Importing Jihad Refugee Resettlement: The quiet Jihad tsunami
The FBI admits that they cannot properly screen the Syrians, while the US State Department is telling the media that 10,000 Syrians will be here soon. Syria, home of the Islamic State.
Al hijrah, jihad by immigration.
And while the genocide of Christians is ongoing in Syria, over 90% of the Syrians who are being brought to America are Muslims. It’s a catastrophe. The top five states targeted for Syrian Muslim resettlement are California, Illinois, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Texas.
Meanwhile, dozens of American jihadis who fought in the war in Iraq and Syria have returned to the United States, equipped with the training they used fighting either for or against ISIS, according to one federal official.
Maybe the State Department can reunite these two very similar Muslim groups.
“First Syrians arrive in North Texas,” by Ann Corcoran, RRW, on April 11, 2015
If you haven’t already, you will be seeing more warm and fuzzy stories like this one in your states as the Syrian refugees begin to arrive. We have taken in 682 so far. See my post of last Saturday and see which states they went to.
As the FBI says they cannot properly screen Syrians, the US State Department seems to be still telling the media that 10,000 will be here soon.
The contractors want 65,000 by the end of 2016!
From WFAA (Dallas) which implies only a handful have arrived in Texas, however, Texas has received at least 86 so far and as the top resettlement state in the nation, it will receive the most Syrians.
Doing well by doing good: Heather Reynolds is CEO of Catholic Charities Ft. Worth and is one of the leaders resettling Middle Easterners to Dallas/Ft. Worth. In her mid-30’s, Ms. Reynolds pulls down a cool $199,324 in salary and related income. In a recent form 990 we learned that this Catholic Charities office took in almost $17 million in revenue and $9 million came from you through government grants.
No surprise that the refugee industry puts its most appealing refugees (like these cute girls) out for PR campaigns. The mainstream media eats it up!
Eight Syrian refugee families call North Texas home right now — four in Dallas and four in Fort Worth. But Basatneh [Syrian American Council] said more are on their way after the U.S. State Department agreed to accept as many as 10,000.
Watch the clip where we are told that “it is our duty” to take them in and that 1,000 will be coming to Texas within the year? Say what!
We are told the flow will be on par with the Iraqi flow which stands at 20,000 per year right now.
And, note the lovely apartment the family has received, I bet there are some needy Americans in Dallas/Ft. Worth who would love a place like that!
So who is doing the seeding of refugees in the Dallas/Ft. Worth area?
Four of the nine major contractors have divided up what must be a large flow to Ft. Worth:
Doing well by doing good: Heather Reynolds is CEO of Catholic Charities Ft. Worth and is one of the leaders resettling Middle Easterners to Dallas/Ft. Worth. In her mid-30’s, Ms. Reynolds pulls down a cool $199,324 in salary and related income. In a recent form 990 we learned that this Catholic Charities office took in almost $17 million in revenue and $9 million came from you through government grants.
Thanks for saving me the trouble of looking it up. The Catholic Church is as big an enemy and as dangerous to America and our Constitution as the Soviet Union ever was. They were the ones behind the big push to resettle all the El Salvadorian communists here in the US after they were defeated in El Salvador.
They should have their tax-free charity license pulled,and be taxed at the highest corporate rate on profits and property. Same with any other "religion" that is in the "charity business" via government contracts.
The Catholic Church is a dictatorship, and King maker. Given the power and influence to pull politics into their sphere completely they have done so many times in the past. The reason most immigration into America has been from Catholic dominated countries, political power. America was formed as a breakaway from the theocracy of the Church of England. The Pope moved the French and Spain to change the balance of power in the years before and after the Civil War. Same "game" as todays swarms of Catholics from Central America. I don't hate Catholics, but the Pope to me is just slightly different than a Muslim cleric. You give him the power to make war, and he will make it happen. The Catholic heirarchy is just weaker now than in the past, but still infected with the need for power.
It is actually a republic. They elect their leader.
LOL. It's no more of a Government Of, By, and For the People than the facade facilitated by the Oprichni secret police/KGB/FSB in the Orthodox Russian state-establishment.
Same ol' theocratic Ba'al-shyte, different municipal toilet.
It is actually a republic. They elect their leader.
LOL. It's no more of a Government Of, By, and For the People than the facade facilitated by the Oprichni secret police/KGB/FSB in the Orthodox Russian state-establishment.
A republic does not need to be "a Government Of, By, and For the People" - that is not what republic means.
Uh, yes it is. HELLO. A "Republic" is by definition a representative government.
It does not state that the "representatives" doing the representing need be elected by the people. The Senate for example was appointed as is the Supreme court. President Ford was never elected into office. You don't need elections by the people to be a republic. The president is elected by a college of cardinals aka electoral college.
It does not state that the "representatives" doing the representing need be elected by the people.
It's implied. Or are we now going to engage in a battle of intent and semantics?
The Senate for example was appointed as is the Supreme court. President Ford was never elected into office. You don't need elections by the people to be a republic. The president is elected by a college of cardinals aka electoral college.
Sure, there are some exceptions to the rule. Ford and a VP is intended as a temporary a contingency plan. To your point, even in the Senate case, House reps were elected by peers to represent their respective constituency. They in turn are entrusted to do the same of Senate reps.
Lifetime appointments for ANY judge is a fundamental flaw in the Founders' system. Especially the for SCOTUS. So too are the lack of term-limits. And with the lack of respect for the intent of the Founders, respect for the law, and respect for honor and integrity, this "Republic" ostensibly is no more.
