[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Police clash with pro-Palestine protesters on Ohio State University campus

Joe Rogan Experience #2138 - Tucker Carlson

Police Dispersing Student Protesters at USC - Breaking News Coverage (College Protests)

What Passover Means For The New Testament Believer

Are We Closer Than Ever To The Next Pandemic?

War in Ukraine Turns on Russia

what happened during total solar eclipse

Israel Attacks Iran, Report Says - LIVE Breaking News Coverage

Earth is Scorched with Heat

Antiwar Activists Chant ‘Death to America’ at Event Featuring Chicago Alderman

Vibe Shift

A stream that makes the pleasant Rain sound.

Older Men - Keep One Foot In The Dark Ages

When You Really Want to Meet the Diversity Requirements

CERN to test world's most powerful particle accelerator during April's solar eclipse

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin

How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End?

What on EARTH is going on in Acts 16:11? New Discovery!

2023 Hottest in over 120 Million Years

2024 and beyond in prophecy

Questions

This Speech Just Broke the Internet


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

LEFT WING LOONS
See other LEFT WING LOONS Articles

Title: Homosexual Activist Sneakypete thinks if you're Not for redefining marriage you are a fascist (No Pete you are a fascist faggot activist)
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Jul 13, 2014
Author: sneakypete
Post Date: 2014-07-13 13:00:01 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 35103
Comments: 71

The problem is not and never has been with her. It's been with you and people like you,who blindly jump on any bandwagon that comes around if the person happens to say one or two of the root things you believe in.

I have been saying for years that Coulter isn't a conservative. What she IS,is a self-promoting opportunist. She got out of law school,looked around and figured out there were no real openings for semi-hot (if you like skinny women)women with socialist viewpoints because the field was already crowded,so she invented herself as a conservative babe spokescritter. Most everybody conservative celebrated because it reinforced their views that they were "winning" and because most of them didn't really pay any attention to what she says and does.

What she says and does and what she has always said and done was thrown verbal bombs to get herself involved in controversy in order to sell her books and pump up her speaking fees.

Coulter hasn't changed a bit. The only thing that has changed is you are now starting to pay attention to what she says.

BTW,you are no conservative,either. You are,at BEST a fascist,because IF you were a conservative you would recognize the FACT that homosexual Americans have the same rights as the rest of us BECAUSE THEY ARE AMERICANS. No,you don't have to like them,but you DO have to admit they have the same rights as the rest of us.

sneakypete


Poster Comment: Pete is showing that he is part of the problem. Pete is the coward who ran from this site because I ran him off. I simply used his own faggot propaganda words against him. He thinks that he carries the "fag gene" and that it is his mission to protect faggots. Pete is so fucked in the head that he doesn't even know that marriage is a man and a woman. Pete is obviously a faggot activist. He agrees with the faggot president on destroying the institution of marriage. Pete you're the enemy. You are not a real American.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-16) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#17. To: A K A Stone (#15)

If PETER was consistent. He would demand that men be allowed to play in womens basketball leagues. But his isn't consistent.

Good example.

Also by that ir-rationale, you and I would also be "entitled" to play for the NBA.

Liberator  posted on  2014-10-26   13:40:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: A K A Stone (#14)

When sneakypete was making up his screen name. He based it on a part of his anatomy.

Or perhaps his last snack?

nativist nationalist  posted on  2014-10-26   15:13:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: Liberator (#16)

I can't pretend to know Pete's proclivities, but I presume that his support for and of homosexuality and the goob's claim to stomp on the rights of ALL normal Americans -- especially Christians -- is based on...an irrational level of hate, and revenge for Christian "Fundies."

I might be his upbringing, he seems to harbor actual malice rather than being a libertarian he likes to masquerade as. He can be libertarian when it suits his agenda, like allowing fags in the military, but he's the biggest statist when it comes to forcing Christian bakers to bake wedding cakes for fags. He'd be accorded some respect if actually stood on principles, but he's a sneaky opportunist who tacks to whatever wind furthers his perverted agenda.

nativist nationalist  posted on  2014-10-26   15:21:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: A K A Stone (#12)

You still playing with the Peters?

You still obsessed with other men and their genitalia?

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2014-10-26   18:36:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: A K A Stone (#14)

When sneakypete was making up his screen name. He based it on a part of his anatomy.

You really are proud of your ignorance,aren't you?

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2014-10-26   18:38:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: sneakypete (#21)

Bait.

A K A Stone  posted on  2014-10-26   20:59:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: A K A Stone (#22)

...he doesn't even know that marriage is a man and a woman.

That's where children come from, the intercourse between a man and a woman. Sex between a man and a woman brings life, it brings renewal. Sex between two men brings death, in the form of AIDS and a host of other diseases. The anus is for excreting human wastes, the vagina is for sex. It is amazing that we have people who are unable to grasp this concept. Sodomy is perverted, those who engage in it are mentally ill, with perverted minds. Perverts.

Notice how the queers came out of the woodwork at the same time the mental institutions were closed down by the liberals back in the seventies? Nixon saw it, he knew it was being pushed to destroy our society.

nativist nationalist  posted on  2014-10-26   21:21:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: nativist nationalist, sneakypete (#23)

That's where children come from, the intercourse between a man and a woman. Sex between a man and a woman brings life, it brings renewal. Sex between two men brings death, in the form of AIDS and a host of other diseases. The anus is for excreting human wastes, the vagina is for sex. It is amazing that we have people who are unable to grasp this concept. Sodomy is perverted, those who engage in it are mentally ill, with perverted minds. Perverts.

Notice how the queers came out of the woodwork at the same time the mental institutions were closed down by the liberals back in the seventies? Nixon saw it, he knew it was being pushed to destroy our society.

It is science. A penis is made for a vagian. They produce life like you said. So if fags were born that way (they're not) it would be a birth defect. It would be something to abort over.

A K A Stone  posted on  2014-10-26   21:38:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: A K A Stone (#24)

It is science.

Very true, you don't even need a Bible. Any biology book on the subject will tell you what they're for. The parts of the body that sodomites abuse is for another purpose, from Encyclopedia Britannica:

Anal canal, the terminal portion of the digestive tract, distinguished from the rectum because of the transition of its internal surface from a mucous membrane layer (endodermal) to one of skinlike tissue (ectodermal). The anal canal is 2.5 to 4 cm (1 to 1.5 inches) in length; its diameter is narrower than that of the rectum to which it connects. The canal is divided into three areas: the upper part, with longitudinal folds called rectal columns; the lower portion, with internal and external constrictive muscles (sphincters) to control evacuation of feces; and the anal opening itself.

The anal canal connects with the rectum at the point where it passes through a muscular pelvic diaphragm. The upper region has 5 to 10 rectal columns, each column containing a small artery and vein. These are the terminal portions of the blood vessels that furnish the rectal and anal areas; they are susceptible to enlargement, commonly known as hemorrhoids. The mucous membrane of the upper portion is similar to that in the rest of the large intestine; it contains mucus-producing and absorptive cells.

The lower portions of the anal columns are joined by small concentric circular folds of the mucous membrane known as anal valves. Between the valves are small anal sinuses that open to lymph ducts and glands; these sometimes become abscessed and infected, especially in persons who have chronic diarrhea, constipation, or diabetes mellitus. The internal wall of the anal canal is first lined by moist, soft skin that lacks hair or glands; it then becomes a tough (keratinized) layer of skin containing hair and glands. The keratinized layer is continuous with the skin of the anal opening and external body. Both the upper and lower portions of the anal canal have circular and longitudinal muscle layers that allow expansion and contraction of the canal. The anal opening is keratinized skin that has several folds while contracted. When open, the folds allow the skin to stretch without tearing. In the skin around the anal opening but not immediately adjacent to it are glands that give off perspiration.

The lower anal canal and the anal opening are composed of two muscular constrictions that regulate fecal passage. The internal sphincter is part of the inner surface of the canal; it is composed of concentric layers of circular muscle tissue and is not under voluntary control. The external sphincter is a layer of voluntary (striated) muscle encircling the outside wall of the anal canal and anal opening. One can cause it to expand and contract at will, except during the early years of life when it is not yet fully developed. Nerves in the anal canal cause sphincter response and the sensation of pain. The lower part of the canal is very sensitive to heat, cold, cutting, and abrasion.

Waste products pass to the anal canal from the rectum. Nerve responses from the rectum cause the internal sphincter to relax while the external one contracts; shortly thereafter the external sphincter also relaxes and allows fecal discharge. The pelvic diaphragm and longitudinal muscles draw the anus and rectum up over the passing feces so that they are not extruded (prolapsed) out of the anal opening with the feces.

Numerous blood vessels surround the anal canal and may be subject to enlargement and rupture; this condition, commonly called a hemorrhoid, or pile, may cause pain, bleeding, and projection of the vessels from the anus.

I'm not sure why Peter thinks using this part of the body for sex is so wonderful. A great advance in public health was made when the importance of segregating waste water from drinking water was realized. Many parts of the world do not segregate waste and drinking water to this day, and they have the diseases to show for it. Sodomy is just as bad for public health.

nativist nationalist  posted on  2014-10-26   21:55:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: sneakypete (#21)

Now here is the hook.

Let's just be blunt. You are an asshole. Come on you know you are. Look at the way you talk to everyone. You claim to be a constitutionalist and a conservative. You are no such thing.

You are a statist. A fool. I will agree with the premise that everyone should be treated equally as far as the law goes. No matter if you are normal or perverted. But here is what you pea brain doesn't get or lies about. Marriage has always been a man and a woman. Just like the Ladies Olympic team has always consisted of women. People like you are a big problem of what is wrong with the country. You think because America is a land where people have rights and that we can be who we want. Worship as we please or not worship. You incorrectly think that means that a group of people, a minority in this case, mentally ill I would also add in this case. Not that those things matter it would be the same if it was a majority. Just because we are free, or at least supposed to be. Doesn't mean that a group of people get to change what the institution of marriage is to accomodate their mental illness or stupidity.

I call you the homosexual activist. Because you are an activist for the cause of destroying and perverting marriage.

Furthermore you now claim, I think you used to say the opposite on this case. You claim that someone should be forced to marry someone or bake them a cake. tell me how that doesn't clash with our first amendment rights!

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

If "no law respecting an establishment of religion OR PROHIBITING the free exercise of.." can be made. Tell me Mr fake conservative how can it ever be illegal to practice your religion by not associating with fags or making pro fag cakes in violation of ones own conscience.

Mr fake conservative PETER would have the government use force of law to make one violate ones own conscience.

If the queers say the ones in your family insisted on a baker putting a pro fag message on their cake. You would support that too. Because you don't support free speech either.

You're basically an angry piece of crap asshole who gets on the internet to insult people to make yourself feel good.

You know it is true. You are a bitter old clueless fool.

A K A Stone  posted on  2014-10-26   23:45:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: A K A Stone (#26)

Marriage has always been a man and a woman. Just like the Ladies Olympic team has always consisted of women. People like you are a big problem of what is wrong with the country. You think because America is a land where people have rights and that we can be who we want. Worship as we please or not worship. You incorrectly think that means that a group of people, a minority in this case, mentally ill I would also add in this case. Not that those things matter it would be the same if it was a majority. Just because we are free, or at least supposed to be. Doesn't mean that a group of people get to change what the institution of marriage is to accomodate their mental illness or stupidity.

Amen, well stated sir.

nativist nationalist  posted on  2014-10-27   0:13:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: nativist nationalist (#27)

Amen, well stated sir.

It's just common sense really.

A K A Stone  posted on  2014-10-27   0:24:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: A K A Stone (#28)

It's just common sense really.

Sadly, it is not as common as it once was. Exhibit A, sneakypete!

nativist nationalist  posted on  2014-10-27   0:29:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: nativist nationalist (#29)

You see sneakypete is in checkmate now. The coward is afraid to answer my relevant questions. Because he can't he has lost the argument again. Isn't that right PETER.

A K A Stone  posted on  2014-10-27   10:05:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: Sneakypete (#26)

Furthermore you now claim, I think you used to say the opposite on this case. You claim that someone should be forced to marry someone or bake them a cake. tell me how that doesn't clash with our first amendment rights!

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

If "no law respecting an establishment of religion OR PROHIBITING the free exercise of.." can be made. Tell me Mr fake conservative how can it ever be illegal to practice your religion by not associating with fags or making pro fag cakes in violation of ones own conscience.

Mr fake conservative PETER would have the government use force of law to make one violate ones own conscience.

If the queers say the ones in your family insisted on a baker putting a pro fag message on their cake. You would support that too. Because you don't support free speech either.

You're basically an angry piece of crap asshole who gets on the internet to insult people to make yourself feel good.

You know it is true. You are a bitter old clueless fool.

Can't answer, Meguro got your tongue?

A K A Stone  posted on  2014-10-27   10:06:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: A K A Stone (#0) (Edited)

"Orrin Hatch: Gay Marriage Will Become Law Of The Land"

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/05/28/orrin-hatch-gay- marriage_n_5406931.html

While it is quite obvious that you enjoy issuing graphic descriptions of intimate acts....(I always hear the Church Lady's voice when reading your words!)

The element of sex, and the legal recognition of spousal rights are two very different considerations.

It is very possible that "Gay Marriage" will become, not only legal everywhere in this great nation, but increasingly common.

So what then? What will you do?

Will this even be a talking point for conservatives in two years?

Where will you guys go from here?

"we are tartets from evil doers!!!" [ and ] U looked up birfer on the dcitionary. It isn't a movie.

Jameson  posted on  2014-10-27   12:33:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: Jameson, A K A Stone, liberator (#32)

The post modern understanding of passing laws has a few elements previous generations would not understand and in many cases would not approve of.

Some of the elements evoking this post modern follow:

The first is the notion of passing a law to enforce a tolerance or acceptance of a particular view or practice. People are usually free to exercise such but view societal norms don't accept them the way they feel they should be. So the law becomes a means to do so.

I am reminded of a late 90s forum discussion I had with a homosexual man. He said, back then, that gays just wanted to be left alone and allowed to transfer their wealth and possessions to their life partners. He said all the gay community wanted was legal civil unions to enact this. Back then I pointed out going to a local lawyer and paying a few hundred bucks gets you the same thing. So that was the right before Y2K. A few years later the full push for civil unions. Well it was spun then as addressing the legal and financial issues of homosexuals who had Same sex partners. Most Americans looked at that and said ok, it's not marriage they are looking for but a legal means to take care of estate and benefits. So most Americans left that alone being the fair minded folks they thought they were.

However the homosexual lobby saw it as chum in the water. They went for more. That is why starting with the 2004 presidential primaries we started to see candidates asked about gay marriage. Ten years later we have it and in over 90% of the States that have it, it was an activist court enacting it against the will of the States and their people. And not only that, somehow we allowed state and federal agencies creep into our schools via some "in name" good causes using those resources to teach tolerance from a homosexual perspective.

Now the very word tolerance is good. It means you have a view, I have one and we depart peacefully not convincing the other. We tolerate each other. That is not what the homosexual lobby wants today, and frankly ever did want. What they seek is acceptance. They see it as they are different, want everyone to accept they are normal folk like everyone else. When even good hetero folk said go ahead live your life the way you want but I don't have to accept you but tolerate you, the homosexual lobby raised the flag higher. The lobby moved from acceptance to enforcement through laws, education and litigation. That is where we are today.

So we are at an indoctrination and enforcement phase of a clever lobby. One could almost call it an Alinsky like playbook, but that gets thrown around as much as Nazi model. All of which is happening in the USA and almost exclusively through the Judicial branch. Don't think Thomas Paine (the real one) saw that coming to this country.

So the greater question is why would Americans stand for this manipulation? I wonder too. Those who want to change our constitution and nation just took 25 years to fly their test balloon. Now they know how to manipulate the nation. Through guilt, manipulation and when those don't work through litigation and eventual bankruptcy.

I am sure you noticed I did not mention above the Bible or our Christian founding. The reason is We the people have fashioned our own gold calf and will suffer the consequences.

But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name (John 1:12)

redleghunter  posted on  2014-10-27   13:58:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: Jameson (#32)

So what then? What will you do?

Will this even be a talking point for conservatives in two years?

Where will you guys go from here?

I will ridicule them to their faces. Tell them they are not married.

I will never hire a faggot that makes it known that they are a degenerate.

Normal people will never recognize it.

What you gonna do when you don't have a job because you were outed?

No judge will ever force me to hire a faggot. Can't be done.

A K A Stone  posted on  2014-10-27   14:36:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: Jameson (#32)

"Orrin Hatch: Gay Marriage Will Become Law Of The Land"

Orrin Hatch was always a piece of shit. Now we just know what he does in his spare time too.

Future hell logs.

A K A Stone  posted on  2014-10-27   14:37:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: redleghunter (#33)

So the greater question is why would Americans stand for this manipulation?

I would disagree with your use of the word manipulation....

It just seems that most people have come to realize that the marital status of their neighbors has no affect on them.

I am sure you noticed I did not mention above the Bible or our Christian founding.

No.. until you mentioned it, I hadn't given it a thought. (Christian founding? not really)

"we are tartets from evil doers!!!" [ and ] U looked up birfer on the dcitionary. It isn't a movie.

Jameson  posted on  2014-10-27   14:39:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: Jameson (#36)

It just seems that most people have come to realize that the marital status of their neighbors has no affect on them.

Interesting theory. Care to prove it? You can't because the voters rejected queers on every ballot every time. Save maybe once.

You couldn't even get a majority in California.

Corrupt judges that side for fags pretending to be married should be disbarred, tried and executed.

A K A Stone  posted on  2014-10-27   14:42:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: A K A Stone (#34)

Yes of course, we all know that you'll certainly never accept gay marriage, or gay anything.

Your particular prejudice is not what I'm interested in....

The question was, where will the "conservatives" go once this is no longer an issue?

Serious question! What will be the next windmill?

"we are tartets from evil doers!!!" [ and ] U looked up birfer on the dcitionary. It isn't a movie.

Jameson  posted on  2014-10-27   14:48:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: A K A Stone (#35)

Orrin Hatch was always a piece of shit

There's that intellectual thoughtfulness that makes this such a great place!

(I have no particular interest in Hatch, I just ran across an article that quoted him.)

"we are tartets from evil doers!!!" [ and ] U looked up birfer on the dcitionary. It isn't a movie.

Jameson  posted on  2014-10-27   14:51:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: Jameson (#38)

The question was, where will the "conservatives" go once this is no longer an issue?

It will always be an issue. Is the baby murder that the people you regularly voter for not an issue 40 years later?

What about eternity. Where will the people who rejected truth spend it?

A K A Stone  posted on  2014-10-27   14:52:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#41. To: Jameson (#39)

Orrin Hatch was always a piece of shit

There's that intellectual thoughtfulness that makes this such a great place!

I don't care about being polite. Orrin hatch is a piece of shit. You understand where I am coming from don't you?

A K A Stone  posted on  2014-10-27   14:53:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#42. To: A K A Stone (#37)

Interesting theory. Care to prove it?

No, it's my theory. Based only on my thoughts and experiences.

As for your claim that "...voters rejected queers on every ballot every time..."

maybe 6-8 years ago... I doubt that a gay marriage ban would even make it onto a ballot today.

See - that's the point - the attitude of most people has changed....

"we are tartets from evil doers!!!" [ and ] U looked up birfer on the dcitionary. It isn't a movie.

Jameson  posted on  2014-10-27   15:00:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#43. To: A K A Stone (#41)

I don't care about being polite. Orrin hatch is a piece of shit. You understand where I am coming from don't you?

HAHAHA!

You bet!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62Qfbrc1jdo

"we are tartets from evil doers!!!" [ and ] U looked up birfer on the dcitionary. It isn't a movie.

Jameson  posted on  2014-10-27   15:04:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#44. To: A K A Stone (#40)

It will always be an issue.

I see. Ok - agree to disagree.

What about eternity. Where will the people who rejected truth spend it?

Arkansas, pretty sure it's Arkansas. Let us know when you arrive!!!

"we are tartets from evil doers!!!" [ and ] U looked up birfer on the dcitionary. It isn't a movie.

Jameson  posted on  2014-10-27   15:09:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#45. To: Jameson (#42)

See - that's the point - the attitude of most people has changed....

No voters ever overturned their decisions. Your side relied on faggot judges to do your bidding. Usurping the right of the people.

Like I said treasonous black robes that vote for pretending homos are married deserve to be disbarred tried and executed.

A K A Stone  posted on  2014-10-27   16:13:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#46. To: Jameson (#43)

A K A Stone  posted on  2014-10-27   16:35:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#47. To: Jameson (#46)

Now don't take the above comment literally.

A K A Stone  posted on  2014-10-27   16:37:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#48. To: A K A Stone (#45)

Your side relied on faggot judges to do your bidding.

Heh Heh!

ok.... so now any judge who in the course of hearing a case... rules against YOUR wishes....is a "faggot"

perfect!! You are classic!

"...Like I said treasonous black robes that vote for pretending homos are married deserve to be disbarred tried and executed...."

You said, "Your side relied on..." yes - my side. My side includes everyone who does not wallow in their own self-pity, and fear those who are different (or not so different than you really huh?) and hate that which frightens them...

The side on which most good an honest people choose to reside, respects all and wants what is best for all people, all Americans.

"we are tartets from evil doers!!!" [ and ] U looked up birfer on the dcitionary. It isn't a movie.

Jameson  posted on  2014-10-27   20:50:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#49. To: A K A Stone (#47)

Now don't take the above comment literally.

Literally? I cannot take anything from you even seriously....

"we are tartets from evil doers!!!" [ and ] U looked up birfer on the dcitionary. It isn't a movie.

Jameson  posted on  2014-10-27   20:52:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#50. To: A K A Stone (#30)

You see sneakypete is in checkmate now. The coward is afraid to answer my relevant questions. Because he can't he has lost the argument again. Isn't that right PETER.

He is conspicuous by his absence on this thread. His normal M.O. is to show up and scream fascist at anyone who does not approve of sodomy. Sneakypete is the Islamic Rage Boy of sodomy. Perhaps he is fining comfort in the arms of Meguro right now.

nativist nationalist  posted on  2014-10-27   20:52:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#51. To: Jameson (#48)

ok.... so now any judge who in the course of hearing a case... rules against YOUR wishes....is a "faggot"

Ok you have a point there. The number is probably like 95 percent. The rest are just thinking about it.

A K A Stone  posted on  2014-10-27   20:52:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#52. To: Jameson (#48)

he side on which most good an honest people choose to reside,

A faggot by definition cannot be good. Unless.....They repent and change their ways.

A K A Stone  posted on  2014-10-27   20:54:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#53. To: Jameson (#49)

Literally? I cannot take anything from you even seriously....

That is good. Here is something to remember. Sometimes I exaggerate my opinion a little.

A K A Stone  posted on  2014-10-27   20:55:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#54. To: nativist nationalist, sneakypete, Mr. white (#50)

He is conspicuous by his absence on this thread. His normal M.O. is to show up and scream fascist at anyone who does not approve of sodomy.

I know how to shut him up. Mister White should adopt my tactics.

A K A Stone  posted on  2014-10-27   20:56:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#55. To: A K A Stone (#53)

Sometimes I exaggerate my opinion a little.

HAHA!

Isn't that special!

"we are tartets from evil doers!!!" [ and ] U looked up birfer on the dcitionary. It isn't a movie.

Jameson  posted on  2014-10-27   21:14:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#56. To: redleghunter (#33)

The [gay/homofascist] lobby moved from acceptance to enforcement through laws, education and litigation. That is where we are today....

So we are at an indoctrination and enforcement phase of a clever lobby...

So the greater question is why would Americans stand for this manipulation?

EXCELLENT summary.

This camel's nose in the tent was begotten from the seemingly innocuous seed of -- yes, "civil unions" based on the bogus "asset protection," for homosexuals. Then onto simple "tolerance," to becoming emboldened and strident enough to demand of "acceptance," growing into a giant beanstalk though institutional indoctrination and enforcement via judicial fiat by a tyrannical State.

I realize I'm preaching to the choir, but America has fallen for and been brainwashed to reject its traditional moral underpinnings as a result of three decades of tactical, militant subversive media/entertainment/academia/internet propaganda. The collective Jim Jones/Stockholm Syndrome has caused many a timid mind and weak will to become captives of their perverse kidnappers' agenda. Why? The Sheep have lost their way and become....MORAL RELATIVISTS.

Liberator  posted on  2014-10-28   2:27:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#57. To: Jameson, A K A Stone (#38)

Your particular prejudice is not what I'm interested in....

So, you would have found Hitler's Brownshirts "victims of oppression and prejudice"? (Of course you would -- I mean as a bleating "Seig Heil!" advocate for "the cause.")

The question was, where will the "conservatives" go once this [opposing homofascist tyranny] is no longer an issue?

Where would you like them to go? The Gulag? Chained by your bed as part of your harem? Or just...dead?

Liberator  posted on  2014-10-28   2:58:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (58 - 71) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com