[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Police clash with pro-Palestine protesters on Ohio State University campus

Joe Rogan Experience #2138 - Tucker Carlson

Police Dispersing Student Protesters at USC - Breaking News Coverage (College Protests)

What Passover Means For The New Testament Believer

Are We Closer Than Ever To The Next Pandemic?

War in Ukraine Turns on Russia

what happened during total solar eclipse

Israel Attacks Iran, Report Says - LIVE Breaking News Coverage

Earth is Scorched with Heat

Antiwar Activists Chant ‘Death to America’ at Event Featuring Chicago Alderman

Vibe Shift

A stream that makes the pleasant Rain sound.

Older Men - Keep One Foot In The Dark Ages

When You Really Want to Meet the Diversity Requirements

CERN to test world's most powerful particle accelerator during April's solar eclipse

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin

How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End?

What on EARTH is going on in Acts 16:11? New Discovery!

2023 Hottest in over 120 Million Years

2024 and beyond in prophecy

Questions

This Speech Just Broke the Internet


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

LEFT WING LOONS
See other LEFT WING LOONS Articles

Title: Marco Rubio: I’d attend a gay wedding
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://fusion.net/video/120998/marc ... arriage-jorge-ramos-interview/
Published: Apr 16, 2015
Author: Brett LoGiurato and AMERICA with Jorge R
Post Date: 2015-04-16 06:48:26 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 14266
Comments: 87

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Florida), the newest and youngest official Republican candidate for president, has said he believes marriage should be “traditional”—between a man and a woman.

So Fusion’s Jorge Ramos asked him: If someone in his family or on his staff were gay and getting married, would he attend the wedding?

“If it’s somebody in my life that I care for, of course I would,” Rubio told Ramos in an interview on Wednesday.

“I’m not going to hurt them simply because I disagree with a choice they’ve made or because I disagree with a decision they’ve made, or whatever it may be,” he added. “Ultimately, if someone that you care for and is part of your family has decided to move in one direction or another or feels that way because of who they love, you respect that because you love them.”

Rubio spoke with Ramos about a variety of issues, including marriage equality, immigration reform, climate change, President Barack Obama’s move to normalize relations with Cuba, and which rapper or singer he’d like to perform at his potential 2017 inauguration.

In the early throes of his campaign, Rubio has positioned himself as the candidate of “tomorrow.” He has cast himself as a young, fresh alternative to other Republicans and to likely Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton, who he referred to in his announcement speech as the candidate of “yesterday.”

But his stance on gay marriage has led to questions on whether he’s more out of touch than Clinton with young people on certain issues. According to a recent NBC/Wall Street Journal poll, 74 percent of 18-to-34-year-olds said they were in favor of allowing gay and lesbian couples to marry. On Tuesday, CNN anchor Jake Tapper called Rubio “the candidate of yesterday” on the issue of marriage equality.

Rubio said that while he personally opposes gay marriage, he would encourage people in favor to petition their state legislatures to permit same-sex marriages. He does not think the decision should be left up to courts, he said.

“I would point out that we live in a free society,” Rubio said. “If people want to change the definition of marriage, they should petition their state legislature, and they can have that debate in the political arena. Who I don’t think should be redefining marriage is the court system.”

Rubio, who is Catholic, noted that his faith also teaches that divorce is wrong, and he drew on that as a comparison to his personal feelings on gay marriage.

“But again, as I said, I’m a member of the Catholic faith that teaches, for example, that divorce is wrong,” Rubio said. “But if someone gets divorced, I’m not going to stop loving them or having them a part of our lives.”


Poster Comment:

He is now officially off the list. He was at the bottom. Sounds like a perfect candidate for queers that are sneaky.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-46) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#47. To: sneakypete (#44)

No, I answered your question.

I just reject your progressive perverse redefinition of sex.

What your queer pals do is nothing but mutual masturbation and has nothing to do with sex, which is an evolved mechanism for procreation.

VxH  posted on  2015-04-16   23:27:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#48. To: VxH (#47)

Just because Sneakypetes family is loaded with faggots. He thinks every family has faggots in it.

No Sneaky Peter our family is normal. We don't carry the genetic defect that your family carries.

What Pete don't get.. Is that if it is not a choice like he lies about. That means his family is carrying a birth defect and passing it on to others. P

Pete doesn't even know that if you are born with a penis it is made for a vagina. And vice versa.

I wonder if Petes parents taught him this nonsense of if he is just stupid and immoral.

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-04-17   6:50:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#49. To: Biff Tannen (#46)

Mostly they despise you because you refuse to jump through their hoops, the way they did when told to.

People despise Pete because he is a moral degenerate who promotes perverted sex to adults and any children that happen to stumble upon this site.

I don't despise him. I think he is just convinced himself that wrong is right.

Pete is hung up on saying "gay marriage" is a right. But Pete is full of shit.

If Pete was consistent, and he is not even close to being consistent. He would say Mike Tyson was discriminated against because he had to join the mens olympic team and was not allowed to join the womans olympic boxing team.

That is how fucked in the head Petes reasoning is.

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-04-17   6:53:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#50. To: A K A Stone (#49)

Well, I've never seen him 'promote' it.

Biff Tannen  posted on  2015-04-17   7:28:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#51. To: sneakypete (#42)

Whew, that's god to hear.

ROFLMAO! Subliminal spelling now,Bob?

nope, little keuyboard on my not so smart, smart phone.

BobCeleste  posted on  2015-04-17   7:36:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#52. To: VxH (#47)

What your queer pals do is nothing but mutual masturbation and has nothing to do with sex, which is an evolved mechanism for procreation.

Ahhhh! So you side with Bubba Bill that oral sex "isn't really sex"?

Good to know!

You do know it is still legally defined as sodomy,right?

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-17   9:45:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#53. To: A K A Stone (#48)

He thinks every family has faggots in it.

Your's certainly does.

They might not confront you with it,but you can't have them all fooled.

You must sleep well at night,knowing that you are going to burn in hells fire for eternity.

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-17   9:47:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#54. To: A K A Stone (#49)

Pete is hung up on saying "gay marriage" is a right. But Pete is full of shit.

No,YOU are the one full of shit. I say MARRIAGE is a individual RIGHT. In FACT,who you marry may be the biggest personal decision you ever make,and EVERY American has the right to choose who they marry or don't marry.

Even homosexuals.

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-17   9:49:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#55. To: sneakypete (#52) (Edited)

I side with what Nature self-evidently created - not with the abominations advocated by reprobates like you and Bubba Bill.

VxH  posted on  2015-04-17   10:06:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#56. To: sneakypete (#54) (Edited)

I say MARRIAGE is a individual RIGHT.

Rights are natural and self-evident, the perversions of tranhumanist/postgenderists aren't rights -- not even when the demoralized, reprobate, and tyrannical majority says they are.

Gen 19:1-5

19 The two angels arrived at Sodom in the evening, and Lot was sitting in the gateway of the city. When he saw them, he got up to meet them and bowed down with his face to the ground. 2 "My lords," he said, "please turn aside to your servant's house. You can wash your feet and spend the night and then go on your way early in the morning."

"No," they answered, "we will spend the night in the square."

3 But he insisted so strongly that they did go with him and entered his house. He prepared a meal for them, baking bread without yeast, and they ate. 4 Before they had gone to bed, all the men from every part of the city of Sodom — both young and old — surrounded the house.

 5 They called to Lot, "Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us so that we can have sex with them."

NIV

Same Ol' Ba'al shyte, different municipal toilet.

VxH  posted on  2015-04-17   10:08:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#57. To: VxH (#55)

I side with what Nature self-evidently created - not with the abominations advocated by reprobates like you and Bubba Bill.

You seriously think *I* have enough power to create homsexuality?

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-17   17:23:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#58. To: VxH (#56)

Quoting a work of fiction proves nothing.

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-17   17:24:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#59. To: sneakypete (#58)

Quoting a work of fiction proves nothing.

" 5 They called to Lot, "Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us so that we can have sex with them."

Fiction or not, somebody went through the trouble of writing it down.

What do you suppose their motivation was?

VxH  posted on  2015-04-17   17:31:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#60. To: sneakypete (#57)

You seriously think *I* have enough power to create homsexuality?

Well, 3.5 billion years of evolution certainly didn't.

VxH  posted on  2015-04-17   17:32:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#61. To: sneakypete (#54)

I say MARRIAGE is a individual RIGHT. In FACT,who you marry may be the biggest personal decision you ever make,and EVERY American has the right to choose who they marry or don't marry.

I see you now support incest. Pete I think you have lost your mind. You can't remember stuff. You and your leftist ideas are reprehensible.

Please tell me no one let you use their uterus.

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-04-17   20:56:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#62. To: A K A Stone (#61)

I see you now support incest.

Are you and liberator brothers? It would make sense from my vantage point.

Fred Mertz  posted on  2015-04-17   20:59:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#63. To: VxH (#59)

What do you suppose their motivation was?

Control and power.

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-17   21:40:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#64. To: VxH (#60)

Well, 3.5 billion years of evolution certainly didn't.

Must have been magic,huh?

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-17   21:41:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#65. To: A K A Stone (#61)

I see you now support incest.

Where did THAT come from?

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-17   21:42:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#66. To: sneakypete (#64)

Must have been magic,huh?

Nope, just the usual reprobate perversion of nature.

VxH  posted on  2015-04-18   0:29:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#67. To: sneakypete (#63)

Control and power.

Self preservation.

VxH  posted on  2015-04-18   0:31:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#68. To: sneakypete, Fred Mertz (#65)

I see you now support incest.

Sneakypete "In FACT,who you marry may be the biggest personal decision you ever make,and EVERY American has the right to choose who they marry or don't marry."

Fred Mertz do you only correct misspellings. Or do you also know the meaning of words and what a sentence means?

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-04-18   0:55:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#69. To: Fred Mertz, Liberaor, Biff Tannen (#62)

I see you now support incest. Are you and liberator brothers? It would make sense from my vantage point.

No I am not brothers with Liberator. But I agree with him on most things.

When Biff rips Liberator. I sometimes wonder if Biff is ripping me.

I like Biff though.

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-04-18   0:56:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#70. To: Fred Mertz (#62)

Fred would you go to a sham fag pretend wedding?

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-04-18   0:57:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#71. To: VxH (#67)

Control and power.

Self preservation.

You do have a point,so we are both right. Self-preservation and advancement are at the core of the lust for control and power.

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-18   8:07:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#72. To: A K A Stone, Fred Mertz (#68)

I see you now support incest.

Sneakypete "In FACT,who you marry may be the biggest personal decision you ever make,and EVERY American has the right to choose who they marry or don't marry."

Fred Mertz do you only correct misspellings. Or do you also know the meaning of words and what a sentence means?

Has it ever occurred to you that YOU are the only one that is automatically linking "the right to marry anyone you want" with marrying your sister or mother?

I'm not easily shocked,but it never once occurred to me that anyone would get that meaning from what I wrote.

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-18   8:09:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#73. To: sneakypete, nolu chan (#72)

Learn to write correctly. You support incest according to your comment.

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-04-18   8:19:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#74. To: A K A Stone (#73)

Learn to write correctly. You support incest according to your comment.

I tell ya what,start a stand-alone thread quoting what I wrote,and poll LP readers to see who sees where I claim to support for incest in it,and who doesn't?

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-18   8:24:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#75. To: sneakypete (#71)

Self-preservation and advancement

The reprobate  transhumanist/postgenderist agenda isn't an advancement.   The sociobiological fitness of human homosexual behavior is naturaly ZERO. 

If the human race is to evolve and advance then let it do so in the context of the natural biological paradigm in which it has always existed -- not through the Übermensch wanabe misfit's perversion of science and abomination of nature.

VxH  posted on  2015-04-18   9:47:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#76. To: sneakypete, A K A Stone, Fred Mertz (#72)

the only one that is automatically linking "the right to marry anyone you want" with marrying your sister

That's exactly what the Pharaohs did when the Eunuchs propped them up and declared them as gods.

Same ol' progrethive Ba'alshyte, different municipal toilet.

VxH  posted on  2015-04-18   9:51:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#77. To: A K A Stone (#0) (Edited)

“Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rapidly promoted by mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.”

CZ82  posted on  2015-04-18   11:56:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#78. To: All (#0)

Come on ladies I think the arguing about faggots has been beat to death and the only thing you're gonna do is just piss each other off for no good reason, they aren't worth it.

“Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rapidly promoted by mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.”

CZ82  posted on  2015-04-18   11:58:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#79. To: VxH (#76)

That's exactly what the Pharaohs did when the Eunuchs propped them up and declared them as gods.

Ever heard of the word "relevance"?

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-18   18:47:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#80. To: sneakypete (#79)

Ever heard of the word "relevance"?

The reprobate perversions of the Eqyptian Eunuchs and their self-appointed Ubermensch man-god Pharaohs is just as "relevant", in the context of today's Transhumanist/Postgenderist perversion of nature, as it was then.

3000 years is a single grain of sand in the evolutionary time frame.

VxH  posted on  2015-04-18   22:07:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#81. To: A K A Stone (#69)

I like you too, AKA.

When I rip Luberator it's only him. Usually for being an idiot.

You two don't seem the same at all.

Biff Tannen  posted on  2015-04-18   22:10:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#82. To: VxH (#80)

Ever heard of the word "relevance"?

The reprobate perversions of the Eqyptian Eunuchs and their self-appointed Ubermensch man-god Pharaohs is just as "relevant", in the context of today's Transhumanist/Postgenderist perversion of nature, as it was then.

3000 years is a single grain of sand in the evolutionary time frame.

None of that has anything whatsoever to do with what I wrote,or with AKAStones claim that what I wrote promoted incest.

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-19   7:05:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#83. To: sneakypete (#82)

None of that has anything whatsoever to do with what I wrote

Your defense of the Transhumanst/Postgenderist agenda is the product of a reprobate mind that defies Natural Law.

VxH  posted on  2015-04-19   10:58:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#84. To: VxH (#83)

Your defense of the Transhumanst/Postgenderist agenda is the product of a reprobate mind that defies Natural Law.

Kneejerk fundie propaganda. I did no such thing as "defend the agenda" nonsense.

ALL I wrote is that homosexuals are Americans just like you and I are,and regardless of if you or I or anyone else likes them or approves of their lifestles or not,they are STILL American citizens and they STILL have the same RIGHTS as every other American.

And I wouldn't have it any other way because by definition any other way means that none of us have rights. All we have is permissions that can be withdrawn at any time because the government will be the only one with rights and they will be the ones setting the agenda.

Be VERY careful what you ask for,because if you get the America you seem to want,being a fundie will be outlawed,and you may every well end up in a mental institute.

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-19   16:38:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#85. To: sneakypete (#84) (Edited)

Kneejerk fundie propaganda.

No. Biogical FACT.

homosexuals are Americans just like you and I are

Nope. I recognize the fact that Nature selected HETEROsexual procreation for humans, and they don't

Reprobate Transhumanist/Postgenderists and those who support their agenda can't change the facts of natural evolutionary history, even if they do manage to temporarily manufacture a tyrannical majority in their favor.

VxH  posted on  2015-04-19   18:00:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#86. To: VxH (#85)

Nope. I recognize the fact that Nature selected HETEROsexual procreation for humans, and they don't

Do you really think people only have sex to have children?

I guess your mother only had sex one time so you could be born,and even that was probably by accident,right? Your father was probably sleeping on his back on the floor,and your mother tripped and fell on him,got up,tripped and fell on him again,got up and tripped and fell on him again,etc,etc,etc.

All by accident,of course.

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-19   20:52:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#87. To: sneakypete (#86)

Do you really think people only have sex to have children?

Natural selection produced sex for that purpose.

Mutual masturbation isn't sex.

VxH  posted on  2015-04-20   21:01:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com