United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Trooper: Dzhokhar Tsarnaev Had at Least 3 Additional Bombs
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.people.com/article/dzhok ... ootout?xid=outbrain_peoplenews
Published: Apr 6, 2015
Author: STEVE HELLING
Post Date: 2015-04-06 08:05:06 by out damned spot
Keywords: Tsarnaev, Terrorism
Views: 1023
Comments: 10
As horrific as the Boston Marathon Bombing was, it could have been even worse, according to court testimony. According to the Boston Herald, Trooper Robert McCarthy of the state bomb squad took the stand in Tsarnaev's trial on Wednesday, the 9th day of testimony. Among his chilling revelations: that Tsarnaev had abandoned three additional bombs. Two bombs were left at the site of a police shootout; a third one was left in the driver's seat of the 2013 Mercedes SUV that Tsarnaev had stolen while fleeing police. McCarthy said the bomb left in the Mercedes was in a clear, square Tupperware container packed with "two to three pounds" of blast powder and "multiple lengths of fuse taped together." Prosecutors say that Tsarnaev and his older brother Tamerlan engaged in a firefight with cops before Dzhokhar drove at officers in the Mercedes, running over his brother in the process. He abandoned the vehicle on a street in Watertown, Massachusetts. According to the Boston Globe, the SUV was riddled with bullet holes. McCarthy testified that two other undetonated bombs were left at the scene of the firefight. One was made from a length of metal pipe, and the other was made from an pipe's elbow joint. McCarthy said the elbow joint bomb was more dangerous. "Rather than call it a pipe bomb, I call it an improvised grenade," he said, adding that the elbow bomb was very heavy. "It will not roll when it's tossed. It will stop in the spot where it's intended to be." Tsarnaev's trial is a two-phase death penalty trial. In the first phase, jurors will determine whether he is guilty of more than 30 charges. In the second phase, they will determine whether Tsarnaev should be put to death.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: out damned spot (#0)
Why do we have "wall to wall" coverage of OJ's trial, but for the Boston Bombing trial, OKC trial, or even the trial of the President of Panama zilch?
HA! Good question...and humorously posed.
Zero scrutiny. How much media scrutiny would there be for this trail were the perp a Christian or Tea Partier who bombed an abortion clinic?
Good point. Meanwhile, back at the MSM, Diane Sawyer will be having a 2 hour interview of...Bruce Jenner. I kid you not.
http://www.tedcruz.org
We are living within the US-SR reboot. There is very little reason to believe anything one hears. I guess my dads old saying is more true than ever. Believe only half of what you see, and none of what you hear.
Especially in this era of Photoshop, doctored video, and the satanic deceptions yet to come.
The Tsarnaev's are patsies, used in a false-flag op. The Brothers Tsarnaev: The Lee Harvey Oswalds of the Boston bombings? The Brothers Tsarnaev, like Lee Harvey Oswald, are innocent patsies. But Oswald, unlike the Brothers Tsarnaev, was able to speak for himself. After his arrest, and before being gunned down in the Dallas Police Department basement by CIA-linked mob hit-man Jack Ruby, Oswald said: “I’m a patsy.” The Brothers Tsarnaev may never be allowed to speak in their own defense; fifty years after Oswald’s “I’m a patsy,” the National Security State appears to have learned that lesson well. Indeed, the Israeli doctors tasked with treating Dzokhar Tsarnaev in the hospital reported that “he may never speak again.” (Why were Israeli doctors assigned an American national security case? Perhaps for the same reason that an Israeli team of terror specialists flew to Boston, on a trip organized before the bombing, to take charge of the “investigation.” After all, Israel is the global “A Team” of false-flag terrorism.) Dzokhar Tsarnaev did speak out, in a way, in his own defense – by endorsing 9/11 truth before he was framed for the bombing. Using his Twitter account, he wrote: “Idk why it’s hard for many of you to accept that 9/11 was an inside job.” That tweet, like Oswald’s “I’m a patsy,” may go down in history. It strongly suggests Dzokhar’s innocence. (Why would any Muslim who knew 9/11 was an inside job – as 80% of Muslims do, according to polls – want to commit terrorism whose only beneficiaries are Zionists and imperialists?) Though the Brothers Tsarnaev will not be allowed to defend themselves, their loved ones are doing it for them. Their mother, father, and aunt all say they are innocent patsies, framed by agents of the National Security state. Oswald’s girlfriend, Judith Vary Baker, has similarly exonerated Oswald. Another Tsarnaev-Oswald parallel: They were Russian speakers who were shadowed for years by the FBI before being framed for a spectacular crime. NOT buying that. The Brothers Tsarnaev act was purposely and knowingly enabled. Just as in the case of the 9/11 perps and plan. In both cases, the beneficiary is...a more highly un-constitutional and over-officious centralized police state.
The overwhelming majority of solved, before the event arrests of suspected bombings are infiltrated by authorities. I am firmly convinced that the Tsarnaev brothers were known and abetted by authorities. They knew the "attack" was planned and when. I wish that we could KNOW what actually happened that day. I just don't believe that there was the amount of damage, death and maimed people on that day. I think this was a "training" event that was used for purposes not clearly understood. God forgive me if I am wrong, but I am convinced to a reasonable doubt, of the destructive power of the "bombs" and the effects. Wouldn't it have been nice, in this "Land of the Free and open press" if we could have watched trial coverage, including video and stills of the event? Why no "wall to wall" coverage of the trial, including evidences used for and against the perpetrators? Using the government and medias line that they use against protests of internal spying, if they have nothing to hide, why are they hiding so much?
I happen to agree with every word of your assessment and speculation. "A 'training' event that was used for purposes not clearly understood" is a succinct way to put it. Unless it was about "conditioning" people like Pavlov's hamsters. Another obviously planned "training" exercise: Allowing Tsarnaev to wandering in the dark as he was isolated and his general whereabouts known (without orders to pursue such a "danger" to the city.) Nabbing him during the wee hours would have forced the PTB to scratch the exciting 'Martial Law' exercise hatched for the fateful following day in Beantown ("Three cheers for our Gubmint Storm Troopers!! They caught the one guy who terrorized and shut down a city of 700,000!! HIP-HIP, HURRAY!!") Article and photo retrospective on event: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2311443/Boston-bomber-caught-Dzhokhar-Tsarnaev-captured-ALIVE-hiding-inside-BOAT.html So much made little sense that day, that all anyone remembers now is the trite catch-phrase, "BOSTON STRONG". Conspicuous, ain't it? Suddenly the media became bored? OR, were they ordered to back off? Using the government and medias line that they use against protests of internal spying, if they have nothing to hide, why are they hiding so much? Great rationale. I guess it would be inconvenient to be *that* "transparent" when the the PTB would have to belly-up to the bar and admit they let things get out of hand. OR WORSE. Better to maintain the smoke and mirrors blurring the line of "good-guys vs. "bad-guys". GI, what was your take on this event? Buy the official narrative? Did any red flags pop up for you?
#2. To: jeremiad (#1)
Why do we have "wall to wall" coverage of OJ's trial, but for the Boston Bombing trial, OKC trial, or even the trial of the President of Panama zilch?
#3. To: out damned spot (#0)
According to the Boston Herald, Trooper Robert McCarthy of the state bomb squad took the stand in Tsarnaev's trial on Wednesday, the 9th day of testimony.
#4. To: jeremiad (#1)
#5. To: Liberator (#3)
Believe only half of what you see, and none of what you hear.
#6. To: jeremiad (#5)
Believe only half of what you see, and none of what you hear.
#7. To: out damned spot (#0)
(Edited)
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Americans who have no experience with, or knowledge of, tyranny believe that only terrorists will experience the unchecked power of the state. They will believe this until it happens to them, or their children, or their friends.
Paul Craig Roberts
#8. To: Deckard (#7)
The Brothers Tsarnaev, like Lee Harvey Oswald, are innocent patsies.
#9. To: Liberator (#8)
#10. To: jeremiad, Deckard, stoner, Grand Island (#9)
Why no "wall to wall" coverage of the trial, including evidences used for and against the perpetrators?
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]