[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Joe Rogan Experience #2138 - Tucker Carlson

Police Dispersing Student Protesters at USC - Breaking News Coverage (College Protests)

What Passover Means For The New Testament Believer

Are We Closer Than Ever To The Next Pandemic?

War in Ukraine Turns on Russia

what happened during total solar eclipse

Israel Attacks Iran, Report Says - LIVE Breaking News Coverage

Earth is Scorched with Heat

Antiwar Activists Chant ‘Death to America’ at Event Featuring Chicago Alderman

Vibe Shift

A stream that makes the pleasant Rain sound.

Older Men - Keep One Foot In The Dark Ages

When You Really Want to Meet the Diversity Requirements

CERN to test world's most powerful particle accelerator during April's solar eclipse

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin

How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End?

What on EARTH is going on in Acts 16:11? New Discovery!

2023 Hottest in over 120 Million Years

2024 and beyond in prophecy

Questions

This Speech Just Broke the Internet

This AMAZING Math Formula Will Teach You About God!


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: Obama to detail immigration order Thursday night
Source: Washington Times
URL Source: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news ... gration-order-expected-friday/
Published: Nov 19, 2014
Author: Dave Boyer
Post Date: 2014-11-19 14:00:44 by nolu chan
Keywords: None
Views: 1028
Comments: 7

Obama to detail immigration order Thursday night

By Dave Boyer
The Washington Times
Updated: 1:43 p.m. on Wednesday, November 19, 2014

President Obama said Wednesday he will use “my lawful authority as president” to issue a highly anticipated executive order on immigration in a prime-time address from the White House on Thursday night.

In a video posted on Facebook, Mr. Obama said he will outline “some steps that I can take to start fixing our broken immigration system.” His action is expected to grant legal status and work permits for as many as 5 million illegal immigrants and touch off a firestorm with congressional Republicans.

“Everybody agrees that our immigration system is broken,” Mr. Obama said in the video, seated on the edge of his desk in the Oval Office. “Unfortunately, Washington has allowed the problem to fester for too long. So what I’m going to be laying out is the things that I can do with my lawful authority as president to make the system work better even as I continue to work with Congress and encourage them to get a bipartisan, comprehensive bill that can solve the entire problem.”

He said he will address the nation at 8 p.m. Thursday, and follow it with a trip to a high school in Las Vegas on Friday, where he’ll lay out more details of the plan.

The White House may have been forced into making the announcement sooner than planned when the AFL-CIO inadvertently disclosed the plans in an email Wednesday.

“We hear there will be a prime time Thursday evening announcement (to preview) and full unveiling in Vegas on Friday,” AFL-CIO spokesman Jeff Hauser wrote in an e-mail to members, a message that was also inadvertently sent to reporters. “Can folks begin to work and plan watch parties for Thursday and/or Friday? Unclear whether Thursday night content will be what is ‘celebratory,’ but Friday will be where we need a lot of energy guaranteed.”

The executive order will set up a showdown between the White House and Republicans in Congress, who have warned Mr. Obama not to take the action.

“If ‘Emperor Obama’ ignores the American people and announces an amnesty plan that he himself has said over and over again exceeds his constitutional authority, he will cement his legacy of lawlessness and ruin the chances for congressional action on this issue — and many others,” said Michael Steel, a top aide to Speaker John A. Boehner, Ohio Republican.

Reuters said Mr. Obama’s immigration order will expand assistance for undocumented residents brought to the U.S. as children.

Rep.-elect Mia Love, Utah Republican, said Thursday that Mr. Obama’s plan for executive amnesty looks “more like a dictatorship” than a democracy.

“This is not about the president,” she said on “Fox and Friends.” “It’s about the American people, and what the American people want the president to do. The American people want Congress to work with the president, want the president to work with Congress so that we can be compassionate, so that we can create a uniform rule of naturalization.”

She added, “It is Congress’ job under Article 1, Section 8 [of the Constitution], to create a uniform rule of naturalization, a way in. It should be done line by line, section by section with the input of the public instead of being done by one person. It looks more like a dictatorship when a president is unilaterally making decisions for the American people.”

Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, Texas Democrat, suggested on the House floor Tuesday that Americans who oppose granting legal status to illegal immigrants are “selfish.”

“This is not amnesty,” Ms. Jackson Lee said. “This is prioritization. This is saving money. This is keeping families together. This is allowing children to not come home to places where their parents have been thrown from their places of work and taken away from them. I am excited about the courage of this president. I look forward to America finally understanding the gifts you that you are given. Let us not be a selfish nation. Let us be a generous nation.”

Nearly half of Americans disapprove of Mr. Obama’s expected plan, according to a new NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll.

In the survey released Wednesday, 48 percent oppose Mr. Obama taking executive action on immigration, while 38 percent support it; another 14 percent have no opinion or are unsure. Nearly half of Americans disapprove of Mr. Obama’s expected plan, a new NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll said.

In the survey released Wednesday, 48 percent oppose Mr. Obama taking executive action on immigration, while 38 percent support it; another 14 percent have no opinion or are unsure.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: All (#0)

I expect Ferguson, Missouri the "no true bill" will be issued first. If it bleeds, it leads. The ensuing riots will distract attention from the royal edict. We should see soon enough.

nolu chan  posted on  2014-11-19   14:05:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: All (#0)

This will be in conjunction with another program. Parents, whose children are lawfully present in the United States, will be offered flights at U.S. taxpayer expense, to be reunited with their children in the United States. After the royal edict, millions will be considered "legally present" in the United States despite their unlawful entry.

nolu chan  posted on  2014-11-19   14:12:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: nolu chan (#1)

The ensuing riots will distract attention from the royal edict.

I think you are right. The usurper probably planned it that way.

A K A Stone  posted on  2014-11-19   15:31:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: nolu chan (#0) (Edited)

Rep.-elect Mia Love, Utah Republican, said Thursday that Mr. Obama’s plan for executive amnesty looks “more like a dictatorship” than a democracy.

“This is not about the president,” she said on “Fox and Friends.” “It’s about the American people, and what the American people want the president to do. The American people want Congress to work with the president, want the president to work with Congress so that we can be compassionate, so that we can create a uniform rule of naturalization.”

Looks like Mia just outed herself as someone that wasn't worth electing, wonder how screwed over her constituents feel?

“Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rapidly promoted by mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.”

CZ82  posted on  2014-11-19   17:09:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: CZ82 (#4)

Rep.-elect Mia Love, Utah Republican, said Thursday that Mr. Obama’s plan for executive amnesty looks “more like a dictatorship” than a democracy.

“This is not about the president,” she said on “Fox and Friends.” The American people want Congress to work with the president, want the president to work with Congress so that we can be compassionate, so that we can create a uniform rule of naturalization.”

Mia Love's statement is incoherent. She says Obama's plan looks like a dictatorship. She asserts the American people want the President and the Congress to work together to create a uniform rule of naturalization. The power to delegate a uniform rule of naturalization was explicitly delegated to Congress, not the President. Congress works for the people, not the Executive. We already have a uniform rule of naturalization. If the Congress does not act to change it, it does not change. The President is not empowered to change it, nor is he empowered to flout the law, nor is he empowered to nullify the law. Article 2, Section 3 mandates, "he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed."

The Constitution at Article 1, Section 1 states:

All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.

The Constitution at Article 1, Section 8, Clause 4 states:

The Congress shall have Power ...

[4] To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization....

The power to establish a uniform rule of naturalitation is explicitly delegated to the Congress, not the President. The Congress writes the uniform Rule and the President is obligated to carry it out unless he challenges it as unconstitutional. There is no conceivable constitutional challenge and none has been made.

In determining who is eligible for naturalization, the Congress necessarily determines others are not eligible for naturalization.

8 U.S.C. § 1255 paragraph i:

(i) Adjustment in status of certain aliens physically present in United States

(1) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsections (a) and (c) of this section, an alien physically present in the United States—

(A) who—

(i) entered the United States without inspection; or

(ii) is within one of the classes enumerated in subsection (c) of this section;

(B) who is the beneficiary (including a spouse or child of the principal alien, if eligible to receive a visa under section 1153(d) of this title) of—

(i) a petition for classification under section 1154 of this title that was filed with the Attorney General on or before April 30, 2001; or

(ii) an application for a labor certification under section 1182(a)(5)(A) of this title that was filed pursuant to the regulations of the Secretary of Labor on or before such date; and

(C) who, in the case of a beneficiary of a petition for classification, or an application for labor certification, described in subparagraph (B) that was filed after January 14, 1998, is physically present in the United States on December 21, 2000;

may apply to the Attorney General for the adjustment of his or her status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence. The Attorney General may accept such application only if the alien remits with such application a sum equalling $1,000 as of the date of receipt of the application, but such sum shall not be required from a child under the age of seventeen, or an alien who is the spouse or unmarried child of an individual who obtained temporary or permanent resident status under section 1160 or 1255a of this title or section 202 of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 at any date, who—

(i) as of May 5, 1988, was the unmarried child or spouse of the individual who obtained temporary or permanent resident status under section 1160 or 1255a of this title or section 202 of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986;

(ii) entered the United States before May 5, 1988, resided in the United States on May 5, 1988, and is not a lawful permanent resident; and

(iii) applied for benefits under section 301(a) of the Immigration Act of 1990. The sum specified herein shall be in addition to the fee normally required for the processing of an application under this section.

(2) Upon receipt of such an application and the sum hereby required, the Attorney General may adjust the status of the alien to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence if—

(A) the alien is eligible to receive an immigrant visa and is admissible to the United States for permanent residence; and

(B) an immigrant visa is immediately available to the alien at the time the application is filed.

[snip]

8 U.S.C. § 1325 (2012)

§1325. Improper entry by alien

(a) Improper time or place; avoidance of examination or inspection; misrepresentation and concealment of facts

Any alien who (1) enters or attempts to enter the United States at any time or place other than as designated by immigration officers, or (2) eludes examination or inspection by immigration officers, or (3) attempts to enter or obtains entry to the United States by a willfully false or misleading representation or the willful concealment of a material fact, shall, for the first commission of any such offense, be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than 6 months, or both, and, for a subsequent commission of any such offense, be fined under title 18, or imprisoned not more than 2 years, or both.

[snip]

8 U.S.C. § 1181 (2012)

Admission Qualifications for Aliens; Travel Control of Citizens and Aliens

§1181. Admission of immigrants into the United States

(a) Documents required; admission under quotas before June 30, 1968

Except as provided in subsection (b) and subsection (c) of this section no immigrant shall be admitted into the United States unless at the time of application for admission he (1) has a valid unexpired immigrant visa or was born subsequent to the issuance of such visa of the accompanying parent, and (2) presents a valid unexpired passport or other suitable travel document, or document of identity and nationality, if such document is required under the regulations issued by the Attorney General. With respect to immigrants to be admitted under quotas of quota areas prior to June 30, 1968, no immigrant visa shall be deemed valid unless the immigrant is properly chargeable to the quota area under the quota of which the visa is issued.

(b) Readmission without required documents; Attorney General's discretion

Notwithstanding the provisions of section 1182(a)(7)(A) of this title in such cases or in such classes of cases and under such conditions as may be by regulations prescribed, returning resident immigrants, defined in section 1101(a)(27)(A) of this title, who are otherwise admissible may be readmitted to the United States by the Attorney General in his discretion without being required to obtain a passport, immigrant visa, reentry permit or other documentation.

The provisions of subsection (a) of this section shall not apply to an alien whom the Attorney General admits to the United States under section 1157 of this title.

Public Law 99-603, 100 Stat. 3359, 3443 (6 Nov. 1986), Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, Section 407:

SEC. 407. SENSE OF THE CONGRESS.

It is the sense of the Congress that the President of the United States should consult with the President of the Republic of Mexico within 90 days after enactment of this Act regarding the implementation of this Act and its possible effect on the United States or Mexico. After the consultation, it is the sense of the Congress that the President should report to the Congress any legislative or administrative changes that may be necessary as a result of the consultation and the enactment of this legislation.

nolu chan  posted on  2014-11-19   19:00:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: A K A Stone (#3)

FYI.

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/430/787/case.html

U.S. Supreme Court

Fiallo v. Bell, 430 U.S. 787 (1977)

No. 75-6297

Argued December 7, 1976
Decided April 26, 1977

Excerpt at 792:

At the outset, it is important to underscore the limited scope of judicial inquiry into immigration legislation. This Court has repeatedly emphasized that "over no conceivable subject is the legislative power of Congress more complete than it is over" the admission of aliens. Oceanic Navigation Co. v. Stranahan,214 U. S. 320, 214 U. S. 339 (1909); accord, Kleindienst v. Mandel,408 U. S. 753, 408 U. S. 766 (1972). Our cases "have long recognized the power to expel or exclude aliens as a fundamental sovereign attribute exercised by the Government's political departments largely immune from judicial control." Shaughnessy v. Mezei,345 U. S. 206, 345 U. S. 210 (1953); see, e.g., Harisiades v. Shaughnessy,342 U. S. 580 (1952); Lem Moon Sing v. United States,158 U. S. 538 (1895); Fon Yue Ting v. United States,149 U. S. 698 (1893); The Chinese Exclusion Case,130 U. S. 581 (1889). Our recent decisions have not departed from this long-established rule. Just last Term, for example, the Court had occasion to note that "the power over aliens is of a political character, and therefore subject only to narrow judicial review." Hampton v. Mow Sun Wong,426 U. S. 88, 426 U. S. 101 n. 21 (1976), citing Fong Yue Ting v. United States, supra at 149 U. S. 713; accord, Mathews v. Diaz,426 U. S. 67, 426 U. S. 81-82 (1976). And we observed recently that, in the exercise of its broad power over immigration and naturalization, "Congress regularly makes rules that would be unacceptable if applied to citizens." Id. at 426 U. S. 80.

nolu chan  posted on  2014-11-19   20:28:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: nolu chan, A K A Stone (#1)

I hope you're both wrong, but I doubt it.

out damned spot  posted on  2014-11-20   3:28:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com