[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Paul Krugman: Thank Goodness Democrats Don’t Create Cults of Personality Around Undeserving Politicians

Libertarian Youth

Hydrogen fuel cell unit to provide renewable power to Honolulu port

Stephen Colbert Gets Political, Booking Supreme Court Justice, UN Secretary-General, Bernie Sanders

The Fire Rises…Germany Calls for Other EU States To Take in “Refugees”

Kentucky clerk still won't issue same-sex marriage licenses

Atlanta cop critically wounded, a homeowner shot and dog killed in shootout after police 'went to the wrong address to investigate burglary'

If Conservatives think YouÂ’re Liberal and Liberals think YouÂ’re Conservative, You are Doing it Right

Pope tells priests to pardon women who have abortions

Poll: 71% of Americans unhappy with country's direction

Should Libertarians Vote Republican?

Why the Supreme Court is not Supreme

DC District Court Rules Pro-Life Group Cannot Be Mandated To Provide Birth Control

State Department says 150 more Hillary Clinton emails have been 'upgraded' to classified status in the release scheduled for tonigh

Armed Black Panthers to Texas Cops: ‘We Will Start Creeping Up on You in the Darkness’

Can I sue somebody for this?

Economics 102: WalMart Cuts Worker Hours After Hiking Minimum Wages

Ben Carson, Donald Trump at 23% each show “most Iowa Republicans prefer someone without a traditional political pedigree,”

One Question the Media Refuses to Ask Donald Trump

Donald Trump comes to The Barclays and all hell breaks loose

Video Shows UNARMED Man With Hands Up Right Before Cops Shoot and Kill Him

Professors threaten bad grades for saying ‘illegal alien,’ ‘male,’ ‘female’

The TRUMP Fight Song [unofficial] - TRUMP 2016

Donald Trump: U.S. Treats Illegals Better than Vets

Who is Donald Trump and what does he really stand for?

I hope he lives long enough and the trial is open enough so that we know WHY.

Exclusive — ‘Stump for Trump’ Girls: Trump’s ‘Immigration Proposal Is Phenomenal’

The 'Birmingham Koran' fragment that could shake Islam after carbon-dating suggests it is OLDER than the Prophet Muhammad

White House says Mount McKinley to be renamed Denali

On a plate

Injured Man Comes To Jail Lobby Asking Cops For Help, But Deputies Pile On Him and Kill Him Instead

Police Raid Man’s Home WITHOUT A WARRANT After He Criticized Them On Facebook

Rally for state secession falls flat

Confederate flag snapped in two at a high school football game

Police kill bystander when New York undercover gun buy goes bad

Jeb! Libertarian Veins

Donald Trump on George W. Bush's 'best moment'

Christie: Clinton caught lawlessness 'disease' from Obama White House

Democratic primary suddenly seems less certain

Christie: Track immigrants the way FedEx tracks packages

WaPo Fails to Identify ‘Close’ Clinton Adviser Used in Ignatius Column to Clear Hillary in Email Scandal

Ben Carson Edging Close to Front-Runner Trump in Latest Iowa Poll

Bruce Jenner Wants to Meet a Guy Who Treats Him ‘Like a Normal Woman’

A summer of Clinton stumbles gives way to an uncertain fall for Democrats

Spanish-Language Journalists Call Donald Trump ‘Hitler,’ ‘Monkey’

The Case of the MH370 Wing Segment Keeps Getting Weirder

Alex Jones’ Message to Rand Paul (Rant!)

SWAT Team Raids Home, Kills Man Over $2 Worth of Pot – Informant Exposes Police Cover-Up

Cop Slams Mom’s Face to the Ground Over Tinted Plate Cover as She Dropped Her Kids Off at School

Oath Keepers and Tea Partiers want to turn upstate New York into ‘New Amsterdam’


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Opinions/Editorials
See other Opinions/Editorials Articles

Title: Buchanan: A Decade Of War -- For What?
Source: Human Events
URL Source: http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=51281
Published: May 4, 2012
Author: Patrick J Buchanan
Post Date: 2012-05-04 12:28:05 by Brian S
Keywords: None
Views: 608
Comments: 2

"My fellow Americans, we have traveled through more than a decade under the dark cloud of war," said Barack Obama from Bagram Air Base.

"Here in the predawn darkness, we can see the light of a new day on the horizon. The Iraq War is over. The number of troops in harm's way has been cut in half, and more will be coming home. ... The time of war began in Afghanistan, and this is where it will end."

Interesting comment, that last.

If "the time of war" is at an end, does that rule out U.S. military action in Syria or war on Iran?

Setting aside the 14,000-mile round trip to Afghanistan to do an end zone dance on the anniversary of Seal Team Six's dispatch of Osama bin Laden, Obama seems to have boxed in his Republican rivals.

His assurance that our wars are ending and our troops are coming home reflects the national will. And his partnership agreement with President Hamid Karzai and pledge that a U.S. force will remain to train the Afghan army and prevent al-Qaida's return inoculates him against the charge that he is cutting and running.

Yet The New York Times was disappointed.

Obama had not said how the United States is to train the Afghan army to defeat the Taliban by 2014, nor how we can get Karzai to deal with the pervasive corruption and incompetence of his government.

Nor did Obama say how we can be certain al-Qaida will not return when we depart.

The Times misses the point.

This speech was not designed to lay out a U.S. strategy for the next 12 years, but to get Barack Obama past the post in November.

And for that objective, the speech works.

No one knows what will happen when 23,000 more U.S. troops come home by Sept. 30, and all combat troops are out in 2014. The odds are that, after a "decent interval," like the one in Vietnam from 1973 to 1975, the Taliban will return to take vengeance on all who abandoned them, and Afghanistan will come again to resemble the land we invaded a decade ago.

Why is this probable?

First, because the Taliban have shown themselves to be, though fewer in number, a superior fighting force to the Afghan army. They have not needed foreigners to motivate, train, advise or lead them.

Nor have they needed foreign money to fight. Yet they have battled the best army in the world for a decade and repeatedly sacrificed their lives in suicide attacks.

How many Afghans on our side have launched suicide attacks?

Second, the Taliban are rooted in the Pashtun, the largest tribal group in Afghanistan, which constitutes half the population and is concentrated in the crucial south and east.

Third, they have a secure sanctuary in Pakistan.

Fourth, because, as we saw with the hysterical reaction to what U.S. troops thought was the routine burning of desecrated Qurans, Islam is the most powerful cultural and social force in the country. And the Taliban are the most deeply rooted in that faith.

Fifth, because nationalism is the most potent political current roiling nations from the Maghreb to Middle East to South Asia. And the Taliban have the causalities and credentials to prove they will fight forever to free their country of foreign influence.

A majority of Afghans surely wish the Taliban would not return, given the savagery of their previous rule and the desire of the Afghan people to be free to live their own lives according to their own interpretation of their faith.

Yet the Taliban have shown themselves willing to persist against huge odds, to fight and die in considerable numbers for the kind of country they wish to live in -- and the kind of regime they wish to live under.

Our allies have not remotely matched their zeal.

"A small body of determined spirits fired by an unquenchable faith in their mission can alter the course of history," said Mohandas Gandhi.

So, after a decade of war in Afghanistan, what have we accomplished, and at what cost? Some 2,000 U.S. dead, 16,000 wounded, hundreds of billions sunk, scores of thousands of Afghan dead. Al-Qaida was driven out a decade ago but is now in Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, North Africa and Iraq.

The Taliban are gone from Kabul but may be coming back. And our hope of preserving what success we have had rests with Hamid Karzai.

"America has no designs beyond an end to al-Qaida safe havens," said Obama in Bagram. "Our goal is not to build a country in America's image, or to eradicate every vestige of the Taliban."

But if those are our goals, had we not achieved them all by early 2002? What, then, were we fighting for -- these 10 years?

If we had to do it all over again, would we?

The nation now seems not to think so. And the nation is right.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Brian S (#0)

But if those are our goals, had we not achieved them all by early 2002? What, then, were we fighting for -- these 10 years?

Paul Craig Roberts explains exactly what we were fighting for.

If we had to do it all over again, would we?

Hell yeah! Republicans and Democrats throughout the District of Criminals made a killing! What's a few thousand dead GI's and hundreds of thousands of "furriners?"

Fibr Dog  posted on  2012-05-04   16:30:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Brian S (#0)

What do you think of Pat Buchanans article.

You being a Buchanan supporter don't you fee like a turn coat supporting Obama and the destruction of our nation?

Buchanan and Obama are light years apart.

A K A Stone  posted on  2012-05-04   21:49:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com