BEAST Revealed (REV 13) - WARNING: Not for Everyone

WEF Calls for AI to Replace Voters: ‘Why Do We Need Elections?’

The OCCULT Burger king EXPOSED

PANERA BREAD Antichrist message EXPOSED

The OCCULT Cheesecake Factory EXPOSED


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Education
See other Education Articles

Title: Colorado Court Rules Use of Public Funds for Private Schools Is Unconstitutional
Source: NY Times
URL Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/30/u ... -is-unconstitutional.html?_r=0
Published: Jun 30, 2015
Author: JACK HEALY and MOTOKO RICH
Post Date: 2015-06-30 10:25:16 by Willie Green
Keywords: None
Views: 2225
Comments: 18

DENVER — Colorado’s highest court on Monday struck down a voucher program that allowed parents in a conservative suburban school district to use taxpayer dollars to send their children to private schools.

The split decision to throw out the voucher program in Douglas County, Colorado’s third-largest school district, was a blow to conservative education advocates and those who want to redefine public education to funnel tax dollars directly to families who then choose the type of schooling they want for their children.

The state’s Supreme Court ruled against the district’s voucher program, which was passed in 2011, saying it violated a plank of the State Constitution that explicitly prevents public money from going to schools “controlled by any church or sectarian denomination whatsoever.”

“This stark constitutional provision makes one thing clear,” Colorado’s chief justice, Nancy E. Rice, wrote in the court’s opinion. “A school district may not aid religious schools.”

The ruling’s immediate effect will be to prevent the district from giving vouchers to families to send their children to any private school, including secular ones. The court’s decision will also stop other school districts around Colorado from pursuing similar voucher programs.

School officials in Douglas County, just south of Denver, signaled that the district would appeal the case directly to the United States Supreme Court, with the hopes of weakening laws here and in other states that block public money from flowing to religious schools. More than a decade ago, the federal Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution could not prohibit the use of public vouchers to pay for religious schools in Cleveland.

Douglas County’s voucher program, called the Choice Scholarship Pilot Program, created 500 scholarships of about $4,570 each. The funds could have gone to any of 23 district-approved “private school partners” — 16 of which were religious.

The vouchers were at the heart of a series of conservative reforms that have transformed Douglas County into an educational battleground in recent years, pitting teachers’ unions, civil liberties groups and liberal parents against conservative families, a majority conservative school board and a group backed by the billionaire conservative Koch brothers.

In addition to vouchers, Douglas County’s school board has embraced merit-based teacher pay and charter schools. Conservative supporters say the policies have put the district in the vanguard of school reforms. Opponents say the efforts are chipping away at pillars of public education and have made Douglas County a hostile place for teachers.

With the court’s decision on Monday, the state’s largest teachers’ union claimed victory. “We’re incredibly gratified that the state’s Supreme Court recognized that public dollars should stay in public schools,” said Kerrie Dallman, president of the Colorado Education Association.

Many states are moving forward with programs that allow families to apply public money toward private school tuition. According to the American Federation for Children, a nonprofit group that supports school vouchers, there are now 46 programs in 23 states and Washington, D.C. They include tax credit scholarships, in which private individuals or companies can earn tax credits for donating to scholarship funds, and education savings accounts that allow families to use tax dollars to pay for a range of educational services, including private schools, tutors and home schooling materials.

In Colorado, opponents challenged the vouchers soon after they were approved, halting the program as the lawsuit moved through the court system. Civil liberties groups that hailed Monday’s ruling said it drew a clear border between public money and private faith.

“Parents are free to send their children to private religious schools if they wish, but the Colorado Supreme Court affirmed today that taxpayers should not be forced to pay for it,” read a statement by Mark Silverstein, legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Colorado, which represented some of the challengers.

But proponents of vouchers said the religious-funding prohibitions in Colorado discriminated against families on the basis of religion, and violated their constitutional rights.

“The question now is whether a state can specifically target and exclude” religious schools from getting voucher funds, said Michael Bindas, a senior attorney at the Institute for Justice, which represented parents fighting for the vouchers.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Willie Green (#0)

DENVER — Colorado’s highest court on Monday struck down a voucher program that allowed parents in a conservative suburban school district to use taxpayer dollars to send their children to private schools.

Shouldn't that be, "... a voucher program that allowed parents taxpayers in a conservative suburban school district to use taxpayer dollars to send their children to private schools"?

misterwhite  posted on  2015-06-30   10:30:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Willie Green (#0)

“Parents are free to send their children to private religious schools if they wish, but the Colorado Supreme Court affirmed today that taxpayers should not be forced to pay for it,”

Great! Using that same logic, those parents who send their children to non- public schools should not be forced to pay for public schools.

Right?

misterwhite  posted on  2015-06-30   10:33:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Willie Green (#0)

Bull. S***.

The monopoly, the subversive swindle that has "public school" is itself....UN-CONSTITUTIONAL.

Liberator  posted on  2015-06-30   10:49:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: misterwhite, Willie Green (#2)

Great! Using that same logic, those parents who send their children to non- public schools should not be forced to pay for public schools.

Right?

*SWOOSH* (Nothing but net.)

Don't expect Willie or ANY liberal to refute that kind of clear-headed logic.

Liberator  posted on  2015-06-30   10:50:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: misterwhite, releghunter, CZ82, Stoner, Bob Celeste, We The People (#2)

“Parents are free to send their children to private religious schools if they wish, but the Colorado Supreme Court affirmed today that taxpayers should not be forced to pay for it,”

How much longer must We-the-Sane be compelled to keep on swallowing this propagandist swill? Once again, we allow an activist court of a few subverted judges to supersede and side-step the Peoples' authority on matters of law which should be decided through LEGISLATION.

The parents ARE "taxpayers"! OUR taxes are confiscated as the Indoctrinaires teach Commie 101, Hate Whitey 101, Sodomy 101, and Victimhood & Oppression 101 -- yet, these fascists believe we ought to be DOUBLE taxed for rejecting their Leftist, perverted indoctrination masquerading as "education"??

Enough is a enough!

Liberator  posted on  2015-06-30   11:01:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Liberator (#5)

"yet, these fascists believe we ought to be DOUBLE taxed"

The bulk of my property taxes go to the school district. I have no children attending school. Yet I pay.

Now, the same people who see nothing wrong with that are the first ones to support say, a toll road, using the argument, "Only the people using the road will pay for the road. And that's fair".

misterwhite  posted on  2015-06-30   11:17:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: misterwhite (#2)

Using that same logic, those parents who send their children to non- public schools should not be forced to pay for public schools.

Who would pay for public schools for children whose parents who do not pay for any school? They have to take your money before they can redistribute it.

nolu chan  posted on  2015-06-30   13:36:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Liberator (#5)

How much longer must We-the-Sane be compelled to keep on swallowing this propagandist swill? Once again, we allow an activist court of a few subverted judges to supersede and side-step the Peoples' authority on matters of law which should be decided through LEGISLATION.

You would let your taxes pay for a Sharia Muslim school?

Pericles  posted on  2015-06-30   13:39:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: nolu chan (#7)

"Who would pay for public schools for children whose parents who do not pay for any school?"

Probably the same people who pay for the healthcare of children whose parents who do not pay for any healthcare.

misterwhite  posted on  2015-06-30   13:42:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Pericles (#8)

You would let your taxes pay for a Sharia Muslim school?

On what insane basis?

Liberator  posted on  2015-06-30   13:47:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: nolu chan (#7)

They have to take your money before they can redistribute it.

Under the guise of "The greater good." (as only Fascist-Dems and statists see it.)

Liberator  posted on  2015-06-30   13:48:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Liberator (#10)

Colorado’s highest court on Monday struck down a voucher program that allowed parents in a conservative suburban school district to use taxpayer dollars to send their children to private schools.

The state’s Supreme Court ruled against the district’s voucher program, which was passed in 2011, saying it violated a plank of the State Constitution that explicitly prevents public money from going to schools “controlled by any church or sectarian denomination whatsoever

Do you read English?

Pericles  posted on  2015-06-30   13:49:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: misterwhite (#6) (Edited)

The bulk of my property taxes go to the school district. I have no children attending school. Yet I pay.

Now, the same people who see nothing wrong with that are the first ones to support say, a toll road, using the argument, "Only the people using the road will pay for the road. And that's fair".

Can you be more specific about your point? Do you favor compulsory taxation of a public school system that indoctrinates leftist-socialist "education"? WHILE enjoying a unionized monopoly? It's insane. And no, I do NOT believe the school tax is a fair system. It provides NO choice.

Public roads are not biased...unless ALL roads lead into Camden or Baltimore ;-)

Liberator  posted on  2015-06-30   13:55:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Pericles (#12)

What part of "court" or "activist judiciary" don't you understand?

STATES. LEGISLATURES. ENACT. STATE. LAWS.

(Hello.)

Liberator  posted on  2015-06-30   13:57:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Pericles (#8)

You would let your taxes pay for a Sharia Muslim school?

Again I will ask -- ON WHAT BASIS WHATSOEVER?? Are you able to answer this simple request?

Liberator  posted on  2015-06-30   13:59:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Liberator (#13)

"Do you favor compulsory taxation of a public school system that indoctrinates leftist-socialist "education"?

Based on my post, did I give you the impression that I'd favor compulsory taxation of a public school system that indoctrinates conservative education?

Two separate issues.

misterwhite  posted on  2015-06-30   14:04:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: Liberator (#15)

You would let your taxes pay for a Sharia Muslim school?

Again I will ask -- ON WHAT BASIS WHATSOEVER?? Are you able to answer this simple request?

If the law allows for tax payer funded vouchers to private religious schools that means Muslim sharia schools can get them also. I did not think I would have to spell it out to you.

Pericles  posted on  2015-06-30   14:20:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Liberator (#11)

Under the guise of "The greater good."

For the children. It is a moral imperative.

nolu chan  posted on  2015-06-30   15:49:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com