[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Question to the Forum: When the SHTF, are You Prepared?

Romans chapter thirteenBy Adam Clarke 1731

"The Federalist Papers"

Our Enemies, the Saudis They’re invading Yemen to empower Al Qaeda

Putin says US helped North Caucasus separatists against Russia in the 2000s

Who Really Controls the World?

Non-Voting as an Act of Secession

State Says Bakers Should Pay $135,000 for Refusing to Bake Cake for Same-Sex Wedding

The Ted Cruz Blimp, Coming to a Sky Near You! (Ron Paul 2008, ripoff)

America's Soft Police State

"F*ck This Court": Woman Who Took AK-47 To Jailbreak Pens Epic Rant Against Judge

Frenzied Negros Smashing Police Cars In Baltimore

Hillary Clinton Is Corrupt And 100% Pure Evil

Education Secretary: Parents Who Opt Out Of Common Core are Racist – “Feds Will Step In” If Opt Out Continues…

Google Executive Identified in Deadly Mount Everest Avalanche

A-10 Warthog "Treason" Comments Cost Air Force General His Job

Brutal Antagonistic Cop Assaults Woman Just Innocently Trying to Exercise her Constitutional Rights

Iowa Faith and Freedom Coalition Summit - C-SPAN live

Marijuana Is Not, Repeat Not, a Gateway Drug

Cops Kill Man for Refusing to ID as He Dropped Off Stray Cat to Animal Shelter, Police Remain Silent

Lindsey Graham’s “All-Jewish Cabinet”

New York City buses must show 'killing Jews' ad, judge rules

As contributions fall, House GOP rebels blame party leaders

Say Yes to Ice Cream-Flavored Beer (Neo-Prohibitionists Say "No")

Bruce Jenner Blasted Online After Coming Out As a Republican: ‘Personally, I Am Disgusted’

Restoring the 10th Amendment

Cops Not Only Covered Up 15-Year Old Expolorer Scout Molested by Police, They Encouraged It

Ron Paul: Obama 'literally assassinated' Americans in airstrikes

Government Schooling in a Nutshell

Debian 8.0 'Jessie' is out and even Microsoft is celebrating

Ohio: 26 people suspected of having botulism; 27th confirmed

Cupcake Jones Supports the faggot agenda. Gets Go Fund Me Campaign Shut down

Obamatrade: A gift for Sharia regimes

Tesla wants to power your home with a battery

DrugFacts: Marijuana

Open Borders

The Monsanto overtake of the market

Should You Follow The (Copernican) Principle?

'Straight Pride' Posters Appear On Ohio's Youngstown State University Campus (removed)

Hillary Furious as Thousands of Americans Send Cigars to Her Office

A US Government Agency Quietly Acknowledged That Marijuana May Help Fight Brain Tumors

From the Archives Elvis Covers AC/DC's 'Whole Lot of Rosie'

Gaddafi’s Revenge: Europe Can Save Africans From Drowning—Or Itself From Being Swamped

Why Is Yemen Our War?

The Pitbull Behind the Homosexual Agenda

6th grade students punished for "pantsing"

Liberland: hundreds of thousands apply to live in world's newest 'country

Frat boys spit on wounded vet, urinate on American flag

Cuba has had a lung cancer vaccine for years

Marines practice riot control for future American civil unrest, footage shows troops taking on protesters


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

U.S. Constitution
See other U.S. Constitution Articles

Title: ***BREAKING*** Military Detention Law Blocked by New York Judge (NDAA)
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012- ... blocked-by-new-york-judge.html
Published: May 16, 2012
Author: Bob Van Voris and Patricia Hurtado
Post Date: 2012-05-16 20:01:35 by Capitalist Eric
Keywords: None
Views: 835
Comments: 2

A federal judge temporarily blocked enforcement of a part of the National Defense Authorization Act that opponents claim could subject them to indefinite military detention for activities including news reporting and political activism.

U.S. District Judge Katherine Forrest in Manhattan today ruled in favor of a group of writers and activists who sued President Barack Obama, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and the Defense Department, claiming a provision of the act, signed into law Dec. 31, puts them in fear that they could be arrested and held by U.S. armed forces.

The complaint was filed Jan. 13 by a group including former New York Times reporter Christopher Hedges. The plaintiffs contend a section of the law allows for detention of citizens and permanent residents taken into custody in the U.S. on “suspicion of providing substantial support” to people engaged in hostilities against the U.S., such as al-Qaeda.

“The statute at issue places the public at undue risk of having their speech chilled for the purported protection from al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and ‘associated forces’ - i.e., ‘foreign terrorist organizations,’” Forrest said in an opinion today. “The vagueness of Section 1021 does not allow the average citizen, or even the government itself, to understand with the type of definiteness to which our citizens are entitled, or what conduct comes within its scope.”

Enforcement Blocked Forrest’s order prevents enforcement of the provision of the statute pending further order of the court or an amendment to the statute by Congress.

Ellen Davis, a spokeswoman for U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara in Manhattan, declined to comment on the ruling.

The plaintiffs claim Section 1021 is vague and can be read to authorize their detention based on speech and associations that are protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution.

Hedges and two other plaintiffs testified in a hearing before Forrest in March, the judge said. A fourth plaintiff submitted a sworn declaration. The government put on no evidence, Forrest said.

Forrest, an Obama appointee who has served on the Manhattan federal court since October, rejected the government’s arguments that the plaintiffs lacked standing to sue over the law and that it merely reaffirmed provisions in an earlier law, the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force, which was passed in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

Plaintiffs’ Activities In her opinion, Forrest said the government declined to say that the activities of Hedges and the other defendants don’t fall under the provision. Forrest held a hearing in March at which government lawyers didn’t call any witnesses or present evidence, according to the judge. The government did cross- examine the plaintiffs who testified and submitted legal arguments.

“The government was given a number of opportunities at the hearing and in its briefs to state unambiguously that the type of expressive and associational activities engaged in by plaintiffs -- or others -- are not within Section 1021,” Forrest said. “It did not. This court therefore must credit the chilling impact on First Amendment rights as reasonable -- and real.”

Hedges, who testified he has been a foreign news correspondent for 20 years, said he has reported on 17 groups that are on a State Department list of terrorist groups. Hedges testified that after the law was passed, he changed his dealings with groups he had reported on, Forrest said.

“I think the ruling was not only correct, but courageous and important,” Hedges said in a telephone interview today.

The case is Hedges v. Obama, 12-CV-00331, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan).

To contact the reporters on this story: Bob Van Voris in Manhattan federal court at rvanvoris@bloomberg.net; Patricia Hurtado in Manhattan federal court at phurtado@bloomberg.net.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Capitalist Eric (#0)

U.S. District Judge Katherine Forrest in Manhattan today ruled in favor of a group of writers and activists who sued President Barack Obama, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and the Defense Department, claiming a provision of the act, signed into law Dec. 31, puts them in fear that they could be arrested and held by U.S. armed forces.

But the REAL issue is with a CONGRESS that presented the legislation for enactment.

Doesn't anyone here realize that a STUPID, BUNGLING PRESIDENT didn't make this SHIT up? It was all CONGRESS.

buckeroo  posted on  2012-05-16   20:13:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Capitalist Eric (#0)

news.yahoo.com/federal-ju...-amendment-233222966.html

Same story but with a few more details from the judge, etc.

SJN  posted on  2012-05-17   11:06:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com