[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin

How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End?

What on EARTH is going on in Acts 16:11? New Discovery!

2023 Hottest in over 120 Million Years

2024 and beyond in prophecy

Questions

This Speech Just Broke the Internet

This AMAZING Math Formula Will Teach You About God!

The GOSPEL of the ALIENS | Fallen Angels | Giants | Anunnaki

The IMAGE of the BEAST Revealed (REV 13) - WARNING: Not for Everyone

WEF Calls for AI to Replace Voters: ‘Why Do We Need Elections?’

The OCCULT Burger king EXPOSED

PANERA BREAD Antichrist message EXPOSED

The OCCULT Cheesecake Factory EXPOSED

Satanist And Witches Encounter The Cross

History and Beliefs of the Waldensians

Rome’s Persecution of the Bible

Evolutionists, You’ve Been Caught Lying About Fossils

Raw Streets of NYC Migrant Crisis that they don't show on Tv

Meet DarkBERT - AI Model Trained On DARK WEB

[NEW!] Jaw-dropping 666 Discovery Utterly Proves the King James Bible is God's Preserved Word

ALERT!!! THE MOST IMPORTANT INFORMATION WILL SOON BE POSTED HERE


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Corrupt Government
See other Corrupt Government Articles

Title: First of thousands of Syrians Resettled in ….. North Texas
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://pamelageller.com/2015/04/fir ... resettled-in-north-texas.html/
Published: Apr 12, 2015
Author: Pamela Geller
Post Date: 2015-04-12 08:29:20 by out damned spot
Keywords: Syrians, resettled, Texas
Views: 22291
Comments: 103

Importing Jihad Refugee Resettlement: The quiet Jihad tsunami

The FBI admits that they cannot properly screen the Syrians, while the US State Department is telling the media that 10,000 Syrians will be here soon. Syria, home of the Islamic State.

Al hijrah, jihad by immigration.

And while the genocide of Christians is ongoing in Syria, over 90% of the Syrians who are being brought to America are Muslims. It’s a catastrophe. The top five states targeted for Syrian Muslim resettlement are California, Illinois, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Texas.

Meanwhile, dozens of American jihadis who fought in the war in Iraq and Syria have returned to the United States, equipped with the training they used fighting either for or against ISIS, according to one federal official.

Maybe the State Department can reunite these two very similar Muslim groups.

“First Syrians arrive in North Texas,” by Ann Corcoran, RRW, on April 11, 2015

If you haven’t already, you will be seeing more warm and fuzzy stories like this one in your states as the Syrian refugees begin to arrive. We have taken in 682 so far. See my post of last Saturday and see which states they went to.

As the FBI says they cannot properly screen Syrians, the US State Department seems to be still telling the media that 10,000 will be here soon.

The contractors want 65,000 by the end of 2016!

From WFAA (Dallas) which implies only a handful have arrived in Texas, however, Texas has received at least 86 so far and as the top resettlement state in the nation, it will receive the most Syrians.

Doing well by doing good: Heather Reynolds is CEO of Catholic Charities Ft. Worth and is one of the leaders resettling Middle Easterners to Dallas/Ft. Worth. In her mid-30’s, Ms. Reynolds pulls down a cool $199,324 in salary and related income. In a recent form 990 we learned that this Catholic Charities office took in almost $17 million in revenue and $9 million came from you through government grants.

http://www.guidestar.org/FinDocuments/2013/750/808/2013- 750808769-0ae83cfc-9.pdf

No surprise that the refugee industry puts its most appealing refugees (like these cute girls) out for PR campaigns. The mainstream media eats it up!

Eight Syrian refugee families call North Texas home right now — four in Dallas and four in Fort Worth. But Basatneh [Syrian American Council] said more are on their way after the U.S. State Department agreed to accept as many as 10,000.

Watch the clip where we are told that “it is our duty” to take them in and that 1,000 will be coming to Texas within the year? Say what!

We are told the flow will be on par with the Iraqi flow which stands at 20,000 per year right now.

And, note the lovely apartment the family has received, I bet there are some needy Americans in Dallas/Ft. Worth who would love a place like that!

So who is doing the seeding of refugees in the Dallas/Ft. Worth area?

Four of the nine major contractors have divided up what must be a large flow to Ft. Worth:

Click for Full Text!

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-62) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#63. To: VxH (#50)

The Romans always had a knack for mobilizing and manipulating the Mob with bread, circuses, and state-established superstition.

You sound like you think the Romans in charge were not religious men - were not as superstitious as their citizens?

It is now considered more accurate to think that the Romans deeply believed their religion and superstitions. They actually did think the gods would punish Rome if a ritual or sacrifice was not performed, etc.

Also, it was a long established belief that the Romans were tricking the people into submission by providing them with bread and circuses - free food and distractions - but now scholars are of the opinion the Roman senate feared the public and these were bribes to prevent the citizenry from turning on them.

In other words, there was real power that the Roman citizen had and the Roman citizen very much intended to get a benefit from the empire and that they always watched to make sure the senate elite did not steal it all for themselves.

Pericles  posted on  2015-04-14   12:18:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#64. To: sneakypete (#46)

Why do you assume the USA's version of a republic is the only model?

Because it is the modern model we live under,and the one you are always attacking.

The Catholic church as it operates in Rome is at least 1,500 to 2,000 years old so why deny them the use of the term republic when they are more contemporaries of Plato more than the modern versions?

Pericles  posted on  2015-04-14   12:22:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#65. To: Pericles (#61) (Edited)

Plato documented various forms of 'republics' - republic is any govt that is based on rules. A tyranny is based on the whims of one man - he is the law and above the law. In a republic - regardless of if there is universal sufferage or not - the appointed or elected or inherited rulers are bound by laws and their powers are limited and deliniated.

That is why the commies could call their system "republics".

"Rules"? You mean like a Bill of Rights and Constitution?

Yes, both are mere squares of Charmin if unenforced or upheld by the appointed authorities.

Simply defined, a "Republic" is a representative government. The citizenry elects it's representatives at a local level, county, state, and so forth. There is no king or queen (as in a monarchy.)

ANY "commies" calling their socialist-slave state a "Republic" is lying (as is their wont.)

"Tyranny" can indeed be based upon the whim of one man OR a mob -- as are Communists, Fascists, or...those who cruelly enslave or limit or unfairly withhold freedom without consent of the governed.

The Founding Fathers were in awe of the Greeks and Romans - America's system is Roman system pre empire. Which means the USA is also prone to having it's Republic one day become a autocracy.

True, the American Founder admired tsome of the political systems and ideals of the Romans and Greeks -- most notably, a Senate of representatives. Only the American Founders built upon and refined their systems of a true representative government. This begot an economic system where the poor could become wealthy based on individual economic freedom as well as personal freedom. Both the Greek and Roman Empires were weighted down and eventually destroyed within through...slavery and diluted nationalism.

Liberator  posted on  2015-04-14   13:05:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#66. To: Pericles, VxH (#62)

A republic does not need to be "a Government Of, By, and For the People" - that is not what republic means.

Uh, yes it is. HELLO. A "Republic" is by definition a representative government.

Liberator  posted on  2015-04-14   13:08:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#67. To: Pericles (#63)

In other words, there was real power that the Roman citizen had and the Roman citizen very much intended to get a benefit from the empire and that they always watched to make sure the senate elite did not steal it all for themselves.

One parallel in this case is that *neither* Roman citizens OR Americans (or for that matter ANY of the world's citizenry) are capable of truly monitoring their respective government reps for corruption and administering justice. The elites are immune from the law. How do we know this? The American people are now on the hook for $19 trillion as countless reps get caught with their hands in the cookie jar...and routinely collude with international elites in larceny on an epic scale. WITH impunity. You own country -- socialist Greece -- is dead broke. It now survives on hand-outs from the EU.

Liberator  posted on  2015-04-14   13:19:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#68. To: Liberator (#66) (Edited)

Uh, yes it is. HELLO. A "Republic" is by definition a representative government.

It does not state that the "representatives" doing the representing need be elected by the people. The Senate for example was appointed as is the Supreme court. President Ford was never elected into office. You don't need elections by the people to be a republic. The president is elected by a college of cardinals aka electoral college.

Pericles  posted on  2015-04-14   14:47:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#69. To: Liberator (#67) (Edited)

The American people are now on the hook for $19 trillion as countless reps get caught with their hands in the cookie jar...and routinely collude with international elites in larceny on an epic scale. WITH impunity. You own country -- socialist Greece -- is dead broke. It now survives on hand- outs from the EU.

If we had socialism we would be on the hook for the same amount but be a cleaner, and well built nation like Scandinavia. But what we got instead was Reagonomics.

Pericles  posted on  2015-04-14   14:49:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#70. To: Pericles (#68)

It does not state that the "representatives" doing the representing need be elected by the people.

It's implied. Or are we now going to engage in a battle of intent and semantics?

The Senate for example was appointed as is the Supreme court. President Ford was never elected into office. You don't need elections by the people to be a republic. The president is elected by a college of cardinals aka electoral college.

Sure, there are some exceptions to the rule. Ford and a VP is intended as a temporary a contingency plan. To your point, even in the Senate case, House reps were elected by peers to represent their respective constituency. They in turn are entrusted to do the same of Senate reps.

Lifetime appointments for ANY judge is a fundamental flaw in the Founders' system. Especially the for SCOTUS. So too are the lack of term-limits. And with the lack of respect for the intent of the Founders, respect for the law, and respect for honor and integrity, this "Republic" ostensibly is no more.

Liberator  posted on  2015-04-14   15:27:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#71. To: Pericles (#69)

If we had socialism we would be on the hook for the same amount but be a cleaner, and well built nation like Scandinavia.

Nonsense. (Btw, "Scandinavia" isn't a nation. Is that what they're teaching in Grecian elementary school huts? :-)

No, you can NOT hold up monolithic Sweden as template for the multi-ethnic, infinitely diverse and divided USA. The US population is 30x, while it's economy and geography dwarfs Sweden's.

That said, Sweden is unfairly confiscating, aka "spreading the wealth" from it's hard-working producers, to its ever growing Muslim parasite immigrants. It's national identity, security, as well as motivation to create and risk capital are being strangled.

Liberator  posted on  2015-04-14   15:35:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#72. To: Pericles (#69) (Edited)

But what we got instead was Reagonomics.

Who is "we," Kemosabe??

The 1980s of the Ronald Reagan's Era into the early 90s was an unprecedented era of peace, prosperity, and hope for the future. (Do you remember any wars during the Reagan Years?)

"Reaganomics" -- though not perfect -- helped smash the Berlin Wall and free millions from the bondage of Communism. Investments and creativity in America as well as the West were off the hook. Optimism and stability will do that. Yeah, "Reaganomics" really sucked...

But THEN we got NWO Globalist Puppet Poppy Bush and Klinton, began stressing "Global First," and immediately got into major international wars. Socialist economics and social "justice" policies (aka "compassionate conservatism" and Klintomics) were implemented and enforced. From 1991 and onward we've nose-dived demographically, culturally, economically, and morally into a death-spiral.

Liberator  posted on  2015-04-14   15:47:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#73. To: SOSO (#41)

" God help us !!

Why should He bother? "

A very good, & legitimate question. I share the same delima.

Granted, a large percentage of the American population are evil and worthless critters devoid of any redeeming qualities, that the nation / world would be better off without. There are still some good people that deserve to be saved/spared. I am simply asking for God to spare the deserving souls, much like Lot asked for Sodom/Gomorrah to be spared for at least one good man.

I know that is a Mission Impossible. Our nation as a whole has sinned greatly, turned our ungrateful backs on God, spit in His face, etc, etc, etc. But it is true, we do have many people that do deserve to be spared. Little children come to mind, and a fair number of senior citizens.

Those I mentioned are innocent, and have done no wrong, or were unable to stop the evil that has infested this once great nation.

I pray God Almighty will help & spare those I mentioned, for the Day of His Wrath is approaching!

Si vis pacem, para bellum

Stoner  posted on  2015-04-14   18:42:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#74. To: Liberator (#56)

That would be the globalist-controlled RNC's love-child, the GOP -- wouldn't it?

I'm not going to say they are "the" one,but they damn sure serve as a prime example of backstabbing and double-dealing as you are likely to find.

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-14   20:20:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#75. To: Pericles (#64)

The Catholic church as it operates in Rome is at least 1,500 to 2,000 years old so why deny them the use of the term republic when they are more contemporaries of Plato more than the modern versions?

Because they are a dictatorship.

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-14   20:22:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#76. To: rlk (#25)

" Last presidential election I voted for Goode of the Constitution Party. "

As did I. This time I will probably vote for the Constitution Party candidate. I realize the ballot box is broke/dysfunctional. Since I have inexperienced children, I am not eager to move to the ammo box.

Our nation is in for a world of hurt! may God Almighty help us!!

Si vis pacem, para bellum

Stoner  posted on  2015-04-14   20:52:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#77. To: Liberator (#60)

On the shoulders of THIS faith America became great.

That faith was manifested in the hearts and free minds of Individuals between themselves and their Creator -- not between the collectivist sheeple fleecers and their religious mobs.

VxH  posted on  2015-04-16   7:51:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#78. To: Pericles (#62)

A republic does not need to be "a Government Of, By, and For the People" - that is not what republic means.

I didn't says that's what Republic means.

That was the PURPOSE, specified in the Declaration of Independence, for which the American republic was constituted.

"TO SECURE THIS RIGHTS"...

...For who? For the people.

...By who? By the people acting through lawful government.

...Of who? Of the people, whose tyrannical majority and human nature must be constrained by law.

VxH  posted on  2015-04-16   8:02:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#79. To: Pericles (#64)

The Catholic church as it operates in Rome is at least 1,500 to 2,000 years old so why deny them the use of the term republic

Ok. It's a republic.

What is the historically observable purpose toward which its framework of law aspires?

It's a self-serving, hierarchical, oligarchic, kleptocratic, theocratic state-establishment.

It aspires to be Ba'al - Lord, Master, and Possessor -- over all upon which it asserts its fraudulent temporal dominion.

VxH  posted on  2015-04-16   8:11:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#80. To: Liberator (#72) (Edited)

The 1980s of the Ronald Reagan's Era into the early 90s was an unprecedented era of peace, prosperity, and hope for the future.

The peace and prosperity of the 80's and 90's were products of the technological revolution that was ignited by the Space Race in the 60's.

Buggs Bunny could've been in the White Hut and the times wouldn't have been different.

Even Bill Klintoon couldn't muck it up. And his minions like to take credit too for the inertial prosperity that remained on their watch.

Ironically, it is the worship of technology that invokes the cyclical cultural demise described in Romans 1:25+

VxH  posted on  2015-04-16   8:20:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#81. To: VxH (#79)

The Catholic church as it operates in Rome is at least 1,500 to 2,000 years old so why deny them the use of the term republic

Ok. It's a republic

The Vatican is a Republic. In other nations the Catholic Church operates the way private groups operate and within the laws of said nation.

Pericles  posted on  2015-04-16   10:52:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#82. To: VxH (#80)

The peace and prosperity of the 80's and 90's were products of the technological revolution that was ignited by the Space Race in the 60's.

I specifically cited the 1980s and early 90s. Were you using the internet in the 80s and early 90s?? If technological advances are a reason for peace and prosperity, then by your theory we ought to be in Nirvana by now.

No, as I stated, the Reagan Years were punctuated an unprecedented era of peace, prosperity, and hope for the future. In other words, the REAL America. That basis was that was the moral clarity, optimism, and conviction of righteousness emanating right from the top: RONALD REAGAN.

Buggs Bunny could've been in the White Hut and the times wouldn't have been different. Even Bill Klintoon couldn't muck it up. And his minions like to take credit too for the inertial prosperity that remained on their watch.

Oh but Clinton indeed DID "muck it up," during his regime, didn't he? Badly. He was a liar. And rapist. He made a mockery of morality, leadership, and accountability. Your much bally-hooed theory about technology facilitating "peace and prosperity" is a FAIL. You'd also omitted the "hope for the future" that Reagan projected but Clinton personally helped destroy. He and his regime were a national moral disaster, which of course led to a government that we no longer trusted, nor believed was benevolent.

Liberator  posted on  2015-04-16   11:19:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#83. To: Stoner, SOSO (#73)

" God help us !!"

("Why should He bother? ")

I am simply asking for God to spare the deserving souls, much like Lot asked for Sodom/Gomorrah to be spared for at least one good man. I know that is a Mission Impossible.

Our nation as a whole has sinned greatly, turned our ungrateful backs on God, spit in His face, etc, etc, etc. But it is true, we do have many people that do deserve to be spared. Little children come to mind, and a fair number of senior citizens.

Those I mentioned are innocent, and have done no wrong, or were unable to stop the evil that has infested this once great nation.

Yours is a noble and humble intent and request. But God has already judged America. Nationally, we ARE Sodom/Gomorrah, and have even less excuse for embracing all of the evil *it* once was, and we now are. Thus the hammer of justice is about to fall. HARD.

As a so-called "Christian" nation who used to honor God did turn its back on Him. The good news is that on an individual/church basis, we are spared...AND saved. For Eternity. And so are those many believers are who still have time to heed and embrace the Gospel and the Lord's grace. Hopefully, our children, grandchildren, friends and family will do the same before the thief comes in the night.

The good news: Recently it has been reported that 100 million former ChiComs have embraced the Gospel, as well as millions of converts in the Middle East. Amen to that!

Liberator  posted on  2015-04-16   11:41:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#84. To: sneakypete (#74)

They [the RNC's love-child, the GOP] damn sure serve as a prime example of backstabbing and double-dealing as you are likely to find.

No question.

During this election we're about to see to just what degree the RNC's typical backstabbing and double-dealing is executed. IF their chosen globalist-RINO-Statist dressed in a Dem sundress doesn't win the GOP nomination, I expect them to sabotage that nominee (especially if it's Cruz.)

Liberator  posted on  2015-04-16   11:46:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#85. To: Pericles (#64)

The Catholic church as it operates in Rome is at least 1,500 to 2,000 years old so why deny them the use of the term republic when they are more contemporaries of Plato more than the modern versions?

Why does the age of the Vatican's secret society matter? And how in the world is the Vatican a "Republic" by any definition of the word? It's a city-state and financial operation that masquerades as the seat of Christ's Church while engaging in political monkey business and subterfuge that assures itself of nothing but POWER.

Still tooting the horn of Plato and the Greek "republic" again? In their (or your) concept of "republic," who were the "Grantors" of liberty and "rights" again?

Liberator  posted on  2015-04-16   11:54:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#86. To: VxH (#77) (Edited)

On the shoulders of THIS faith America became great.

That faith was manifested in the hearts and free minds of Individuals between themselves and their Creator -- not between the collectivist sheeple fleecers and their religious mobs.

Uh, America and its basis of freedom and inspiration were STILL its faith in God. Our founders clearly spelled that out as a Right -- "endowed by our Creator." Are you now going to deny the role of God and faith in the Founders' conviction in establishing this republic?

Whether between families or local churches, the Bible remained the choice of spiritual "weapon" and guidance in all matters. THAT fact is irrefutable.

Btw, you may be shocked to learn this, but Jim Bakker-types did not EVER run contemporary America OR the fledgling America OR the Colonies.

"Collectivist sheeple fleecers and their religious mobs"?? HA! You've bought into the mob-assassination caricatures of the Left now? Any hallucinogenic notion of the pot calling the kettle black simply cannot be taken seriously.

Liberator  posted on  2015-04-16   12:10:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#87. To: Liberator (#85)

Still tooting the horn of Plato and the Greek "republic" again? In their (or your) concept of "republic," who were the "Grantors" of liberty and "rights" again?

Why not? Plato's ancestors invented the concept of political science. AKA, the people who you owe that got your filthy northern European ancestors to stop human sacrifices and living in mud huts.

Pericles  posted on  2015-04-16   12:19:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#88. To: Liberator (#84)

IF their chosen globalist-RINO-Statist dressed in a Dem sundress doesn't win the GOP nomination, I expect them to sabotage that nominee (especially if it's Cruz.)

Eliminate the Cruz part,and it would be the safest bet you could ever make.

They have been doing this ever since they forced Reagan to take the treasonous old bastard Poppy Bush as his running mate.

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-16   13:07:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#89. To: Liberator (#85)

It's a city-state and financial operation that masquerades as the seat of Christ's Church

It's actually a for-profit private corporation hiding behind the skirts of charity.

In many respects,it is the original New World Order,and laid the ground work for how the globalists of today plan on taking over control of the world.

Hitler and Stalin must be spinning in their graves from jealousy. Especially Stalin,since he went to Divinity School to become a priest.

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-16   13:11:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#90. To: Liberator (#83)

The good news is that on an individual/church basis, we are spared

Salvation is by individual not by community. I not aware that God judges a individual by what church and/or community he/she attends or embraces. Are there any churches in Heaven? Besides I am not at all certain how God would judge the Catholic church or most of the Protest-ant churches.

потому что Бог хочет это тот путь

SOSO  posted on  2015-04-16   14:49:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#91. To: Liberator (#86) (Edited)

"Collectivist sheeple fleecers and their religious mobs"?

Yep. Like when Calvin and Co. were burning folks alive for disagreeing with the dogmatic principles of Cal's "reformation" in Geneva.

Mob rule. The kind of state-established Ba'al manure the founders deliberately created a secular republic to protect themselves and their heirs from.

Fortunately, thanks to founders like Franklin, Washington, John Adams, and Jefferson, "liberators" like you and Calvin don't get to fire up the state- established Theocratic BBQ in America.

VxH  posted on  2015-04-16   20:09:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#92. To: Liberator (#82) (Edited)

Were you using the internet in the 80s and early 90s?

Yep. Compuserve, GEnie, AOL --- and DARPAnet.

I bought my first PC clone in 1985

VxH  posted on  2015-04-16   20:14:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#93. To: Liberator (#82)

Oh but Clinton indeed DID "muck it up,"

What year did the dot.com boom reach its apex, suuuper-genius?

VxH  posted on  2015-04-16   20:16:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#94. To: Pericles (#81) (Edited)

The Vatican is a Republic

Uhuh. Already stipulated into the record.

What differentiates the PURPOSE of the Vatican's republic from the purpose specified for America's legal framework in the American Declaration of Independence?

VxH  posted on  2015-04-16   20:22:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#95. To: Liberator (#86)

Btw, you may be shocked to learn this, but Jim Bakker-types did not EVER run contemporary America OR the fledgling America OR the Colonies

Oh, so the Catholic farce never had any influence in fledgling America.

LOL. Riiiiiiiight. Be sure and let Christopher Columbus know will ya?

VxH  posted on  2015-04-16   23:44:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#96. To: SOSO (#90)

Salvation is by individual not by community.

Yes...but that doesn't mean God hasn't either chastised, cursed or blessed "communities" or churches or people in scripture.

I not aware that God judges a individual by what church and/or community he/she attends or embraces.

Hold onto your backwards baseball cap; Are you familiar with The Seven Churches of Revelation described in Revelation chapters 2 through chapter 3? They were REAL churches:

(1) Ephesus

(2) Smyrna

(3) Pergamum

(4) Thyatira

(5) Sardis

(6) Philadelphia

(7) Laodicea

I reckon this would be a good opportunity to review what the Lord has to say about each of them.

Are there any churches in Heaven?

Why? I don't think altar boys are required.

I am not at all certain how God would judge the Catholic church or most of the Protest-ant churches.

Perfectly.

Liberator  posted on  2015-04-17   11:59:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#97. To: VxH (#91) (Edited)

Yep. Like when Calvin and Co. were burning folks alive for disagreeing with the dogmatic principles of Cal's "reformation" in Geneva.

WHAT in the world does your post have to do with my assertion that America and its basis of freedom and inspiration was its faith in God? OR, that our Founders clearly spelled that out "Rights" -- as "endowed by our Creator."

I'll ask you again (since your attention span is gnat-like): Are you still denying the role of God and faith in the Founders' conviction in establishing this republic?

Yet another of my assertions:

Whether between families or local churches, the Bible remained the choice of spiritual "weapon" and guidance in all matters. THAT fact is irrefutable.

DO YOU DISAGREE?

Mob rule. The kind of state-established Ba'al manure the founders deliberately created a secular republic to protect themselves and their heirs from.

"Mob Rule"?? Lol -- based on WHAT again? (take all the time you need to shovel whatever "proof" you can muster.)

Fortunately, thanks to founders like Franklin, Washington, John Adams, and Jefferson, "liberators" like you and Calvin don't get to fire up the state- established Theocratic BBQ in America.

Your frontal lobe is....BBQ'd. Burnt to a crisp. Btw -- now that your secular humanist gubmint, education system, and loyalty to...Ba'al (Heh -- what irony) has veered off course and destroyed the mention of "God", how much longer do you see this psuedo-republic lasting before it devolves into....absolute tyranny?

The governance of the Republic may be secular-based, but the vast majority of Founders were....CHRISTIAN. As has been documented at this forum and at LP forever. I will repeat: On the shoulders of THIS faith America became great.

But somehow, someway in your fevered alleged mind YOU believe there's suddenly some "Fundie Conspiracy" to turn the US into a "Theocracy"?? HAH!! Paranoid much??

Liberator  posted on  2015-04-17   12:20:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#98. To: VxH (#93)

What year did the dot.com boom reach its apex, suuuper-genius?

HUH?? Off track again? What else is new.

Tell the class exactly what the "dot.com boom" has to do with my assertion that the Reagan Years were punctuated an unprecedented era of peace, prosperity, and hope for the future? And that it was based on Reagan's leadership which stressed moral clarity, optimism, and conviction of righteousness.

YOUR kooky assertion is that THE basis of the Reagan Era of peace, prosperity, and hope was based on....technology. And (Bwaahaa!) "The Space Race."

Liberator  posted on  2015-04-17   12:29:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#99. To: Liberator (#96)

I am not at all certain how God would judge the Catholic church or most of the Protest-ant churches.

Perfectly.

In that case I would be quite worried if I were they.

потому что Бог хочет это тот путь

SOSO  posted on  2015-04-17   12:44:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#100. To: Liberator (#96)

Hold onto your backwards baseball cap; Are you familiar with The Seven Churches of Revelation described in Revelation chapters 2 through chapter 3? They were REAL churches:

(1) Ephesus

(2) Smyrna

(3) Pergamum

(4) Thyatira

(5) Sardis

(6) Philadelphia

(7) Laodicea

I reckon this would be a good opportunity to review what the Lord has to say about each of them.

Oh, I see now. The Angel was speaking to stone not people. Thanks for clearing that up.

потому что Бог хочет это тот путь

SOSO  posted on  2015-04-17   12:46:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#101. To: Liberator (#98) (Edited)

The inertial prosperity observable through out the 90's wasn't created by Klintoon any more than it was created by the preceding administrations.

The times made the men, not vice-versa - and the times were driven by the computer and technological revolution of the unfolding Information Age.

Now I'll ask again: What year did the dot.com boom reach it's apex?

It's completely relevant because that's when the inertia of the Information Age's wave broke.

VxH  posted on  2015-04-17   14:36:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#102. To: Liberator (#97) (Edited)

The governance of the Republic may be secular-based

That's a FACT.

And it's that FACT, established by LAW, that prevents state-establishing religious goons like you from doing what you, and Calvin, have always done: SETTING UP YOUR OPINIONS AND MODES OF THINKING AS THE ONLY TRUE AND INFALLIBLE.

VxH  posted on  2015-04-17   14:38:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#103. To: Liberator (#98) (Edited)

an unprecedented era of peace,

LOL Right.

That's what Saint Ronaldo's angels were creating when they were selling arms to Iran, and their bidness associates were selling cocaine to fund the Contras.

"an unprecedented era of peace" - NOT.

FAIL.

VxH  posted on  2015-04-17   15:12:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com