[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Trump WANTS the Dakota Access pipeline and will review Obama administration's decision to sideline crude oil project after months of protests

No, The Shooting Of a Knife-Armed Reno Teen Isn’t “Sparking Debate”

Reno School Cop Shoots Teen Victim of Bullying in the Chest—District Praises Cop for ‘Protecting Children’

It's dead, Jim (Hopalong's site crashes)

Rex Tillerson of ExxonMobil Expected to Be Named Trump's Secretary of State (Bolton, Deputy SOS)

A real C. in C. ... not a metrosexual/bi-sexual fool --- who's hatred of our military is well known.

jethrro strikes oil ... goode bye oklahoma --- we're goining to calyphornia now

Muslim Teen Who Reported NYC Subway Harrassment Found Safe (No kidding?)

A "Soft Coup" Attempt: Furious Trump Slams "Secret" CIA Report Russia Helped Him Win

Senate Passes Major Portman-Murphy Counter-Propaganda Bill as Part of NDAA

Hillary Clinton’s losing campaign cost a record $1.2B

So much for 'lock her up': Trump tells Michigan crowd the famous chant 'plays great before the election' but now 'we don't care'

In Unprecedented Move, Dallas Pension System Suspends Withdrawals

Walmart to invest $1.3 billion in Mexico

Navy Won’t Remove ‘Midshipman’ Title Because It’s Enshrined In The Law As A Rank

Trump picks Goldman Sachs chief for top economic adviser (Swamp Up)

‘After Eight Years of Pajama Boys, It’s Time for the Alpha Males’

Trump: 'WeÂ’re going to work something out' with Dreamers (Lindsey Graham: "encouraged")

Trump’s critics have gone insane

‘Drug War has Failed’ Governor to Pardon Thousands of People Convicted for Pot

Big Media’s Contra-Cocaine Cover-up

If Trump’s Really a Populist, He’ll Fight Against the Destructive AT&T-Time Warner Merger

Has the Trumpian Revolution Begun?

Clinton Puppet Stephen Colbert Tells Pizzagate Conspiracy Researchers to “Grow the F*ck Up”

Dismal Jobs Report

The Ultimate “Fake News” List

Fake Newsman Brian Williams Slams Fake News

'Lives are at risk' because of fake news

Former astronaut, US Sen. John Glenn of Ohio has died at 95

Our Right to Ourselves

This Is the Purge We All Knew Was Coming: “Shutting Down Extremist Content”

Libertarians and Democrats Need to Fall in Love Again

Federal judge kills recount effort in Michigan

FBI employee arrested after firing shots at officer, Planet Fitness

AP source: Trump to tap Oklahoma AG Pruitt to head EPA (climate change skeptic - pro energy)

Police Busted Giving Fake News Reports to Media Who Then Reported It As FACT

Trump says he's consulted Obama on Cabinet picks ("I take his recommendations very seriously")

Carrying Cash? Be Ready to Lose It

#DumpKelloggs: Here Are the Products You’ll Never Need in Your Shopping Cart Again

TIME Person of the Year for 2016 is President-elect Donald Trump

Is Trump Calling Out Xi Jinping?

Pearl Harbor 75th Anniversary: Time to Admit the Deception

“Fake News” Has Been a Problem for Thousands of Years… Here’s How Governments Have Stopped It

Corporate Media Demands Social Media Ban “Fake News”

Under President Trump, the Dakota Pipeline and Independence from Saudi Oil is Coming

BREAKING : Michigan Court Rules in Trump’s Favor – Orders Recount to STOP Immediately

Rogue electors brief Clinton camp on anti-Trump plan (Kasich most acceptable, high approval rating)

BREAKING: Ohio Senate passes ‘Heartbeat Bill’

Kissinger summoned to Trump Tower for private meeting

Oakland fire ... City missed signs of looming disaster --- at Ghost Ship


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Corrupt Government
See other Corrupt Government Articles

Title: Are ‘Sock Puppets’ Propaganda?
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.theamericanconservative.com/are-sock-puppets-propaganda/
Published: May 21, 2012
Author: By Jordan Bloom
Post Date: 2012-05-21 18:07:49 by We The People
Keywords: None
Views: 399

Rep. Adam Smith (D-WA) sure has some strange priorities.

Last week, he formed the left flank of the Amash-Smith coalition to upend the indefinite detention provisions of the National Defense Authorization Act. It failed, 238-182. 

Three days ago, BuzzFeed reported that he had proposed another amendment, along with Texas Republican Mac Thornberry, to “strike the current ban on domestic dissemination” of Pentagon and State Department propaganda:

In a little noticed press release earlier in the week — buried beneath the other high-profile issues in the $642 billion defense bill, including indefinite detention and a prohibition on gay marriage at military installations — Thornberry warned that in the Internet age, the current law “ties the hands of America’s diplomatic officials, military, and others by inhibiting our ability to effectively communicate in a credible way.”

The bill’s supporters say the informational material used overseas to influence foreign audiences is too good to not use at home, and that new techniques are needed to help fight Al-Qaeda, a borderless enemy whose own propaganda reaches Americans online.

Critics of the bill say there are ways to keep America safe without turning the massive information operations apparatus within the federal government against American citizens.

Recognizing that some legal limits on domestic information operations are probably a good thing, it remains clear that the limits in place up until now haven’t exactly prevented either agency from advancing their own agendas in the press.

This is not new. Complete separation of state and media has always been a fallacy; in fact venerable broadcasters like Edward Murrow, who President Kennedy appointed head of the U.S. Information Agency more than a decade after the Smith-Mundt Act‘s passage, have turned to the state messaging apparatus in the face of the perceived market failure of broadcasting to deliver news as anything other than entertainment.

It’s a salient anecdote because a subsidiary of the USIA, Voice of America, provided the pretext for some of the provisions of Smith-Mundt; the bill’s supporters were concerned about how an organ like VOA might be used if it were allowed to broadcast domestically. The first attempt to permanentize the agency was blocked in 1946 by Sen. Robert Taft. Back then, VOA was justified as providing a way to make sure the recipients of our foreign aid knew where it was coming from; hearts and minds and all. Therefore, the assumption went, it was better for academicians and the traditional media to bring it home instead, with an acceptably independent spin. This is a significant development because it extended the antagonistic wartime understanding of information ops–it’s ok to broadcast propaganda over there, but not here–to peacetime.

Now, due primarily to the internet, it’s nearly impossible to separate foreign and domestic dissemination.  If the old Smith-Mundt bill was paranoid in its apparent fear of government leaflet operations over Peoria, the repeal provisions now before the House seem to have a paranoid belief that Al Jazeera’s presence in domestic markets will make Americans unduly skeptical of our current mideast policy of promiscuous military intervention. So why not repeal an ineffective law?

Because this is all about wartime messaging. Repealing portions of the law would only give more cover to the military for violating the spirit of the law, which they already do in several ways. It was revealed earlier this year that the military was engaged in creating armies of social media “sock puppets” to drum up support for its policies. When two USA Today staffers started to look into the propaganda contracting, they found themselves on the receiving end of it.  And the sock puppets are just the automated version of their earlier talking heads.  That is, the Pentagon’s military analysts program, which provided VIP trips to Guantanamo and other perks for retired military officers who would then appear on cable news and reliably tout DoD talking points.

Consistent messaging and a complacent public are enormously important to the war managers at the Pentagon. Not to get all Alex Jones-y, but my favorite example thereof is this lovely white paper from 1980 on Mindwar–”The Psychology of Victory”–co-written by Fox News military analyst Paul Vallely and avowed satanist Michael Aquino. (You’re not allowed to ask if there’s anything wrong with a satanist writing policy briefs on U.S. military information policy, by the way. Aquino dismisses earlier objections as an “absurdly comic opera.”) Nearly every sentence reads like an unholy hate-child of Orwell, Machiavelli, and Freud, but here’s the most relevant:

MindWar must target all participants if it is to be effective. It must not only weaken the enemy; it must strengthen the United States. It strengthens the United States by denying enemy propaganda access to our people, and by explaining and emphasizing to our people the rationale for our national interest in a specific war. 

Under existing United States Law, PSYOP units may not target American citizens. That prohibition is based upon the presumption that “propaganda” is necessarily a lie or at least a misleading half-truth, and that the government has no right to lie to the people. The Propaganda Ministry of Goebbels must not be a part of the American way of life.

Quite right, and so it must be axiomatic of MindWar that it always speaks the truth. Its power lies in its ability to focus recipients’ attention on the truth of the future as well as that of the present. MindWar thus involves the stated promise of the truth that the United States has resolved to make real if it is not already so.

Yet, based on its own actions, the military has already claimed the prerogative to determine that truth, and suppressed two journalists’ ability to contradict it. So why give them even more license to turn the bullhorn on us? (1 image)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com