[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Libertarians are Awesome

How the French learned to love their police

Sorry, Gary Johnson: The libertarian movement is fringe and it will remain fringe

Libertarian candidate Feldman’s death leaves world ‘darker place’

Donald Trump: Bill Clinton-Loretta Lynch Secret Meeting Shows ‘Rigged System’

Obama Administration and UN Announce Global Police Force to Fight Extremism In U.S.

Trump hires Rand Paul's former digital director

BREXIT Signals the End of the New World Order

How Brexit Fits Into The New World Order

Transgender People Will Be Allowed to Serve Openly in Military

Legal weed sparks Colorado debate _ why not allow pot clubs?

Jesus Miraculously 'Appearing to Muslims' All Over Middle East

Why Did Bill Clinton And Loretta Lynch Meet On Her Airplane In Phoenix This Week?

Mike Lee Launches Epic Rant Why He Won't Endorse Trump

Say Goodbye to the 50 States, Get Ready for FEMA Regions For the North American Union

School Calls Cops, Cops Call Child Services on Boy Who Made Harmless 'Brownies' Remark

Violent Pro-Trump Neo-Nazis to Crash GOP Convention (non-libertarians for Trump)

Chairman claims Nevada Libertarian Party ‘infested with idiots’

fine deranged logic you got there ... voting for your unviable Paultard choice in anyway --- keeping the Chicago urban zoo animal out of the whitehouse?

The dangers of de-policing — will cops just stand down?

John Stossel pushes Libertarian view on terrorism: Do Nothing !!!

Homicide Rates Jump in Many Major U.S. Cities, New Data Shows

Libertarians for Trump

Cop Accused of Sexually Assaulting a Child Says She Wanted It — “It was Absolutely Consensual”

Media Silent as Secret Service Agent Exposes Clinton White House as Coke Den, Full of Mistresses

Video shows Silver City, State Police ignore DWI investigation of district attorney

Why Radical Libertarians Are the New Communists - A toxic strand of a political ideology

This U.N. official accidentally crushed his own throat right before he was set to testify against Hillary Clinton

SHOCKING POLL: Libertarians are too Stupid to Understand What ‘Libertarian’ Really Means!

Judge tosses Libertarian Frank Tamburri from U.S. Senate ballot

Full Speech: Donald Trump Delivers Economic Policy Speech in Monessen, PA (6-28-16)

Turkey Istanbul: Explosions and gunfire rock Ataturk airport

White House: Benghazi report is political

‘Super Racist’ Water Safety Poster Prompts American Red Cross Apology

Obama Could Be Facing 10 Years To Life In Prison... TALIBAN SWAP RESULTS

Here’s What the Brexit Did to the World’s 400 Richest People

Here’s Why You Shouldn’t Say “Christian Conservative”

FBI Transcript Shows Nobody Died in Orlando Shooting Until SWAT Teams Entered the Building at 5:13 AM

Judge Richard Posner: ‘No value’ in studying the U.S. Constitution

Officials Reveal America’s National Security is “Controlled” by the Jihadists

Our Lost Constitution: The Willful Subversion of America's Founding Document

The Government Made Me a Litterbug

A Libertarian Lexicon

Clinton Removes The Mask—Goes Full Merkel On Immigration

After Brexit, a Trump Path to Victory

Cleveland Is Purposefully Setting the Stage for Mass Protester Violence at the RNC (Westboro Baptist Church, July 20 Perk Plaza)

Liberal Foreign Policy explained

How Liberal Journalists Think

Meet the Liberal Elite!

Wow, Justice Sotomayor Kind of Agrees With Justice Thomas on a Gun Case!


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Opinions/Editorials
See other Opinions/Editorials Articles

Title: Buchanan: A Decade Of War -- For What?
Source: Human Events
URL Source: http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=51281
Published: May 4, 2012
Author: Patrick J Buchanan
Post Date: 2012-05-04 12:28:05 by Brian S
Keywords: None
Views: 750
Comments: 2

"My fellow Americans, we have traveled through more than a decade under the dark cloud of war," said Barack Obama from Bagram Air Base.

"Here in the predawn darkness, we can see the light of a new day on the horizon. The Iraq War is over. The number of troops in harm's way has been cut in half, and more will be coming home. ... The time of war began in Afghanistan, and this is where it will end."

Interesting comment, that last.

If "the time of war" is at an end, does that rule out U.S. military action in Syria or war on Iran?

Setting aside the 14,000-mile round trip to Afghanistan to do an end zone dance on the anniversary of Seal Team Six's dispatch of Osama bin Laden, Obama seems to have boxed in his Republican rivals.

His assurance that our wars are ending and our troops are coming home reflects the national will. And his partnership agreement with President Hamid Karzai and pledge that a U.S. force will remain to train the Afghan army and prevent al-Qaida's return inoculates him against the charge that he is cutting and running.

Yet The New York Times was disappointed.

Obama had not said how the United States is to train the Afghan army to defeat the Taliban by 2014, nor how we can get Karzai to deal with the pervasive corruption and incompetence of his government.

Nor did Obama say how we can be certain al-Qaida will not return when we depart.

The Times misses the point.

This speech was not designed to lay out a U.S. strategy for the next 12 years, but to get Barack Obama past the post in November.

And for that objective, the speech works.

No one knows what will happen when 23,000 more U.S. troops come home by Sept. 30, and all combat troops are out in 2014. The odds are that, after a "decent interval," like the one in Vietnam from 1973 to 1975, the Taliban will return to take vengeance on all who abandoned them, and Afghanistan will come again to resemble the land we invaded a decade ago.

Why is this probable?

First, because the Taliban have shown themselves to be, though fewer in number, a superior fighting force to the Afghan army. They have not needed foreigners to motivate, train, advise or lead them.

Nor have they needed foreign money to fight. Yet they have battled the best army in the world for a decade and repeatedly sacrificed their lives in suicide attacks.

How many Afghans on our side have launched suicide attacks?

Second, the Taliban are rooted in the Pashtun, the largest tribal group in Afghanistan, which constitutes half the population and is concentrated in the crucial south and east.

Third, they have a secure sanctuary in Pakistan.

Fourth, because, as we saw with the hysterical reaction to what U.S. troops thought was the routine burning of desecrated Qurans, Islam is the most powerful cultural and social force in the country. And the Taliban are the most deeply rooted in that faith.

Fifth, because nationalism is the most potent political current roiling nations from the Maghreb to Middle East to South Asia. And the Taliban have the causalities and credentials to prove they will fight forever to free their country of foreign influence.

A majority of Afghans surely wish the Taliban would not return, given the savagery of their previous rule and the desire of the Afghan people to be free to live their own lives according to their own interpretation of their faith.

Yet the Taliban have shown themselves willing to persist against huge odds, to fight and die in considerable numbers for the kind of country they wish to live in -- and the kind of regime they wish to live under.

Our allies have not remotely matched their zeal.

"A small body of determined spirits fired by an unquenchable faith in their mission can alter the course of history," said Mohandas Gandhi.

So, after a decade of war in Afghanistan, what have we accomplished, and at what cost? Some 2,000 U.S. dead, 16,000 wounded, hundreds of billions sunk, scores of thousands of Afghan dead. Al-Qaida was driven out a decade ago but is now in Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, North Africa and Iraq.

The Taliban are gone from Kabul but may be coming back. And our hope of preserving what success we have had rests with Hamid Karzai.

"America has no designs beyond an end to al-Qaida safe havens," said Obama in Bagram. "Our goal is not to build a country in America's image, or to eradicate every vestige of the Taliban."

But if those are our goals, had we not achieved them all by early 2002? What, then, were we fighting for -- these 10 years?

If we had to do it all over again, would we?

The nation now seems not to think so. And the nation is right.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Brian S (#0)

But if those are our goals, had we not achieved them all by early 2002? What, then, were we fighting for -- these 10 years?

Paul Craig Roberts explains exactly what we were fighting for.

If we had to do it all over again, would we?

Hell yeah! Republicans and Democrats throughout the District of Criminals made a killing! What's a few thousand dead GI's and hundreds of thousands of "furriners?"

Fibr Dog  posted on  2012-05-04   16:30:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Brian S (#0)

What do you think of Pat Buchanans article.

You being a Buchanan supporter don't you fee like a turn coat supporting Obama and the destruction of our nation?

Buchanan and Obama are light years apart.

A K A Stone  posted on  2012-05-04   21:49:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com