[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Four words that could deep-six Obamacare

Brat: 'Not one thin dime' for Obama's immigration plan

How Hollywood Accounting Can Make a $450 Million Movie 'Unprofitable'

Impeach President Obama—Why When Where and How

Georgia Man Shoots & Kills Man Who Mistakenly Pulled Into Driveway; Misdemeanor, $500 Fine (Castle Doctrine)

The Benghazi Brief – “Operation Zero Footprint” – What We Know About The Benghazi Mission, And Subsequent Attack

Ferguson Protests Grow Larger: ‘We Don’t Give a F--- about Your Laws’

How $10,000 In The Bank In 2008 Lost Over $7000 Of Wealth by 2013

The Use and Abuse of Executive Orders and Other Presidential Directives

BREAKING REPORT: DOJ Is Threatening #Ferguson Prosecutor With Bias Order Over No Indictment

‘Now, That’s What I Call a Friday News Dump’: Final Report Released After Two-Year Investigation Into Benghazi

Security Experts: What to do if protesters surround your car.

Liberal 2016 poll: Elizabeth Warren beating Clinton by double digits

FBI arrests two in connection with plot to set off bomb during protests - Ferguson

Arpaio v Obama, DCDC 14-cv-01966, Doc 1 COMPLAINT

Obama’s Amnesty Is The Act Of A Rogue President

Bandits in Guinea steal blood samples believed to be infected with Ebola

30,000 missing emails from IRS' Lerner recovered

House of Representatives v Burwell (COMPLAINT)

Obama releases Gitmo detainees, setting up fight with GOP

Texas Leaders Ready to Fight After Obama's Executive Action

HOUSE FILES CHALLENGE OVER THE CHANGES TO THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT

Will Scripted Ferguson Agenda Overshadow the Executive Amnesty Announcement?

Diplomat dumps burqa-clad fiancée due to crossed-eyes, beard

U.S. Senate Votes Against Freedom in the USA (Again)

Sheriff Joe Arpaio Files Lawsuit Against Obama over Amnesty Executive Order

HILLARY CLINTON: 'I SUPPORT THE PRESIDENT'S DECISION'

Patriots Headed to White House; Arrest Obama NOW! Pete Santilli Interviews US Marine Manny Vega

JEFF SESSIONS: NOW IS ‘TIME TO STAND STRONG’ AGAINST OBAMA’S ILLEGAL AMNESTY TO PROTECT AMERICAN WORKERS AND THEIR FAMILIES

Reagan and Bush Offer No Precedent for Obama's Amnesty Order

Bachmann to America: Come to D.C. on Dec. 3 & Rally to 'Defund Amnesty'

No, Reagan Did Not Offer An Amnesty By Lawless Executive Order

No, ‘Prosecutorial Discretion’ Does Not Justify Obama’s Lawless Amnesty

A Law Enforcement Perspective on Obama’s Lawlessness

The last reich ... obombacare - amnesty --- bread - circus - stepford nastion !

Here’s Obama’s Immigration Speech In Full--transcript

Obama's speech live

Jim Webb Forms Exploratory Committee for White House (Reagan Democrat)

Somali Actor who played Somali pirate in Tom Hanks blockbuster 'Captain Phillips' is jailed for vicious assault -- Sentencing Judge/Fanboi Impressed with Somali "Actors"

Muslims Chant to Remove Jesus at WashingtonÂ’s National Cathedral

Tipping Point: 50% of Americans reject the D&R terrorist party

Jordanian Parliament Prays for “Spirits of Heroes” Who Murdered 4 Rabbis

Does John Boehner Believe That Perjury About Sex Is Worse Then Obama Acting Like A Dictator And Bypassing Congress To Make Law?

mohammed obomba atta ... toppling the the twin towers --- of our country - constitution !

First Time In History A Sitting U.S. President Authorizes And Supports Terrorism On American Soil

BREAKING: GOODLATTE, MCCALL DEMAND PRESIDENT OBAMA RESPECT THE CONSTITUTION, Abandon Unilateral Plan To Move On Immigration

REPUBLICANS CAN STOP EXECUTIVE ORDER AMNESTY DEAD

‘OPEN REBELLION’: CHAOS IF REPUBLICANS DON’T WITHHOLD FUNDING FOR OBAMA EXECUTIVE AMNESTY

White House hits TV networks for skipping immigration address

Schlafly: Obama could launch another Civil War


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

U.S. Constitution
See other U.S. Constitution Articles

Title: CISPA passes House in unexpected last-minute vote
Source: RT
URL Source: http://rt.com/news/house-cispa-vote-thursday-083/
Published: Apr 26, 2012
Author: RT
Post Date: 2012-04-26 21:44:23 by Anthem
Keywords: None
Views: 256
Comments: 2

The House of Representatives has approved Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act with a vote count of 248-168. The bill is now headed for the Senate. President Barack Obama will be able to sign or cancel it pending Senate approval.

Initially slated to vote on the bill Friday, the House of Representatives decided to pass Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA) Thursday after approving a number of amendments. The snap vote took place after Congressional legislators approved a number of amendments to the bill.

Apart from cyber and national security purposes, the bill would now allow the government to use private information obtained through CISPA for the investigation and prosecution of “cybersecurity crime,” protection of individuals and the protection of children. The new clauses define “cybersecurity crime” as any crime involving network disruption or hacking.

“Basically this means CISPA can no longer be called a cyber security bill at all. The government would be able to search information it collects under CISPA for the purposes of investigating American citizens with complete immunity from all privacy protections as long as they can claim someone committed a 'cybersecurity crime.' Basically it says the Fourth Amendment does not apply online, at all,” Techdirt's Leigh Beadon said. [bolding added]

The CISPA battleground in numbers

CISPA was introduced in the House last November. Critics chided the bill, saying its broad wording could allow the government to spy on individual Internet users and block websites that publish vaguely defined ‘sensitive’ data.

"[CISPA] doesn’t really have any protections against cyber threats, all it does is make people share their information. But that’s not going to solve the problem. What’s going to solve the problem is actual security measures, protecting the service in the first place, not spying on people after the fact," Internet activist Aaron Swartz told RT.

The White House issued a statement Wednesday saying President Barack Obama would be advised to veto the bill if he receives it. The Obama administration denounces the proposed law for potentially giving the government cyber-sleuthing powers that would allow both federal authorities and private businesses to sneak into inboxes and online activities in the name of combating Internet terrorism tactics.

Earlier, the House of Representatives and Senate also considered adopting the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and Protect IP Act (PIPA). These bills sought to entitle the US government to curb access to “rogue websites” that illegally hosted intellectual property. The bills could effectively force search engines to remove these websites from search results, an action many private companies considered intrusive.

PIPA and SOPA were opposed by many Internet giants including Google, Mozilla, Facebook, Yahoo!, Wikipedia and Reddit. Google organized a petition against the legislation, while Wikipedia held a 24-hour blackout to protest the bill in January. As a result, SOPA was recalled while PIPA was postponed indefinitely.

However, CISPA was actually backed by Facebook, despite its opposition to SOPA and PIPA. In a blog post on April 13, Joel Kaplan, Vice President of US Public Policy at Facebook, argued that if enacted into law, the bill would “give companies like ours the tools we need to protect our systems and the security of our users’ information, while also providing those users confidence that adequate privacy safeguards are in place.”

A number of big companies, including AT&T, Microsoft, Boeing, Verizon and Oracle have also supported CISPA.


Poster Comment:

However, CISPA was actually backed by Facebook, despite its opposition to SOPA and PIPA. In a blog post on April 13, Joel Kaplan, Vice President of US Public Policy at Facebook, argued that if enacted into law, the bill would “give companies like ours the tools we need to protect our systems and the security of our users’ information, while also providing those users confidence that adequate privacy safeguards are in place.”
Yep, it's a con game. Anytime they want you to be confident in their protection, look out! If you want to protect your information encrypt it or don't put it on the Internet! So who thinks Obama is going to veto this?

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Anthem, *Ron Paul for President* (#0)

The final tally was 248-168, enough to pass the measure but not enough to override the threatened veto. Forty-two Democrats broke with the White House to vote for the bill, and 28 Republicans voted against it.

dyn.politico.com/printsto...A5-44FB-8985-C99EB72FFD43

Bipartisan jackboots across the isle. 42 Dems couldn't resist this opportunity to stomp on the serfs.


"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul

Obama's watch stopped on 24 May 2008, but he's been too busy smoking crack to notice.

hondo68  posted on  2012-04-26   21:49:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: hondo68 (#1) (Edited)

.

Thanks for the link.

Did you know that after the leadership counts heads, they give some permission to vote the "other way" to give themselves political cover? Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi did just that. You know she doesn't give a hoot about our privacy.

Anthem  posted on  2012-04-26   22:08:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com