[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Good Morning everyone my name is Devil Anse

US Navy NCIS Scrambles To Get Story Together After Suspicious Death / Commander Firing At GITMO

Female Commander At Pope AFB Fired

Obama ... 'Matrix' --- a world of deniability

Jeb's invisible man strategy

N.M. court upholds ban on switchblades, suggests broader knife bans might be constitutional, too.

'American Sniper' Movie Guide "Family Review" (Warning: Details & SPOILERS)

Scott Walker shows fire in Iowa

Who Killed Litvinenko? Perhaps Not Russia After All

Rooftop solar is now cheaper than the grid in 42 American cities

Possible drone found on White House grounds (Obamas take refuge in New Delhi)

Man Faces Jail After Not Paying Child Support For a Child He’s Proven is Not His

Jeb Bush: We Need to Control Border By Politely Asking Illegals to Leave

10 Weirdest Ways Pro Sports Teams Tried To Get An Edge

Top 20 Greatest Strategy Games (How Many Have You Played?)

Law Has Been Murdered (Government Kangaroo Courts)

Marijuana a Schedule 1 Drug! (Marijuana Is Classified With Heroin and Cocaine) Are you Kidding me?

Libertarians have ‘good reason to be optimistic’ (43% of Americans are independents, 30% D, 26% R)

Sunday Night Music Thread

Who is Sajida al-Rishawi? And why does ISIS care about her?

...And Now for Something Completely Different

Sidney argues that a People’s liberty is a gift of nature and exists prior to any government (1683)

Algernon Sidney argues that a law that is not just is not a law (1683)

Walker vs. Cruz on Gay Marriage

California Bars Judges From Boy Scouts Because of Anti-Gay Stance

(vanity) Reminder---First Episode Of History Channel's "Sons Of Liberty'' TONIGHT

AC/DC’s ‘Big Balls’ Rewritten About Tom Brady and DeflateGate

New Psychiatric Diagnosis Targets “Internet Conspiracy Theorists”

Leggett on the tendency of the government to become “the universal dispenser of good and evil” (1834)

Texas open carry activists unlawfully arrested against state penal codes

A GUIDE TO 2016 REPUBLICAN CANDIDATES’ POSITIONS ON ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION

The New Progressive Mitt Romney is the Same as the Old Progressive Mitt Romney

Fox News Raises Alarm Over College Course About Race

Mayor Calls 911 To Report A Robbery, Police Show Up, Beat and Arrest Her

The Secret of Global Warming

Socrates as the “gadfly” of the state (4thC BC)

GOP Summit—The Good, The Bad And The Absolutely Crazy

Game chants strike racial nerve in Lodi

Fact-checking Rand Paul's disability claims

The day I ate pot candy and ended up in hospital

Welcome Back Calcon

Failure to Launch

Great news. Republicans look at eliminating filibuster for SCOTUS nominees

Japanese Characters stolen from Korean Characters

Who Decides Whether Rand Paul's Libertarian Girl Has 'Fringe' Foreign Policy Views?

The flawed libertarian response to the Charlie Hebdo attacks

Lars Andersen: a new level of archery

Terrorists in Paris Don’t Understand How Free People Think

White professor teaches 'problem of whiteness' course at Arizona State

Man Acquitted of Stabbing a Police Officer, Juror says he Was “Protecting his Family”

Bipartisan Special Skills Visa Bill Helping Companies Get Rid of Older Employees


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: NC Board of Nutrition and Dietitians are Assholes who Hate Free Speech
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.diabetes-warrior.net/2012/04/27/letter/
Published: Jun 3, 2012
Author: Steve Cooksey
Post Date: 2012-06-03 10:09:28 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 413
Comments: 2

I received a letter from the North Carolina Board of Dietetics and Nutritionists stating that I am in ‘substantial compliance’ with NC Law. The letter was dated April 9, 2012 and I received it April 20, 2012. If this is new to you, click here for the investigation post.

In January, the state board opened an investigation into my blog and told me to stop advising people through my blog postings, publicly or in private. No matter if it was for compensation or for free. Essentially, the board told me that not only could I not charge people to talk about diet, I could not talk to my friends about diet.

The board made it clear that talking about diet without a license is a crime and they could take me to court.

In response to this investigation, I did three things:

1) stopped doing my published advice column.

2) took down my diabetes support package links.

3) and made my disclaimer more prominent. Additionally, I added a disclaimer at the bottom of every page.

Because I complied with their order to stop speaking and to change what I say and what I publish, the board concluded that I am in substantial compliance and closed the investigation.

All this means is that the board has violated my First Amendment rights by silencing me and altering how I express my opinions.

My compliance is compliance with their violation of my rights, not an agreement between us that I was wrong and they were right.

The letter actually threatens to keep monitoring me.

I have absolutely no intention of complying with the board’s violation of my free speech rights. I intend to defend those rights, not only for myself, but for everyone.

This is America and in America people should be free to give each other advice about things like diet.

This isn’t the end of the fight, this is not over.

It’s just the end of round one.

THANK YOU ALL FOR ALL OF THE SUPPORT!!! … I will not back down and I will not waiver!


Poster Comment:

Here is the assholes contact number. I would call them and give them a piece of your mind. Exercise your free speech. Who do these parasites think they are.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: All (#0)

The letter actually threatens to keep monitoring me.

Someone get the message to Steve. Put anything you want to here. When they call me I will tell them to FUCK OFF!!!

A K A Stone  posted on  2012-06-03   10:11:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: A K A Stone (#0)

All this means is that the board has violated my First Amendment rights by silencing me and altering how I express my opinions.

No, it means the author voluntarily declined to exercise his first amendment right to free speech and silenced himself.

They threatened and he didn't stand his ground and exercise his rights. His choice.

some text

"If men through fear, fraud or mistake, should in terms renounce and give up any essential natural right, the eternal law of reason and the great end of society, would absolutely vacate such renunciation; the right to freedom being the gift of God Almighty, it is not in the power of Man to alienate this gift, and voluntarily become a slave." Samuel Adams, Rights of the Colonists, 1772

We The People  posted on  2012-06-03   11:25:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com