[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Israel Attacks Iran, Report Says - LIVE Breaking News Coverage

Earth is Scorched with Heat

Antiwar Activists Chant ‘Death to America’ at Event Featuring Chicago Alderman

Vibe Shift

A stream that makes the pleasant Rain sound.

Older Men - Keep One Foot In The Dark Ages

When You Really Want to Meet the Diversity Requirements

CERN to test world's most powerful particle accelerator during April's solar eclipse

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin

How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End?

What on EARTH is going on in Acts 16:11? New Discovery!

2023 Hottest in over 120 Million Years

2024 and beyond in prophecy

Questions

This Speech Just Broke the Internet

This AMAZING Math Formula Will Teach You About God!

The GOSPEL of the ALIENS | Fallen Angels | Giants | Anunnaki

The IMAGE of the BEAST Revealed (REV 13) - WARNING: Not for Everyone

WEF Calls for AI to Replace Voters: ‘Why Do We Need Elections?’

The OCCULT Burger king EXPOSED

PANERA BREAD Antichrist message EXPOSED

The OCCULT Cheesecake Factory EXPOSED


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

LEFT WING LOONS
See other LEFT WING LOONS Articles

Title: Marco Rubio: I’d attend a gay wedding
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://fusion.net/video/120998/marc ... arriage-jorge-ramos-interview/
Published: Apr 16, 2015
Author: Brett LoGiurato and AMERICA with Jorge R
Post Date: 2015-04-16 06:48:26 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 14250
Comments: 87

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Florida), the newest and youngest official Republican candidate for president, has said he believes marriage should be “traditional”—between a man and a woman.

So Fusion’s Jorge Ramos asked him: If someone in his family or on his staff were gay and getting married, would he attend the wedding?

“If it’s somebody in my life that I care for, of course I would,” Rubio told Ramos in an interview on Wednesday.

“I’m not going to hurt them simply because I disagree with a choice they’ve made or because I disagree with a decision they’ve made, or whatever it may be,” he added. “Ultimately, if someone that you care for and is part of your family has decided to move in one direction or another or feels that way because of who they love, you respect that because you love them.”

Rubio spoke with Ramos about a variety of issues, including marriage equality, immigration reform, climate change, President Barack Obama’s move to normalize relations with Cuba, and which rapper or singer he’d like to perform at his potential 2017 inauguration.

In the early throes of his campaign, Rubio has positioned himself as the candidate of “tomorrow.” He has cast himself as a young, fresh alternative to other Republicans and to likely Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton, who he referred to in his announcement speech as the candidate of “yesterday.”

But his stance on gay marriage has led to questions on whether he’s more out of touch than Clinton with young people on certain issues. According to a recent NBC/Wall Street Journal poll, 74 percent of 18-to-34-year-olds said they were in favor of allowing gay and lesbian couples to marry. On Tuesday, CNN anchor Jake Tapper called Rubio “the candidate of yesterday” on the issue of marriage equality.

Rubio said that while he personally opposes gay marriage, he would encourage people in favor to petition their state legislatures to permit same-sex marriages. He does not think the decision should be left up to courts, he said.

“I would point out that we live in a free society,” Rubio said. “If people want to change the definition of marriage, they should petition their state legislature, and they can have that debate in the political arena. Who I don’t think should be redefining marriage is the court system.”

Rubio, who is Catholic, noted that his faith also teaches that divorce is wrong, and he drew on that as a comparison to his personal feelings on gay marriage.

“But again, as I said, I’m a member of the Catholic faith that teaches, for example, that divorce is wrong,” Rubio said. “But if someone gets divorced, I’m not going to stop loving them or having them a part of our lives.”


Poster Comment:

He is now officially off the list. He was at the bottom. Sounds like a perfect candidate for queers that are sneaky.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: A K A Stone (#0) (Edited)

Just another "Conthervative" { uhhh } "But Progrethive" log cabin RINO.

VxH  posted on  2015-04-16   6:56:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: A K A Stone (#0)

Sounds like a perfect candidate for queers that are sneaky.

Hey, sneaky queers have to find a candidate to vote for too.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-04-16   7:04:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: TooConservative (#2)

Hey, sneaky queers have to find a candidate to vote for too.

I would think the vast majority of queers, sneaky or otherwise, will vote for KILLary.

Rubio might get just the sneaky Cuban queers.

Every society gets the kind of criminal it deserves. What is equally true is that every community gets the kind of law enforcement it insists on. Robert Kennedy

GrandIsland  posted on  2015-04-16   7:11:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: TooConservative (#2) (Edited)

Hey, sneaky queers have to find a candidate to vote for too.

Fithcal TooConthervatism- TEAParrot Herman Cain edition.
====================

TP: Mr. Cain, you recently came under fire for your comments about the kind of people you would appoint to your cabinet. Would you be opposed to appointing an openly gay but qualified person to be in your cabinet?

CAIN: Nope, not at all. I wouldn’t have a problem with that at all. I just want people who are qualified, I want them to believe in the Constitution of the United States of America. So yep, I don’t have a problem with appointing an openly gay person. Because they’re not going to try to put sharia law in our laws.

http://www.google.com/#hl=en&sugexp=gsihc&cp=20&gs_id=25&xhr=t&q=Open+homosexual+Cain

=====================
HERMAN: What happens now?
Scott Toomey: Well, now, uh, Ken Mehlman, R. Clarke Cooper, Meghan McCain, Mary Cheney and I wait until nightfall, and then leap out of the Fithcally Conthervative log cabin, taking The Party(tm) by surprise -- not only by surprise, but totally unarmed!
HERMAN: Who leaps out?
Scott Toomey: Uh, Ken Mehlman, R. Clarke Cooper, Meghan McCain, Mary Cheney and I. Uh, leap out of the log cabin, uh and uh....
HERMAN: Oh....
Scott Toomey: Oh.... Um, l-look, if we built this large wooden Rhinocerous -- [twong]
ALL:  Run
away!  Run away!  Run away!  Run away!
      [splat]
 

VxH  posted on  2015-04-16   7:12:33 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: GrandIsland (#3)

Probably the only sneaky ones left are priests or married guys in the closet.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-04-16   7:38:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: GrandIsland (#3) (Edited)

I would think the vast majority of queers, sneaky or otherwise, will vote for KILLary.

LOL. Ask TOO Conthervative if he's still a Cain fan.

libertysflame.com/cgi-bin...gi?ArtNum=39119&Disp=4#C4

VxH  posted on  2015-04-16   7:43:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: A K A Stone (#0)

According to a recent NBC/Wall Street Journal poll, 74 percent of 18-to-34-year-olds said they were in favor of allowing gay and lesbian couples to marry.

It's not about "allowing" them to do anything. It's about RECOGNIZING THEY HAVE THE SAME RIGHTS AS ANY OTHER CITIZEN.

Your,mine,or anyone else's approval or disapproval isn't relevant. RIGHTS are NOT dependent on the approval of others. Either we all have them,or none of us has them. If they require approval,they are requests for permission,not rights.

Why is this so hard for so many people to figure out?

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-16   8:21:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: VxH (#1)

Just another "Conthervative" { uhhh } "But Progrethive" log cabin RINO.

So,you think the idea of having Second Class citizens that don't have the same rights as other citizens is a "conservative opinion"?

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-16   8:22:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: TooConservative (#5)

Probably the only sneaky ones left are priests or married guys in the closet.

And a awful lot of those married guys in the closet seem to be really pissed they were "forced" to marry a woman.

It's almost like they are saying "I coulda had the man of my dreams if I had waited,and I'm pissed about it!" in the background.

Misery sure does love company,in all cultures.

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-16   8:27:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: sneakypete (#8) (Edited)

I think the deliberate proliferation of social cancer is as culturally self-destructive as it has always been documented to be.

Worshiping transhumanist/postgenderist cancer isn't "conservative".

VxH  posted on  2015-04-16   8:34:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: TooConservative (#5)

Is everyone gay in America? That is all we hear about on the news it seems.

Pericles  posted on  2015-04-16   11:23:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: A K A Stone (#0)

74 percent of 18-to-34-year-olds said they were in favor of allowing gay and lesbian couples to marry.

The programming of the youth by Amerika's government indoctrination centers (schools), Hollywood and the MSM is going as planned.

“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Americans who have no experience with, or knowledge of, tyranny believe that only terrorists will experience the unchecked power of the state. They will believe this until it happens to them, or their children, or their friends.
Paul Craig Roberts

Deckard  posted on  2015-04-16   11:30:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: sneakypete (#9)

And a awful lot of those married guys in the closet seem to be really pissed they were "forced" to marry a woman.

I'm not so sure. Most of them married so they could have kids and a traditional nuclear family, the whole 2.2 kids in the suburbs with a dog and a minivan.

I think there are gays who will continue to go the daddy route, getting by with using some porn or a few sleazy hookups or a boyfriend on the side.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-04-16   11:41:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: A K A Stone (#0)

So Fusion’s Jorge Ramos asked him: If someone in his family or on his staff were gay and getting married, would he attend the wedding?

“If it’s somebody in my life that I care for, of course I would,” Rubio told Ramos in an interview on Wednesday.

Another good reason to write me in, I would not attend a sodomite wedding.

BobCeleste  posted on  2015-04-16   12:27:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: BobCeleste (#14)

I attended my younger brother's three weddings; the most recent was about two years ago. I tried to get out of that one at the time because I was a bit financially strapped - he put enough pressure on me and offered free housing that I finally relented and attended. I was best man at his first wedding back in the 80s.

His wedding was in San Francisco and yes, all three of his wives are wimmins.

Fred Mertz  posted on  2015-04-16   12:35:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Pericles (#11)

Is everyone gay in America? That is all we hear about on the news it seems.

Apparently so. Yes, according to America's propagandist news outlets. (But...but...that must just be our bigoted, homophobic eyes doing the noticing.)

And if an American citizen opposed the perception that the gay slant on EVERYTHING is repulsive and sick on any level, they should expect to be ostracized, fired, or your business ruined. ALL sanctioned by this oppressive, un-constitutional gubmint of ours.

So in this vein, I hereby agree with you: This nation is a rotted fish carcass.

Liberator  posted on  2015-04-16   12:45:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: VxH (#10)

I think the deliberate proliferation of social cancer is as culturally self-destructive as it has always been documented to be.

OK.

Does that mean you get to pick and choose who can have sex with who,and who has rights and who doesn't have rights?

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-16   12:55:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: TooConservative (#13)

Most of them married so they could have kids and a traditional nuclear family, the whole 2.2 kids in the suburbs with a dog and a minivan.

AND they wanted to appear to be normal and to be accepted as normal.

And who can blame them for that? Who wants to go through their lives having people screaming insults at them every day,and who wants to face rejection by their own family?

I think there are gays who will continue to go the daddy route,...

Of course they will. Remember,they are people just like everybody else,and most people want to have children. Which will probably save some heterosexual women from having to live with a lot of grief to keep their families together. Can't wait until we get to see their kids rebelling against them when the kids become teens. Prior to modern times,the only way they could have children was to marry someone of the opposite gender and try to pass as a heterosexual. I see less of that happening now and into the future,and predict most of the future "hookups" will be between lesbians and male homosexuals,and the hookups will take place in a lab somewhere.

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-16   13:02:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: Liberator (#16)

By concentrating on gay rights it really is an attack on religion by secularists because the Abrahamic religions are explicitly hostile to gays. By having people accept gays then the Bible is questioned and religion is negated.

Pericles  posted on  2015-04-16   13:03:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: BobCeleste (#14)

I would not attend a sodomite wedding.

Of course you would,and you have.

You do know that men and women can and often do commit sodomy together,right? When it comes to sodomy players,homosexuals are a tiny minority.

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-16   13:04:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Fred Mertz (#15)

His wedding was in San Francisco and yes, all three of his wives are wimmins.

And chances all 4 of them are sodomites.

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-16   13:05:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: sneakypete (#21)

Back in our younger days we used to talk about blow jobs (from wimmins), but I've been polite enough not to ask this of the ones he married. I could guess tho!

Fred Mertz  posted on  2015-04-16   13:10:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: Deckard, A K A Stone (#12)

74 percent of 18-to-34-year-olds said they were in favor of allowing gay and lesbian couples to marry.

The programming of the youth by Amerika's government indoctrination centers (schools), Hollywood and the MSM is going as planned.

The programming of yoots has gone even BETTER than planned. But then how can a Statist-Leftist-Fascist 24/7/365 campaign to lobotomize a captive audience fail?

Even if their frontal lobes remain intact after the usual social media assaults, these young people have had to repel and reject the non-stop homo-advocacy TV, movies, advertisements, and "education system." The good news: That 26% are rock-solid warriors for truth.

Especially depressing: When the demo of weak 50+ baby-boomers fall prey to Stockholm-Syndrome and begin accepting or even crusading for "gay marriage rights."

Liberator  posted on  2015-04-16   13:22:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: Fred Mertz, Biff Tannen (#22)

Back in our younger days we used to talk about blow jobs (from wimmins)

Thanks for the MUCH needed gender clarification, Fred. Biffy will be disappointed :-(

Liberator  posted on  2015-04-16   13:24:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: Pericles (#19)

By concentrating on gay rights it really is an attack on religion by secularists because the Abrahamic religions are explicitly hostile to gays. By having people accept gays then the Bible is questioned and religion is negated.

SPOT ON.

This obvious assault and war on God makes it especially odd when so-called Christians embrace "gay" marriage, or even the magical "gay rights" lie.

Liberator  posted on  2015-04-16   13:28:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: sneakypete (#18)

Of course they will. Remember,they are people just like everybody else,and most people want to have children. Which will probably save some heterosexual women from having to live with a lot of grief to keep their families together.

A lot of them married women with low sex drives or who had deep-set issues with regular sex. Often, the women knew in advance what they were getting into.

A lot of these sham marriages weren't so much a sham as a bargain between two people who knew what they both were getting into.

I knew a guy in college whose best friend was this girl. She had a half-dozen boyfriends in high school and college and he ended up sleeping with every one of them. Finally, she just married him. They ended up farming and raising five kids. Their lives, their choice. Sort of like a Will and Grace scenario where they actually ended up Married With Kids. Not everyone's cup of tea obviously.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-04-16   13:38:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: sneakypete, VxH (#17)

Does that [social cancer/cultural self-destruction] mean you get to pick and choose who can have sex with who,and who has rights and who doesn't have rights?

It means there is STILL an age of consent and common sense expected of ANY proper civilization. But don't expect a thriving culture from one that endorses, teaches, and sanctions sodomy as "normal" sexual behavior.

To further address your question, you or any mutant or multi-gendered person can indeed legally have consensual sex with anyone else otherwise to my knowledge. So what "right" are you implying is deprived? (other than with non-human creatures and the under-aged?)

Liberator  posted on  2015-04-16   13:38:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: sneakypete, BobCeleste (#20)

You do know that men and women can and often do commit sodomy together,right?

Yes, but their respective relationship, identity, and act isn't based on a singular act of sodomy, NOR is it celebrated in the public domain as some kind of noble, liberating act that EVERYONE should also celebrate. WITH GUSTO.

When it comes to sodomy players,homosexuals are a tiny minority.

Chyeah, sooo "tiny" that according to social media, Yahoo News, Google, MSM, the Tee-bee networks, movies, and academia, "sodomy players" are this society's annointed High Priests of liberation and enlightenment.

Liberator  posted on  2015-04-16   13:46:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: A K A Stone (#0)

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Florida)...has said he believes marriage should be “traditional”—between a man and a woman.

So Fusion’s Jorge Ramos asked him:

If someone in his family or on his staff were gay and getting married, would he attend the wedding?

Gay "GOTCHA!!" questions. Expect them every day, week, and month leading up to the election.

Follow up question from the gay-media:

"Are you still beating your wife?"

Liberator  posted on  2015-04-16   13:50:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: Fred Mertz (#15)

yes, all three of his wives are wimmins.

Whew, that's god to hear.

BobCeleste  posted on  2015-04-16   17:15:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: sneakypete (#20) (Edited)

I would not attend a sodomite wedding.

Let me correct that: I would not attend a male sodomite husband marrying a male homosexual wife wedding. No sense in me going to a lesbian wedding, I don't attend weddings that I can't tell the bride from the groom.

But, I need not worry, after 20 years of doing ChristianPatriot.com, I doubt I would be invited. I'm not known for keeping my feelings to myself.

BobCeleste  posted on  2015-04-16   17:20:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: Liberator (#28)

Your points are better than Pete's.

BobCeleste  posted on  2015-04-16   17:21:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: Fred Mertz (#9)

And a awful lot of those married guys in the closet seem to be really pissed they were "forced" to marry a woman.

It's almost like they are saying "I coulda had the man of my dreams if I had waited,and I'm pissed about it!" in the background.

Ahem ... To continue our previous thoughts.

Biff Tannen  posted on  2015-04-16   18:48:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: A K A Stone (#0)

Bisexual - Person who likes both men and boys or person who like both women and girls.

“Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rapidly promoted by mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.”

CZ82  posted on  2015-04-16   18:52:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: sneakypete (#17) (Edited)

Does that mean you get to pick and choose who can have sex with

Nature already did that ala several billion years of selective evolution which resulted in HETEROsexual human procreation.

Hedonistic mutual masturbation isn't sex regardless of which body parts are used, and regardless of what the transhumanist/postgenderist progressive NewSpeak dictionary attempts to redefine it as.

VxH  posted on  2015-04-16   19:34:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: Fred Mertz (#22)

Back in our younger days we used to talk about blow jobs (from wimmins), but I've been polite enough not to ask this of the ones he married.

I suggested he had once,and he came unhinged.

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-16   20:10:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: Liberator, Fred Mertz (#24)

Thanks for the MUCH needed gender clarification, Fred.

You DO know it is still considered to be sodomy and is still illegal in several states,right?

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-16   20:12:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: TooConservative (#26)

Their lives, their choice.

I agree.

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-16   20:14:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: sneakypete (#37)

We still have some dry counties in Kentucky.

Nobody drinks alcohol there.../sarc

They can't buy it there though. Dang Baptists!

Fred Mertz  posted on  2015-04-16   20:15:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: Liberator (#27)

To further address your question, you or any mutant or multi-gendered person can indeed legally have consensual sex with anyone else otherwise to my knowledge.

And it fries your fritters that you can't have them tossed in jail for it,doesn't it?

So what "right" are you implying is deprived?

Are you trying to deny that you and your cult want any sexual contact made illegal that isn't between to married heterosexual adults,and any that doesn't consist entirely of the missionary position?

I asked you once if you and your wife ever had oral sodomy,and I thought your head was going to explode. You didn't answer directly,but IIRC you said or implied it was none of my business. On this I agree with you. Or would,if you didn't want other people put in jail for doing the same thing.

Are you ready to come out here now and publically state that you have never had any sex other than missionary position sex with your wife? If you won't make that claim,what moral standing do you have to jump all over others for having morality similar to yours?

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-16   20:20:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#41. To: Liberator (#28)

Yes, but their respective relationship, identity, and act isn't based on a singular act of sodomy, NOR is it celebrated in the public domain as some kind of noble, liberating act that EVERYONE should also celebrate. WITH GUSTO.

When it comes to sodomy players,homosexuals are a tiny minority.

Chyeah, sooo "tiny" that according to social media, Yahoo News, Google, MSM, the Tee-bee networks, movies, and academia, "sodomy players" are this society's annointed High Priests of liberation and enlightenment.

Ok,looks to me like you aren't against it as much as your are jealous of people who do it.

BTW,What kind of claim is "their respective relationship, identity, and act isn't based on a singular act of sodomy"? Are you claiming sodomy is ok some times?

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-16   20:23:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#42. To: BobCeleste (#30)

Whew, that's god to hear.

ROFLMAO! Subliminal spelling now,Bob?

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-16   20:24:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#43. To: BobCeleste (#31)

Let me correct that: I would not attend a male sodomite husband marrying a male homosexual wife wedding. No sense in me going to a lesbian wedding, I don't attend weddings that I can't tell the bride from the groom.

I think it is safe to assume since we are talking about the wedding of a relative here,you wouldn't have any trouble knowing who was male and who was female.

And to be truthful,it was too broad of a question. We all have relatives we wouldn't urinate on if they were on fire,so why would we go to their weddings regardless of who they married?

The INTENT of the question was to ask "Would you go to the homosexual wedding of a brother or sister,or a child of yours?"

And of course the lame follow up for this set up would be "If you would go to your homosexual son's homosexual wedding,who are you to criticise homosexuals for getting married,huh,huh,HUH?"

And the truth the homosexual activists AND the anti-homosexual fundies never want to hear anyone speak is "Of course,it was my son getting married,so I went to his wedding". The point being the focus was on him being your son,not that he was a homosexual.

Too much of that "Gotcha!" crap being played by both sides.

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-16   20:30:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#44. To: VxH (#35)

Does that mean you get to pick and choose who can have sex with

Nature already did that ala several billion years of selective evolution which resulted in HETEROsexual human procreation.

He bobs,he weaves,he avoids the question........

The question was "Would YOU want the power to tell others who they can and can not have sex with,and under what conditions?" It's not a hard question to understand.

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-16   20:33:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#45. To: Gay Wedding Pizzas (#0)

Before this nomination process is over they will all be sucking on a big Cuban blunt.

Percy Misanthrope  posted on  2015-04-16   21:19:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#46. To: sneakypete (#44)

Mostly they despise you because you refuse to jump through their hoops, the way they did when told to.

It never occured to them to refuse and when they found out you could it was too late and they were too afraid.

So rather than backtrack they try to get others to jump through, so they feel right.

If you won't jump, they despise.

Just children, really.

Biff Tannen  posted on  2015-04-16   22:30:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#47. To: sneakypete (#44)

No, I answered your question.

I just reject your progressive perverse redefinition of sex.

What your queer pals do is nothing but mutual masturbation and has nothing to do with sex, which is an evolved mechanism for procreation.

VxH  posted on  2015-04-16   23:27:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#48. To: VxH (#47)

Just because Sneakypetes family is loaded with faggots. He thinks every family has faggots in it.

No Sneaky Peter our family is normal. We don't carry the genetic defect that your family carries.

What Pete don't get.. Is that if it is not a choice like he lies about. That means his family is carrying a birth defect and passing it on to others. P

Pete doesn't even know that if you are born with a penis it is made for a vagina. And vice versa.

I wonder if Petes parents taught him this nonsense of if he is just stupid and immoral.

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-04-17   6:50:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#49. To: Biff Tannen (#46)

Mostly they despise you because you refuse to jump through their hoops, the way they did when told to.

People despise Pete because he is a moral degenerate who promotes perverted sex to adults and any children that happen to stumble upon this site.

I don't despise him. I think he is just convinced himself that wrong is right.

Pete is hung up on saying "gay marriage" is a right. But Pete is full of shit.

If Pete was consistent, and he is not even close to being consistent. He would say Mike Tyson was discriminated against because he had to join the mens olympic team and was not allowed to join the womans olympic boxing team.

That is how fucked in the head Petes reasoning is.

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-04-17   6:53:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#50. To: A K A Stone (#49)

Well, I've never seen him 'promote' it.

Biff Tannen  posted on  2015-04-17   7:28:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#51. To: sneakypete (#42)

Whew, that's god to hear.

ROFLMAO! Subliminal spelling now,Bob?

nope, little keuyboard on my not so smart, smart phone.

BobCeleste  posted on  2015-04-17   7:36:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#52. To: VxH (#47)

What your queer pals do is nothing but mutual masturbation and has nothing to do with sex, which is an evolved mechanism for procreation.

Ahhhh! So you side with Bubba Bill that oral sex "isn't really sex"?

Good to know!

You do know it is still legally defined as sodomy,right?

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-17   9:45:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#53. To: A K A Stone (#48)

He thinks every family has faggots in it.

Your's certainly does.

They might not confront you with it,but you can't have them all fooled.

You must sleep well at night,knowing that you are going to burn in hells fire for eternity.

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-17   9:47:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#54. To: A K A Stone (#49)

Pete is hung up on saying "gay marriage" is a right. But Pete is full of shit.

No,YOU are the one full of shit. I say MARRIAGE is a individual RIGHT. In FACT,who you marry may be the biggest personal decision you ever make,and EVERY American has the right to choose who they marry or don't marry.

Even homosexuals.

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-17   9:49:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#55. To: sneakypete (#52) (Edited)

I side with what Nature self-evidently created - not with the abominations advocated by reprobates like you and Bubba Bill.

VxH  posted on  2015-04-17   10:06:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#56. To: sneakypete (#54) (Edited)

I say MARRIAGE is a individual RIGHT.

Rights are natural and self-evident, the perversions of tranhumanist/postgenderists aren't rights -- not even when the demoralized, reprobate, and tyrannical majority says they are.

Gen 19:1-5

19 The two angels arrived at Sodom in the evening, and Lot was sitting in the gateway of the city. When he saw them, he got up to meet them and bowed down with his face to the ground. 2 "My lords," he said, "please turn aside to your servant's house. You can wash your feet and spend the night and then go on your way early in the morning."

"No," they answered, "we will spend the night in the square."

3 But he insisted so strongly that they did go with him and entered his house. He prepared a meal for them, baking bread without yeast, and they ate. 4 Before they had gone to bed, all the men from every part of the city of Sodom — both young and old — surrounded the house.

 5 They called to Lot, "Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us so that we can have sex with them."

NIV

Same Ol' Ba'al shyte, different municipal toilet.

VxH  posted on  2015-04-17   10:08:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#57. To: VxH (#55)

I side with what Nature self-evidently created - not with the abominations advocated by reprobates like you and Bubba Bill.

You seriously think *I* have enough power to create homsexuality?

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-17   17:23:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#58. To: VxH (#56)

Quoting a work of fiction proves nothing.

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-17   17:24:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#59. To: sneakypete (#58)

Quoting a work of fiction proves nothing.

" 5 They called to Lot, "Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us so that we can have sex with them."

Fiction or not, somebody went through the trouble of writing it down.

What do you suppose their motivation was?

VxH  posted on  2015-04-17   17:31:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#60. To: sneakypete (#57)

You seriously think *I* have enough power to create homsexuality?

Well, 3.5 billion years of evolution certainly didn't.

VxH  posted on  2015-04-17   17:32:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#61. To: sneakypete (#54)

I say MARRIAGE is a individual RIGHT. In FACT,who you marry may be the biggest personal decision you ever make,and EVERY American has the right to choose who they marry or don't marry.

I see you now support incest. Pete I think you have lost your mind. You can't remember stuff. You and your leftist ideas are reprehensible.

Please tell me no one let you use their uterus.

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-04-17   20:56:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#62. To: A K A Stone (#61)

I see you now support incest.

Are you and liberator brothers? It would make sense from my vantage point.

Fred Mertz  posted on  2015-04-17   20:59:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#63. To: VxH (#59)

What do you suppose their motivation was?

Control and power.

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-17   21:40:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#64. To: VxH (#60)

Well, 3.5 billion years of evolution certainly didn't.

Must have been magic,huh?

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-17   21:41:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#65. To: A K A Stone (#61)

I see you now support incest.

Where did THAT come from?

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-17   21:42:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#66. To: sneakypete (#64)

Must have been magic,huh?

Nope, just the usual reprobate perversion of nature.

VxH  posted on  2015-04-18   0:29:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#67. To: sneakypete (#63)

Control and power.

Self preservation.

VxH  posted on  2015-04-18   0:31:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#68. To: sneakypete, Fred Mertz (#65)

I see you now support incest.

Sneakypete "In FACT,who you marry may be the biggest personal decision you ever make,and EVERY American has the right to choose who they marry or don't marry."

Fred Mertz do you only correct misspellings. Or do you also know the meaning of words and what a sentence means?

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-04-18   0:55:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#69. To: Fred Mertz, Liberaor, Biff Tannen (#62)

I see you now support incest. Are you and liberator brothers? It would make sense from my vantage point.

No I am not brothers with Liberator. But I agree with him on most things.

When Biff rips Liberator. I sometimes wonder if Biff is ripping me.

I like Biff though.

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-04-18   0:56:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#70. To: Fred Mertz (#62)

Fred would you go to a sham fag pretend wedding?

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-04-18   0:57:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#71. To: VxH (#67)

Control and power.

Self preservation.

You do have a point,so we are both right. Self-preservation and advancement are at the core of the lust for control and power.

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-18   8:07:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#72. To: A K A Stone, Fred Mertz (#68)

I see you now support incest.

Sneakypete "In FACT,who you marry may be the biggest personal decision you ever make,and EVERY American has the right to choose who they marry or don't marry."

Fred Mertz do you only correct misspellings. Or do you also know the meaning of words and what a sentence means?

Has it ever occurred to you that YOU are the only one that is automatically linking "the right to marry anyone you want" with marrying your sister or mother?

I'm not easily shocked,but it never once occurred to me that anyone would get that meaning from what I wrote.

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-18   8:09:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#73. To: sneakypete, nolu chan (#72)

Learn to write correctly. You support incest according to your comment.

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-04-18   8:19:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#74. To: A K A Stone (#73)

Learn to write correctly. You support incest according to your comment.

I tell ya what,start a stand-alone thread quoting what I wrote,and poll LP readers to see who sees where I claim to support for incest in it,and who doesn't?

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-18   8:24:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#75. To: sneakypete (#71)

Self-preservation and advancement

The reprobate  transhumanist/postgenderist agenda isn't an advancement.   The sociobiological fitness of human homosexual behavior is naturaly ZERO. 

If the human race is to evolve and advance then let it do so in the context of the natural biological paradigm in which it has always existed -- not through the Übermensch wanabe misfit's perversion of science and abomination of nature.

VxH  posted on  2015-04-18   9:47:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#76. To: sneakypete, A K A Stone, Fred Mertz (#72)

the only one that is automatically linking "the right to marry anyone you want" with marrying your sister

That's exactly what the Pharaohs did when the Eunuchs propped them up and declared them as gods.

Same ol' progrethive Ba'alshyte, different municipal toilet.

VxH  posted on  2015-04-18   9:51:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#77. To: A K A Stone (#0) (Edited)

“Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rapidly promoted by mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.”

CZ82  posted on  2015-04-18   11:56:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#78. To: All (#0)

Come on ladies I think the arguing about faggots has been beat to death and the only thing you're gonna do is just piss each other off for no good reason, they aren't worth it.

“Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rapidly promoted by mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.”

CZ82  posted on  2015-04-18   11:58:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#79. To: VxH (#76)

That's exactly what the Pharaohs did when the Eunuchs propped them up and declared them as gods.

Ever heard of the word "relevance"?

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-18   18:47:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#80. To: sneakypete (#79)

Ever heard of the word "relevance"?

The reprobate perversions of the Eqyptian Eunuchs and their self-appointed Ubermensch man-god Pharaohs is just as "relevant", in the context of today's Transhumanist/Postgenderist perversion of nature, as it was then.

3000 years is a single grain of sand in the evolutionary time frame.

VxH  posted on  2015-04-18   22:07:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#81. To: A K A Stone (#69)

I like you too, AKA.

When I rip Luberator it's only him. Usually for being an idiot.

You two don't seem the same at all.

Biff Tannen  posted on  2015-04-18   22:10:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#82. To: VxH (#80)

Ever heard of the word "relevance"?

The reprobate perversions of the Eqyptian Eunuchs and their self-appointed Ubermensch man-god Pharaohs is just as "relevant", in the context of today's Transhumanist/Postgenderist perversion of nature, as it was then.

3000 years is a single grain of sand in the evolutionary time frame.

None of that has anything whatsoever to do with what I wrote,or with AKAStones claim that what I wrote promoted incest.

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-19   7:05:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#83. To: sneakypete (#82)

None of that has anything whatsoever to do with what I wrote

Your defense of the Transhumanst/Postgenderist agenda is the product of a reprobate mind that defies Natural Law.

VxH  posted on  2015-04-19   10:58:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#84. To: VxH (#83)

Your defense of the Transhumanst/Postgenderist agenda is the product of a reprobate mind that defies Natural Law.

Kneejerk fundie propaganda. I did no such thing as "defend the agenda" nonsense.

ALL I wrote is that homosexuals are Americans just like you and I are,and regardless of if you or I or anyone else likes them or approves of their lifestles or not,they are STILL American citizens and they STILL have the same RIGHTS as every other American.

And I wouldn't have it any other way because by definition any other way means that none of us have rights. All we have is permissions that can be withdrawn at any time because the government will be the only one with rights and they will be the ones setting the agenda.

Be VERY careful what you ask for,because if you get the America you seem to want,being a fundie will be outlawed,and you may every well end up in a mental institute.

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-19   16:38:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#85. To: sneakypete (#84) (Edited)

Kneejerk fundie propaganda.

No. Biogical FACT.

homosexuals are Americans just like you and I are

Nope. I recognize the fact that Nature selected HETEROsexual procreation for humans, and they don't

Reprobate Transhumanist/Postgenderists and those who support their agenda can't change the facts of natural evolutionary history, even if they do manage to temporarily manufacture a tyrannical majority in their favor.

VxH  posted on  2015-04-19   18:00:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#86. To: VxH (#85)

Nope. I recognize the fact that Nature selected HETEROsexual procreation for humans, and they don't

Do you really think people only have sex to have children?

I guess your mother only had sex one time so you could be born,and even that was probably by accident,right? Your father was probably sleeping on his back on the floor,and your mother tripped and fell on him,got up,tripped and fell on him again,got up and tripped and fell on him again,etc,etc,etc.

All by accident,of course.

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-19   20:52:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#87. To: sneakypete (#86)

Do you really think people only have sex to have children?

Natural selection produced sex for that purpose.

Mutual masturbation isn't sex.

VxH  posted on  2015-04-20   21:01:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com