[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

The Gog Of Turkey “Erdogan” Threatens The Crusader Of Russia “Putin” (The Tension Between Russia And Turkey Is Escalating)

Denmark moves toward nationalism in face of migrant crisis [Danish Nazi rampage]

Hmmm… some people seem pretty upset that The Donald isn’t spending all his money

Connecticut firm backed up Clinton’s server, might still have personal emails

Matt Drudge Visits the Alex Jones Show: Full Interview

‘Neutralizing’ John Lennon: One Man Against the ‘Monster’

Dashcam Refutes Cop’s Story of “Fearing for His Life,” Shows Him Taser Man for Parking Ticket

Woman Called 9-1-1 to Report Stolen Wallet, Crazed Cop Showed Up and Beat Her Unconscious

U Penn Professor Calls Ben Carson ‘Coon of the Year’ on Twitter


The Great Replacement: The 1965 Immigration Act And The Think Tanks

Thanks, Ted–Pre-1965 America Really NEEDED That

Clinton Calls for “Open Borders to All”–Bill Clinton’s September 10, 2001 Australia Speech

Asylees in Germany Expected to Bring in 4 to 8 Family Members

America’s Senator Jeff Sessions Says Stop to Mega Immigration-Population Growth

Bernie Sanders Explains Social Security

Trump campaign trolls Rubio with bottled water delivery Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/10/donald-trump-bottled-water-marco-rubio-214455#ixzz3nnufOSxo

Minnesota Tries Expensive Social Programs to Cool Jihad Ardor among Somali Immigrants

Marijuana is Bringing in Record Tax Cash for Colorado

"We Lost Our Daughter to a Mass Shooter and Now Owe $203,000 to His Ammo Dealer" And?

Conservative Values

Five things to know about House speaker hopeful Jason Chaffetz

Lawsuit: Pork roll company fired employee for farting


No votes cast in small-town Iowa school board race

The Shocking Reality: This Chart Shows Just How Bad Unemployment Is Today Compared to The Great Depression

Instead of “What would Jesus do?” how about

Valencia Woman Files Suit Alleging She Was Punched By Police In Front Of Her Kids


War Party Targets Putin and Assad

Putin has sent the feared Spetsnaz special forces into Syria to bail out Assad

Boy, 11, Reportedly Shoots Dead 8-Year-Old Neighbor After She Said He Couldn't See Her Puppy

Gay Priest Tries to Bully Church into Approving Homosexual Relations

Number One with a Bullet

McCarthy v. Chaffetz on Immigration

Dunkin’ Donuts employee writes ‘#blacklivesmatter’ on Providence police officer’s cup

White Americans are the biggest terror threat in the United States

Letter: Put all gun owners in a well-regulated militia

Rise of the ROBOSEXUALS: Humans will have virtual reality sex by 2030

Woman who sat in McDonald’s for 24 hours was actually dead

Anybody watch the Mrs Bubba Show on NBC this morning?

25 Things Generation Xers (and Baby Boomers) Did as Kids that Could Get Today’s Kids Arrested

San Francisco's last gun store closing doors for good

Hillary has long history of beating up Bill behind closed doors: book

Egypt backs Russian airstrikes in Syria

Syria: Chinese Uyghurs Killing Russian Spies According to Turkey's Plan

Caitlyn Jenner Claims She No Longer Feels Like A Woman And Asks Everyone To Call Her Bruce Again

China To Join Russian Air Strikes In Syria, Russia Gains Iraq Air Base – Report

Donald Trump After Cage Death Match With Barack Obama

Russia Intensifies Syria Bombing as Cameron Joins Criticism

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Corrupt Government
See other Corrupt Government Articles

Title: Are ‘Sock Puppets’ Propaganda?
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.theamericanconservative.com/are-sock-puppets-propaganda/
Published: May 21, 2012
Author: By Jordan Bloom
Post Date: 2012-05-21 18:07:49 by We The People
Keywords: None
Views: 266

Rep. Adam Smith (D-WA) sure has some strange priorities.

Last week, he formed the left flank of the Amash-Smith coalition to upend the indefinite detention provisions of the National Defense Authorization Act. It failed, 238-182. 

Three days ago, BuzzFeed reported that he had proposed another amendment, along with Texas Republican Mac Thornberry, to “strike the current ban on domestic dissemination” of Pentagon and State Department propaganda:

In a little noticed press release earlier in the week — buried beneath the other high-profile issues in the $642 billion defense bill, including indefinite detention and a prohibition on gay marriage at military installations — Thornberry warned that in the Internet age, the current law “ties the hands of America’s diplomatic officials, military, and others by inhibiting our ability to effectively communicate in a credible way.”

The bill’s supporters say the informational material used overseas to influence foreign audiences is too good to not use at home, and that new techniques are needed to help fight Al-Qaeda, a borderless enemy whose own propaganda reaches Americans online.

Critics of the bill say there are ways to keep America safe without turning the massive information operations apparatus within the federal government against American citizens.

Recognizing that some legal limits on domestic information operations are probably a good thing, it remains clear that the limits in place up until now haven’t exactly prevented either agency from advancing their own agendas in the press.

This is not new. Complete separation of state and media has always been a fallacy; in fact venerable broadcasters like Edward Murrow, who President Kennedy appointed head of the U.S. Information Agency more than a decade after the Smith-Mundt Act‘s passage, have turned to the state messaging apparatus in the face of the perceived market failure of broadcasting to deliver news as anything other than entertainment.

It’s a salient anecdote because a subsidiary of the USIA, Voice of America, provided the pretext for some of the provisions of Smith-Mundt; the bill’s supporters were concerned about how an organ like VOA might be used if it were allowed to broadcast domestically. The first attempt to permanentize the agency was blocked in 1946 by Sen. Robert Taft. Back then, VOA was justified as providing a way to make sure the recipients of our foreign aid knew where it was coming from; hearts and minds and all. Therefore, the assumption went, it was better for academicians and the traditional media to bring it home instead, with an acceptably independent spin. This is a significant development because it extended the antagonistic wartime understanding of information ops–it’s ok to broadcast propaganda over there, but not here–to peacetime.

Now, due primarily to the internet, it’s nearly impossible to separate foreign and domestic dissemination.  If the old Smith-Mundt bill was paranoid in its apparent fear of government leaflet operations over Peoria, the repeal provisions now before the House seem to have a paranoid belief that Al Jazeera’s presence in domestic markets will make Americans unduly skeptical of our current mideast policy of promiscuous military intervention. So why not repeal an ineffective law?

Because this is all about wartime messaging. Repealing portions of the law would only give more cover to the military for violating the spirit of the law, which they already do in several ways. It was revealed earlier this year that the military was engaged in creating armies of social media “sock puppets” to drum up support for its policies. When two USA Today staffers started to look into the propaganda contracting, they found themselves on the receiving end of it.  And the sock puppets are just the automated version of their earlier talking heads.  That is, the Pentagon’s military analysts program, which provided VIP trips to Guantanamo and other perks for retired military officers who would then appear on cable news and reliably tout DoD talking points.

Consistent messaging and a complacent public are enormously important to the war managers at the Pentagon. Not to get all Alex Jones-y, but my favorite example thereof is this lovely white paper from 1980 on Mindwar–”The Psychology of Victory”–co-written by Fox News military analyst Paul Vallely and avowed satanist Michael Aquino. (You’re not allowed to ask if there’s anything wrong with a satanist writing policy briefs on U.S. military information policy, by the way. Aquino dismisses earlier objections as an “absurdly comic opera.”) Nearly every sentence reads like an unholy hate-child of Orwell, Machiavelli, and Freud, but here’s the most relevant:

MindWar must target all participants if it is to be effective. It must not only weaken the enemy; it must strengthen the United States. It strengthens the United States by denying enemy propaganda access to our people, and by explaining and emphasizing to our people the rationale for our national interest in a specific war. 

Under existing United States Law, PSYOP units may not target American citizens. That prohibition is based upon the presumption that “propaganda” is necessarily a lie or at least a misleading half-truth, and that the government has no right to lie to the people. The Propaganda Ministry of Goebbels must not be a part of the American way of life.

Quite right, and so it must be axiomatic of MindWar that it always speaks the truth. Its power lies in its ability to focus recipients’ attention on the truth of the future as well as that of the present. MindWar thus involves the stated promise of the truth that the United States has resolved to make real if it is not already so.

Yet, based on its own actions, the military has already claimed the prerogative to determine that truth, and suppressed two journalists’ ability to contradict it. So why give them even more license to turn the bullhorn on us? (1 image)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com