Importing Jihad Refugee Resettlement: The quiet Jihad tsunami
The FBI admits that they cannot properly screen the Syrians, while the US State Department is telling the media that 10,000 Syrians will be here soon. Syria, home of the Islamic State.
Al hijrah, jihad by immigration.
And while the genocide of Christians is ongoing in Syria, over 90% of the Syrians who are being brought to America are Muslims. It’s a catastrophe. The top five states targeted for Syrian Muslim resettlement are California, Illinois, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Texas.
Meanwhile, dozens of American jihadis who fought in the war in Iraq and Syria have returned to the United States, equipped with the training they used fighting either for or against ISIS, according to one federal official.
Maybe the State Department can reunite these two very similar Muslim groups.
“First Syrians arrive in North Texas,” by Ann Corcoran, RRW, on April 11, 2015
If you haven’t already, you will be seeing more warm and fuzzy stories like this one in your states as the Syrian refugees begin to arrive. We have taken in 682 so far. See my post of last Saturday and see which states they went to.
As the FBI says they cannot properly screen Syrians, the US State Department seems to be still telling the media that 10,000 will be here soon.
The contractors want 65,000 by the end of 2016!
From WFAA (Dallas) which implies only a handful have arrived in Texas, however, Texas has received at least 86 so far and as the top resettlement state in the nation, it will receive the most Syrians.
Doing well by doing good: Heather Reynolds is CEO of Catholic Charities Ft. Worth and is one of the leaders resettling Middle Easterners to Dallas/Ft. Worth. In her mid-30’s, Ms. Reynolds pulls down a cool $199,324 in salary and related income. In a recent form 990 we learned that this Catholic Charities office took in almost $17 million in revenue and $9 million came from you through government grants.
No surprise that the refugee industry puts its most appealing refugees (like these cute girls) out for PR campaigns. The mainstream media eats it up!
Eight Syrian refugee families call North Texas home right now — four in Dallas and four in Fort Worth. But Basatneh [Syrian American Council] said more are on their way after the U.S. State Department agreed to accept as many as 10,000.
Watch the clip where we are told that “it is our duty” to take them in and that 1,000 will be coming to Texas within the year? Say what!
We are told the flow will be on par with the Iraqi flow which stands at 20,000 per year right now.
And, note the lovely apartment the family has received, I bet there are some needy Americans in Dallas/Ft. Worth who would love a place like that!
So who is doing the seeding of refugees in the Dallas/Ft. Worth area?
Four of the nine major contractors have divided up what must be a large flow to Ft. Worth:
...Catholic Charities rejected its long-standing emphasis on personal responsibility and self-reliance and began to blame capitalist society rather than individual behavior for poverty and crime.
It now looked to the welfare state [aka Socialism/Marxism] to solve all social problems. Today, through a continual whirlwind of policy statements and lobbying, and by fostering countless activist community organizations...
(I'll finish):
...as a radical Leftist org, endorsing and embracing fascist-Marxist doctrine contrary to the US Constitutions, US sovereignty and the capitalist system.
Yes, I am acutely aware of the Hegelian dialectic. Despite that, have you a candidate you're willing to support ? Or voting for? Or shall we ignore all politics and illusion of choice? Or is it possible to re-create a new reality at this point in time?
What new reality would you like? A fantasy reality really doesn't qualify as a reality, old or new.
One fantasy is this nation's laws and political system still works. To answer your question simply regarding a candidate I would support, No. Are you going to make the standard comment that I should vote for the lesser of the evils simply because not voting is not a valid option?
The power is firmly entrenched. When these people take over a nation, they wrap their tentacles around the neck of the nation until resistors either surrender or die. They are too close to achieving their goals to let any "fighter" easily overcome their aims. If this nation was still a godly nation, I would have some confidence in taking back this nation. This nation has turned its back on God, and I believe He has turned His back on this nation.
The Catholic Church is a dictatorship, and King maker. Given the power and influence to pull politics into their sphere completely they have done so many times in the past. The reason most immigration into America has been from Catholic dominated countries, political power. America was formed as a breakaway from the theocracy of the Church of England. The Pope moved the French and Spain to change the balance of power in the years before and after the Civil War. Same "game" as todays swarms of Catholics from Central America. I don't hate Catholics, but the Pope to me is just slightly different than a Muslim cleric. You give him the power to make war, and he will make it happen. The Catholic heirarchy is just weaker now than in the past, but still infected with the need for power.
Amen Don, AMEN. I will be shocked if we make it to 2017 without a complete "reset" of the financial order of our once blessed nation. Our border of Gods protection was removed on 9-11-01 with an attack on Wall St/financial centers. What did we do? We defiantly rebuilt instead of hitting our knees in prayer. 7 years later, the great depression hit us with another warning, repent and turn to God. In the fall of 2015, it will have been another 7 year cycle. I am no prophet, but if I were invested in the stock market I would sell before September.
One caveat though, God hasn't turned his back on us. We have turned our back on him. What we are living through is what life looks like to the rest of the world that live like heathens.
The reason most immigration into America has been from Catholic dominated countries, political power.
This is a joke, right?
America is 20% Catholic, and the percentage has gone up in recent years due to immigration. Historically, European immigrants to America were mostly Protestant.
England is a Protestant country. When the first English colony was founded in America, England was already a Protestant country. America didn't fill up with people fleeing Catholic persecution, it filled up, first, with English Protestants fleeing Protestant persecution.
The Germans who came early were Quakers and Brethren, and they were fleeing Protestant persecution in Northern Germany.
This notion that most immigration into America has been from Catholic- dominated countries is ludicrous.
Catholic immigration came out of Ireland, first. Ireland, a land where the Protestants slaughtered and abused the Catholics for a few hundred years. America was a refuge for Irish Catholics FROM Protestants, never the other way around. The Protestant Irish who came, came because England - a Protestant country - wrecked their textile industry. It wasn't to "flee the Catholics", whom they held firmly in subjection.
20% of the population is Catholic, and that's INCLUDING all the recent Latino immigration. America filled up with Protestants fleeing other Protestants, not Protestants fleeing Catholics.
The English were not fleeing Catholics. The Germans and Dutch were not fleeing Catholics. The Scandinavians were not fleeing Catholics.
Honestly, where do you Protestants come up with these ideas? Who tells you these lies?
England is a Protestant country. When the first English colony was founded in America, England was already a Protestant country. America didn't fill up with people fleeing Catholic persecution, it filled up, first, with English Protestants fleeing Protestant persecution.
If American had been discovered sooner I wouldn't be afraid to say the first people to come here would have been trying to escape Catholic persecution.
“Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rapidly promoted by mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.”
Many conservative Catholics I know won't give a red cent to this organization.
I have no doubt at all about that being true. What I question is how anyone that contributes can make sure none of their contributions is used for things like that,or to support "Liberation Theology"?
Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
Not all of the Catholic Church is evil and political.
Of course not. I have no doubt the majority of the members are devout and serious about their beliefs,but the thing is they are so loyal to "The Holy Mother Church" that they will continue to support anything and everything the Vatican proposes.
IMHO,the leadership is completely corrupted.
Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
Part of the Psy-Op plan is to give you and other voters a candidate who seems like the greatest thing since Apple Pie Ala Mode.
Think "Lucy and Charlie Brown with the football",and you won't be far off base.
Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
Since I believe this is a front, 'Catholic Charities' most main sources of contributions can be found deeeeply underground.
IMHO,a wholly-owned subsidiary of "Global Government,Inc".
Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
The Catholic Church is a dictatorship, and King maker.
And sometimes a King Executioner.
It has been that way since Day One.
Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
It is actually a republic. They elect their leader.
No,they don't. The Catholic public has no say-so whatsoever. It is a cabal of Cardinals that elect Gawd's Right Hand Man.
Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
" If this nation was still a godly nation, I would have some confidence in taking back this nation. This nation has turned its back on God, and I believe He has turned His back on this nation "
A Republic? Who gets the vote? I guess it is like an appointed Congress with the power to vote. It is a dictatorship, like the Mafia voting on Capo de Capo.
Of course the early nation was filled with Non-Catholics. People came out looking to escape the dictatorial power of the King(Anglican church) and the Pope(Catholic church). We booted the power of the Anglican church by revolution, then the Catholic church has fought to bring us to heel for years. The goal of the Catholic church is not to bring the Gospel to people, it is to accumulate power and wealth.
" If this nation was still a godly nation, I would have some confidence in taking back this nation. This nation has turned its back on God, and I believe He has turned His back on this nation "
This nation has turned its back on everthing and has become a nation of unruly self obsessed incompetent fifth graders.
No,they don't. The Catholic public has no say-so whatsoever. It is a cabal of Cardinals that elect Gawd's Right Hand Man.
A Republic? Who gets the vote? I guess it is like an appointed Congress with the power to vote. It is a dictatorship, like the Mafia voting on Capo de Capo.
Why do you assume the USA's version of a republic is the only model?
Why do you assume the USA's version of a republic is the only model?
Because it is the modern model we live under,and the one you are always attacking.
Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
It is actually a republic. They elect their leader.
LOL. It's no more of a Government Of, By, and For the People than the facade facilitated by the Oprichni secret police/KGB/FSB in the Orthodox Russian state-establishment.
Same ol' theocratic Ba'al-shyte, different municipal toilet.
What new reality would you like? A fantasy reality really doesn't qualify as a reality, old or new.
Ted Cruz is as close to true "Hope and Change" as there is IMO. I don't believe his Presidency is so much fantasy as destined to be sabotaged by the elites.
One fantasy is this nation's laws and political system still works.
It's broken, no doubt.
To answer your question simply regarding a candidate I would support, No. Are you going to make the standard comment that I should vote for the lesser of the evils simply because not voting is not a valid option?
It's your prerogative to perceive "evil" or the validity of the ballot box any way you need to. But then again, are you really making no distinction between say Hitlery and Cruz? Or 0bola and Cruz (and anyone else?) Are they both "evil," as well as to the same degree?
THIS may well be the last legit election (and I say "may" because IMO 2012's election results were bogus.)
The power is firmly entrenched. When these people take over a nation, they wrap their tentacles around the neck of the nation until resistors either surrender or die. They are too close to achieving their goals to let any "fighter" easily overcome their aims.
I tend to agree with your assessment. For this reason I believe the campaign of Cruz will be sabotaged at all costs.
If this nation was still a godly nation, I would have some confidence in taking back this nation. This nation has turned its back on God, and I believe He has turned His back on this nation.
On this point we also agree. As this nation has continued to turn its back on God, He is doing the same. We are now at the cusp of the "cursed" stage (of which we deserve, frankly.)
This nation has turned its back on everthing and has become a nation of unruly self obsessed incompetent fifth graders.
You've described an epidemic of puerile narcissism. That's what happens when a people and nation instead of worshiping God, turn their back on Him and instead worship...themselves.
Did Greece produce the equivalent of American Founders dedicated to liberty, freedom, and individual rights inherent as "God-given"?
Plato documented various forms of 'republics' - republic is any govt that is based on rules. A tyranny is based on the whims of one man - he is the law and above the law. In a republic - regardless of if there is universal sufferage or not - the appointed or elected or inherited rulers are bound by laws and their powers are limited and deliniated.
That is why the commies could call their system "republics". That is why Venice was a republic. The Founding Fathers were in awe of the Greeks and Romans - America's system is Roman system pre empire. Which means the USA is also prone to having it's Republic one day become a autocracy.
