[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"Analysis: The Final State of the Presidential Race"

He’ll, You Pieces of Garbage

The Future of Warfare -- No more martyrdom!

"Kamala’s Inane Talking Points"

"The Harris Campaign Is Testament to the Toxicity of Woke Politics"

Easy Drywall Patch

Israel Preparing NEW Iran Strike? Iran Vows “Unimaginable” Response | Watchman Newscast

In Logansport, Indiana, Kids are Being Pushed Out of Schools After Migrants Swelled County’s Population by 30%: "Everybody else is falling behind"

Exclusive — Bernie Moreno: We Spend $110,000 Per Illegal Migrant Per Year, More than Twice What ‘the Average American Makes’

Florida County: 41 of 45 People Arrested for Looting after Hurricanes Helene and Milton are Noncitizens

Presidential race: Is a Split Ticket the only Answer?

hurricanes and heat waves are Worse

'Backbone of Iran's missile industry' destroyed by IAF strikes on Islamic Republic

Joe Rogan Experience #2219 - Donald Trump

IDF raids Hezbollah Radwan Forces underground bases, discovers massive cache of weapons

Gallant: ‘After we strike in Iran,’ the world will understand all of our training

The Atlantic Hit Piece On Trump Is A Psy-Op To Justify Post-Election Violence If Harris Loses

Six Al Jazeera journalists are Hamas, PIJ terrorists

Judge Aileen Cannon, who tossed Trump's classified docs case, on list of proposed candidates for attorney general

Iran's Assassination Program in Europe: Europe Goes Back to Sleep

Susan Olsen says Brady Bunch revival was cancelled because she’s MAGA.

Foreign Invaders crisis cost $150B in 2023, forcing some areas to cut police and fire services: report

Israel kills head of Hezbollah Intelligence.

Tenn. AG reveals ICE released thousands of ‘murderers and rapists’ from detention centers into US streets

Kamala Harris Touts Mass Amnesty Offering Fast-Tracked Citizenship to Nearly Every Illegal Alien in U.S.

Migration Crisis Fueled Rise in Tuberculosis Cases Study Finds

"They’re Going to Try to Kill Trump Again"

"Dems' Attempts at Power Grab Losing Their Grip"

"Restoring a ‘Great Moderation’ in Fiscal Policy"

"As attacks intensify, Trump becomes more popular"

Posting Articles Now Working Here

Another Test

Testing

Kamala Harris, reparations, and guaranteed income

Did Mudboy Slim finally kill this place?

"Why Young Americans Are Not Taught about Evil"

"New Rules For Radicals — How To Reinvent Kamala Harris"

"Harris’ problem: She’s a complete phony"

Hurricane Beryl strikes Bay City (TX)

Who Is ‘Destroying Democracy In Darkness?’

‘Kamalanomics’ is just ‘Bidenomics’ but dumber

Even The Washington Post Says Kamala's 'Price Control' Plan is 'Communist'

Arthur Ray Hines, "Sneakypete", has passed away.

No righT ... for me To hear --- whaT you say !

"Walz’s Fellow Guardsmen Set the Record Straight on Veep Candidate’s Military Career: ‘He Bailed Out’ "

"Kamala Harris Selects Progressive Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as Running Mate"

"The Teleprompter Campaign"

Good Riddance to Ismail Haniyeh

"Pagans in Paris"

"Liberal groupthink makes American life creepy and could cost Democrats the election".


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Historical
See other Historical Articles

Title: Generals Sherman and Sheridan: The War Criminals
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.examiner.com/article/gen ... and-sheridan-the-war-criminals
Published: May 3, 2012
Author: Michael Climo
Post Date: 2015-06-29 09:56:28 by lana
Keywords: None
Views: 5986
Comments: 36

Generals Sherman and Sheridan: The War Criminals

During the War Between the States the Union forces were waging war on women and children on two separate fronts, raping, pillaging and murdering in the South as well as in the West. The most notorious of these thugs reported to General William Tecumseh Sherman, famous for his march to the sea. But long before that he had adopted a policy of “total war” against civilians.

In 1862 Sherman was having difficulty subduing Confederate sharpshooters who were harassing federal gunboats on the Mississippi River near Memphis. He then implemented the theory of “collective responsibility” to “justify” attacking innocent civilians in retaliation for such attacks. He had the entire town of Randolph, Tennessee burned to the ground. He also took civilian hostages and either traded them for federal prisoners of war or executed them.

Jackson and Meridian, Mississippi were also destroyed by Sherman’s troops even though there was no Confederate army there to oppose them. After his soldiers sacked the town, stealing anything of value they burned the rest. As Sherman biographer John Marzalek writes, his soldiers “entered residences, appropriating whatever appeared to be of value those articles which they could not carry they broke.” After the destruction of Meridian Sherman boasted “for five days, ten thousand of our men worked hard and with a will, in that work of destruction, with axes, sledges, crowbars, claw bars, and with fire, Meridian no longer exists.”

Sherman once wrote to his wife that his purpose was the "extermination, not of soldiers alone but of the people" of the South. Sherman often ordered his soldiers, many of whom were street criminals from Northern as well as European cities, to shoot civilians at random. And the thousands of letters and diaries that survived the war attest to the rape of both black and white women by Sherman's men.

This war on citizens was not simply restrained to be applied against men and women but also children. General Sherman in a June 21, 1864 letter to Lincoln's Secretary of War, Edwin Station wrote, "There is a class of people men, women and children, who must be killed or banished before you can hope for peace and order." Stanton replied, "Your letter of the 21st of June has just reached me and meets my approval." While the war on civilians started much earlier than 1864, the above is simply proof that the war on children was part of that scheme!

Sherman’s atrocities were not just relegated to his enemies though. For pragmatic reasons, Sherman knowingly bypassed Andersonville prison instead of liberating it. In addition, he was less than kind to the newly freed slaves that followed his troops through Georgia. Sherman's contraband policy was to only allow those that could work to stay with the troops, as long as there were enough supplies and food to support their numbers. In one incident, Brigadier General Jefferson C. Davis of the Union Army prevented a group of freed slaves from crossing Ebenezer creek near Savannah on a pontoon bridge with his troops. Several hundred of these freed slaves drowned while trying to swim across the creek, fearing that they would be left behind to be re-enslaved or killed by a group of nearby Confederates. Sherman not only condoned Davis's actions, but also endorsed them.

Here are a few of Sherman’s other quotes for you to contemplate: “The young bloods of the South; sons of planters, lawyers about towns, good billiard players and sportsmen, men who never did any work and never will. War suits them. They are splendid riders, first rate shots and utterly reckless. These men must all be killed or employed by us before we can hope for peace.”

“Look to the South and you who went with us through that land can best say if they have not been fearfully punished. Mourning is in every household, desolation written in broad characters across the whole face of their country, cities in ashes and fields laid waste, their commerce gone, their system of labor annihilated and destroyed. Ruin and poverty and distress everywhere, and now pestilence adding to the very cap sheaf of their stack of misery.”

"The government of the U.S. has any and all rights which they choose to enforce in war - to take their lives, their homes, their land, their everything...war is simply unrestrained by the Constitution...to the persistent secessionist, why, death is mercy, and the quicker he or she is disposed of the better.”

General Philip Sheridan is another celebrated “war hero” who also used similar tactics to those of Sherman in attacking defenseless civilians. After the Confederate army had finally evacuated the Shenandoah Valley in the autumn of 1864 Sheridan’s 35,000 infantry troops essentially burned the entire valley to the ground. As Sheridan described it in a Oct. 7, 1864 report to General Grant, “I have destroyed over 2,000 barns filled with wheat, hay and farming implements; over 70 mills filled with flour and wheat, and have driven in front of the Army over 4,000 head of stock and have killed and issued to the troops not less than 3,000 sheep. Tomorrow I will continue the destruction down to Fisher’s Mill. When this is completed, the Valley from Winchester to Staunton, 92 miles, will have but little in it for man or beast”.

In letters home Sheridan’s troops described themselves as “barn burners” and “destroyers of homes.” One soldier wrote home that he had personally set 60 private homes on fire and opined that “it was a hard looking sight to see the women and children turned out of doors at this season of the year.” A Sergeant William T. Patterson wrote that “the whole country around is wrapped in flames, the heavens are aglow with the light thereof . . . such mourning, such lamentations, such crying and pleading for mercy by defenseless women I never saw or want to see again.”

As horrific as the burning of the Shenandoah Valley was, in his novel The Hard Hand of War historian Mark Grimsley concluded that it was actually “one of the more controlled acts of destruction during the war’s final year.” Sherman himself admitted after the war that he was taught at West Point that he could be hanged for the things he did. But that did not stop Lincoln from personally conveying to Sheridan “the thanks of the Nation.”

In Marion County, Missouri one of the most hideous of war crimes took place. After Missouri attempted to secede from the Union, the state was quickly overrun by Yankee troops. Anyone who expressed Southern sympathies was quickly persecuted by the "loyal" Missouri (Yankee-backed) government officials. In the little town of Palmyra, Missouri, the war was very personal and ugly. After a local Union supporter, Andrew Allsman came up missing it was presumed by the Federal authorities that he had been abducted. General John McNeil of the "loyal" Missouri troops at that time demanded the return of his informer; otherwise he would execute ten Southerners whom he held in jail."

The men held in jail were not criminals they had been thrown into jail for expressing a pro-Southern point of view. It should be noted that the Yankees claimed that the Union informer had been captured by Confederate military forces. The Southern hostages held by the Yankees had no connection with said military forces. Let me emphasize the fact that these men were civilians.

When the Union informer did not return General McNeil ordered ten men to be chosen for execution. But the ten were not selected by a lottery because General McNeil had a more sinister design for the deaths of these men. He gave orders that only those of high social, military, educational, and professional background were to be chosen. Those selected ranged from nineteen to sixty years of age. Both pro-Southern and pro-Northern citizens made pleas on behalf of the innocent men. Those who thought they had some influence with the Yankee government and who had a sense of decency implored the military authorities not to commit this act. But the order had the highest backing from all levels of the Yankee government. At 1:00 P.M. on October 18, 1862, the ten men were loaded on wagons, seated on newly made coffins, and taken to the Palmyra fairgrounds where the hideous act was to be carried out.

On reaching the fairgrounds the men were placed in a row and seated on their coffins. A few feet away stood thirty United States soldiers. Behind the thirty soldiers were an equal number of reserve troops. At the command "ready, aim, fire," the order was carried out. The only problem was that only three of the men were killed instantly. One was not even hit. The others were lying in pools of their own blood. Not to be outdone, the reserve troops were called into action. Walking among the wounded men, they took their time, and with their pistols shot each hostage until he stopped moaning.

This incident did not pass without some protest. Not only in the South, but also in London and even in the North decent people made loud protests about such a barbaric act. Twice in Lincoln's Cabinet meetings the issue was brought up about how to put the best spin on this atrocity. But finally the incident was just ignored because the South had its hands full and could not pursue the matter. But what became of General McNeil? Surely the Yankees would censure this man for such acts. Not quite because shortly after the Palymra massacre, he was given a promotion to the rank of Brigadier General of United States Volunteers by Abe Lincoln.

"Had the Confederates somehow won, had their victory put them in position to bring their chief opponents before some sort of tribunal, they would have found themselves justified . . . in stringing up President Lincoln and the entire Union high command for violation of the laws of war, specifically for waging war against noncombatants." ~ Lee Kennett, Marching through Georgia: A Life of William Tecumseh Sherman, p. 286

It also must be noted that these same tactics used against Southern civilians by Brigadier General George Custer and Major Generals Philip H. Sheridan and William T. Sherman taught them fine art of extermination which they later used so effectively against Native Americans.

In war the victors always write the history and are never punished for war crimes no matter how heinous. Only the defeated suffer that fate. That is why very few Americans are aware of these unspeakable atrocities of war committed against civilians.

For a more in depth study of this topic get a copy of War Crimes Against Southern Civilians by Walter Brian Cisco. It is very graphic and sometimes disturbing to read but you will have a greater understanding of native Southern sympathies against “damn” Yankees.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: lana (#0)

More proof that modern Republican conservatives tend to be the old Democrat secessionist/segregationists who became Republicans as part of Nixon's southern strategy.

If you hate on Lincoln, Grant and Sherman then leave their Republican party and reform the Dixie-crats.

Pericles  posted on  2015-06-29   10:02:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: All (#0)

It also must be noted that these same tactics used against Southern civilians by Brigadier General George Custer and Major Generals Philip H. Sheridan and William T. Sherman taught them fine art of extermination which they later used so effectively against Native Americans.

lana  posted on  2015-06-29   10:14:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Pericles (#1)

More proof that modern Republican conservatives tend to be the old Democrat secessionist/segregationists who became Republicans as part of Nixon's southern strategy.

Seems silly to me. Particularly dragging Nixon into it. Wallace as a third-party candidate in '68 and the Dem collapse in '72 leaving them with McGovern made Nixon's campaigns a cakewalk. Both Humphreys and McGovern were awful candidates, the only reason someone as lame as Nixon got elected.

If you hate on Lincoln, Grant and Sherman then leave their Republican party and reform the Dixie-crats.

Why leave one to join the other? More weak thinking. Modern Republicans would do better to consolidate control of the GOP and wait for the old-guard GOP "moderates" (liberals) to finish dying out over the next decade.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-06-29   10:15:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: TooConservative (#3) (Edited)

I just can't see how you can call yourself a Republican and somehow equate that with being pro-Confederacy of any kind. It is kind of a 'tell' where your political origins are if you do. The GOP is the party of Lincoln, not Davis.

Pericles  posted on  2015-06-29   10:17:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: lana (#0)

It's only a war crime for the losing side.

Truly my soul waiteth upon God: from him cometh my salvation. He only is my rock and my salvation; he is my defence; I shall not be greatly moved. (Psalm 62:1-2)

redleghunter  posted on  2015-06-29   10:25:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: lana (#2) (Edited)

" these same tactics used against Southern civilians by Brigadier General George Custer "

Karma paid him a very nasty visit at Little Big Horn!

Karma also paid Lincoln a visit at Ford's Theater.

Si vis pacem, para bellum

Stoner  posted on  2015-06-29   10:39:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Stoner (#6)

these same tactics used against Southern civilians by Brigadier General George Custer "

Karma paid him a very nasty visit at Little Big Horn!

Yes! It most certainly did.

lana  posted on  2015-06-29   10:40:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: lana (#0)

This article clearly shows Lincoln's tacit approval of these atrocious war crimes. That should tarnish the undeserved claim that Lincoln is one of "the best American presidents". But many, in their ignorance, will still see him that way.

Si vis pacem, para bellum

Stoner  posted on  2015-06-29   11:01:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: lana (#0) (Edited)

With all of the current fanatical hysterical fervor over the Confederate Flag, and wanting to dig up dead Confederates, I would not be surprised if some of those idiots did not advocate another "Shermans March " through the south, and to burn it all to the ground again, and to execute anyone expressing any pro southern feelings.

Si vis pacem, para bellum

Stoner  posted on  2015-06-29   11:08:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: lana, GarySpFc, liberator, CZ82, BobCeleste, Don, Nolu Chan, TooConservative, tomder55 (#0)

I see the traditional claims of war crimes but within what context? Not arguing that today all of the above would be a violation of the current Law of Armed Conflict (LOAC).

A paper on what the 'rules' were viewed back during the Civil War is linked below for what it's worth. But no matter the rules and the times, pillaging and murdering the local populace has been a secular humanist theme throughout the 'Enlightenment' rules of war for centuries.

This mentality extended to the 20th century with Giulio Douhet. His aerial bombardment of economic and civil nodes is at the link by his name above.

Here is the Fordham Law paper on the rules of armed conflict during the Civil War. Page 1880 starts the discussion of non-combatants:

THE CONSTITUTION AND THE LAWS OF WAR DURING THE CIVIL WAR

Truly my soul waiteth upon God: from him cometh my salvation. He only is my rock and my salvation; he is my defence; I shall not be greatly moved. (Psalm 62:1-2)

redleghunter  posted on  2015-06-29   11:10:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Pericles (#1)

More proof that modern Republican conservatives tend to be the old Democrat secessionist/segregationists who became Republicans as part of Nixon's southern strategy.

If you hate on Lincoln, Grant and Sherman then leave their Republican party and reform the Dixie-crats.

After reading this essay, THIS is how you distill the wanton, indiscriminate slaughter, horrors and evils upon the South? It you who still whine on about the same in Bosnia and Serbia?

This is proof that you are a hypocrite and fascist at heart. Justice is not your wish. Only revenge. Your dog in this fight, ANY fight is the devil.

Liberator  posted on  2015-06-29   12:01:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: redleghunter (#10)

I see the traditional claims of war crimes but within what context?...

A paper on what the 'rules' were viewed back during the Civil War is linked below for what it's worth. But no matter the rules and the times, pillaging and murdering the local populace has been a secular humanist theme throughout the 'Enlightenment' rules of war for centuries.

Perhaps in the context of what was supposed to fundamentally be a "Christian" nation. In that sense America was even at that time unique. Both North and South.

Liberator  posted on  2015-06-29   12:08:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Stoner (#8)

This article clearly shows Lincoln's tacit approval of these atrocious war crimes. That should tarnish the undeserved claim that Lincoln is one of "the best American presidents".

But...but....he freed the slaves! Thoughtfully and compassionate wove the fabric of North and South back together again! "Saved the Republic"! (by putting a gun to the South's head.)

It must have been with Honest Abe's tacit approval that his generals were green-lighted necessary terror and destruction.

Liberator  posted on  2015-06-29   12:13:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Liberator (#11)

After reading this essay, THIS is how you distill the wanton, indiscriminate slaughter, horrors and evils upon the South? It you who still whine on about the same in Bosnia and Serbia?

Then why would you make common cause with the Republican party that did that to the south? That is what I don't get.

Pericles  posted on  2015-06-29   12:14:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Pericles (#14)

Then why would you make common cause with the Republican party that did that to the south? That is what I don't get.

Your analogy still makes no sense.

More than that, you still draw NO conclusion from the above essay other than obsessively being stuck on the odd point of portraying Lincoln's/Sherman's "Republicanism" of 150 years ago? Are you implying that Sherman's terror in 1865 is a "Republican" attribute?

FWIW, you DO know that Democrat Bubba was President as he ordered the US military to get involved in the Serbia/Bosnia, Muzzie/Christian melee, right?

Liberator  posted on  2015-06-29   12:30:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Pericles (#4) (Edited)

The GOP is the party of Lincoln, not Davis.

And the Democrat Party is the Party of 0blabla, Klintoon, FDR, and all the other fascist, dictatorial anti-Christs.

Lincoln was a dictator during the Civil War. What's one more political transvestite masquerading as an (R)? Even if it was 150 years ago?

Liberator  posted on  2015-06-29   12:34:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: Liberator (#16)

Lincoln was a dicator during the Civil War. What's one more political transvestite masquerading as an (R)? Even if it was 150 years ago?

How can he masquerade if Lincoln was the FIRST Republican president. He literally is the mold. You are the RINO compared to Lincoln.

Pericles  posted on  2015-06-29   12:59:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Pericles (#17)

You are the RINO compared to Lincoln.

A good point. I used to consider this back at TOS with all the accusations of RINO-this-RINO-that.

Properly understood, those calling other people RINOs were themselves the RINOs.

A conservative who is registered Republican is a far bigger RINO than most they accuse of RINOism.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-06-29   13:03:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: Pericles (#17)

How can he masquerade if Lincoln was the FIRST Republican president.

What part of "dictator" did you miss? Lincoln shredded the USCON. Kinda like 0blabla. That would make Lincoln and 0blabla far closer in party philosophy.

So...what of Dem Klintoon torching your beloved Serbia and Bosnia? No telling how completely Hitlery will finish the job.

Liberator  posted on  2015-06-29   13:13:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: redleghunter (#10)

I see the traditional claims of war crimes but within what context?

I don't believe for one second the claims above.Garnet Woseley ,the pro- Confederacy Brit office who embedded with Lee throughout the war had the highest praise of the way Sherman conducted himself in the war .

Sherman's 6 week march to the sea resulted in 4,000 casualties ;few of whom were civilian. The marching orders strictly limited what could be taken in forage and how. He ordered that there would be no destruction of private property where his army marched unmolested . He left it up the the Corp commanders to make that call. Of course he could not monitor all the activities of an Army spread 40 miles wide ,but there was much less than the post-war Lost Cause historians portrayed . Much of the destruction on the march was the result of 1) Hood’s detonation of ammunition as his army retreated from Atlanta; 2)Joe Wheeler’s cavalry destroying supplies Sherman could use on the march 3)deserters from both sides ,fugitive slaves ,and civilians who took advantage of the opportunity . Compare that to the deaths in Virginia during that same time period . It had to be close to 10 fold.

During the Mississippi campaign ,Sherman wrote Grant and said he was ashamed of the conduct of some of his troops because of theft and destruction. Grant in turn rebuked Sherman for being too generous to the people of Jackson Miss.

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

tomder55  posted on  2015-06-29   13:14:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: TooConservative (#18)

A conservative who is registered Republican is a far bigger RINO than most they accuse of RINOism.

That depends on how the "Republican" platform is defined, doesn't it?

Should a conservative register as a...Democrat in your opinion?

Liberator  posted on  2015-06-29   13:15:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: Liberator (#19)

hat part of "dictator" did you miss? Lincoln shredded the USCON. Kinda like 0blabla. That would make Lincoln and 0blabla far closer in party philosophy.

So why do you identify with the political party he was a Founding Father of? The Republican party is the party of Lincoln. No wonder people like you are confused - you are schizo! Old Dixiecrats in Republican clothing.

Pericles  posted on  2015-06-29   13:24:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: TooConservative (#18) (Edited)

ou are the RINO compared to Lincoln.

A good point. I used to consider this back at TOS with all the accusations of RINO-this-RINO-that.

Properly understood, those calling other people RINOs were themselves the RINOs.

A conservative who is registered Republican is a far bigger RINO than most they accuse of RINOism.

I came to the USA young and I am fully assimilated - but one thing I never understood was how the South was where all the Republicans concentrated when I was younger and trying to understand politics. As a European, that would be like the Irish Catholics being the most patriotic subjects if the English crown after they were conquered. It never made any sense to me. If the Civil War happened in Europe the North and South would still be fighting a century later - see Yugoslavia.

What makes even less sense to me is Republicans (not conservatives with no party loyalty) being the ones defending old Southern non Republican party institutions like the modern confederate flag started in the Dixiecrat era onwards. You can't be calling Lincoln a traitor and a dictator and claiming the South had a right to leave the Union AND be calling yourself a Republican! That's just nuts!

Pericles  posted on  2015-06-29   13:28:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: Pericles (#23)

I came to the USA young and I am fully assimilated

Indeed by which tradition?

Truly my soul waiteth upon God: from him cometh my salvation. He only is my rock and my salvation; he is my defence; I shall not be greatly moved. (Psalm 62:1-2)

redleghunter  posted on  2015-06-29   13:30:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: redleghunter (#24)

Indeed by which tradition?

I don't know what that means - I meant that in a crowd of mud truck loving rednecks I would not be able to be identified as the European born American. No accent, fully versed in the sports and history and culture, etc.

Pericles  posted on  2015-06-29   13:34:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: Liberator (#21)

That depends on how the "Republican" platform is defined, doesn't it?

I think GOP leaders like McConnell would argue that they are Republicans and challengers like Bevins are the RINOs.

Given the failure of Tea candidates in the 2014 cycle, they're probably right.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-06-29   13:40:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: Pericles (#23)

What makes even less sense to me is Republicans (not conservatives with no party loyalty) being the ones defending old Southern non Republican party institutions like the modern confederate flag started in the Dixiecrat era onwards. You can't be calling Lincoln a traitor and a dictator and claiming the South had a right to leave the Union AND be calling yourself a Republican! That's just nuts!

Actually, both parties have swapped their positions and constituents multiple times over the centuries. Just another indicator of how great our two parties really are.     : )

Yes, it is very confusing.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-06-29   13:42:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: TooConservative (#27)

Actually, both parties have swapped their positions and constituents multiple times over the centuries. Just another indicator of how great our two parties really are. : )

Yes, it is very confusing.

The explanation I came up with is that by the 20th century we had a fixed 2 party system that defaulted to being called "Republican or Democrat" without any connection to their past origins. It may as well be the red and blue party and that is what the press has Freudian slipped into tagging the parties.

Pericles  posted on  2015-06-29   13:45:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: Pericles (#25)

don't know what that means - I meant that in a crowd of mud truck loving rednecks I would not be able to be identified as the European born American. No accent, fully versed in the sports and history and culture, etc.

So you follow NASCAR?

Truly my soul waiteth upon God: from him cometh my salvation. He only is my rock and my salvation; he is my defence; I shall not be greatly moved. (Psalm 62:1-2)

redleghunter  posted on  2015-06-29   13:49:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: lana (#0)

Title: The War of the Rebellion: a compilation of the official records of the Union and Confederate armies. ; Series 1 - Volume 39 (Part III)

Author: United States. War Dept., John Sheldon Moody, Calvin Duvall Cowles, Frederick Caryton Ainsworth, Robert N. Scott, Henry Martyn Lazelle, George Breckenridge Davis, Leslie J. Perry, Joseph William Kirkley

Official Records of the Civil War, Series 1, Vol 39, Part 3, Chap. LI, page 494:

http://ebooks.library.cornell.edu/cgi/t/text/pageviewer-idx?c=moawar&cc=moawar&idno=waro0079&node=waro0079%3A4&view=image&seq=496&size=100

page 494

HDQRS, MILITARY DIVISION OF THE MISSISSIPPI,
In the Field, Rome, Ga., October 29, 1864.

Brigadier-General WATKINS, Calhoun, Ga.: Cannot you send over about Fairmount and Adairsville burn ten or
twelve houses of known secessionists, kill a few at random, and let them
know that it will be repeated every time a train is fired on from Resaca
to Kingston ?
W. T. SHERMAN,
Major. General, Commanding.


Title: The War of the Rebellion: a compilation of the official records of the Union and Confederate armies. ; Series 1 - Volume 32 (Part III)

Author: United States. War Dept., John Sheldon Moody, Calvin Duvall Cowles, Frederick Caryton Ainsworth, Robert N. Scott, Henry Martyn Lazelle, George Breckenridge Davis, Leslie J. Perry, Joseph William Kirkley

Official Records of the Civil War, Series I, Vol. 32, Pt III, Chap XLIV, pp 118-19.

http://ebooks.library.cornell.edu/cgi/t/text/pageviewer-idx?c=moawar&cc=moawar&idno=waro0059&node=waro0059%3A5&view=image&seq=120&size=100

page 118| page 119

118 KY., SW., VA., TENN., MISS., ALA., AND N. GA. [Chap XLIV.

[Inclosure No. 1]

Headquarters Forrest's Command,
Jackson, Tenn, March 21, 1864,

Maj, J. P. STRANGE,
Assistant Adjutant-General:

Major: Having been appointed by the major-general command­ing to investigate the facts of the recent tax levied by Col, Fielding Hurst upon the citizens of this place to idemnify himself and command against damages assessed by the Federal authorities of Memphis in favor of Mrs, Newman, formerly a citizen of Jackson, whose house had been entered and robbed by the Federal soldiery in the summer of 1863, also the facts available in reference to the mur­ders which have been committed by the enemy upon soldiers and citizens in this part of the State within the past few months, in obedience to instructions I called together a party of citizens, from whom I derived the following facts: About the 7th of February, 1864, Colonel Hurst, with his command, visited Jackson, Tenn., and announced publicly that in consequence of the assessment by the Federal authorities of Memphis, Tenn., against himself and com­mand of damages to the amount of $5,139.25 in favor of Mrs. New­man, formerly a citizen of this place, he was here to demand this amount, at once of the citizens, or on refusal or failure promptly to pay said amount into his hands that he would burn the town. Upon application of some of the citizens and the guaranty of 20 of them, five days were granted in which to raise the sum required, to be paid in greenbacks or Kentucky funds. On the 12th of February, 1864, the entire amount, $5,139.25, was paid into the hands of Col. Field­ing Hurst by the citizens of Jackson, Tenn.

The murders committed are as follows: Lieut. Willis Dodds, Com­pany F, Colonel Newsom's regiment Tennessee volunteers, Forrest's command, under orders from his commanding officers, collecting his command, was arrested at the residence of his father in Henderson County, Tenn., on or about the 9th of March, 1864, by the command of Colonel Thornburgh, of the Federal army, on their march through this portion of the State eastward, and put to death by torture.

Private Silas Hodges, a scont, acting under orders from Colonel Tansil, states that he saw the body of Lieutenant Dodds very soon after his murder, and that it was most horribly mutilated, the face having been skinned, the nose cut off, the under jaw disjointed, the privates cut off, and the body otherwise barbarously lacerated and most wantonly injured, and that his death was brought about by the most inhuman process of torture.

Private Alex Vale, Company H, Newsom's regiment Tenessee volunteers, under orders from Colonel Tansil, was arrested and shot to death, in Madison Connty, Tenn., by same command, on or about the 8th March, 1864.

Lieut. Joseph Stewart, Private John Wilson, Private Samuel Osborn, members of Newsom's regiment Tennessee volunteers while on duty under orders from their commanding officers, were captured by Hurst's command on or about the 15th February, 1864 in McNairy County, Tenn., and about three days thereafter their bodies' were found in Haywood County, Tenn., having been shot to death.

On or about the 5th February, 1864, Private Martin, Company —, Wilson's regiment Tennessee volunteers, was captured by same

Chap. XLIV.] CORRESPONDENCE, ETC.—UNION 119

command and was shot to death and the rights of sepulture forbid­den while the command remained, some four days. Mr. Lee Doroughty, a citizen of McNairy County, Tenn., a youth about sixteen years of age, deformed and almost helpless, was arrested and wan­tonly murdered by same command about 1st January, 1864. I am, maior, very respectfully, your obedient servant,

W. M. REED,
Lieutenant-Colonel, Provisional Army, C.S.


Title: The War of the Rebellion: a compilation of the official records of the Union and Confederate armies. ; Series 1 - Volume 30 (Part IV)

Author: United States. War Dept., John Sheldon Moody, Calvin Duvall Cowles, Frederick Caryton Ainsworth, Robert N. Scott, Henry Martyn Lazelle, George Breckenridge Davis, Leslie J. Perry, Joseph William Kirkley

http://ebooks.library.cornell.edu/cgi/t/text/pageviewer-idx?c=moawar;cc=moawar;rgn=full%20text;idno=waro0053;didno=waro0053;view=image;seq=00236;node=waro0053%3A1

| Page 234 |Page 235 |

234 KY., SW., VA., TEN., MISS., N. ALA., AND N. GA. [Chap. XLII.

HEADQUARTERS FIFTEENTH ARMY CORPS,

Memphis, October 10, 1863.
Major-General HALLECK,
Commander-in- Chief, Washington:

DEAR GENERAL: I start out early in the morning to take the head of my corps, now stretched out as far as Bear Creek. A heavy force of the enemy’s cavalry hovers to the south and is going to bother us. not in reaching Athens, but in making this road a safe line of supply.

I have just received your letter of October 1, and assure you of my hearty concurrence in all you say. It has been to us all a source of pleasure to know that such perfect cordiality, social and official, existed among the generals on this line. One noted exception alone, who is disposed of. I hear of jealousies elsewhere and am astonished, as the war is not yet over, and a feeling of common safety and interest should make all harmonize, if not the higher sense of patriotism and duty. Neither McClellan nor Buell ever had a shadow of cause of ill-feeling to an administration or commander-in-chief who lavished on them all that man could ask. I know you had for both great personal friendship and manifested it on many occasions, and they mistake you and are ungrateful, if they attribute to you what thinking men in all times will attribute to their failure to appreciate the situation of the army and the country.

This war might end sooner than it will, but it may be the good of the future requires our people to pass through all the phases of revolution before they are again permitted to enjoy the luxury of peace and safety. When that time comes I believe we will be a better people, and the very ones who provoked war so thoughtlessly will be cured.

I have your telegram saying the President had read my letter and thought it should be published. I have no copy by me, but if I can recall it I think it won’t bear publication. Would it not impair my usefulness here? A great many people here and in Louisiana are influenced by men of my shade of opinion. They are full-blooded Southrons, were never disunionists, but were carried into rebellion by the tempest of feeling which their potiticians knew so well how to beget and guide. As long as a doubtful contest for supremacy exists between the two races they cannot control their choice; but as soon as we demonstrate equal courage, equal skill, superior resources, and superior tenacity of purpose, they will gradually relax and finally submit to men who profess, like myself, to fight for but one single purpose, viz, to sustain a Government capable of vindicating its just and rightful authority, independent of niggers, cotton, money, or any earthly interest. Might not the publication of my letter, even without my signature, impair my usefulness with the South? Still if you or Judge Holt, or General Hitchcock, or Reverdy Johnson, or Mr. Ewing would take my letter and mold it in such shape as not to compromise me, so as to serve any good purpose, I give my full consent to its use, or indeed to use anything I have. If I covet any public reputation it is as a silent actor. I dislike to see my name in print.

Thanking you always for many favors, I am, always your sincere friend,
W. T. SHERMAN.


Title: The War of the Rebellion: a compilation of the official records of the Union and Confederate armies. ; Series 1 - Volume 34 (Part II)

Author: United States. War Dept., John Sheldon Moody, Calvin Duvall Cowles, Frederick Caryton Ainsworth, Robert N. Scott, Henry Martyn Lazelle, George Breckenridge Davis, Leslie J. Perry, Joseph William Kirkley

http://ebooks.library.cornell.edu/cgi/t/text/pageviewer-idx?c=moawar&cc=moawar&idno=waro0062&node=waro0062%3A4&view=image&seq=768&size=100

Page 766

766 LOUISIANA AND THE TRANS-MISSISSIPPI [Chap. XLVI.

HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF THE NORTHWEST,
Milwaukee, Wis., March 28, 1864.

Major General H. W. HALLECK,
Chief of Staff of the Army, Washington, D. C.:

GENERAL; I received yesterday an order from the Adjutant-General’s Office assigning the Sixth Minnesota Volunteers, now in this department on duty to the Second Corps, in the Army of the Potomac. I do not write to object to the order, but only to ask a suspension of its execution for a time. My reasons are, that if this regiment be removed from the Minnesota frontier before the new posts are fairly established and the expedition meet the Indians, there will be trouble and excitement on the frontier amongst the inhabitants which may entirely defeat our movements. There seems little doubt of a formidable concentration of the most powerful of the Sioux bands at some point on the upper Missouri. General Sully can only take into the field at most 1,200 men. I have directed Sibley to send him 1,600 men from Minnesota, which will give Sully about 2,800 men, by no means too many if the Indians make battle. Sibley is left with only 700 men on the Minnesota border, and they will be necessary for a time to keep the frontier settlers from abandoning settlements, precipitating themselves in the river towns, and spreading dismay and excitement through the State.

The result will be that the Department in Washington will be overwhelmed with petitions and remonstrances, and our whole military operations, which now promise a final solution of the entire Indian question on the northern plains, be brought to naught. As soon as I possibly can do so (and I am sure, general, the Department will acquit me of any fault hitherto in forwarding troops to the South) I will send this regiment en route for this corps on the Potomac. Unless I considered it essential to our success I would not think of keeping the regiment a day, and I hope still to send it off very shortly. In this connection, I send you extract from letters received from General Sibley, from which you will perceive the difficulties under which I have labored, and in fact, do still. Unless otherwise directed, I will suspend the execution of the order to the Sixth Minnesota for the present.

I am, general, respectfully, your obedient servant,

JNO. POPE,
Major-General, Commanding.


https://mises.org/library/feds-versus-indians

The Feds versus The Indians

Thomas J. DiLorenzo
January 1, 1998
The Free Market 16, no. 1 (January 1998)

[Excerpt]

"We must act with vindictive earnestness against the Sioux," Sherman wrote to Ulysses S. Grant (commanding general of the federal army) in 1866, "even to their extermination, men, women and children." The Sioux must "feel the superior power of the Government." Sherman vowed to remain in the West" till the Indians are all killed or taken to a country where they can be watched."

"During an assault," he instructed his troops, "the soldiers cannot pause to distinguish between male and female, or even discriminate as to age." He chillingly referred to this policy in an 1867 letter to Grant as "the final solution to the Indian problem," a phrase Hitler invoked some 70 years later.


nolu chan  posted on  2015-06-29   16:36:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: redleghunter, lana, GarySpFc, liberator, CZ82, BobCeleste, Don, TooConservative, tomder55 (#10)

I see the traditional claims of war crimes but within what context? Not arguing that today all of the above would be a violation of the current Law of Armed Conflict (LOAC).

See my #30. Subsequent to Lincoln's declaration of a blockade (a distinctively international act) the status of a lawful belligerent was bestowed upon the confederacy and it was an international war. Note that upon the declaration of a blockade, Britain, followed by others, declared neutrality.

A nation does not "blockade" its own ports. It declares a closing of the ports. That is the domestic act. In 1865, just before the end of the war, Lincoln declared a closing of the ports.

nolu chan  posted on  2015-06-29   17:27:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: lana (#2) (Edited)

Started a reply then decided I don't need to deal with silly people today. Have a nice day.

calcon  posted on  2015-06-29   18:51:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: calcon (#32)

It also must be noted that these same tactics used against Southern civilians by Brigadier General George Custer and Major Generals Philip H. Sheridan and William T. Sherman taught them fine art of extermination which they later used so effectively against Native Americans.

In war the victors always write the history and are never punished for war crimes no matter how heinous. Only the defeated suffer that fate. That is why very few Americans are aware of these unspeakable atrocities of war committed against civilians.

For a more in depth study of this topic get a copy of War Crimes Against Southern Civilians by Walter Brian Cisco. It is very graphic and sometimes disturbing to read but you will have a greater understanding of native Southern sympathies against “damn” Yankees.

Maybe you should take your own advice and READ. This was a quote taken from the article. Not something written by me.

lana  posted on  2015-06-29   19:00:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: Pericles (#14)

Then why would you make common cause with the Republican party that did that to the south? That is what I don't get.

The Republican Paarty is bigger than Lincoln.

And the words of the LORD are flawless, like silver refined* in a furnace of clay, purified seven times. Psalm 12:6

GarySpFC  posted on  2015-06-29   22:08:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: GarySpFC (#34)

he Republican Paarty is bigger than Lincoln.

It is not composed of people who sympathize with the confederacy. The GOP killed them.

Pericles  posted on  2015-06-30   1:13:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: Liberator (#16)

" the Democrat Party is the Party of 0blabla, Klintoon, FDR, and all the other fascist, dictatorial anti-Christs. "

Or, just say the Demoncrap Party is the party of SATAN !!

Si vis pacem, para bellum

Stoner  posted on  2015-06-30   8:46:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com