[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

This is what happens when the police wait too long before shooting

WikiLeaks Bombshell: Hillary’s Brain Injury Caused By ‘Near Fatal Plane Crash’

Trump calls for police to take (confiscate) guns during stop-and-frisks

Obama Pursues World Government in Final United Nations Speech: “Call To End National Sovereignty”

Hillary Clinton has a meltdown

Boehner’s GOP replacement slurs veterans as ‘moochers’ and ‘pretenders’ for seeking VA care

Obama’s Muslim Convert CIA Director Admits to Supporting Communist Party

The Next (and Last) Battle

“Somebody’s Gotta Do It”

A ferocious assault on Aleppo suggests the U.S. may be wrong on SyriaA ferocious assault on Aleppo suggests the U.S. may be wrong on Syria

Ted Cruz endorses Donald Trump

How Trigger Happy Cops React to Tinted Windows — In a Police State

Monday Night Debate

Three foods that were discontinued that never should have been

Breakthrough Study Explains Why We Arrest Moms for Putting Kids in Nearly Non-Existent 'Danger'

Before Forfeiture Is Finalized, Sheriff Racks Up 54k Miles On Seized Vehicle, Sells It To Private Buyer

How Trump Wins The Debate: All He Has To Do Is Beat The Point Spread

Deranged psycho-killers in the woods

“Big Second Amendment Guy” Donald Trump Wants Police to Take Away More Guns

War clouds are gathering. A hard rain is soon going to fall.

Fox News Latino: Ted Cruz warming up to Donald Trump

US Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) on RP Liberty Report

12-Year-Old Suspended for a Year After Turning in Knife He Found—It Wasn't Even His

US companies are hoarding $2.5 trillion in cash overseas

Who are America's 'super' gun-owners?

Don't freak out, but your Horoscope sign has probably changed

Scientists tell Donald Trump: Climate change is real

The DEA’s Own Website Proves the War on Drugs Is an Epic Failure

Video Released Showing Police Kill Innocent Unarmed Father With His Hands Up

Cops Steal Man’s Phone, Accidentally Record Themselves Conspiring to Falsely Charge Him

7 Reasons the Government Must Stop Little Free Libraries for the Sake of the Nation

Ohio Man Arrested for Mocking Cops Files First Amendment Lawsuit

The CIA’s Operation ‘Midnight Climax’ Was Exactly What It Sounded Like

Trump: I might vote for Clinton too if I were Bush

The internet belongs to the world, not to Ted Cruz

‘We Out Like The Taliban!’ Charlotte Citizens Riot After Police Shooting

Wards of the Nanny State: Protecting America’s Children from Police State Goons, Bureaucratic Idiots and Mercenary Creeps

Obama Used His Final UN Address To Promote A ‘Liberal World Order’ And A Palestinian State

Charlotte police shooting: Protests erupt after officer kills man

We Are Headed For War

Which Major Party Presidential Candidate Blamed Free Speech for Terrorism Today?

Server Outage Today

Trump & the Press—A Death Struggle

Christian fundamentalist schools ‘performed exorcisms on children and beat pupils in religious rituals’

Marijuana Missionaries: First Cannabis Church Rolls Into Michigan

San Francisco State To Launch Afro-Themed Dorm Floors

George H.W. Bush to vote for Hillary

George H.W. Bush to vote for Hillary

Al "I invented the Internet" Gore to the Rescue

He's back with a new ad - Jeb! 2016


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

U.S. Constitution
See other U.S. Constitution Articles

Title: ***BREAKING*** Military Detention Law Blocked by New York Judge (NDAA)
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012- ... blocked-by-new-york-judge.html
Published: May 16, 2012
Author: Bob Van Voris and Patricia Hurtado
Post Date: 2012-05-16 20:01:35 by Capitalist Eric
Keywords: None
Views: 1456
Comments: 2

A federal judge temporarily blocked enforcement of a part of the National Defense Authorization Act that opponents claim could subject them to indefinite military detention for activities including news reporting and political activism.

U.S. District Judge Katherine Forrest in Manhattan today ruled in favor of a group of writers and activists who sued President Barack Obama, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and the Defense Department, claiming a provision of the act, signed into law Dec. 31, puts them in fear that they could be arrested and held by U.S. armed forces.

The complaint was filed Jan. 13 by a group including former New York Times reporter Christopher Hedges. The plaintiffs contend a section of the law allows for detention of citizens and permanent residents taken into custody in the U.S. on “suspicion of providing substantial support” to people engaged in hostilities against the U.S., such as al-Qaeda.

“The statute at issue places the public at undue risk of having their speech chilled for the purported protection from al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and ‘associated forces’ - i.e., ‘foreign terrorist organizations,’” Forrest said in an opinion today. “The vagueness of Section 1021 does not allow the average citizen, or even the government itself, to understand with the type of definiteness to which our citizens are entitled, or what conduct comes within its scope.”

Enforcement Blocked Forrest’s order prevents enforcement of the provision of the statute pending further order of the court or an amendment to the statute by Congress.

Ellen Davis, a spokeswoman for U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara in Manhattan, declined to comment on the ruling.

The plaintiffs claim Section 1021 is vague and can be read to authorize their detention based on speech and associations that are protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution.

Hedges and two other plaintiffs testified in a hearing before Forrest in March, the judge said. A fourth plaintiff submitted a sworn declaration. The government put on no evidence, Forrest said.

Forrest, an Obama appointee who has served on the Manhattan federal court since October, rejected the government’s arguments that the plaintiffs lacked standing to sue over the law and that it merely reaffirmed provisions in an earlier law, the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force, which was passed in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

Plaintiffs’ Activities In her opinion, Forrest said the government declined to say that the activities of Hedges and the other defendants don’t fall under the provision. Forrest held a hearing in March at which government lawyers didn’t call any witnesses or present evidence, according to the judge. The government did cross- examine the plaintiffs who testified and submitted legal arguments.

“The government was given a number of opportunities at the hearing and in its briefs to state unambiguously that the type of expressive and associational activities engaged in by plaintiffs -- or others -- are not within Section 1021,” Forrest said. “It did not. This court therefore must credit the chilling impact on First Amendment rights as reasonable -- and real.”

Hedges, who testified he has been a foreign news correspondent for 20 years, said he has reported on 17 groups that are on a State Department list of terrorist groups. Hedges testified that after the law was passed, he changed his dealings with groups he had reported on, Forrest said.

“I think the ruling was not only correct, but courageous and important,” Hedges said in a telephone interview today.

The case is Hedges v. Obama, 12-CV-00331, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan).

To contact the reporters on this story: Bob Van Voris in Manhattan federal court at rvanvoris@bloomberg.net; Patricia Hurtado in Manhattan federal court at phurtado@bloomberg.net.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Capitalist Eric (#0)

U.S. District Judge Katherine Forrest in Manhattan today ruled in favor of a group of writers and activists who sued President Barack Obama, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and the Defense Department, claiming a provision of the act, signed into law Dec. 31, puts them in fear that they could be arrested and held by U.S. armed forces.

But the REAL issue is with a CONGRESS that presented the legislation for enactment.

Doesn't anyone here realize that a STUPID, BUNGLING PRESIDENT didn't make this SHIT up? It was all CONGRESS.

buckeroo  posted on  2012-05-16   20:13:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Capitalist Eric (#0)

news.yahoo.com/federal-ju...-amendment-233222966.html

Same story but with a few more details from the judge, etc.

SJN  posted on  2012-05-17   11:06:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com