[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

'Straight Pride' Posters Appear On Ohio's Youngstown State University Campus (removed)

Hillary Furious as Thousands of Americans Send Cigars to Her Office

A US Government Agency Quietly Acknowledged That Marijuana May Help Fight Brain Tumors

From the Archives Elvis Covers AC/DC's 'Whole Lot of Rosie'

Gaddafi’s Revenge: Europe Can Save Africans From Drowning—Or Itself From Being Swamped

Why Is Yemen Our War?

The Pitbull Behind the Homosexual Agenda

6th grade students punished for "pantsing"

Liberland: hundreds of thousands apply to live in world's newest 'country

Frat boys spit on wounded vet, urinate on American flag

Cuba has had a lung cancer vaccine for years

Marines practice riot control for future American civil unrest, footage shows troops taking on protesters

The American Dream is a myth, says Nobel-prize winner

A shocking new report details a memorandum between the VA and the FBI that shows them working together to disarm American veterans

Robert Downey Jr. ambushed over politics: Reporters want Iron Man to be a liberal activist

Dear Churches in America: Prepare to Be Treated Like 1st Century Christians in Rome

Google Maps hides an image of the Android robot urinating on Apple

Huckabee: U.S. moving toward 'criminalization of Christianity'

Mentally Ill Homeless Man Severely Beaten By Police Because His Beach Umbrella was Too Big

Exclusive — Empirical Vote Data Shows Democrats Still Control US Senate, Harry Reid’s Office Rejoices

NYT reporter: Misdirecting on Clinton stories is what Media Matters "exists to do"

The Threat of Gravity Payments [The Great Bloviator himself, Rush Limbaugh, ruptured a vessel railing]

Model for Norman Rockwell's 'Rosie the Riveter' Dies at 92

The Bombardment of the Clinton Crime Family Foundation Continues

Congressman Massie’s 500-Yard Run That is Driving Congress Crazy

Raisin takings case oral argument goes badly for the government

Entitled Underachieving Middle Son of the Romney Clan Wants Someone to Challenge Mike Lee

If science shows abortion is wrong, why is the pro-life movement so Christian?

Rand Paul’s Internet Army

GM, Ford, And Others Want to Make Working on Your Own Car Illegal

Watch: Here’s An Actual Ad For A New DC ‘Abortion Spa’

U.S. Army FORCES Cadets to Wear High Heels to Promote Feminist Campaign

Clinton Cash author is targeting Jeb Bush next

LOOK: Fan emails insane Tim Tebow conspiracy theory to Eagles player

Legislation that Fines Cops $15,000 for Interfering with Citizens who Film Them, Passes House - Cops Outraged

Body Cam: Cop Ignores Dog Sign, Hops Fence in Response to a Burglar Alarm, Kills Homeowners Dog

Cops Go Car To Car In Traffic Jam, Issue $18,000 in Fines for Cellphone Use at a Near Dead Stop

Robber Puts Knife to Grandma’s Throat, Grandma Puts Gun In His Face

Rushes to Judgment: The Top 10 Assassination Movies

John McCain: I Prefer Cruz Over Paul

Arkansas sheriff’s department with DHS deny family’s civil rights and kidnap their 7 children over legal dietary supplements

Jeb Bush Says NSA Surveillance is “the best part of the Obama administration”

What Rand Paul is doing is more important than trying to be a pure libertarian

What if you bring a gun onto ‘educational property,’ but don’t know that it’s educational property

These girls fight better than many boys.

Driving on Bullsh*t

Let me ask all of you some questions:

“Fast Track” And Trade Policy: Obama’s Republican Collaborators

Kochs defeated in Montana

Schick Hydro Silk TrimStyle Commercial 2015 (anyone offended by this?)


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: Strassel: The President Has a List
Source: Wall Street Journal
URL Source: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB100 ... 4723304577368280604524916.html
Published: Apr 28, 2012
Author: KIMBERLEY A. STRASSEL
Post Date: 2012-04-28 07:53:15 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 835
Comments: 16

Try this thought experiment: You decide to donate money to Mitt Romney. You want change in the Oval Office, so you engage in your democratic right to send a check.

Several days later, President Barack Obama, the most powerful man on the planet, singles you out by name. His campaign brands you a Romney donor, shames you for "betting against America," and accuses you of having a "less-than-reputable" record. The message from the man who controls the Justice Department (which can indict you), the SEC (which can fine you), and the IRS (which can audit you), is clear: You made a mistake donating that money.

Are you worried?

Richard Nixon's "enemies list" appalled the country for the simple reason that presidents hold a unique trust. Unlike senators or congressmen, presidents alone represent all Americans. Their powers—to jail, to fine, to bankrupt—are also so vast as to require restraint. Any president who targets a private citizen for his politics is de facto engaged in government intimidation and threats. This is why presidents since Nixon have carefully avoided the practice.

Save Mr. Obama, who acknowledges no rules. This past week, one of his campaign websites posted an item entitled "Behind the curtain: A brief history of Romney's donors." In the post, the Obama campaign named and shamed eight private citizens who had donated to his opponent. Describing the givers as all having "less-than-reputable records," the post went on to make the extraordinary accusations that "quite a few" have also been "on the wrong side of the law" and profiting at "the expense of so many Americans."

These are people like Paul Schorr and Sam and Jeffrey Fox, investors who the site outed for the crime of having "outsourced" jobs. T. Martin Fiorentino is scored for his work for a firm that forecloses on homes. Louis Bacon (a hedge-fund manager), Kent Burton (a "lobbyist") and Thomas O'Malley (an energy CEO) stand accused of profiting from oil. Frank VanderSloot, the CEO of a home-products firm, is slimed as a "bitter foe of the gay rights movement."

These are wealthy individuals, to be sure, but private citizens nonetheless. Not one holds elected office. Not one is a criminal. Not one has the barest fraction of the position or the power of the U.S. leader who is publicly assaulting them.

Enlarge Image pw0427 pw0427 Associated Press/The News & Observer

Barack Obama at the University of North Carolina, April 24

"We don't tolerate presidents or people of high power to do these things," says Theodore Olson, the former U.S. solicitor general. "When you have the power of the presidency—the power of the IRS, the INS, the Justice Department, the DEA, the SEC—what you have effectively done is put these guys' names up on 'Wanted' posters in government offices." Mr. Olson knows these tactics, having demanded that the 44th president cease publicly targeting Charles and David Koch of Koch Industries, which he represents. He's been ignored.

The real crime of the men, as the website tacitly acknowledges, is that they have given money to Mr. Romney. This fundraiser of a president has shown an acute appreciation for the power of money to win elections, and a cutthroat approach to intimidating those who might give to his opponents.

He's targeted insurers, oil firms and Wall Street—letting it be known that those who oppose his policies might face political or legislative retribution. He lectured the Supreme Court for giving companies more free speech and (falsely) accused the Chamber of Commerce of using foreign money to bankroll U.S. elections. The White House even ginned up an executive order (yet to be released) to require companies to list political donations as a condition of bidding for government contracts. Companies could bid but lose out for donating to Republicans. Or they could quit donating to the GOP—Mr. Obama's real aim.

The White House has couched its attacks in the language of "disclosure" and the argument that corporations should not have the same speech rights as individuals. But now, says Rory Cooper of the Heritage Foundation, "he's doing the same at the individual level, for anyone who opposes his policies." Any giver, at any level, risks reprisal from the president of the United States.

It's getting worse because the money game is not going as Team Obama wants. Super PACs are helping the GOP to level the playing field against Democratic super-spenders. Prominent financial players are backing Mr. Romney. The White House's new strategy is thus to delegitimize Mr. Romney (by attacking his donors) as it seeks to frighten others out of giving.

The Obama campaign has justified any action on the grounds that it has a right to "hold the eventual Republican nominee accountable," but this is a dodge. Politics is rough, but a president has obligations that transcend those of a candidate. He swore an oath to protect and defend a Constitution that gives every American the right to partake in democracy, free of fear of government intimidation or disfavored treatment. If Mr. Obama isn't going to act like a president, he bolsters the argument that he doesn't deserve to be one.


Poster Comment:

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 12.

#3. To: A K A Stone (#0) (Edited)

Try this thought experiment: You decide to donate money to Mitt Romney. You want change in the Oval Office, so you engage in your democratic right to send a check.

Several days later, President Barack Obama, the most powerful man on the planet, singles you out by name. His campaign brands you a Romney donor, shames you for "betting against America," and accuses you of having a "less-than-reputable" record. The message from the man who controls the Justice Department (which can indict you), the SEC (which can fine you), and the IRS (which can audit you), is clear: You made a mistake donating that money.

I hate these leftist bastards more than anything.

It's a sad state of affairs that Americans personally like Obama. He's a corrupt, leftist son of a bitch.

He needs to be removed from public life.

jwpegler  posted on  2012-04-28   9:30:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: jwpegler (#3)

He needs to be removed from public life.

How? Vote for Romney?

buckeroo  posted on  2012-04-28   9:38:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: buckeroo (#4)

How?

Look at history. Elections are only one of many the ways to get rid of an evil politician.

jwpegler  posted on  2012-04-28   9:51:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: jwpegler (#5)

Sure but with the existing poopulace feeding out of the government trough at some 15Tr in debt, how are they going to change?

buckeroo  posted on  2012-04-28   9:53:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: buckeroo (#6) (Edited)

Sure but with the existing poopulace feeding out of the government trough at some 15Tr in debt, how are they going to change?

Not much will change until the country goes belly up and everyone is wiped out either through hyperinflation, war, or both.

Jefferson said that every generation needs their own revolution.

We've had too many generations in America without one.

The government's ability to print money to keep things afloat is coming to an end.

We will either devolve into dictatorship or renew the American spirit.

Over the last 30 years I've been very pessimistic. Over the last few years I've seen a few reasons to become cautiously optimistic.

Time will tell...

jwpegler  posted on  2012-04-28   16:31:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: jwpegler (#8)

The government's ability to print money to keep things afloat is coming to an end.

Sometimes, you make tip-toe within your own comments as though you know what the score really *IS*. It is called massive and decisive REVOLUTION.

When Stone gets a call from the UBERland cops, he can turn me in for saying that.

buckeroo  posted on  2012-04-28   17:10:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: buckeroo (#9) (Edited)

It is called massive and decisive REVOLUTION.

I'm just hoping to avoid the French Revolution, the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, the Cultural Revolution in China, the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia...

I'm pretty sure that we can, but I'm not entirely confident.

The GOOD THING is that the evil leftists have really begun to expose themselves in the Obama administration for all to see. Look at the Obama appointed dope in the EPA who was recently caught on camera advocating war against the energy that we need to keep modern civilization afloat.

These people are nuts.

Unfortunately, people have very short memories. So every 30 or 40 years we need to take a hit, and allow the leftist nuts to take power, just to demonstrate how rotten they are.

It's a scary thing, but it's essential to keep everyone guarded against these lunatics.

jwpegler  posted on  2012-04-28   17:35:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: jwpegler (#10) (Edited)

I'm just hoping to avoid the French Revolution, the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, the Cultural Revolution in China, the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia...

Nope. It ain't going to happen. Each and everyone of those REVOLUTIONS you cited were when the People had unemployment numbers far more LESS than in contemporary America. Meanwhile the rising technocratic, fascist aristocracy in America often make over 1000x of the common man while they pay no taxes at all.

America is up-side-down and there is no way to right the place.

buckeroo  posted on  2012-04-28   17:43:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: buckeroo (#11) (Edited)

America is up-side-down and there is no way to right the place.

So, are you predicting the end of America?

How?

Maybe Vermont secedes, Texas secedes, Cascadia (Washington, Oregon, British Colombia) tells D.C. and Ottawa to take a hike, etc.....

If there isn't any way to right place, secession is an alternative. As the Civil War demonstrated, secession is not an easy path, but it can be done.

The other alternative is an ugly dictatorship.

What do you see in our future???

I'm curious about your opinion.

jwpegler  posted on  2012-04-28   18:03:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 12.

#14. To: jwpegler (#12)

I'm curious about your opinion.

You are a fairely smart and intelligent poster.

So, without describing the events of America leading up to this day, let me remind you that you can't push a string or rope into a straight or linear method of orientation unless it is by luck. It is physically impossible unless there is some sort of coincidental outside force that explains that phenomena.

It is possible to "pull" a string or rope into a straight line however; and it is done with ease time after time after time.

Do you understand? The dissatisfaction with America is because it was "pushed" for years into submission. It wasn't "pulled" and as a result the recoil is going to be TREMENDOUS in terms of magnitude and order.

buckeroo  posted on  2012-04-28 18:19:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 12.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com