Importing Jihad Refugee Resettlement: The quiet Jihad tsunami
The FBI admits that they cannot properly screen the Syrians, while the US State Department is telling the media that 10,000 Syrians will be here soon. Syria, home of the Islamic State.
Al hijrah, jihad by immigration.
And while the genocide of Christians is ongoing in Syria, over 90% of the Syrians who are being brought to America are Muslims. It’s a catastrophe. The top five states targeted for Syrian Muslim resettlement are California, Illinois, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Texas.
Meanwhile, dozens of American jihadis who fought in the war in Iraq and Syria have returned to the United States, equipped with the training they used fighting either for or against ISIS, according to one federal official.
Maybe the State Department can reunite these two very similar Muslim groups.
“First Syrians arrive in North Texas,” by Ann Corcoran, RRW, on April 11, 2015
If you haven’t already, you will be seeing more warm and fuzzy stories like this one in your states as the Syrian refugees begin to arrive. We have taken in 682 so far. See my post of last Saturday and see which states they went to.
As the FBI says they cannot properly screen Syrians, the US State Department seems to be still telling the media that 10,000 will be here soon.
The contractors want 65,000 by the end of 2016!
From WFAA (Dallas) which implies only a handful have arrived in Texas, however, Texas has received at least 86 so far and as the top resettlement state in the nation, it will receive the most Syrians.
Doing well by doing good: Heather Reynolds is CEO of Catholic Charities Ft. Worth and is one of the leaders resettling Middle Easterners to Dallas/Ft. Worth. In her mid-30’s, Ms. Reynolds pulls down a cool $199,324 in salary and related income. In a recent form 990 we learned that this Catholic Charities office took in almost $17 million in revenue and $9 million came from you through government grants.
No surprise that the refugee industry puts its most appealing refugees (like these cute girls) out for PR campaigns. The mainstream media eats it up!
Eight Syrian refugee families call North Texas home right now — four in Dallas and four in Fort Worth. But Basatneh [Syrian American Council] said more are on their way after the U.S. State Department agreed to accept as many as 10,000.
Watch the clip where we are told that “it is our duty” to take them in and that 1,000 will be coming to Texas within the year? Say what!
We are told the flow will be on par with the Iraqi flow which stands at 20,000 per year right now.
And, note the lovely apartment the family has received, I bet there are some needy Americans in Dallas/Ft. Worth who would love a place like that!
So who is doing the seeding of refugees in the Dallas/Ft. Worth area?
Four of the nine major contractors have divided up what must be a large flow to Ft. Worth:
Doing well by doing good: Heather Reynolds is CEO of Catholic Charities Ft. Worth and is one of the leaders resettling Middle Easterners to Dallas/Ft. Worth. In her mid-30’s, Ms. Reynolds pulls down a cool $199,324 in salary and related income. In a recent form 990 we learned that this Catholic Charities office took in almost $17 million in revenue and $9 million came from you through government grants.
Thanks for saving me the trouble of looking it up. The Catholic Church is as big an enemy and as dangerous to America and our Constitution as the Soviet Union ever was. They were the ones behind the big push to resettle all the El Salvadorian communists here in the US after they were defeated in El Salvador.
They should have their tax-free charity license pulled,and be taxed at the highest corporate rate on profits and property. Same with any other "religion" that is in the "charity business" via government contracts.
The Catholic Church is a dictatorship, and King maker. Given the power and influence to pull politics into their sphere completely they have done so many times in the past. The reason most immigration into America has been from Catholic dominated countries, political power. America was formed as a breakaway from the theocracy of the Church of England. The Pope moved the French and Spain to change the balance of power in the years before and after the Civil War. Same "game" as todays swarms of Catholics from Central America. I don't hate Catholics, but the Pope to me is just slightly different than a Muslim cleric. You give him the power to make war, and he will make it happen. The Catholic heirarchy is just weaker now than in the past, but still infected with the need for power.
The Romans always had a knack for mobilizing and manipulating the Mob with bread, circuses, and state-established superstition.
You sound like you think the Romans in charge were not religious men - were not as superstitious as their citizens?
It is now considered more accurate to think that the Romans deeply believed their religion and superstitions. They actually did think the gods would punish Rome if a ritual or sacrifice was not performed, etc.
Also, it was a long established belief that the Romans were tricking the people into submission by providing them with bread and circuses - free food and distractions - but now scholars are of the opinion the Roman senate feared the public and these were bribes to prevent the citizenry from turning on them.
In other words, there was real power that the Roman citizen had and the Roman citizen very much intended to get a benefit from the empire and that they always watched to make sure the senate elite did not steal it all for themselves.
In other words, there was real power that the Roman citizen had and the Roman citizen very much intended to get a benefit from the empire and that they always watched to make sure the senate elite did not steal it all for themselves.
One parallel in this case is that *neither* Roman citizens OR Americans (or for that matter ANY of the world's citizenry) are capable of truly monitoring their respective government reps for corruption and administering justice. The elites are immune from the law. How do we know this? The American people are now on the hook for $19 trillion as countless reps get caught with their hands in the cookie jar...and routinely collude with international elites in larceny on an epic scale. WITH impunity. You own country -- socialist Greece -- is dead broke. It now survives on hand-outs from the EU.
The American people are now on the hook for $19 trillion as countless reps get caught with their hands in the cookie jar...and routinely collude with international elites in larceny on an epic scale. WITH impunity. You own country -- socialist Greece -- is dead broke. It now survives on hand- outs from the EU.
If we had socialism we would be on the hook for the same amount but be a cleaner, and well built nation like Scandinavia. But what we got instead was Reagonomics.
The 1980s of the Ronald Reagan's Era into the early 90s was an unprecedented era of peace, prosperity, and hope for the future. (Do you remember any wars during the Reagan Years?)
"Reaganomics" -- though not perfect -- helped smash the Berlin Wall and free millions from the bondage of Communism. Investments and creativity in America as well as the West were off the hook. Optimism and stability will do that. Yeah, "Reaganomics" really sucked...
But THEN we got NWO Globalist Puppet Poppy Bush and Klinton, began stressing "Global First," and immediately got into major international wars. Socialist economics and social "justice" policies (aka "compassionate conservatism" and Klintomics) were implemented and enforced. From 1991 and onward we've nose-dived demographically, culturally, economically, and morally into a death-spiral.
The peace and prosperity of the 80's and 90's were products of the technological revolution that was ignited by the Space Race in the 60's.
I specifically cited the 1980s and early 90s. Were you using the internet in the 80s and early 90s?? If technological advances are a reason for peace and prosperity, then by your theory we ought to be in Nirvana by now.
No, as I stated, the Reagan Years were punctuated an unprecedented era of peace, prosperity, and hope for the future. In other words, the REAL America. That basis was that was the moral clarity, optimism, and conviction of righteousness emanating right from the top: RONALD REAGAN.
Buggs Bunny could've been in the White Hut and the times wouldn't have been different. Even Bill Klintoon couldn't muck it up. And his minions like to take credit too for the inertial prosperity that remained on their watch.
Oh but Clinton indeed DID "muck it up," during his regime, didn't he? Badly. He was a liar. And rapist. He made a mockery of morality, leadership, and accountability. Your much bally-hooed theory about technology facilitating "peace and prosperity" is a FAIL. You'd also omitted the "hope for the future" that Reagan projected but Clinton personally helped destroy. He and his regime were a national moral disaster, which of course led to a government that we no longer trusted, nor believed was benevolent.
What year did the dot.com boom reach its apex, suuuper-genius?
HUH?? Off track again? What else is new.
Tell the class exactly what the "dot.com boom" has to do with my assertion that the Reagan Years were punctuated an unprecedented era of peace, prosperity, and hope for the future? And that it was based on Reagan's leadership which stressed moral clarity, optimism, and conviction of righteousness.
YOUR kooky assertion is that THE basis of the Reagan Era of peace, prosperity, and hope was based on....technology. And (Bwaahaa!) "The Space Race."
That's what Saint Ronaldo's angels were creating when they were selling arms to Iran, and their bidness associates were selling cocaine to fund the Contras.
