[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Police clash with pro-Palestine protesters on Ohio State University campus

Joe Rogan Experience #2138 - Tucker Carlson

Police Dispersing Student Protesters at USC - Breaking News Coverage (College Protests)

What Passover Means For The New Testament Believer

Are We Closer Than Ever To The Next Pandemic?

War in Ukraine Turns on Russia

what happened during total solar eclipse

Israel Attacks Iran, Report Says - LIVE Breaking News Coverage

Earth is Scorched with Heat

Antiwar Activists Chant ‘Death to America’ at Event Featuring Chicago Alderman

Vibe Shift

A stream that makes the pleasant Rain sound.

Older Men - Keep One Foot In The Dark Ages

When You Really Want to Meet the Diversity Requirements

CERN to test world's most powerful particle accelerator during April's solar eclipse

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin

How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End?

What on EARTH is going on in Acts 16:11? New Discovery!

2023 Hottest in over 120 Million Years

2024 and beyond in prophecy

Questions

This Speech Just Broke the Internet


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Religion
See other Religion Articles

Title: The biggest threat now is not Radical Islam. It is “Apocalyptic Islam.”
Source: Flash Traffic Blog
URL Source: https://flashtrafficblog.wordpress. ... gious-broadcasters-convention/
Published: Feb 27, 2015
Author: Joel Rosenberg
Post Date: 2015-02-27 13:50:34 by redleghunter
Ping List: *Islamic caliphate expansion*     Subscribe to *Islamic caliphate expansion*
Keywords: None
Views: 13050
Comments: 63

(Nashville, Tennessee) — Yesterday, the Christian Post published the following article: “ISIS, Iran Are Agents of ‘Apocalyptic Islam’ Paving Way for ‘Islamic Messiah,’ Says NYT Bestselling Author.” I hope you will take a few moments to read it and consider the analysis.

Last night, I discussed this subject in more detail at the closing dinner of the National Religious Broadcasters convention. Here are excerpts from those remarks. I also promised to post stunning research data on the End Times beliefs of Muslims from a 2012 Pew Research Center study. You will find those numbers below.

—————

THE THREAT OF “APOCALYPTIC ISLAM”

The threat we face is not simply from Radical Islam. Indeed, it not even primarily from Radical Islamic groups like Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, and al Qaeda at this hour, as serious as these threats are.

The most serious threat we face in the Middle East and North Africa is what I call “Apocalyptic Islam.”

This term — “Apocalyptic Islam” — is one that each of needs to become familiar with and begin to teach others. Why? Because for the first time in all of human history, we have not just one but two nation states whose rulers are driven not by political ideology — or even mere religious theology — but by apocalyptic, genocidal End Times eschatology.

The Islamic Republic of Iran today is ruled by an apocalyptic, genocidal death cult. (see also here, here and here)

So is the Islamic State, also known as ISIS or ISIL. (see here and here)

The former are Shia. The latter are Sunni. Both believe the End of days has come. Both believe their messiah – known as the “Mahdi” — is coming at any moment. Both are trying to hasten the coming of the Mahdi. Yet each has entirely different strategies to hasten his arrival or appearance on earth.

ISIS wants to build a caliphate. Iran wants to build The Bomb. ISIS is committing genocide now. Iran is preparing to commit genocide later.

In the near term, ISIS is more dangerous. Why? Because ISIS is on a jihadist rampage right now. Robbing. Killing. Destroying. Enslaving. Raping. Torturing. Beheading. Because ISIS is a Satanic movement. This is not mere terrorism. This is genocide. These are demon-possessed people making blood sacrifices to their god and if they are not stopped they will murder millions and bring down one Mid-eastern regime after another.

As Americans, we dare not turn a blind eye to this threat. If we don’t defeat the jihadists over there, they are coming here. We must act, and act now.

Longer term, Iran is the most dangerous, especially if the President approves this disastrous nuclear deal that is emerging. Why? Because the apocalyptic leaders of Iran are biding their time to build a nuclear arsenal capable of killing tens of millions of people in a matter of minutes.

Far too few people in the West truly understand the nature and threat of Radical Islam. Fewer still are aware of — much less understand — the nature and threat of Apocalyptic Islam. Indeed, many dismiss these concerns all together. But the fact is that a deep and widespread belief exists within the Islamic world that we are living in the End of Days, and that the Islamic “Mahdi” or “messiah” is coming at any moment to bring Judgment Day and the end of all things.

According to a 2012 report by the Pew Research Center, “in most countries in the Middle East and North Africa, South Asia and Southeast Asia, more than half or more of Muslims believe they will live to see the return of the Mahdi.”

Consider that sentence again — “more than half.” In a world of 1.5 billion Muslims, that means more than 750 million Muslims believe not only that the Mahdi is coming, but that his arrival is imminent. •In Egypt, 40% of Muslims believe the return of the Mahdi is imminent. •In Jordan, 41% •Among Palestinians, the number is 46% •In Iraq, a stunning 72% of Muslims believe this

What’s more, an enormous number of Muslims believe that Jesus is coming back to earth. In their eschatology, however, Jesus is not the Savior. He’s not the Son of God. He does not come to reign as King. Rather, Islamic End Times theology posits Jesus as the deputy, serving under the Mahdi, and forcing all people to convert to Islam or die. •In Jordan, 29% of Muslims believe Jesus is coming back to earth •In Egypt, it’s 39% •Among Palestinians, the number is 46% •In Iraq, an eye-popping 64% of Muslims believe Jesus is coming back.

These facts have real-world implications. Our President and many policy-makers are ignoring both the facts and their implications. But we must be clear: we face a threat from Radical Islam which seeks to attack us. We face an even greater threat from Apocalyptic Islam which seeks to annihilate us. Subscribe to *Islamic caliphate expansion*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 51.

#29. To: redleghunter, Too Conservative, Vicomte13, Gatlin (#0)

Go to the 18:00 mark and tell me what you think about Rubio's opinion about Obozo and ISIS.

CZ82  posted on  2015-02-28   8:54:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: CZ82, Pericles, redleghunter (#29)

"They're not Presbyterian." Kinda annoyed Vannity. As it should since he was trying to give Rubio a chance to shine on foreign policy.

Then Rubio delusionally says that Obama won't fight ISIS because it might sour the deal with Iran. This boob seems unaware that Shi'a Iran would like nothing better than to knock off Sunni ISIS and protect its Alawite (Shi'a) partner, Assad. This would also please Shi'a Iraq.

This twit is past his sell-by date.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-02-28   9:40:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#42. To: TooConservative (#32)

I think the link to a US build up of ground troops posited in or around Iraq is something Obola is avoiding because of the Iran talks.

There's a reason why Iran has not sent divisions in to Iraq to help Baghdad defeat ISIL out west and north.

redleghunter  posted on  2015-03-01   2:38:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#43. To: redleghunter (#42) (Edited)

I think the link to a US build up of ground troops posited in or around Iraq is something Obola is avoiding because of the Iran talks.

Maybe. Or he is just doing this as a way to try to build some legacy as a statesman, however laughable it is. And he avoids the possibility of Iran testing a nuclear weapon while he is still in office.

Obama does not care if Iran tests a nuke the day after he moves out of the White Hut to make hundreds of millions on the paid speech circuit.

There's a reason why Iran has not sent divisions in to Iraq to help Baghdad defeat ISIL out west and north.

They saw our troubles in cleaning out the Iraqi Sunni (Ba'athist revanchists and apocalyptic nutjobs). Why would they take that job on, especially given their own miserable performance in the Iran-Iraq war?

Staying out of Iraq is a no-brainer for Iran's mullahs. Let the stupid Americans do it and play it for every angle, like the survival of their partner, Assad. Which is exactly what is happening.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-03-01   7:06:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#47. To: TooConservative (#43)

They saw our troubles in cleaning out the Iraqi Sunni (Ba'athist revanchists and apocalyptic nutjobs). Why would they take that job on, especially given their own miserable performance in the Iran-Iraq war?

Staying out of Iraq is a no-brainer for Iran's mullahs. Let the stupid Americans do it and play it for every angle, like the survival of their partner, Assad. Which is exactly what is happening.

The above are considerations. However the Persians know Iraq's history better than Iraqis.

Tehran knows they have mind control over the Baghdad central government. So they don't have to send divisions. This is where the relation of Shia with Shia ends. Once Persian divisions come across into Arab Iraq, the Iraqis start thinking like Arabs and not Shia Muslims. The ethnic divide is as strong as the Sunni and Shia divide. Something we later learned too late.

redleghunter  posted on  2015-03-01   13:00:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#51. To: redleghunter (#47)

Tehran knows they have mind control over the Baghdad central government. So they don't have to send divisions. This is where the relation of Shia with Shia ends. Once Persian divisions come across into Arab Iraq, the Iraqis start thinking like Arabs and not Shia Muslims. The ethnic divide is as strong as the Sunni and Shia divide. Something we later learned too late.

Mmm...yeah, I generally think that the Persian/Arab divide is as great and as obvious as the Turkish/Arab divide.

Certainly, Iraq and Iran will not be forming a Shi'a superstate or even a common military. They might have generals who fought each other brutally back in the Eighties, not easily forgotten for either side. So I do not expect Iran to inter-operate directly with Iraq's military.

I do recall that Iran put their forces on high alert and insisted they would attack if ISIS drew significant forces within 40km (or so) of the Iraq/Iran border. That was a few months back. And they probably didn't announce that so openly without Baghdad's assent (it was also to Baghdad's advantage for Iran to take this posture).

Another much-neglected topic is how Iran and Iraq both are determined to prevent any unity of the mountain Kurds of Iran with the northern Kurds of Iraq or any Kurdish faction from Turkey or Syria. Turkey and Syria also oppose this. So that is a sort of longstanding ethnic subtext among these states.

And we forget too quickly that Iran is nowhere close to being ethnically pure like, say, Japan is. Only about 60% of Iran is ethnically Persian. And there are some religious minorities still there, even about 20,000 Orthodox Jews (who aren't always that fond of Israel, just like other Iranians).

Wiki: "The CIA World Factbook has estimated that Persians constitute 61% of the population, Azerbaijanis at 16%, Kurds 10%, Lurs 6%, Arabs 2%, Balochs 2%, Turkmens and Turkic tribes 2%, and others 1% (such as Armenians, Georgians, Circassians, and Assyrians). It found Persian to be first language of 53% of the population, Azeri and other Turkic dialect being spoken by 18%, Kurdish by 10%, Gilaki and Mazandarani by 7%, Luri by 6%, Balochi by 2%, Arabic by 2%, and other languages at 2%."

And while Iran is over 99% Muslim, they are still more tolerant of other religions than our precious allies, the Turks:

Wiki:

Iranian people by religion, 2011 General Census Results[228]
ReligionPercent of
population
Number of
people
Muslim99.3989%74,682,938
Not declared0.3538%205,317
Christian0.1566%117,704
Zoroastrian0.0336%25,271
Jew0.0117%8,756
Other0.0653%49,101
I have to wonder if we'll see in coming years the last Christians eliminated from Iraq much as the ancient Jewish community is now a bare handful of the elderly.

The same may be true of the ancient Syrian churches. I keep wondering when people will start to hold our leaders and pundits who babbled about being "greeted as liberators" and the wonders of the Arab Spring to the public as some great foreign policy initiative.

Personally, our leaders and pundits suck and should be held to account for the wreckage left in the wake of their foolishness across the Mideast. There's plenty of blame for the last two presidents, no need to get partisan.

And we face a far more hostile and dangerous Mideast than we ever did before as a result of this foolish meddling and inability to magically wave a wand and turn Baghdad into Akron, Ohio. Because that just isn't going to happen and it is the job of our leaders to avoid such wishful thinking, not make impossible promises they could never hope to fulfill.

Democracy in Iraq. An Islamic republic. And it's just peachy how all those good intentions and those wartime slogans from our pols worked out, eh?

By the time this nonsensical Arab Spring spread to Cairo and the war crimes that Obama and Hitlery committed against Libya, you really have to consider whether they should be deported to face justice at the Hague.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-03-01   15:29:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 51.

        There are no replies to Comment # 51.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 51.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com