[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
United States News Title: Report: At least seven black witnesses have corroborated Darren Wilson’s testimony before the Ferguson grand jury An addendum to Eds post this morning. Per WaPo, its not just the forensic evidence thats backing Wilson up. [M]ore than a half-dozen unnamed black witnesses have provided testimony to a St. Louis County grand jury that supports Wilsons account of events of Aug. 9, according to several people familiar with the investigation who spoke with The Washington Post. Some of the physical evidence including blood spatter analysis, shell casings and ballistics tests also supports Wilsons account of the shooting, the Post sources said, which cast Brown as an aggressor who threatened the officers life. The sources spoke on condition of anonymity because they are prohibited from publicly discussing the case
Benjamin L. Crump, a lawyer for the Brown family, said Browns family and supporters will not be persuaded by the autopsy report or eyewitness statements that back Wilsons account of the incident
Exactly how high Browns hands were has been inconsistent in the accounts, and at least one witness said that after Brown was shot, he appeared to take a step toward Wilson. That witness said, however, Brown had his arms around his stomach before hitting the ground. The Post doesnt specify which details from Wilsons account were supported by the witnesses (none of whom want to be named, of course, lest they face reprisals for being honest). Did they corroborate the fight in the front seat of the squad car when, Wilson claims, Brown grabbed his gun? The physical evidence supports that too: One forensic pathologist who reviewed the autopsy report noted that Browns hand wound wouldnt have had gunpowder particulate in it unless his hand had been on or right next to Wilsons gun. Two shell casings were also found in Wilsons squad car, per the Post, supporting the fact that the gun was discharged twice inside the vehicle. Or did the witnesses corroborate the fatal shooting later, after Brown had moved away from the car and Wilson had gotten out? Thats what the case will turn on: If Wilson ends up being indicted, prosecutors will argue that, yes, Brown might have reached for Wilsons gun but the subsequent shooting was unnecessary. Brown was already wounded; Wilson was shooting out of rage, not to repel a mortal threat. Realistically, though, how likely is it that hes going to be indicted at this point? Crump says he has seven witnesses wholl say that Wilson gunned Brown down unjustifiably. Great, says the defense, we have seven witnesses who say the opposite plus a pile of forensic evidence that shows Brown, whod just committed a robbery at the local convenience store, not only assaulted a police officer but attempted to seize his firearm. Theres little doubt, barring some bombshell evidence that the public doesnt know about, that Wilsons not going to be convicted. The question now is whether hell be charged. One theory for all the leaks lately is that law enforcement is trying to prepare the public for the fact that grand jury is unlikely to return an indictment, but I dont know: Given what Crump said in the excerpt above plus protesters vowing that its going to be a war if Wilson isnt charged, sounds like releasing the evidence early isnt going to calm anyone down. On the contrary, it may be that this is being leaked because Wilson supporters fear that hell be unfairly indicted anyway for political reasons, even though theres no probable cause to think he murdered Brown. Thats probably the outcome city leaders would prefer indictment followed by acquittal so that they can say the system took the incident seriously enough to force Wilson to defend his actions in open court. Think that result would calm people down? Me neither. One more odd detail from WaPos story: The Post sources said the levels in Browns body may have been high enough to trigger hallucinations. Er, okay, but isnt the fact that Brown had just apparently committed a crime minutes before Wilson rolled up a more likely explanation for why he got aggressive? He had obvious reasons to fear police scrutiny at the time. Reefer madness seems like an odd theory of the case.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread |
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|