[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Police clash with pro-Palestine protesters on Ohio State University campus

Joe Rogan Experience #2138 - Tucker Carlson

Police Dispersing Student Protesters at USC - Breaking News Coverage (College Protests)

What Passover Means For The New Testament Believer

Are We Closer Than Ever To The Next Pandemic?

War in Ukraine Turns on Russia

what happened during total solar eclipse

Israel Attacks Iran, Report Says - LIVE Breaking News Coverage

Earth is Scorched with Heat

Antiwar Activists Chant ‘Death to America’ at Event Featuring Chicago Alderman

Vibe Shift

A stream that makes the pleasant Rain sound.

Older Men - Keep One Foot In The Dark Ages

When You Really Want to Meet the Diversity Requirements

CERN to test world's most powerful particle accelerator during April's solar eclipse

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin

How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End?

What on EARTH is going on in Acts 16:11? New Discovery!

2023 Hottest in over 120 Million Years

2024 and beyond in prophecy

Questions

This Speech Just Broke the Internet


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

LEFT WING LOONS
See other LEFT WING LOONS Articles

Title: Marco Rubio: I’d attend a gay wedding
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://fusion.net/video/120998/marc ... arriage-jorge-ramos-interview/
Published: Apr 16, 2015
Author: Brett LoGiurato and AMERICA with Jorge R
Post Date: 2015-04-16 06:48:26 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 14285
Comments: 87

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Florida), the newest and youngest official Republican candidate for president, has said he believes marriage should be “traditional”—between a man and a woman.

So Fusion’s Jorge Ramos asked him: If someone in his family or on his staff were gay and getting married, would he attend the wedding?

“If it’s somebody in my life that I care for, of course I would,” Rubio told Ramos in an interview on Wednesday.

“I’m not going to hurt them simply because I disagree with a choice they’ve made or because I disagree with a decision they’ve made, or whatever it may be,” he added. “Ultimately, if someone that you care for and is part of your family has decided to move in one direction or another or feels that way because of who they love, you respect that because you love them.”

Rubio spoke with Ramos about a variety of issues, including marriage equality, immigration reform, climate change, President Barack Obama’s move to normalize relations with Cuba, and which rapper or singer he’d like to perform at his potential 2017 inauguration.

In the early throes of his campaign, Rubio has positioned himself as the candidate of “tomorrow.” He has cast himself as a young, fresh alternative to other Republicans and to likely Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton, who he referred to in his announcement speech as the candidate of “yesterday.”

But his stance on gay marriage has led to questions on whether he’s more out of touch than Clinton with young people on certain issues. According to a recent NBC/Wall Street Journal poll, 74 percent of 18-to-34-year-olds said they were in favor of allowing gay and lesbian couples to marry. On Tuesday, CNN anchor Jake Tapper called Rubio “the candidate of yesterday” on the issue of marriage equality.

Rubio said that while he personally opposes gay marriage, he would encourage people in favor to petition their state legislatures to permit same-sex marriages. He does not think the decision should be left up to courts, he said.

“I would point out that we live in a free society,” Rubio said. “If people want to change the definition of marriage, they should petition their state legislature, and they can have that debate in the political arena. Who I don’t think should be redefining marriage is the court system.”

Rubio, who is Catholic, noted that his faith also teaches that divorce is wrong, and he drew on that as a comparison to his personal feelings on gay marriage.

“But again, as I said, I’m a member of the Catholic faith that teaches, for example, that divorce is wrong,” Rubio said. “But if someone gets divorced, I’m not going to stop loving them or having them a part of our lives.”


Poster Comment:

He is now officially off the list. He was at the bottom. Sounds like a perfect candidate for queers that are sneaky.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 68.

#1. To: A K A Stone (#0) (Edited)

Just another "Conthervative" { uhhh } "But Progrethive" log cabin RINO.

VxH  posted on  2015-04-16   6:56:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: VxH (#1)

Just another "Conthervative" { uhhh } "But Progrethive" log cabin RINO.

So,you think the idea of having Second Class citizens that don't have the same rights as other citizens is a "conservative opinion"?

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-16   8:22:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: sneakypete (#8) (Edited)

I think the deliberate proliferation of social cancer is as culturally self-destructive as it has always been documented to be.

Worshiping transhumanist/postgenderist cancer isn't "conservative".

VxH  posted on  2015-04-16   8:34:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: VxH (#10)

I think the deliberate proliferation of social cancer is as culturally self-destructive as it has always been documented to be.

OK.

Does that mean you get to pick and choose who can have sex with who,and who has rights and who doesn't have rights?

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-16   12:55:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: sneakypete (#17) (Edited)

Does that mean you get to pick and choose who can have sex with

Nature already did that ala several billion years of selective evolution which resulted in HETEROsexual human procreation.

Hedonistic mutual masturbation isn't sex regardless of which body parts are used, and regardless of what the transhumanist/postgenderist progressive NewSpeak dictionary attempts to redefine it as.

VxH  posted on  2015-04-16   19:34:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#44. To: VxH (#35)

Does that mean you get to pick and choose who can have sex with

Nature already did that ala several billion years of selective evolution which resulted in HETEROsexual human procreation.

He bobs,he weaves,he avoids the question........

The question was "Would YOU want the power to tell others who they can and can not have sex with,and under what conditions?" It's not a hard question to understand.

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-16   20:33:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#46. To: sneakypete (#44)

Mostly they despise you because you refuse to jump through their hoops, the way they did when told to.

It never occured to them to refuse and when they found out you could it was too late and they were too afraid.

So rather than backtrack they try to get others to jump through, so they feel right.

If you won't jump, they despise.

Just children, really.

Biff Tannen  posted on  2015-04-16   22:30:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#49. To: Biff Tannen (#46)

Mostly they despise you because you refuse to jump through their hoops, the way they did when told to.

People despise Pete because he is a moral degenerate who promotes perverted sex to adults and any children that happen to stumble upon this site.

I don't despise him. I think he is just convinced himself that wrong is right.

Pete is hung up on saying "gay marriage" is a right. But Pete is full of shit.

If Pete was consistent, and he is not even close to being consistent. He would say Mike Tyson was discriminated against because he had to join the mens olympic team and was not allowed to join the womans olympic boxing team.

That is how fucked in the head Petes reasoning is.

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-04-17   6:53:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#54. To: A K A Stone (#49)

Pete is hung up on saying "gay marriage" is a right. But Pete is full of shit.

No,YOU are the one full of shit. I say MARRIAGE is a individual RIGHT. In FACT,who you marry may be the biggest personal decision you ever make,and EVERY American has the right to choose who they marry or don't marry.

Even homosexuals.

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-17   9:49:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#61. To: sneakypete (#54)

I say MARRIAGE is a individual RIGHT. In FACT,who you marry may be the biggest personal decision you ever make,and EVERY American has the right to choose who they marry or don't marry.

I see you now support incest. Pete I think you have lost your mind. You can't remember stuff. You and your leftist ideas are reprehensible.

Please tell me no one let you use their uterus.

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-04-17   20:56:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#65. To: A K A Stone (#61)

I see you now support incest.

Where did THAT come from?

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-17   21:42:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#68. To: sneakypete, Fred Mertz (#65)

I see you now support incest.

Sneakypete "In FACT,who you marry may be the biggest personal decision you ever make,and EVERY American has the right to choose who they marry or don't marry."

Fred Mertz do you only correct misspellings. Or do you also know the meaning of words and what a sentence means?

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-04-18   0:55:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 68.

#72. To: A K A Stone, Fred Mertz (#68)

I see you now support incest.

Sneakypete "In FACT,who you marry may be the biggest personal decision you ever make,and EVERY American has the right to choose who they marry or don't marry."

Fred Mertz do you only correct misspellings. Or do you also know the meaning of words and what a sentence means?

Has it ever occurred to you that YOU are the only one that is automatically linking "the right to marry anyone you want" with marrying your sister or mother?

I'm not easily shocked,but it never once occurred to me that anyone would get that meaning from what I wrote.

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-18 08:09:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 68.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com