Importing Jihad Refugee Resettlement: The quiet Jihad tsunami
The FBI admits that they cannot properly screen the Syrians, while the US State Department is telling the media that 10,000 Syrians will be here soon. Syria, home of the Islamic State.
Al hijrah, jihad by immigration.
And while the genocide of Christians is ongoing in Syria, over 90% of the Syrians who are being brought to America are Muslims. It’s a catastrophe. The top five states targeted for Syrian Muslim resettlement are California, Illinois, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Texas.
Meanwhile, dozens of American jihadis who fought in the war in Iraq and Syria have returned to the United States, equipped with the training they used fighting either for or against ISIS, according to one federal official.
Maybe the State Department can reunite these two very similar Muslim groups.
“First Syrians arrive in North Texas,” by Ann Corcoran, RRW, on April 11, 2015
If you haven’t already, you will be seeing more warm and fuzzy stories like this one in your states as the Syrian refugees begin to arrive. We have taken in 682 so far. See my post of last Saturday and see which states they went to.
As the FBI says they cannot properly screen Syrians, the US State Department seems to be still telling the media that 10,000 will be here soon.
The contractors want 65,000 by the end of 2016!
From WFAA (Dallas) which implies only a handful have arrived in Texas, however, Texas has received at least 86 so far and as the top resettlement state in the nation, it will receive the most Syrians.
Doing well by doing good: Heather Reynolds is CEO of Catholic Charities Ft. Worth and is one of the leaders resettling Middle Easterners to Dallas/Ft. Worth. In her mid-30’s, Ms. Reynolds pulls down a cool $199,324 in salary and related income. In a recent form 990 we learned that this Catholic Charities office took in almost $17 million in revenue and $9 million came from you through government grants.
No surprise that the refugee industry puts its most appealing refugees (like these cute girls) out for PR campaigns. The mainstream media eats it up!
Eight Syrian refugee families call North Texas home right now — four in Dallas and four in Fort Worth. But Basatneh [Syrian American Council] said more are on their way after the U.S. State Department agreed to accept as many as 10,000.
Watch the clip where we are told that “it is our duty” to take them in and that 1,000 will be coming to Texas within the year? Say what!
We are told the flow will be on par with the Iraqi flow which stands at 20,000 per year right now.
And, note the lovely apartment the family has received, I bet there are some needy Americans in Dallas/Ft. Worth who would love a place like that!
So who is doing the seeding of refugees in the Dallas/Ft. Worth area?
Four of the nine major contractors have divided up what must be a large flow to Ft. Worth:
" If this nation was still a godly nation, I would have some confidence in taking back this nation. This nation has turned its back on God, and I believe He has turned His back on this nation "
This nation has turned its back on everthing and has become a nation of unruly self obsessed incompetent fifth graders.
No,they don't. The Catholic public has no say-so whatsoever. It is a cabal of Cardinals that elect Gawd's Right Hand Man.
A Republic? Who gets the vote? I guess it is like an appointed Congress with the power to vote. It is a dictatorship, like the Mafia voting on Capo de Capo.
Why do you assume the USA's version of a republic is the only model?
Why do you assume the USA's version of a republic is the only model?
Because it is the modern model we live under,and the one you are always attacking.
Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
It is actually a republic. They elect their leader.
LOL. It's no more of a Government Of, By, and For the People than the facade facilitated by the Oprichni secret police/KGB/FSB in the Orthodox Russian state-establishment.
Same ol' theocratic Ba'al-shyte, different municipal toilet.
What new reality would you like? A fantasy reality really doesn't qualify as a reality, old or new.
Ted Cruz is as close to true "Hope and Change" as there is IMO. I don't believe his Presidency is so much fantasy as destined to be sabotaged by the elites.
One fantasy is this nation's laws and political system still works.
It's broken, no doubt.
To answer your question simply regarding a candidate I would support, No. Are you going to make the standard comment that I should vote for the lesser of the evils simply because not voting is not a valid option?
It's your prerogative to perceive "evil" or the validity of the ballot box any way you need to. But then again, are you really making no distinction between say Hitlery and Cruz? Or 0bola and Cruz (and anyone else?) Are they both "evil," as well as to the same degree?
THIS may well be the last legit election (and I say "may" because IMO 2012's election results were bogus.)
The power is firmly entrenched. When these people take over a nation, they wrap their tentacles around the neck of the nation until resistors either surrender or die. They are too close to achieving their goals to let any "fighter" easily overcome their aims.
I tend to agree with your assessment. For this reason I believe the campaign of Cruz will be sabotaged at all costs.
If this nation was still a godly nation, I would have some confidence in taking back this nation. This nation has turned its back on God, and I believe He has turned His back on this nation.
On this point we also agree. As this nation has continued to turn its back on God, He is doing the same. We are now at the cusp of the "cursed" stage (of which we deserve, frankly.)
This nation has turned its back on everthing and has become a nation of unruly self obsessed incompetent fifth graders.
You've described an epidemic of puerile narcissism. That's what happens when a people and nation instead of worshiping God, turn their back on Him and instead worship...themselves.
Did Greece produce the equivalent of American Founders dedicated to liberty, freedom, and individual rights inherent as "God-given"?
Plato documented various forms of 'republics' - republic is any govt that is based on rules. A tyranny is based on the whims of one man - he is the law and above the law. In a republic - regardless of if there is universal sufferage or not - the appointed or elected or inherited rulers are bound by laws and their powers are limited and deliniated.
That is why the commies could call their system "republics". That is why Venice was a republic. The Founding Fathers were in awe of the Greeks and Romans - America's system is Roman system pre empire. Which means the USA is also prone to having it's Republic one day become a autocracy.
It is actually a republic. They elect their leader.
LOL. It's no more of a Government Of, By, and For the People than the facade facilitated by the Oprichni secret police/KGB/FSB in the Orthodox Russian state-establishment.
A republic does not need to be "a Government Of, By, and For the People" - that is not what republic means.
The Romans always had a knack for mobilizing and manipulating the Mob with bread, circuses, and state-established superstition.
You sound like you think the Romans in charge were not religious men - were not as superstitious as their citizens?
It is now considered more accurate to think that the Romans deeply believed their religion and superstitions. They actually did think the gods would punish Rome if a ritual or sacrifice was not performed, etc.
Also, it was a long established belief that the Romans were tricking the people into submission by providing them with bread and circuses - free food and distractions - but now scholars are of the opinion the Roman senate feared the public and these were bribes to prevent the citizenry from turning on them.
In other words, there was real power that the Roman citizen had and the Roman citizen very much intended to get a benefit from the empire and that they always watched to make sure the senate elite did not steal it all for themselves.
Why do you assume the USA's version of a republic is the only model?
Because it is the modern model we live under,and the one you are always attacking.
The Catholic church as it operates in Rome is at least 1,500 to 2,000 years old so why deny them the use of the term republic when they are more contemporaries of Plato more than the modern versions?
Plato documented various forms of 'republics' - republic is any govt that is based on rules. A tyranny is based on the whims of one man - he is the law and above the law. In a republic - regardless of if there is universal sufferage or not - the appointed or elected or inherited rulers are bound by laws and their powers are limited and deliniated.
That is why the commies could call their system "republics".
"Rules"? You mean like a Bill of Rights and Constitution?
Yes, both are mere squares of Charmin if unenforced or upheld by the appointed authorities.
Simply defined, a "Republic" is a representative government. The citizenry elects it's representatives at a local level, county, state, and so forth. There is no king or queen (as in a monarchy.)
ANY "commies" calling their socialist-slave state a "Republic" is lying (as is their wont.)
"Tyranny" can indeed be based upon the whim of one man OR a mob -- as are Communists, Fascists, or...those who cruelly enslave or limit or unfairly withhold freedom without consent of the governed.
The Founding Fathers were in awe of the Greeks and Romans - America's system is Roman system pre empire. Which means the USA is also prone to having it's Republic one day become a autocracy.
True, the American Founder admired tsome of the political systems and ideals of the Romans and Greeks -- most notably, a Senate of representatives. Only the American Founders built upon and refined their systems of a true representative government. This begot an economic system where the poor could become wealthy based on individual economic freedom as well as personal freedom. Both the Greek and Roman Empires were weighted down and eventually destroyed within through...slavery and diluted nationalism.
In other words, there was real power that the Roman citizen had and the Roman citizen very much intended to get a benefit from the empire and that they always watched to make sure the senate elite did not steal it all for themselves.
One parallel in this case is that *neither* Roman citizens OR Americans (or for that matter ANY of the world's citizenry) are capable of truly monitoring their respective government reps for corruption and administering justice. The elites are immune from the law. How do we know this? The American people are now on the hook for $19 trillion as countless reps get caught with their hands in the cookie jar...and routinely collude with international elites in larceny on an epic scale. WITH impunity. You own country -- socialist Greece -- is dead broke. It now survives on hand-outs from the EU.
Uh, yes it is. HELLO. A "Republic" is by definition a representative government.
It does not state that the "representatives" doing the representing need be elected by the people. The Senate for example was appointed as is the Supreme court. President Ford was never elected into office. You don't need elections by the people to be a republic. The president is elected by a college of cardinals aka electoral college.
The American people are now on the hook for $19 trillion as countless reps get caught with their hands in the cookie jar...and routinely collude with international elites in larceny on an epic scale. WITH impunity. You own country -- socialist Greece -- is dead broke. It now survives on hand- outs from the EU.
If we had socialism we would be on the hook for the same amount but be a cleaner, and well built nation like Scandinavia. But what we got instead was Reagonomics.
It does not state that the "representatives" doing the representing need be elected by the people.
It's implied. Or are we now going to engage in a battle of intent and semantics?
The Senate for example was appointed as is the Supreme court. President Ford was never elected into office. You don't need elections by the people to be a republic. The president is elected by a college of cardinals aka electoral college.
Sure, there are some exceptions to the rule. Ford and a VP is intended as a temporary a contingency plan. To your point, even in the Senate case, House reps were elected by peers to represent their respective constituency. They in turn are entrusted to do the same of Senate reps.
Lifetime appointments for ANY judge is a fundamental flaw in the Founders' system. Especially the for SCOTUS. So too are the lack of term-limits. And with the lack of respect for the intent of the Founders, respect for the law, and respect for honor and integrity, this "Republic" ostensibly is no more.
If we had socialism we would be on the hook for the same amount but be a cleaner, and well built nation like Scandinavia.
Nonsense. (Btw, "Scandinavia" isn't a nation. Is that what they're teaching in Grecian elementary school huts? :-)
No, you can NOT hold up monolithic Sweden as template for the multi-ethnic, infinitely diverse and divided USA. The US population is 30x, while it's economy and geography dwarfs Sweden's.
That said, Sweden is unfairly confiscating, aka "spreading the wealth" from it's hard-working producers, to its ever growing Muslim parasite immigrants. It's national identity, security, as well as motivation to create and risk capital are being strangled.
The 1980s of the Ronald Reagan's Era into the early 90s was an unprecedented era of peace, prosperity, and hope for the future. (Do you remember any wars during the Reagan Years?)
"Reaganomics" -- though not perfect -- helped smash the Berlin Wall and free millions from the bondage of Communism. Investments and creativity in America as well as the West were off the hook. Optimism and stability will do that. Yeah, "Reaganomics" really sucked...
But THEN we got NWO Globalist Puppet Poppy Bush and Klinton, began stressing "Global First," and immediately got into major international wars. Socialist economics and social "justice" policies (aka "compassionate conservatism" and Klintomics) were implemented and enforced. From 1991 and onward we've nose-dived demographically, culturally, economically, and morally into a death-spiral.
A very good, & legitimate question. I share the same delima.
Granted, a large percentage of the American population are evil and worthless critters devoid of any redeeming qualities, that the nation / world would be better off without. There are still some good people that deserve to be saved/spared. I am simply asking for God to spare the deserving souls, much like Lot asked for Sodom/Gomorrah to be spared for at least one good man.
I know that is a Mission Impossible. Our nation as a whole has sinned greatly, turned our ungrateful backs on God, spit in His face, etc, etc, etc. But it is true, we do have many people that do deserve to be spared. Little children come to mind, and a fair number of senior citizens.
Those I mentioned are innocent, and have done no wrong, or were unable to stop the evil that has infested this once great nation.
I pray God Almighty will help & spare those I mentioned, for the Day of His Wrath is approaching!
That would be the globalist-controlled RNC's love-child, the GOP -- wouldn't it?
I'm not going to say they are "the" one,but they damn sure serve as a prime example of backstabbing and double-dealing as you are likely to find.
Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
The Catholic church as it operates in Rome is at least 1,500 to 2,000 years old so why deny them the use of the term republic when they are more contemporaries of Plato more than the modern versions?
Because they are a dictatorship.
Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
" Last presidential election I voted for Goode of the Constitution Party. "
As did I. This time I will probably vote for the Constitution Party candidate. I realize the ballot box is broke/dysfunctional. Since I have inexperienced children, I am not eager to move to the ammo box.
Our nation is in for a world of hurt! may God Almighty help us!!
On the shoulders of THIS faith America became great.
That faith was manifested in the hearts and free minds of Individuals between themselves and their Creator -- not between the collectivist sheeple fleecers and their religious mobs.
The peace and prosperity of the 80's and 90's were products of the technological revolution that was ignited by the Space Race in the 60's.
I specifically cited the 1980s and early 90s. Were you using the internet in the 80s and early 90s?? If technological advances are a reason for peace and prosperity, then by your theory we ought to be in Nirvana by now.
No, as I stated, the Reagan Years were punctuated an unprecedented era of peace, prosperity, and hope for the future. In other words, the REAL America. That basis was that was the moral clarity, optimism, and conviction of righteousness emanating right from the top: RONALD REAGAN.
Buggs Bunny could've been in the White Hut and the times wouldn't have been different. Even Bill Klintoon couldn't muck it up. And his minions like to take credit too for the inertial prosperity that remained on their watch.
Oh but Clinton indeed DID "muck it up," during his regime, didn't he? Badly. He was a liar. And rapist. He made a mockery of morality, leadership, and accountability. Your much bally-hooed theory about technology facilitating "peace and prosperity" is a FAIL. You'd also omitted the "hope for the future" that Reagan projected but Clinton personally helped destroy. He and his regime were a national moral disaster, which of course led to a government that we no longer trusted, nor believed was benevolent.
I am simply asking for God to spare the deserving souls, much like Lot asked for Sodom/Gomorrah to be spared for at least one good man. I know that is a Mission Impossible.
Our nation as a whole has sinned greatly, turned our ungrateful backs on God, spit in His face, etc, etc, etc. But it is true, we do have many people that do deserve to be spared. Little children come to mind, and a fair number of senior citizens.
Those I mentioned are innocent, and have done no wrong, or were unable to stop the evil that has infested this once great nation.
Yours is a noble and humble intent and request. But God has already judged America. Nationally, we ARE Sodom/Gomorrah, and have even less excuse for embracing all of the evil *it* once was, and we now are. Thus the hammer of justice is about to fall. HARD.
As a so-called "Christian" nation who used to honor God did turn its back on Him. The good news is that on an individual/church basis, we are spared...AND saved. For Eternity. And so are those many believers are who still have time to heed and embrace the Gospel and the Lord's grace. Hopefully, our children, grandchildren, friends and family will do the same before the thief comes in the night.
The good news: Recently it has been reported that 100 million former ChiComs have embraced the Gospel, as well as millions of converts in the Middle East. Amen to that!
They [the RNC's love-child, the GOP] damn sure serve as a prime example of backstabbing and double-dealing as you are likely to find.
No question.
During this election we're about to see to just what degree the RNC's typical backstabbing and double-dealing is executed. IF their chosen globalist-RINO-Statist dressed in a Dem sundress doesn't win the GOP nomination, I expect them to sabotage that nominee (especially if it's Cruz.)
