Corrupt Government
See other Corrupt Government Articles
Title: Boehner Extends Olive Branch on 'Fiscal Cliff' (tax increases)
Source:
CNBC
URL Source: http://www.cnbc.com/id/49731550
Published: Nov 7, 2012
Author: Reuters
Post Date: 2012-11-07 17:54:49 by Hondo68
Ping List: *The Two Parties ARE the Same* Subscribe to *The Two Parties ARE the Same*
Keywords: want you to lead, a balanced approach, will include higher taxes
Views: 94212
Comments: 133
House Speaker John Boehner offered Wednesday to pursue a deal with a victorious President Barack Obama that will include higher taxes "under the right conditions" to help reduce the nation's staggering debt and put its finances in order. "Mr. President, this is your moment," Boehner told reporters, speaking about the "fiscal cliff" that will hit in January. "We want you to lead." Poster Comment: He's ready to be lead to Obama's lame duck a$$, so he can kiss it.
Boehner said House Republicans are asking Obama "to make good on a balanced approach" that would including spending cuts and address government social benefit programs.
"Let's find the common ground that has eluded us," Boehner said while congratulating the president on winning a second term. (Read more: Obama Re-elected as Crucial Ohio Goes His Way.)
The Ohio Republican spoke a day after the president's clear re-election victory. He said conditions on higher taxes would include a revamped tax code to make it cleaner and fairer, fewer loopholes and lower rates for all.
The speaker noted that during one-on-one budget talks with the president in the summer of 2011, Obama had "endorsed the idea of tax reform and lower rates, including a top rate of lower than 35 percent," the present top rate.
"We're closer than we think to the critical mass needed legislatively to get tax reform done," he said. (Read more: Alarm on Wall Street Grows as 'Fiscal Cliff' Nears.)
Boehner did not specify what loopholes House Republicans might consider trimming. Nor did he take questions.
His comments were generally along the lines of proposals by vanquished Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney that also were vague on specifics. Still, the speaker's comments signaled a willingness to enter into talks. He suggested Congress could use its upcoming lame-duck session to get the ball moving on such a compromise.
"We can't solve the problem of our fiscal imbalance overnight...This is going to take time," he said.
Subscribe to *The Two Parties ARE the Same*
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 132.
#6. To: hondo68 (#0)
It won't be that bad.... America is still the Vaunted Global Military power. Buck up America....its not even anywhere's scarry like 1/3 rd of the Earth burned with fire...1/3 of the water poisoned....and the Beast image in Jerusalem.
Yeah,but you know what? One day the money won't be there for us to fight to protect Saudi Arabia in the Muddle East,and all those soldiers will be coming back home and looking for jobs that just aren't there. Won't life be just grand when that happens?
LOL!!! We all know who we are 'protecting' in the ME and it sure as the hell isn't SA. I.E.: Israel To U.S.: Don't Delay Iraq Attack Israel is urging U.S. officials not to delay a military strike against Iraq's Saddam Hussein, an aide to Prime Minister Ariel Sharon said Friday. Israeli intelligence officials have gathered evidence that Iraq is speeding up efforts to produce biological and chemical weapons, said Sharon aide Ranaan Gissin. "Any postponement of an attack on Iraq at this stage will serve no purpose," Gissin said. "It will only give him (Saddam) more of an opportunity to accelerate his program of weapons of mass destruction."
Yes,it IS Saudi Arabia. Your hatred for Jews is blinding you to reality. The Jews are perfectly capable of taking care of themselves against their Muslim neighbors. It's SA that needs the protection of the US military.
Oh sure...if they are 'fighting' from 30,000 feet. Sniveling cowards of today won't fight a ground war up against a well armed foe. The bastard state, 'you people' call israel, had their collective asses handed to them during the 2006 Israel–Hezbollah War.
A woman wears Obama campaign buttons, in both English and Hebrew The Israelites have chosen a nice Jewish boy to protect their nation, Barrouk Obama.
Romney lost all of the demographic vote except the 'white vote' and even they didn't turn out like they did for McCain in 2008.
But Romney is not a murderer. Obama is. Romney is a better man then Obama. A superior human being to the boy in the White House.
Nothing compared to your 'hero', the war criminal, baby bush. How many babies and children did HE direct the killing of in the illegal invasion of Iraq. Hell already has a room set up for him and it is in the same block as Hilter, Stalin, et.al. You just can't be selective Stone. Murder is murder and jorge was the grand murdered of our time.
How many babies and children did HE direct the killing of in the illegal invasion of Iraq. Last I checked you voted Bush in 2000. Last I checked I voted Peroutka in 2004. Last I checked you support Obama the war criminal.
I voted for the bushes at least 10 times in my days (probably more than that) throwing in daddy and jr's governor stint in TX...primaries and all. At least I can admit my folly, you haven't the balls to. That said, 'you people' are never going to win another election with your neandrathal mentality. Move, get out...find another place to live that shares your views. OH...what? There isn't such a place? LOL
You are being dishonest or your memory isn't that good. I've said stuff about Bush that I'm glad the secret service didn't come visit me.
Seriously, you've gone off the deep end, much as goldi, the Israel-firster fat- bitch, has... You're making up shit about other people, that should be easy to substantiate (IF they were true), and then look like a complete loon because they're not. You then act as though you're the ONLY honest person on the forum, when it's obvious that you're the biggest liar here... And yet you have the balls to claim you're a "Christian," and honest, and all that... If your purpose is to drive everyone off your forum, so they don't have to tolerate your blatant hypocrisy, you're doing a damn fine job of it... Whatever. I don't know what your game is, but it's clear that you've lost your moral compass, and any semblance of credibility with regard to much of anything. Whatever. I was impressed with your "Galt" article this morning... thought, 'hey, that's COOL, I like it.' But tonight, your emotions have taken over, and your behavior is borderline 'hysterical.' In real life, I'm not known as one to sugar-coat the truth, because I've neither the time nor patience for emotional sugar-coating of facts... And I'm used to dealing with the consequences of this approach. So if telling you the truth is what gets me booted from here, than I fine with that. At the end of the day, you'll be rimjob-jr., echo-chamber and all. Pfft.
Seriously, you've gone off the deep end, much as goldi, the Israel-firster fat- bitch, has... You're making up shit about other people, What did I make up? You don' even know what I was talking about here.
Maybe THIS will refresh your memory. Thanks for proving that you're a lying, disengenuous, IMMORAL HYPOCRITE. Check-mate.
Ok you need to quit talking to me that way. On your first point I looked back up and it was sneakypete that said that. So that doesn't make me a liar but mistaken. But you have said that it would be better of Obama is re elected. Your reason if I am remember correctly was that Romney would have a friendly congress to get things done with. Your other times calling me a liar are also inaccurate. So watch your mouth. I'm tolerant but not forever.
For someone who claims such devotion to accuracy, you've been "mistaken" a great many times about me, and for a very long time... You use every sleazy trick in the book, all while pretending to be "Christian," and a believer of truth. ANOTHER MISTAKE. I have made the point many times, that it could easily be argued that it would be better if o'Bungler were elected, because the collapse would be shorter and less drawn-out than it would be under mcRomneystain... and that there is historical basis for that viewpoint, especially when you study Cicero's writings. That is NOT the same thing as saying I supported o'Bungler, and I defy you to find a SINGLE POST where I've said that. AGAIN, you are "mistaken." ANOTHER MISTAKE. ANOTHER MISTAKE. Or what? You gonna' call ME a child-molester? Rapist? Thief? Murderer? You dare to tell me how "tolerant" you are, when it is YOU who've been Here's something for you to chew on, stone... I don't really have the time to lie, push any particular agenda (beyond restoring TRUE liberty to this country), and pimping for any group.
You support Obama.
I support the dismantling the welfare/warfare system. I support the dismantling of the American police-state. I support REAL freedom in America- the freedom to do whatever you want, provided you don't interfere with the rights of others to do what they want. I support a REAL free market, where prices and production are established via mutual agreement of producers and customers, without interference from the government via insane regulations, taxation or subsidization, in the hope to force market behavior to match what government shit-head bureaucrats think is "best" for the country... IN ALL OF THESE THINGS, I AM A FIRM BELIEVER. NEITHER O'BUNGLER NOR MCROMNEYSTAIN WILL TOUCH ANY OF THESE ISSUES, SO I SUPPORT NEITHER OF THEM. If you are too much of brain-dead zombie to get that, then just tell me so, so I can bozo your sorry, incredibly stupid ass, and have done with it.
I support the dismantling of the American police-state. I support REAL freedom in America- the freedom to do whatever you want, provided you don't interfere with the rights of others to do what they want. I support a REAL free market, where prices and production are established via mutual agreement of producers and customers, without interference from the government via insane regulations, taxation or subsidization, in the hope to force market behavior to match what government shit-head bureaucrats think is "best" for the country..." Stone will never agree with you; you are making too much sense here. He's still whining as he cries over the lose of his Mitt. In fact he'll probably milk this particuar hair shirt for a long time to come.
There are no replies to Comment # 132. End Trace Mode for Comment # 132.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestBoehner Extends Olive Branch on 'Fiscal Cliff' (tax increases)
So there will certainly be many more wars....lots of parades.
Who knows...maybe they finally do another great movie like the San Pebbles or Saving Private Ryan.
Hey...it will be at least 10 years before things get that bad : )
#11. To: Parrot with speed dial (#6)
America is still the Vaunted Global Military power. So there will certainly be many more wars....lots of parades.
#12. To: sneakypete (#11)
us to fight to protect Saudi Arabia in the Muddle East
#13. To: Brian S (#12)
We all know who we are 'protecting' in the ME and it sure as the hell isn't SA.
#25. To: sneakypete (#13)
The Jews are perfectly capable of taking care of themselves against their Muslim neighbors.
#26. To: Brian S, *Liberal Rehab Staff* (#25)
Jewish Vote Goes 69 Percent For Barack Obama: Exit Polls
#33. To: hondo68 (#26)
#36. To: Brian S (#33)
Romney lost all of the demographic vote
#57. To: A K A Stone (#36)
But Romney is not a murderer. Obama is.
#60. To: Brian S (#57)
Nothing compared to your 'hero', the war criminal, baby bush.
#92. To: A K A Stone (#60)
(Edited)
#95. To: Brian S (#92)
At least I can admit my folly, you haven't to balls to.
#102. To: A K A Stone (#95)
You are being dishonest or your memory isn't that good.
#103. To: Capitalist Eric (#102)
You are being dishonest or your memory isn't that good.
#107. To: A K A Stone (#103)
What did I make up?
You don' even know what I was talking about here.
#110. To: Capitalist Eric (#107)
#122. To: A K A Stone (#110)
Ok you need to quit talking to me that way. On your first point I looked back up and it was sneakypete that said that. So that doesn't make me a liar but mistaken.
But you have said that it would be better of Obama is re elected.
Your reason if I am remember correctly was that Romney would have a friendly congress to get things done with.
Your other times calling me a liar are also inaccurate.
So watch your mouth. I'm tolerant but not forever.
lying your ass off "mistaken" for months???
#123. To: Capitalist Eric (#122)
#131. To: A K A Stone (#123)
(Edited)
You support Obama.
#132. To: Capitalist Eric (#131)
" I support the dismantling the welfare/warfare system.
Replies to Comment # 132.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]