[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Think You Are Too Old to Fight ?

Dumbass Muzzie Father Who Claimed Trump Should Read the Constitution Should Read it Himself

BREAKING: Convoys Of Berserk Muslims Headed Against US Air Force Base In Turkey

John Hinckley, Who Tried To Kill A President (Reagan), Wins His Freedom

Her Majesty is on stage

Bye Bye Middle Class: The Rate Of Homeownership In The United States Has Hit The Lowest Level Ever

The Sorry State of Marylin Mosby

Marine Gen. John Allen has endorsed Hillary Clinton for president. Here's why that matters

US Silent as Major Ally Begins Campaign of Murdering Drug Users — Executing 11 People a Day

Cops Mistake Krispy Kreme Donuts for Meth, Throw Innocent 64-yo Man in Jail, Strip Search Him

7 Ways That People Died Trying To Become Immortal

Cops Ignore Dispatch Calls for REAL Crimes to Unlawfully Hold Innocent People at Gunpoint

SWAT Team Given ‘Medal of Valor’ for Killing 107-yo Man — Refuse Town’s Order to Give it Back

Clinton Over the Hump, and Trump Gets a Bump

Bleeding Syria, Meet Bleeding Kansas

Deutsche Bank Profit Plunges 98 Percent As The Outlook For ‘The World’s Riskiest Bank’ Darkens

The real war on drugs

this election - every election ... is about who will have the power to shape our children --- for the next four - eight years of their lives.”

Breaking News: Bikers for Hillary are on their way to Philly

Refugee rapes 79yo woman at German cemetery

Daily Caller News Foundation EXCLUSIVE: IRS Launches Investigation Of Clinton Foundation

Do You Know Why I’m Pulling You Over, Being Wildly Aggressive, And Charging You With Assault Today, Sir?

3D Printed and Homemade “Ghost Guns” Must Now Be Registered in California

First Poll to Show Majority Support by Republicans for Full Marijuana Legalization

Cop Who Killed His Own Son By Leaving Him in a Hot Car All Day, Not Charged — Because He’s a Cop

WashPost Editor Warns Vast Conspiracy: Avoid Talk of Bill’s ‘Libertine Tendencies’

You’re Likely Committing a Crime Right Now

Stop Drinking the Kool-Aid, America: Political Fiction in an Age of Televised Lies

Assassination of Gandhi ... The Facts - Behind

'You Christians, you kill us': Nun reveals words of ISIS knifemen who forced elderly priest, 84, to kneel at altar as they slit his throat on camera after invading Mass

LIVE: DNC Protest in Philadelphia

White people ordered to the back at DNC

Anthony Weiner and Trumps take swipes at each other

America's Largest Shotgun Maker Shifts More Jobs to Texas

#DNCLeaks: Will Putin Get a Pulitzer?

People Spend As Much On Legal Weed As They Do On Alcohol

Anybody watching the Demoncrap Convention ?

France church attack: Priest killed in hostage-taking near Rouen

German MP Critical of Police for Killing Crazed, Axe-Wielding Jihadist

calling all beer lovers

30 Seconds To Midnight

America Needs a Good, Old-Fashioned Economic Depression

Even Bernie Sanders supporters want Hillary Clinton behind bars

RealClearPolitics has Trump up by 0.2%

Cop Pulls Gun on Jack in the Box Employee for Not Making his Burger Fast Enough

Fort Myers Nightclub Shooting: 2 Dead, at Least 14 Others Reportedly Wounded

The Law Of Cosmic Imperative

Clinton Foundation is Robin Hood in Reverse

Leaked Emails Show DNC Officials Planned Anti-Trump Protests

BREAKING NEWS: Democrat chairwoman RESIGNS hours before Clinton convention. Email hack revealing how party conspired against Sanders forces Debbie Wasserman Schultz to quit


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

U.S. Constitution
See other U.S. Constitution Articles

Title: ***BREAKING*** Military Detention Law Blocked by New York Judge (NDAA)
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012- ... blocked-by-new-york-judge.html
Published: May 16, 2012
Author: Bob Van Voris and Patricia Hurtado
Post Date: 2012-05-16 20:01:35 by Capitalist Eric
Keywords: None
Views: 1424
Comments: 2

A federal judge temporarily blocked enforcement of a part of the National Defense Authorization Act that opponents claim could subject them to indefinite military detention for activities including news reporting and political activism.

U.S. District Judge Katherine Forrest in Manhattan today ruled in favor of a group of writers and activists who sued President Barack Obama, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and the Defense Department, claiming a provision of the act, signed into law Dec. 31, puts them in fear that they could be arrested and held by U.S. armed forces.

The complaint was filed Jan. 13 by a group including former New York Times reporter Christopher Hedges. The plaintiffs contend a section of the law allows for detention of citizens and permanent residents taken into custody in the U.S. on “suspicion of providing substantial support” to people engaged in hostilities against the U.S., such as al-Qaeda.

“The statute at issue places the public at undue risk of having their speech chilled for the purported protection from al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and ‘associated forces’ - i.e., ‘foreign terrorist organizations,’” Forrest said in an opinion today. “The vagueness of Section 1021 does not allow the average citizen, or even the government itself, to understand with the type of definiteness to which our citizens are entitled, or what conduct comes within its scope.”

Enforcement Blocked Forrest’s order prevents enforcement of the provision of the statute pending further order of the court or an amendment to the statute by Congress.

Ellen Davis, a spokeswoman for U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara in Manhattan, declined to comment on the ruling.

The plaintiffs claim Section 1021 is vague and can be read to authorize their detention based on speech and associations that are protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution.

Hedges and two other plaintiffs testified in a hearing before Forrest in March, the judge said. A fourth plaintiff submitted a sworn declaration. The government put on no evidence, Forrest said.

Forrest, an Obama appointee who has served on the Manhattan federal court since October, rejected the government’s arguments that the plaintiffs lacked standing to sue over the law and that it merely reaffirmed provisions in an earlier law, the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force, which was passed in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

Plaintiffs’ Activities In her opinion, Forrest said the government declined to say that the activities of Hedges and the other defendants don’t fall under the provision. Forrest held a hearing in March at which government lawyers didn’t call any witnesses or present evidence, according to the judge. The government did cross- examine the plaintiffs who testified and submitted legal arguments.

“The government was given a number of opportunities at the hearing and in its briefs to state unambiguously that the type of expressive and associational activities engaged in by plaintiffs -- or others -- are not within Section 1021,” Forrest said. “It did not. This court therefore must credit the chilling impact on First Amendment rights as reasonable -- and real.”

Hedges, who testified he has been a foreign news correspondent for 20 years, said he has reported on 17 groups that are on a State Department list of terrorist groups. Hedges testified that after the law was passed, he changed his dealings with groups he had reported on, Forrest said.

“I think the ruling was not only correct, but courageous and important,” Hedges said in a telephone interview today.

The case is Hedges v. Obama, 12-CV-00331, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan).

To contact the reporters on this story: Bob Van Voris in Manhattan federal court at rvanvoris@bloomberg.net; Patricia Hurtado in Manhattan federal court at phurtado@bloomberg.net.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Capitalist Eric (#0)

U.S. District Judge Katherine Forrest in Manhattan today ruled in favor of a group of writers and activists who sued President Barack Obama, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and the Defense Department, claiming a provision of the act, signed into law Dec. 31, puts them in fear that they could be arrested and held by U.S. armed forces.

But the REAL issue is with a CONGRESS that presented the legislation for enactment.

Doesn't anyone here realize that a STUPID, BUNGLING PRESIDENT didn't make this SHIT up? It was all CONGRESS.

buckeroo  posted on  2012-05-16   20:13:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Capitalist Eric (#0)

news.yahoo.com/federal-ju...-amendment-233222966.html

Same story but with a few more details from the judge, etc.

SJN  posted on  2012-05-17   11:06:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com