[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Think You Are Too Old to Fight ?

Dumbass Muzzie Father Who Claimed Trump Should Read the Constitution Should Read it Himself

BREAKING: Convoys Of Berserk Muslims Headed Against US Air Force Base In Turkey

John Hinckley, Who Tried To Kill A President (Reagan), Wins His Freedom

Her Majesty is on stage

Bye Bye Middle Class: The Rate Of Homeownership In The United States Has Hit The Lowest Level Ever

The Sorry State of Marylin Mosby

Marine Gen. John Allen has endorsed Hillary Clinton for president. Here's why that matters

US Silent as Major Ally Begins Campaign of Murdering Drug Users — Executing 11 People a Day

Cops Mistake Krispy Kreme Donuts for Meth, Throw Innocent 64-yo Man in Jail, Strip Search Him

7 Ways That People Died Trying To Become Immortal

Cops Ignore Dispatch Calls for REAL Crimes to Unlawfully Hold Innocent People at Gunpoint

SWAT Team Given ‘Medal of Valor’ for Killing 107-yo Man — Refuse Town’s Order to Give it Back

Clinton Over the Hump, and Trump Gets a Bump

Bleeding Syria, Meet Bleeding Kansas

Deutsche Bank Profit Plunges 98 Percent As The Outlook For ‘The World’s Riskiest Bank’ Darkens

The real war on drugs

this election - every election ... is about who will have the power to shape our children --- for the next four - eight years of their lives.”

Breaking News: Bikers for Hillary are on their way to Philly

Refugee rapes 79yo woman at German cemetery

Daily Caller News Foundation EXCLUSIVE: IRS Launches Investigation Of Clinton Foundation

Do You Know Why I’m Pulling You Over, Being Wildly Aggressive, And Charging You With Assault Today, Sir?

3D Printed and Homemade “Ghost Guns” Must Now Be Registered in California

First Poll to Show Majority Support by Republicans for Full Marijuana Legalization

Cop Who Killed His Own Son By Leaving Him in a Hot Car All Day, Not Charged — Because He’s a Cop

WashPost Editor Warns Vast Conspiracy: Avoid Talk of Bill’s ‘Libertine Tendencies’

You’re Likely Committing a Crime Right Now

Stop Drinking the Kool-Aid, America: Political Fiction in an Age of Televised Lies

Assassination of Gandhi ... The Facts - Behind

'You Christians, you kill us': Nun reveals words of ISIS knifemen who forced elderly priest, 84, to kneel at altar as they slit his throat on camera after invading Mass

LIVE: DNC Protest in Philadelphia

White people ordered to the back at DNC

Anthony Weiner and Trumps take swipes at each other

America's Largest Shotgun Maker Shifts More Jobs to Texas

#DNCLeaks: Will Putin Get a Pulitzer?

People Spend As Much On Legal Weed As They Do On Alcohol

Anybody watching the Demoncrap Convention ?

France church attack: Priest killed in hostage-taking near Rouen

German MP Critical of Police for Killing Crazed, Axe-Wielding Jihadist

calling all beer lovers

30 Seconds To Midnight

America Needs a Good, Old-Fashioned Economic Depression

Even Bernie Sanders supporters want Hillary Clinton behind bars

RealClearPolitics has Trump up by 0.2%

Cop Pulls Gun on Jack in the Box Employee for Not Making his Burger Fast Enough

Fort Myers Nightclub Shooting: 2 Dead, at Least 14 Others Reportedly Wounded

The Law Of Cosmic Imperative

Clinton Foundation is Robin Hood in Reverse

Leaked Emails Show DNC Officials Planned Anti-Trump Protests

BREAKING NEWS: Democrat chairwoman RESIGNS hours before Clinton convention. Email hack revealing how party conspired against Sanders forces Debbie Wasserman Schultz to quit


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Corrupt Government
See other Corrupt Government Articles

Title: Are ‘Sock Puppets’ Propaganda?
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.theamericanconservative.com/are-sock-puppets-propaganda/
Published: May 21, 2012
Author: By Jordan Bloom
Post Date: 2012-05-21 18:07:49 by We The People
Keywords: None
Views: 372

Rep. Adam Smith (D-WA) sure has some strange priorities.

Last week, he formed the left flank of the Amash-Smith coalition to upend the indefinite detention provisions of the National Defense Authorization Act. It failed, 238-182. 

Three days ago, BuzzFeed reported that he had proposed another amendment, along with Texas Republican Mac Thornberry, to “strike the current ban on domestic dissemination” of Pentagon and State Department propaganda:

In a little noticed press release earlier in the week — buried beneath the other high-profile issues in the $642 billion defense bill, including indefinite detention and a prohibition on gay marriage at military installations — Thornberry warned that in the Internet age, the current law “ties the hands of America’s diplomatic officials, military, and others by inhibiting our ability to effectively communicate in a credible way.”

The bill’s supporters say the informational material used overseas to influence foreign audiences is too good to not use at home, and that new techniques are needed to help fight Al-Qaeda, a borderless enemy whose own propaganda reaches Americans online.

Critics of the bill say there are ways to keep America safe without turning the massive information operations apparatus within the federal government against American citizens.

Recognizing that some legal limits on domestic information operations are probably a good thing, it remains clear that the limits in place up until now haven’t exactly prevented either agency from advancing their own agendas in the press.

This is not new. Complete separation of state and media has always been a fallacy; in fact venerable broadcasters like Edward Murrow, who President Kennedy appointed head of the U.S. Information Agency more than a decade after the Smith-Mundt Act‘s passage, have turned to the state messaging apparatus in the face of the perceived market failure of broadcasting to deliver news as anything other than entertainment.

It’s a salient anecdote because a subsidiary of the USIA, Voice of America, provided the pretext for some of the provisions of Smith-Mundt; the bill’s supporters were concerned about how an organ like VOA might be used if it were allowed to broadcast domestically. The first attempt to permanentize the agency was blocked in 1946 by Sen. Robert Taft. Back then, VOA was justified as providing a way to make sure the recipients of our foreign aid knew where it was coming from; hearts and minds and all. Therefore, the assumption went, it was better for academicians and the traditional media to bring it home instead, with an acceptably independent spin. This is a significant development because it extended the antagonistic wartime understanding of information ops–it’s ok to broadcast propaganda over there, but not here–to peacetime.

Now, due primarily to the internet, it’s nearly impossible to separate foreign and domestic dissemination.  If the old Smith-Mundt bill was paranoid in its apparent fear of government leaflet operations over Peoria, the repeal provisions now before the House seem to have a paranoid belief that Al Jazeera’s presence in domestic markets will make Americans unduly skeptical of our current mideast policy of promiscuous military intervention. So why not repeal an ineffective law?

Because this is all about wartime messaging. Repealing portions of the law would only give more cover to the military for violating the spirit of the law, which they already do in several ways. It was revealed earlier this year that the military was engaged in creating armies of social media “sock puppets” to drum up support for its policies. When two USA Today staffers started to look into the propaganda contracting, they found themselves on the receiving end of it.  And the sock puppets are just the automated version of their earlier talking heads.  That is, the Pentagon’s military analysts program, which provided VIP trips to Guantanamo and other perks for retired military officers who would then appear on cable news and reliably tout DoD talking points.

Consistent messaging and a complacent public are enormously important to the war managers at the Pentagon. Not to get all Alex Jones-y, but my favorite example thereof is this lovely white paper from 1980 on Mindwar–”The Psychology of Victory”–co-written by Fox News military analyst Paul Vallely and avowed satanist Michael Aquino. (You’re not allowed to ask if there’s anything wrong with a satanist writing policy briefs on U.S. military information policy, by the way. Aquino dismisses earlier objections as an “absurdly comic opera.”) Nearly every sentence reads like an unholy hate-child of Orwell, Machiavelli, and Freud, but here’s the most relevant:

MindWar must target all participants if it is to be effective. It must not only weaken the enemy; it must strengthen the United States. It strengthens the United States by denying enemy propaganda access to our people, and by explaining and emphasizing to our people the rationale for our national interest in a specific war. 

Under existing United States Law, PSYOP units may not target American citizens. That prohibition is based upon the presumption that “propaganda” is necessarily a lie or at least a misleading half-truth, and that the government has no right to lie to the people. The Propaganda Ministry of Goebbels must not be a part of the American way of life.

Quite right, and so it must be axiomatic of MindWar that it always speaks the truth. Its power lies in its ability to focus recipients’ attention on the truth of the future as well as that of the present. MindWar thus involves the stated promise of the truth that the United States has resolved to make real if it is not already so.

Yet, based on its own actions, the military has already claimed the prerogative to determine that truth, and suppressed two journalists’ ability to contradict it. So why give them even more license to turn the bullhorn on us? (1 image)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com