[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Hey - Precious Metals - What's Happening?

Russia outraged by Poland's removal of Soviet war memorial

Greeks vote for 'destiny' in poll putting euro future in doubt

Five myths about the Founding Fathers

Illegal Aliens Disrupt Ann Coulter Book Signing, Author Fires Back

Tancredo: Independence Day, Time to Think Radical Thoughts

Anti-police brutality activists are “cultural brothers and sisters of that maniac racist murder in Charleston”

Red Lane: Merle Haggard Songwriter Dies At ‘Age 76′

Sorry, Donald Trump Has A Point

TRUMP HAMMERS RUBIO: ‘ZERO CREDIBILITY,’ ‘OUTRIGHT LIES’ TO SELL AMNESTY

GAME ON: TRUMP RESPONDS TO JEB

Cliven Bundy says Rand Paul promised to make Nevada a ‘sovereign state’ if he’s elected president

Bosnia: The cradle of modern jihadism? (The BBC kind of admits the Serbs were right)

Trump comes up top in 'poll of polls' of Republican voters - despite growing backlash over his anti-immigrant comments 'Poll of polls' shows Trump ahead of front-runner Jeb Bush

The Crossing (Best movie made of the Revolutionary War)

Sling TV

ISIS makes the British lion a declawed and shabby cat

At Age 3 — Transitioning From Jack To Jackie

Pilot Recounts Tales of SR-71 Blackbird

Texas wants its gold back inside the state's borders

RINO'S JOIN IN ATTACKING DONALD TRUMP OVER IMMIGRATION COMMENTS: ‘A SEVERE ERROR’

Trump calls out Rubio for being 'weak' on immigration, praises Cruz

TRUMP HAMMERS RUBIO: ‘ZERO CREDIBILITY,’ ‘OUTRIGHT LIES’ TO SELL AMNESTY

Patriotic 4th of July Song

Matt Stonie tops Joey Chestnut in hot dog eating contest

Donald Trump is on an absolute roll after wild week filled with Twitter fights and heated debates about rape

See how ABC honors America

Rep. Peter King won't run for GOP presidential nomination

Gay Friendly San Francisco Sheriff’s Department Releases An Illegal Mexican Repeat Felon Who Goes Out And Murders An Innocent American Girl

Police Celebrate 4th Of July With Nationwide No Refusal Checkpoints and Forced Blood Draws

Islamic State claims it fired rockets from Egypt's Sinai at Israel

H8 Wins: Business Insider Senior Political Reporter: ‘Cheer’ Gay Marriage or ‘Go F*ck ‘ Yourself

Pound Sand, Your Honor! More Americans Want States to Ignore Federal Courts

Greek banks prepare plan to raid deposits to avert collapse

The Fourth and Romans 13

Google Photos Mislabels 2 Black Americans as Gorillas

Donald Trump again lambastes border security after a California woman is killed by 5 Time Illegal Alien Deportee from Mexico

Pentagon Urged To Boot Chaplains Who Oppose 'Gay' Marriage

Prof. to student: Remove Christian references or fail

A Conservative Firebrand From The Start, Ted Cruz Always Had A Plan

Oops -- Trump Is Right

Greek banks down to €500m in cash reserves as economy crashes

Bubba Watson to paint over Confederate flag on General Lee

Accused San Francisco Pier Shooter Should Have Been Deported: Immigration Officials

State Silences Bakers Who Refused to Make Cake for Lesbian Couple, Fines Them $135K

Reasonble Christian WomanTelling It LIke It Is

Cop Kills Man with Patrol Car While Speeding & Looking at Laptop, Flexes Blue Privilege – No Charges

Obama to meet with leader of Vietnam’s Communist Party at the White House

Report: FBI Agents Telling Friends & Family to ‘Avoid July 4 Celebrations’

Court Tosses Truck Owner’s Parking Citation Because Of A Missing Comma


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

U.S. Constitution
See other U.S. Constitution Articles

Title: ***BREAKING*** Military Detention Law Blocked by New York Judge (NDAA)
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012- ... blocked-by-new-york-judge.html
Published: May 16, 2012
Author: Bob Van Voris and Patricia Hurtado
Post Date: 2012-05-16 20:01:35 by Capitalist Eric
Keywords: None
Views: 1019
Comments: 2

A federal judge temporarily blocked enforcement of a part of the National Defense Authorization Act that opponents claim could subject them to indefinite military detention for activities including news reporting and political activism.

U.S. District Judge Katherine Forrest in Manhattan today ruled in favor of a group of writers and activists who sued President Barack Obama, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and the Defense Department, claiming a provision of the act, signed into law Dec. 31, puts them in fear that they could be arrested and held by U.S. armed forces.

The complaint was filed Jan. 13 by a group including former New York Times reporter Christopher Hedges. The plaintiffs contend a section of the law allows for detention of citizens and permanent residents taken into custody in the U.S. on “suspicion of providing substantial support” to people engaged in hostilities against the U.S., such as al-Qaeda.

“The statute at issue places the public at undue risk of having their speech chilled for the purported protection from al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and ‘associated forces’ - i.e., ‘foreign terrorist organizations,’” Forrest said in an opinion today. “The vagueness of Section 1021 does not allow the average citizen, or even the government itself, to understand with the type of definiteness to which our citizens are entitled, or what conduct comes within its scope.”

Enforcement Blocked Forrest’s order prevents enforcement of the provision of the statute pending further order of the court or an amendment to the statute by Congress.

Ellen Davis, a spokeswoman for U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara in Manhattan, declined to comment on the ruling.

The plaintiffs claim Section 1021 is vague and can be read to authorize their detention based on speech and associations that are protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution.

Hedges and two other plaintiffs testified in a hearing before Forrest in March, the judge said. A fourth plaintiff submitted a sworn declaration. The government put on no evidence, Forrest said.

Forrest, an Obama appointee who has served on the Manhattan federal court since October, rejected the government’s arguments that the plaintiffs lacked standing to sue over the law and that it merely reaffirmed provisions in an earlier law, the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force, which was passed in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

Plaintiffs’ Activities In her opinion, Forrest said the government declined to say that the activities of Hedges and the other defendants don’t fall under the provision. Forrest held a hearing in March at which government lawyers didn’t call any witnesses or present evidence, according to the judge. The government did cross- examine the plaintiffs who testified and submitted legal arguments.

“The government was given a number of opportunities at the hearing and in its briefs to state unambiguously that the type of expressive and associational activities engaged in by plaintiffs -- or others -- are not within Section 1021,” Forrest said. “It did not. This court therefore must credit the chilling impact on First Amendment rights as reasonable -- and real.”

Hedges, who testified he has been a foreign news correspondent for 20 years, said he has reported on 17 groups that are on a State Department list of terrorist groups. Hedges testified that after the law was passed, he changed his dealings with groups he had reported on, Forrest said.

“I think the ruling was not only correct, but courageous and important,” Hedges said in a telephone interview today.

The case is Hedges v. Obama, 12-CV-00331, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan).

To contact the reporters on this story: Bob Van Voris in Manhattan federal court at rvanvoris@bloomberg.net; Patricia Hurtado in Manhattan federal court at phurtado@bloomberg.net.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Capitalist Eric (#0)

U.S. District Judge Katherine Forrest in Manhattan today ruled in favor of a group of writers and activists who sued President Barack Obama, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and the Defense Department, claiming a provision of the act, signed into law Dec. 31, puts them in fear that they could be arrested and held by U.S. armed forces.

But the REAL issue is with a CONGRESS that presented the legislation for enactment.

Doesn't anyone here realize that a STUPID, BUNGLING PRESIDENT didn't make this SHIT up? It was all CONGRESS.

buckeroo  posted on  2012-05-16   20:13:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Capitalist Eric (#0)

news.yahoo.com/federal-ju...-amendment-233222966.html

Same story but with a few more details from the judge, etc.

SJN  posted on  2012-05-17   11:06:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com