Title: The RIGHT STRIKES BACK!! Christian Pizzeria ATTACKED by gay lobby raises over $18k in 2 HOURS! Source:
[None] URL Source:http://therightscoop.com/the-right- ... by-raises-over-18k-in-2-hours/ Published:Apr 1, 2015 Author:Staff Post Date:2015-04-01 23:32:10 by out damned spot Keywords:Christian, pizzeria, RFRA Views:6967 Comments:30
Crystal OConnor co-owns a pizzeria in Indiana but they may close their doors permanently after being attacked for putting forth their Christian faith. When she said she would not cater a gay wedding, the shops website was hacked, their Yelp profile was plastered with insults and obscene pictures, and they even received death threats.
A supporter has begun a GoFundMe profile for the Pizzeria owners to help them weather the gay mafia storm, and they have so many people angry that theyve received over $18,000 in donations in just two hours!
Crystal talks about the onslaught in an interview with Dana Loesch:
Isnt this exactly why there needs to be a law to protect the ability of religious people to practice their faith? Not according to the scummy degenerates who are attacking her for having some standards.
No I don't... Please show me where it says "Thou shalt not serve pizza at gay weddings." I've looked for it but can't find it anywhere.
The queers have escalated this beyond serving pizza for your homo friends.
If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.
If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.
Leviticus is OLD Covenant, dude. If you adhere to that, you will be denied Salvation, just like the ancient Hebrews were. Pay more attention to what the NEW Testament says. THAT's the one that really matters to anybody who claims to be a Christian.
That's true, but God reaffirms His moral law in the New Covenant.
John 8:3-11
3 The scribes and the Pharisees brought a woman who had been caught in adultery; and making her stand before all of them, 4 they said to him, Teacher, this woman was caught in the very act of committing adultery. 5 Now in the law Moses commanded us to stone such women. Now what do you say? 6 They said this to test him, so that they might have some charge to bring against him. Jesus bent down and wrote with his finger on the ground. 7 When they kept on questioning him, he straightened up and said to them, Let anyone among you who is without sin be the first to throw a stone at her. 8 And once again he bent down and wrote on the ground. 9 When they heard it, they went away, one by one, beginning with the elders; and Jesus was left alone with the woman standing before him. 10 Jesus straightened up and said to her, Woman, where are they? Has no one condemned you? 11 She said, No one, sir. And Jesus said, Neither do I condemn you. Go your way, and from now on do not sin again.
The self-righteous pizza shop owners shouldn't go around proclaiming themselves to be more judgemental than Our Lord, Jesus Christ Himself.
The self-righteous pizza shop owners shouldn't go around proclaiming themselves to be more judgemental than Our Lord, Jesus Christ Himself.
Did the pizza owners try to stone any homosexuals?
Taking your example, the pizza owners should have catered the event and then tell the homosexuals 'go and sin no more.'
While it's commendable that Willie is seeking scriptural precedence that supports his pro-homo advocacy in this case, apparently Red, you have found some obvious inconsistencies...
No, the Pizza owners did NOT stone or threaten to stone any homosexuals (how disappointing for the homo-advocates :-( Didn't threaten them. Disn't even demonstrate "hate" of homosexuals.
But what IF the Pizza owners (or bakers) DID indeed serve their sodomite-customers...and punctuated their service with, "In the words of Jesus Christ, GO AND SIN NO MORE!"? Would/could the Christian business owners have been charged with "harassment"? "Verbal assault"? "Hate Speech"?
Before you know it, parents will be compelled to have a homosexual-pedophile babysit for little Johnny, by law lest they be violating the homo-pedo of his "civil rights." Not the mention being judged as "intolerant Christian homophobes." Will little Johnny's dad (a goob employee in this example) be ostracized, fired, and be forced to apologize to the homo-pedophile (then finally attend "sensitivity training"?)
This is what happens when folks incorrectly use Scripture.
And use exploit scripture out of context, and then ONLY to help support a subversive agenda and point. The ploy doesn't quite work against those who know Scripture.
Before you know it, parents will be compelled to have a homosexual-pedophile babysit for little Johnny, by law lest they be violating the homo-pedo of his "civil rights." Not the mention being judged as "intolerant Christian homophobes." Will little Johnny's dad (a goob employee in this example) be ostracized, fired, and be forced to apologize to the homo-pedophile (then finally attend "sensitivity training"?)