[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Good Morning everyone my name is Devil Anse

Rand Paul Wins 2015 CPAC Straw Poll

Pope Francis attacks 'throw-away' economic globalization

Attackers hack American blogger to death in Bangladesh

"War tubas" -- The strange history of listening before radar

CPAC 2015: Cruz Marijuana Policy Shifts (should be state's decision)

Japan Mulls Creating Its Own CIA

MAJOR BREAKTHROUGH In The Case Of Barack Obama And His Muslim Brother Malik--terrorist ties

Finally: A Wearable That Lets You Charge Your Gadgets by Jerking Off

Why Bibi’s Speech Matters

Prominent Russian opposition figure Boris Nemtsov shot dead

Black Privilege: Students Get SAT Bonus Points for Being Black or Hispanic – Asians Are Penalized

Congress barely meets DHS deadline

HOUSE VOTES DOWN STOP-GAP DHS FUNDING BILL, DHS SHUTDOWN HOURS AWAY

Mexico captures most wanted drug kingpin

JEB BUSH HAD TO BUS IN CPAC SUPPORTERS FROM K STREET

JEB BUSH’S CPAC FAIL--constant boos!

KP student charged with manslaughter in Fairhaven friend’s death; authorities say she encouraged him to commit suicide

Top GOP operative calls Scott Walker 'kind of a dumba--'

Why would GOP candidate for Missouri governor kill himself?

Most Americans see combating climate change as a moral duty

Russian opposition politician Nemtsov shot dead

Paging Dr. Frankenstein! Human head transplant possible in just two years

Rand Paul: Rise to the Occasion - CPAC 2015

Rubio Assures CPAC: ‘I’ve Learned’ Since Immigration Debate

The biggest threat now is not Radical Islam. It is “Apocalyptic Islam.”

SPLC on Ben Carson: We hated him before we didn't

Cops Promoted Despite Video of Them Severely Beating Peaceful Mentally Ill Man with Hands Up

Leonard Nimoy, Spock of ‘Star Trek,’ Dies at 83

Two headlines that define BULL DUNG

chief persecutor of Christians ... has a name --- Barack Hussein Obama

Congress close in on short-term Homeland Security bill

Cruz takes aim at libertarians

6 Reasons Why 'Starship Troopers' Is the New 'The Art of War'

Sarah Palin tells Obama Christians pray for you, 'radical Islamists want to cut off your head'

GOP Platform: War Without End

Eight people dead over 'family feud' in rural Missouri town by gunman who then shot himself

Obama Dares GOP: Go Ahead, ‘Have a Vote on Whether What I’m Doing Is Legal…I Will Veto’

Elizabeth Warren’s next target: Trade deals

If You're Not "Sovereign", You're Servile

Barbarians gonna barbarian [ISIS destroys antiquities, Assad's gain]

Congress launches Medal of Honor campaign for ‘American Sniper’ Chris Kyle

The stranger in the White House

CPAC attendees plan to walk out on Jeb Bush

Cop Pulls Assault Rifle, Threatens Protesters For Their ‘Constitutional Bullsh**’

Pop Quiz: How Many Constitutional Rights Have We Lost?

Investigators find 32,000 emails in IRS probe--Lois Lerner

The Net Neutrality Scam

en. Ted Cruz at CPAC 2015: Stand With the People, Not Washington

‘US Spends Millions on Overseas Propaganda, But No One is Buying it’

When Strong Encryption Isn't Enough to Protect Our Privacy


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Corrupt Government
See other Corrupt Government Articles

Title: Even with a High Court win, Obamacare won't work
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://finance.fortune.cnn.com/2012 ... 22/health-care-reform-hurdles/
Published: May 22, 2012
Author: By Shawn Tully
Post Date: 2012-05-24 23:14:48 by We The People
Keywords: None
Views: 544
Comments: 3

A new study shows that the basic requirements of President Obama's health care plan have been tried, and failed, in many states in the past two decades.

FORTUNE -- The Obama administration maintains that its Affordable Care Act is a complex construct that's endangered if the Supreme Court finds its central feature -- the requirement that all Americans buy health insurance -- unconstitutional. It's certainly true that eliminating the "individual mandate" will immediately expose the plan as unworkable. It can only succeed by creating a broad, universal insurance pool that collects big premiums from the young and healthy. If the young and healthy aren't required to sign on, they won't. Hence, the pools won't be remotely large enough to pay for the older, sicker folks who get the best deal, and are bound to flock to the state exchanges.

In reality, the reform plan's success doesn't depend on the Supreme Court's decision at all. Its faulty design virtually guarantees that all the things the administration warns will happen if it loses will happen anyway. Even if it stands, the legislation will spawn insurance plans crowded with high-cost folks, driving premiums higher, hobbling competition as carriers abandon the exchanges, and leaving tens of millions of Americans uninsured.

Here's the reason the Affordable Care Act's future is predictable: Its basic requirements have been tried, and failed, in many states in the past two decades. A new study, prepared by Milliman, Inc. for AHIP, the group representing America's healthcare insurers, examines the experience of eight states, including Kentucky, Maine and Washington, that adopted the two basic pillars of the Obama plan in the 1990s.

MORE: If Obamacare survives, employers may do it in

Those two measures are Guaranteed Issue, and Community Rating. The former requires that insurance companies accept all patients regardless of their medical condition, at any time they want to sign up. Community Rating dictates that insurers cannot charge different premiums based on health status, and face limits on how much they can vary premiums according to a person's age.

All eight states encountered similar problems. People who'd been previously uninsured bought coverage as soon as they suffered a heart attack or contracted diabetes. Pregnant women entered the plans, then dropped out after giving birth. Premiums for young, healthy people soared. Typically, a 60-year old's medical care runs about six times that of someone in their twenties. But in New York, insurers must charge exactly the same premiums for both. For many years, Maine limited the difference to just 20%.

So the young Americans needed to make the plans work mostly dropped out. Instead of shrinking the ranks of the uninsured -- the goal touted by the states -- their numbers often increased, rising 30% in Washington from 1993 to 2000. Premiums jumped as the insurance pools became dominated by older, sicker patients. From 1996 to 2002, for example, premiums in the individual market rose 44% in Maine. Carriers fled. By 2000, 31 out of 39 counties in Washington didn't have a single insurer offering coverage to people not covered by their employer or a federal plan.

By the early 2000s, most states either abandoned or radically changed the two provisions that caused the damage. Kentucky and New Hampshire repealed both guaranteed issue and community rating. Washington substantially loosened its provisions. New Jersey and Maine both expanded the range insurers could charge for patients of different ages, with Maine going from a limit of 20% to a band that expands to five-to-one by 2015. South Dakota and Iowa repealed guaranteed issue in 2004 and 2003 respectively.

MORE: Where CEO political dollars go

The Affordable Care Act is embracing the provisions that many states tried, and then rushed to escape. It imposes guaranteed issue, so that patients with any pre-existing condition must be granted coverage any time they apply. It also limits differences in premiums according to age to a three-to-one range. That would force insurers to raise premiums for 20-year olds by at least 50%, and lower them for 60-year olds to far below their actual costs, forcing the young and healthy to subsidize older, sicker Americans.

That goal may sound laudable, but it won't work. The Affordable Care Act professes to ensure that all Americans buy insurance, but undermines its own goals by setting penalties so low that the young and healthy, and many middle-aged and healthy, will not buy coverage. The penalties start at 2014 at either $95 a year, or 1% of income, whichever is higher. They reach a maximum of 2.5% of income in 2016. Those small penalties may be irrelevant anyway. The measure also provides that anyone who can't find a policy priced at 8.5% of their income or less is exempted from buying insurance.

The plan's champions argue that it will work where the state plans didn't because of the big subsidies it provides. But that's not what the math shows. Take a 30-year old, single person earning $50,000. He or she would get no subsidy under the Obama plan. A policy would cost our candidate, say, $10,000 a year, far more than that person is paying now--again, courtesy of community rating. The penalty for foregoing coverage is just $1250 a year in 2016.

MORE: We're having the wrong debate about rising health care costs

But remember, if the policy costs over 8.5% of income, you can drop your insurance and pay no penalty, and the $10,000 more than qualifies. So our healthy 30-year old is making a rational economic choice by going uninsured. In fact, he or she is really "insured" after all since a non-payer can sign up for coverage, no questions asked, any time they get sick.

It may be true that the Obama plan would work if it pulled all Americans into the insurance pools, even though that would force the young to pay more than their costs. But it doesn't come close. The Supreme Court drama is a distraction from the real issue: A "reform" plan that the experience of the states, and its own jerry-rigged system of penalties and subsidies, guarantee will fail. (1 image)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: We The People (#0)

Good analysis, WTP.

buckeroo  posted on  2012-05-24   23:24:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: buckeroo (#1)

Agreed.

This quote really stuck with me:

It can only succeed by creating a broad, universal insurance pool that collects big premiums from the young and healthy.

That sounds like Social Security. We're *forced* to pay in. If I had the option, I would drop out, because I know I'll never collect the *purchasing value* back. A lot of others, I believe, would do the same, and force the Ponzi scheme to finally collapse.

Rational buyers, dontcha' know... ;)

LoonyMing: I brandish my ignorance like a crucifix at vampires.
Translation: IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH

'It's now very common to hear people say, "I'm rather offended by that", as if that gives them certain rights. It's no more than a whine. It has no meaning, it has no purpose, it has no reason to be respected as a phrase. "I'm offended by that." Well, so fucking what?' —Stephen Fry

Capitalist Eric  posted on  2012-05-25   0:12:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: We The People (#0)

.

I mean it's NOT like the entire history of humanity has proven over and over that COLLECTIVISM IS DEATH.

It's NOT like so called libTURDS/progressives have ever TRIED any of this nonsense before in any human population.

It's NOT like this entire socialist DELUSION of a free lunch has ever been proven in action to be an ACTUAL REAL FAILURE.

I mean ROME and the CCCP NEVER existed ?

Oh wait, actually yeah, YEAH they sure F'ing did.

gooberment FAIL = FAIL

Duh.

Spoiled, stupid and ignorant, brain dead phuckwads, libTURD fools, tools, and idiots, are the real sickness; the messiah "king" obammy and his regime are only the symptoms.

Mad Dog  posted on  2012-05-25   2:18:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com