[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Who Is Our Real Ally Against Terror: Erdogan, Who Helps Islamists, Or Putin, Who Bombs Them?

Annotated 'Mein Kampf' goes on sale in Germany next month

Shock: GOP establishment considering DRASTIC move if Trump’s the nominee

High military court will hear case of Marine punished for displaying Bible verse

Targeting racist trolls by putting their comments on local billboards

Falls police said man who overdosed left 5-year-old unattended in restaurant

No charges after US boy, 13, shot dead for stealing

Question: What is Medicare?

Ghost Ships full of decomposed bodies found near Japan

Little harem boys in Afghanistan ... They are objects-—dependents—socialistic for life ---It would be a miracle to change their embedded worldview.

Report: Father of 4 paralyzed in I-85 rest area shooting

Bracken: Tet, Take Two – Islam’s 2016 European Offensive

The fiddling with temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever

The War on Terror is Creating More Terror

The NSA Will Stop Collecting Your Phone Metadata Tonight! (White House claims "a less invasive process")

Hypersonic rocket engine could revolutionize space flight

Russian Authorities Call Soros Foundation Threat to Russian “National Security”–When Will Europe And The US Catch On?

Syrian Turkmen commander who 'killed' Russian pilot turns out to be Turkish ultranationalist

Teen who was allergic to WiFi commits suicide

Witness the Carbon Footprint of This Fully Armed and Operational Climate Summit

Upstream: A Genetically Modified Story

The Irrelevant Majority - When The Minority Rule The World

ISIS Oil - The Root Of The Turkey/Russia Crisis

The fiddling with temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever

Skeptical Climate Documentary Set to Rock UN Climate Summit – ‘Climate Hustle’ To Have Red Carpet Premiere in Paris

Businessman Buys 400 American Soldiers Meals During Airport Layover

It’s Official: Ground Zero Mosque Defeated!

Anyone ever prime a car with Rustoleum "Paint and Primer in One" spray cans?

Physicians Urged To Ask Patients About Gun Ownership During Office Health Histories

McCain: Trump’s Rhetoric Turning Muslims Against the U.S.

39 DIFFERENT THINGS: That Automatically Make You A Racist

For our safety, our future: Chris Christie for President - NH Union Leader endorsement (Hillary)

Obama’s Legacy at Stake in Paris Talks on Climate Accord

Progressive heads exploding over gay marriage ban on tribal lands

From penguins to Pope's shoes, climate rallies pressure U.N. summit

Demolition Has Begun on Soviet-Era Building Built on Site of Kremlin Monasteries

What We Know About The Alleged Planned Parenthood Shooter

GOP brought this plague on itself

Quack, Quack, QUACK!

Wake judge rules against teen facing off against NC on climate change


Planned Parenthood Shooting Suspect Made Comment About 'No More Baby Parts'

Team Carson Refutes False Anti-Trump Rove Narrative

5 Devastating Facts About Black-on-Black Crime

I already TOLD you - we are having turkey...


Missouri Dad Drags Teen Daughter from School, Beats Her in Parking Lot for Not Wearing Hijab

Police searching for hooded man over Finsbury Park mosque arson attack

Ex-envoy: Obama brought 'radical Muslim values' into White House

Karl Rove Opens His Rolodex for Ben Carson

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

U.S. Constitution
See other U.S. Constitution Articles

Title: ***BREAKING*** Military Detention Law Blocked by New York Judge (NDAA)
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012- ... blocked-by-new-york-judge.html
Published: May 16, 2012
Author: Bob Van Voris and Patricia Hurtado
Post Date: 2012-05-16 20:01:35 by Capitalist Eric
Keywords: None
Views: 1290
Comments: 2

A federal judge temporarily blocked enforcement of a part of the National Defense Authorization Act that opponents claim could subject them to indefinite military detention for activities including news reporting and political activism.

U.S. District Judge Katherine Forrest in Manhattan today ruled in favor of a group of writers and activists who sued President Barack Obama, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and the Defense Department, claiming a provision of the act, signed into law Dec. 31, puts them in fear that they could be arrested and held by U.S. armed forces.

The complaint was filed Jan. 13 by a group including former New York Times reporter Christopher Hedges. The plaintiffs contend a section of the law allows for detention of citizens and permanent residents taken into custody in the U.S. on “suspicion of providing substantial support” to people engaged in hostilities against the U.S., such as al-Qaeda.

“The statute at issue places the public at undue risk of having their speech chilled for the purported protection from al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and ‘associated forces’ - i.e., ‘foreign terrorist organizations,’” Forrest said in an opinion today. “The vagueness of Section 1021 does not allow the average citizen, or even the government itself, to understand with the type of definiteness to which our citizens are entitled, or what conduct comes within its scope.”

Enforcement Blocked Forrest’s order prevents enforcement of the provision of the statute pending further order of the court or an amendment to the statute by Congress.

Ellen Davis, a spokeswoman for U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara in Manhattan, declined to comment on the ruling.

The plaintiffs claim Section 1021 is vague and can be read to authorize their detention based on speech and associations that are protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution.

Hedges and two other plaintiffs testified in a hearing before Forrest in March, the judge said. A fourth plaintiff submitted a sworn declaration. The government put on no evidence, Forrest said.

Forrest, an Obama appointee who has served on the Manhattan federal court since October, rejected the government’s arguments that the plaintiffs lacked standing to sue over the law and that it merely reaffirmed provisions in an earlier law, the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force, which was passed in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

Plaintiffs’ Activities In her opinion, Forrest said the government declined to say that the activities of Hedges and the other defendants don’t fall under the provision. Forrest held a hearing in March at which government lawyers didn’t call any witnesses or present evidence, according to the judge. The government did cross- examine the plaintiffs who testified and submitted legal arguments.

“The government was given a number of opportunities at the hearing and in its briefs to state unambiguously that the type of expressive and associational activities engaged in by plaintiffs -- or others -- are not within Section 1021,” Forrest said. “It did not. This court therefore must credit the chilling impact on First Amendment rights as reasonable -- and real.”

Hedges, who testified he has been a foreign news correspondent for 20 years, said he has reported on 17 groups that are on a State Department list of terrorist groups. Hedges testified that after the law was passed, he changed his dealings with groups he had reported on, Forrest said.

“I think the ruling was not only correct, but courageous and important,” Hedges said in a telephone interview today.

The case is Hedges v. Obama, 12-CV-00331, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan).

To contact the reporters on this story: Bob Van Voris in Manhattan federal court at rvanvoris@bloomberg.net; Patricia Hurtado in Manhattan federal court at phurtado@bloomberg.net.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Capitalist Eric (#0)

U.S. District Judge Katherine Forrest in Manhattan today ruled in favor of a group of writers and activists who sued President Barack Obama, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and the Defense Department, claiming a provision of the act, signed into law Dec. 31, puts them in fear that they could be arrested and held by U.S. armed forces.

But the REAL issue is with a CONGRESS that presented the legislation for enactment.

Doesn't anyone here realize that a STUPID, BUNGLING PRESIDENT didn't make this SHIT up? It was all CONGRESS.

buckeroo  posted on  2012-05-16   20:13:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

#2. To: Capitalist Eric (#0)


Same story but with a few more details from the judge, etc.

SJN  posted on  2012-05-17   11:06:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com