[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

What Passover Means For The New Testament Believer

Are We Closer Than Ever To The Next Pandemic?

War in Ukraine Turns on Russia

what happened during total solar eclipse

Israel Attacks Iran, Report Says - LIVE Breaking News Coverage

Earth is Scorched with Heat

Antiwar Activists Chant ‘Death to America’ at Event Featuring Chicago Alderman

Vibe Shift

A stream that makes the pleasant Rain sound.

Older Men - Keep One Foot In The Dark Ages

When You Really Want to Meet the Diversity Requirements

CERN to test world's most powerful particle accelerator during April's solar eclipse

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin

How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End?

What on EARTH is going on in Acts 16:11? New Discovery!

2023 Hottest in over 120 Million Years

2024 and beyond in prophecy

Questions

This Speech Just Broke the Internet

This AMAZING Math Formula Will Teach You About God!

The GOSPEL of the ALIENS | Fallen Angels | Giants | Anunnaki

The IMAGE of the BEAST Revealed (REV 13) - WARNING: Not for Everyone


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Creationism/Evolution
See other Creationism/Evolution Articles

Title: Cosmos: A Series Created to Counter Creation
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.icr.org/article/8131/
Published: Oct 27, 2014
Author: Brian Thomas, M.S.
Post Date: 2014-10-27 00:06:54 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 3944
Comments: 12

“The universe is all that is, or was, or ever will be.” Does this statement raise any red flags? It was the opening line of the popular 1980 TV series Cosmos and was repeated in its current incarnation. The statement crystallizes the philosophy of the late Carl Sagan, one of the 20th century’s best communicators of science and naturalism. It imagines a reality that excludes God, essentially replacing Genesis 1’s “In the beginning God” with “In the beginning…hydrogen.” Matter pops into existence without a cause? Now that’s a red flag.

The current Cosmos series raises so many such flags—mingling some good science with historical falsehoods, scientific errors, oversimplifications, and logical lapses—that one article cannot manage them. Its makers’ beliefs reveal a common source for all these problems.

Consider Cosmos’ award-winning producer, Seth MacFarlane, a brilliant artist, outspoken atheist, and creator of debauched cartoon shows like Family Guy. Los Angeles Times asked him, “What are you hoping to get out of [Cosmos]?” MacFarlane replied, “We’ve had a resurgence of creationism and intelligent design quote-unquote theory. There’s been a real vacuum when it comes to science education.”1 In Cosmos, he applied his creative skills in an attempt to eradicate creation thinking from popular thought.

How about Cosmos writer Ann Druyan?2 In 2004 she won the Richard Dawkins Award, granted by Atheist Alliance International for raising public consciousness of atheism. Druyan told the Skeptical Inquirer:

I think the roots of this antagonism to science run very deep. They’re ancient. We see them in Genesis, this first story, this founding myth of ours, in which the first humans are doomed and cursed eternally for asking a question, for partaking of the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge.3

Only tortured atheistic reasoning could twist the Genesis account into a tale of mankind being unfairly cursed for simple curiosity, a trait God graciously gave us, instead of being cursed for disobeying and distrusting Him. Why else would Druyan render the “Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil” as merely “the Tree of Knowledge,” as though God desires His children be ignorant of everything, instead of just ignorant of experiencing evil?

But surely Cosmos host Dr. Neil deGrasse Tyson, a scientist, is more objective than his cohorts? Though careful to not disclose his personal beliefs, Tyson has let slip statements that reveal his God-omitting way of thinking. How could this trio not bring their atheistic religious beliefs into the series?

The caustic threads of this philosophy wind through the tapestry of Cosmos’ imaginative illustrations, visual feasts, and carefully crafted scripts. For example, in Episode Five Tyson said, “Give me a star’s spectrum, and I’ll tell you what it’s made of.”4 He then described other aspects that starlight reveals before saying, “In microwave light, we can see all the way back to the beginning of our universe.” Experts can discern elements in a star by its starlight; repeatable science reveals this. However, light does not necessarily show the past, and certainly does not show the beginning. By wrapping scientific statements around false philosophy, the series’ craftsmen weave a beginning without a Beginner.

MacFarlane told Los Angeles Times, “I thought we solved this whole evolution thing years and years ago but I guess not, I guess it still needs to be explained.”1 The purpose of Cosmos is not to explore God’s wondrous cosmos with objective science but to more convincingly retell the tattered evolutionary story. Viewers beware: Cosmos was created to counter creation.

References

  1. Blake, M. Seth MacFarlane hopes ‘Cosmos’ counteracts ‘junk science,’ creationism. Los Angeles Times. Posted on la-times.com March 7, 2014, accessed March 18, 2014.
  2. Ann Druyan co-wrote the 1980 Cosmos series and was Carl Sagan’s third wife.
  3. Druyan, A. November/December 2003. Ann Druyan Talks About Science, Religion, Wonder, Awe...and Carl Sagan. Skeptical Inquirer. 27 (6).
  4. MacFarlane, S. et al, executive producers. 2014. Cosmos: A Spacetime Odyssey. DVD. 20th Century Fox.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: A K A Stone (#0)

The creation game ... God is the fastest chess player --- it's always your move !

Liberals are playing ouiji board games with themselves !

If you ... don't use exclamation points --- you should't be typeing ! Commas - semicolons - question marks are for girlie boys !

BorisY  posted on  2014-10-27   6:41:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: A K A Stone, ALL (#0)

“I had motives for not wanting the world to have meaning; consequently assumed it had none, and was able without any difficulty to find satisfying reasons for this assumption…. The philosopher who finds no meaning in the world is not concerned exclusively with a problem in pure metaphysics; he is also concerned to prove there is no valid reason why he personally should not do as he wants to do…. For myself, as no doubt for most of my contemporaries, the philosophy of meaninglessness was essentially an instrument of liberation. The liberation we desired was simultaneously liberation from an certain political and economic system and liberation from a certain system of morality. We objected to the morality because it interfered with our sexual freedom..” Aldous Huxley, “Confession of a Professed Atheist,”

Report: Perspective on the News, vol. 3 (June 1966), p. 19. From an article by Helming, “An Interview with God.”

GarySpFC  posted on  2014-10-30   8:44:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: GarySpFC (#2)

One only has to read Huxley fiction to get at his worldview.

But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name (John 1:12)

redleghunter  posted on  2014-10-30   11:19:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: A K A Stone, GarySpFC, redleghunter, Ferret Mike, Orthodoxa, Pinguinite, 4 givan 1, don, CZ82, out damned spot (#0)

Consider Cosmos’ award-winning producer, Seth MacFarlane, a brilliant artist, outspoken atheist, and creator of debauched cartoon shows like Family Guy.

MacFarlane: “We’ve had a resurgence of creationism and intelligent design quote-unquote theory. There’s been a real vacuum when it comes to science education.”

In 'Cosmos,' he applied his creative skills in an attempt to eradicate creation thinking from popular thought.

But...but...Can't militant atheist Nazis and homo-fascists like MacFarlane merely lobby the courts or call on 0buma himself to "eradicate Creation-Thinking from popular thought"?

Cosmos writer Ann Druyan [Carl Sagan's wife] in 2004...won the Richard Dawkins Award, granted by Atheist Alliance International for raising public consciousness of atheism. Druyan told the Skeptical Inquirer:

"I think the roots of this antagonism to science [promoting the myth of "Evolution"] run very deep. They’re ancient. We see them in Genesis, this first story, this founding myth of ours, in which the first humans are doomed and cursed eternally for asking a question, for partaking of the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge."

More insight into the hopelessness of stone-cold Atheists who resent Genesis and believe in their myth that "science" is but the realm of Atheism by default....

Ann Druyan [Carl Sagan's wife]:

"Carl faced his death with unflagging courage & never sought refuge in illusions [of Heaven or Hell.] The tragedy was that we knew we would never see each other again. I don’t ever expect to be reunited with Carl. But, the great thing is that when we were together, for nearly twenty years, we lived with a vivid appreciation of how brief & precious life is. We never trivialized the meaning of death by pretending it was anything other than a final parting."

The real "tragedy": A life punctuated by deception in the end, vanity, hardened hearts, and a disbelief in a spiritual transition and new destination of their soul. Oddly and ironically, they passionately sought exploring ETs and other solar system life while ignoring exploring their own life, purpose, own spirit, inner calling rather than contemplating the Intelligent Designer of all things -- including their beloved "Billions and billions of stars."

Druyan and Sagan were apparently perfectly content with sharing their 20 years on this Earth vs. sharing an Eternity with God in Heaven OR eternity in Hell/separation from God. Very sad. And so counter-intuitive.

Liberator  posted on  2014-10-30   12:46:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: BorisY (#1)

Liberals are playing ouiji board games with themselves !

I can buy that.

But even "Christians" will consult a "seer," the stars, or follow their horoscope.

Liberator  posted on  2014-10-30   12:49:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: redleghunter, GarySpFC (#3)

One only has to read Huxley fiction to get at his worldview.

Aldous Huxley (1894–1963), the brother of the atheistic evolutionist Sir Julian Huxley, advocated a drug-fuelled utopia. He gave the reason for his anti-Christian stance:

“I had motive for not wanting the world to have a meaning … the philosophy of meaninglessness was essentially an instrument of liberation, sexual and political.”

"If most of us remain ignorant of ourselves, it is because self-knowledge is painful and we prefer the pleasures of illusion."

Liberator  posted on  2014-10-30   13:02:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Liberator (#4)

The real "tragedy": A life punctuated by deception in the end, vanity, hardened hearts, and a disbelief in a spiritual transition and new destination of their soul. Oddly and ironically, they passionately sought exploring ETs and other solar system life while ignoring exploring their own life, purpose, own spirit, inner calling rather than contemplating the Intelligent Designer of all things -- including their beloved "Billions and billions of stars."

Druyan and Sagan were apparently perfectly content with sharing their 20 years on this Earth vs. sharing an Eternity with God in Heaven OR eternity in Hell/separation from God. Very sad. And so counter-intuitive.

Tears the heart to see people not acknowledge the Power of God.

But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name (John 1:12)

redleghunter  posted on  2014-10-30   18:52:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Liberator, GarySpFc (#6)

Aldous Huxley (1894–1963), the brother of the atheistic evolutionist Sir Julian Huxley, advocated a drug-fuelled utopia. He gave the reason for his anti-Christian stance:

Seems we are living in Huxley's soma induced Brave New World today.

But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name (John 1:12)

redleghunter  posted on  2014-10-30   18:56:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: A K A Stone (#0)

I suggest expending much effort arguing creationism vs evolution is pointless.

If you want to convince an atheist scientist that God is real, you'll have a much better chance doing so by helping them on the side of the road when their car breaks down than you will by arguing with them about evolution.

We all know people that need friendship, encouragement and such. Effort is much more rewarded in providing such things to them than arguing about how we got here. Somehow, I just can see that our winning purely academic arguments ranks particularly high on God's wish list for us.

My 2c....

Pinguinite  posted on  2014-10-31   4:28:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Pinguinite (#9)

f you want to convince an atheist scientist that God is real, you'll have a much better chance doing so by helping them on the side of the road when their car breaks down than you will by arguing with them about evolution.

I would disagree. Evolution isn't anything close to science.

Can anyone show me life coming from nothing. No one can. They can only speculate. If it happened in the past it would still be happening.

No scientists believe in evolution. At not least if they approach the subject scientifically.

A K A Stone  posted on  2014-10-31   6:42:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Pinguinite (#9)

Attacking evolution is of utmost importance. Fools think that they are actually using scientific methods. When you destroy their foundation of evolution their faith in it. Then and only then can some people be open to the word of God. imo.

So we have to destroy peoples faith in evolution.

And we are winning as most people don't believe in evolution.

A K A Stone  posted on  2014-10-31   6:48:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: A K A Stone (#11)

Can anyone show me life coming from nothing. No one can. They can only speculate. If it happened in the past it would still be happening.

Strictly speaking, life from nothing isn't evolution. It's just the initial spark. Evolution would begin from that point.

But if life was spontaneously started somewhere on the earth once per day or once per century, no one would notice it. Such new life would be assumed to be derived from existing life in some way.

Attacking evolution is of utmost importance. Fools think that they are actually using scientific methods. When you destroy their foundation of evolution their faith in it. Then and only then can some people be open to the word of God. imo.

Debunking evolution does not prove creationism/intelligent design. It just opens the door for some other, yet unproposed theory. A true scientist would need to see Creationism proven on it's own, and a lack of any alternate theories is not proof. Creationism is likely unprovable, which is a problem with it from a scientific perspective.

My opinion is that attacking evolution serves no spiritual purpose. Faith comes from the heart, not the head.

Pinguinite  posted on  2014-10-31   11:56:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com