[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Report: Federal Officials Ignore Evidence About Location of Hillary Clinton’s 33,000 Emails

Mike Pence Called Trump ‘My Opponent’ During Interview

WIKILEAKS - Attachment 2 - Background on Teneo and the Foundation Activities (follow the money)

Betting Odds give Hillary 82% chance of winning

Rigging the Election - Video IV: $20K Wire Transfer From Belize Returned

GOP Accuses State Dept. of 'Cover-Up' to Protect Hillary Clinton Over Emails

WIKILEAKS - Re: HRC and the email flap - There Is Just No Good Answer [Ann Marie Slaughter] - "Honestly, OTR, EVERYONE I knew at State used our private email"

Does justice just stop dead with a corrupt FBI and JustUs Dept?

WIKILEAKS - A Shocking Conflict of Interest? [Paul Ryan]


WIKILEAKS - Arkansas flag and Robert E Lee day

WIKILEAKS - [Brent Budowski] David Brock is a liar which makes his candidate even more distrusted

WIKILEAKS - to John Podesta - "You represent a client that is not honest and is most likely criminal"

Pentagon Demanding Soldiers Return Reenlistment Bonuses

Trump Talks Like a Woman

Rigged elections? GOP does it best.

Redflex CEO Just Given 14 Months In Prison For Bribing Politicians to Extort Citizens with Traffic Cameras

Political Party of Anarchists, Libertarians, Hackers, and Computer Geeks to Likely To Take Power in Iceland

Early Voters From Amarillo Are Saying Their Votes Were Changed On the Ballot

Voters should wake up to the issue of war versus peace.

Election Potpourri

Heather MacDonald on Black Lives Matter: Does The Truth Matter?

FBI No. 2 pressured to resign over McAuliffe donations to wife

WIKILEAKS - [Podesta] How bad is her head? [Huma] She's going to stick to notes a little closer this am, still not perfect in her head.

Exclusive investigation: Donald Trump faces foreign donor fundraising scandal (Jesse Benton, Eric Beach)

Business among Salt Lake City’s homeless: corpses, tents and maybe a store exodus

BOMBSHELL: The same exact day that Cheryl Mills told John Podesta they needed to 'clean up' the email scandal...

WIKILEAKS - Podesta - "Speaking of transparency, our friends Kendall, Cheryl and Phillipe sure weren't forthcoming on the facts here"

WIKILEAKS - "HRC does not want to be in the position of defending ObamaCare during huge premium increases..."

WIKILEAKS - The Executive Order sausage factory

WIKILEAKS - we need to clean this up - he [POTUS] has emails from her - they do not say state.gov

White House dodges on whether Obama will leave country under President Trump

The Trump’s Sex And Cocaine Parties: 5 Fast Facts You Need To Know

Quotes to remember on election day

Trump hosted cocaine-fueled parties with underage girls

Political Conundrums

Obama team kept list of Muslims for top jobs, excluded non-Muslims

'I Want Hillary to Win Badly': Facebook Billionaires Unite to Stop Trump

Early Voting Report: Votes Switched From Trump to Hillary in Texas

comment on “Trump On Miss Universe Pageant Winner.”

Clinton attack featuring Miss Universe was months in the making, email shows (Wikileaks)

WIKILEAKS - [Podesta] they believe the Obama forces flooded the caucuses with ineligible voters. They want to organize lawyers for caucus protection, election protection

WIKILEAKS - [Brent Budowsky] I did not see even one Hillary button or t-shirt from even one student who cared to support the candidate

WIKILEAKS - [atty Erika Rottenberg] none of my friends circle can understand how it was viewed as ok/secure/appropriate to use a private server

Nine bad reasons to vote for Trump

WIKILEAKS: Claire McCaskill: Got some info about the state department IG. You guys should digest and figure out what if anything we can do.

Hillary And The Ducks!

Rigging the Election – Video III: Creamer Confirms Hillary Clinton Involvement

Miley Cyrus: ‘Kiss My Ashtanga Ass if You Aren’t Voting for Hillary’

Migrant foster mum reveals her horror at discovering ’12-year-old refugee’ in her care is actually a 21-year-old Jihadi

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

See other Opinions/Editorials Articles

Title: Buchanan: A Decade Of War -- For What?
Source: Human Events
URL Source: http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=51281
Published: May 4, 2012
Author: Patrick J Buchanan
Post Date: 2012-05-04 12:28:05 by Brian S
Keywords: None
Views: 778
Comments: 2

"My fellow Americans, we have traveled through more than a decade under the dark cloud of war," said Barack Obama from Bagram Air Base.

"Here in the predawn darkness, we can see the light of a new day on the horizon. The Iraq War is over. The number of troops in harm's way has been cut in half, and more will be coming home. ... The time of war began in Afghanistan, and this is where it will end."

Interesting comment, that last.

If "the time of war" is at an end, does that rule out U.S. military action in Syria or war on Iran?

Setting aside the 14,000-mile round trip to Afghanistan to do an end zone dance on the anniversary of Seal Team Six's dispatch of Osama bin Laden, Obama seems to have boxed in his Republican rivals.

His assurance that our wars are ending and our troops are coming home reflects the national will. And his partnership agreement with President Hamid Karzai and pledge that a U.S. force will remain to train the Afghan army and prevent al-Qaida's return inoculates him against the charge that he is cutting and running.

Yet The New York Times was disappointed.

Obama had not said how the United States is to train the Afghan army to defeat the Taliban by 2014, nor how we can get Karzai to deal with the pervasive corruption and incompetence of his government.

Nor did Obama say how we can be certain al-Qaida will not return when we depart.

The Times misses the point.

This speech was not designed to lay out a U.S. strategy for the next 12 years, but to get Barack Obama past the post in November.

And for that objective, the speech works.

No one knows what will happen when 23,000 more U.S. troops come home by Sept. 30, and all combat troops are out in 2014. The odds are that, after a "decent interval," like the one in Vietnam from 1973 to 1975, the Taliban will return to take vengeance on all who abandoned them, and Afghanistan will come again to resemble the land we invaded a decade ago.

Why is this probable?

First, because the Taliban have shown themselves to be, though fewer in number, a superior fighting force to the Afghan army. They have not needed foreigners to motivate, train, advise or lead them.

Nor have they needed foreign money to fight. Yet they have battled the best army in the world for a decade and repeatedly sacrificed their lives in suicide attacks.

How many Afghans on our side have launched suicide attacks?

Second, the Taliban are rooted in the Pashtun, the largest tribal group in Afghanistan, which constitutes half the population and is concentrated in the crucial south and east.

Third, they have a secure sanctuary in Pakistan.

Fourth, because, as we saw with the hysterical reaction to what U.S. troops thought was the routine burning of desecrated Qurans, Islam is the most powerful cultural and social force in the country. And the Taliban are the most deeply rooted in that faith.

Fifth, because nationalism is the most potent political current roiling nations from the Maghreb to Middle East to South Asia. And the Taliban have the causalities and credentials to prove they will fight forever to free their country of foreign influence.

A majority of Afghans surely wish the Taliban would not return, given the savagery of their previous rule and the desire of the Afghan people to be free to live their own lives according to their own interpretation of their faith.

Yet the Taliban have shown themselves willing to persist against huge odds, to fight and die in considerable numbers for the kind of country they wish to live in -- and the kind of regime they wish to live under.

Our allies have not remotely matched their zeal.

"A small body of determined spirits fired by an unquenchable faith in their mission can alter the course of history," said Mohandas Gandhi.

So, after a decade of war in Afghanistan, what have we accomplished, and at what cost? Some 2,000 U.S. dead, 16,000 wounded, hundreds of billions sunk, scores of thousands of Afghan dead. Al-Qaida was driven out a decade ago but is now in Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, North Africa and Iraq.

The Taliban are gone from Kabul but may be coming back. And our hope of preserving what success we have had rests with Hamid Karzai.

"America has no designs beyond an end to al-Qaida safe havens," said Obama in Bagram. "Our goal is not to build a country in America's image, or to eradicate every vestige of the Taliban."

But if those are our goals, had we not achieved them all by early 2002? What, then, were we fighting for -- these 10 years?

If we had to do it all over again, would we?

The nation now seems not to think so. And the nation is right.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Brian S (#0)

But if those are our goals, had we not achieved them all by early 2002? What, then, were we fighting for -- these 10 years?

Paul Craig Roberts explains exactly what we were fighting for.

If we had to do it all over again, would we?

Hell yeah! Republicans and Democrats throughout the District of Criminals made a killing! What's a few thousand dead GI's and hundreds of thousands of "furriners?"

Fibr Dog  posted on  2012-05-04   16:30:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

#2. To: Brian S (#0)

What do you think of Pat Buchanans article.

You being a Buchanan supporter don't you fee like a turn coat supporting Obama and the destruction of our nation?

Buchanan and Obama are light years apart.

A K A Stone  posted on  2012-05-04   21:49:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com