[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Big ruling for abortion rights in Supreme Court's Texas case

A Chat about Illegal Immigration

Barack Obama explained

Normal Guy debates gun control with hillary supporter

European SUPERSTATE to be unveiled: EU nations 'to be morphed into one' post-Brexit

‘It Will Happen Very Soon’: European MEP Issues Dire Warning on Fate of EU After Historic Brexit Vote

Court upholds reach of US gun ban for domestic violence

Federal Court Rules Govt Can Hack Your Computer Without a Warrant, No Probable Cause

The FDA is stockpiling military weapons — and it’s not alone

Pope Francis makes groundbreaking apology to gay people and says the Catholic Church must seek forgiveness for the way it treated them in the past

Judge Jeanine Pirro's Opening Statement June 25, 2016

Hank ‘Meltdown’ Paulson Cites Hillary’s Globalist Platform as Reason for Endorsement

Anyone on a no-fly list ... should not be able to purchase --- a kitchen utensil

I’m suing the US government for its data on who’s entering the country

Which candidate said what?

Democratic Sen. Calls For Ammunition Control [VIDEO]

4 last-ditch efforts that could stop the Brexit

Unlike Congress, Hawaii Takes Action On Gun Control

'No need to write, David,' impatient EU tells Cameron

Never seen so many progressives whine!

'This Is Not My Party' - George Will ... marxist - evolutionist - catholic - poperyist --- Goes from GOP to Unaffiliated

Obama Invites 18.7 Million Immigrants to Avoid Oath of Allegiance, Pledge to Defend America

'It had to be a UFO' (Strange but true baseball story)

Law Professor Demands Repeal Of 'Outdated' Second Amendment, Makes Very Weak Case

Missouri to Generate Power By Covering Highway With Crowdfunded Solar Roadways

Man suspected in killing of JPSO Deputy David Michel Jr. is in custody, authorities say

WashPost: America Can’t Declare Economic Independence Because Not Enough Whites

House Democrats End Sit-In Over Gun Control

'This vote doesn't represent the younger generation who will have to live with the consequences': Millennials vent fury at baby boomers for voting Britain OUT of the EU

6 Diseases Just Reappeared Following the Flood of Refugees into America...

Dem who opposed welfare fraud measure indicted – for food stamp fraud

ISIS calls for attacks in Berlin - Brussels ... thanks arab spring barry - Benghazi Hillary --- to 'paralyse' Europe in wake of Brexit chaos

“Am I anti-Sharia ...Yes - I am - Am I anti-Muslim --- Not if he doesn’t have a gun in his hand shooting at me.”

None Dare Call It Reason

Brexit Vote: The Betting Sites Were Wrong. So Were the Polls. So Were the Pols. (NWO suffers defeat)

Radical Populism, Immigration Patriotism, Trade: Has Trump Found the Formula?

Why Donald Trump supported Jimmy Carter for president (make Billy Beer great again)

Live BR EXIT vote

In true liberal fashion her failures - zeal to go after "enemies" (of theirs) ... will be rewarded --- You are looking at a future Loretta Lynch.

Eric Casebolt, McKinney Officer Who Threw Girl on Ground at Pool Party, Won't Face Charges

Top Clinton aide mocks donor’s appointment to board

From cleaning corpses to sex with strangers, widow rituals fuel disease in Africa

Freddie Gray Van Driver Found Not Guilty On All Charges

Congress rat pays wife 300 grand from Campaign cash

GOP lawmaker proposes holding gun-free zone businesses liable for gun violence

TWA 800: Time to Reopen the Investigation

Border Rescue Dog Dies While Saving Illegal Aliens

NYPD shows support for gay pride with new-look patrol SUV

Poll: Voters Trust Donald Trump to Keep America Safe; Favor Muslim Ban

Donald Rumsfeld says he'll vote for Trump – 'It's not a close call!' – as 9/11-era defense secretary says Hillary Clinton 'would probably be indicted' over emails if she were a soldier or sailor


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Mexican Invasion
See other Mexican Invasion Articles

Title: Supreme Court signals support for Arizona immigration law provision
Source: fox news
URL Source: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201 ... ttle-arrives-at-supreme-court/
Published: Apr 25, 2012
Author: staff
Post Date: 2012-04-25 12:56:07 by calcon
Keywords: None
Views: 301

The Supreme Court signaled Wednesday that it might uphold a key element of Arizona's immigration law, as justices across the board suggested the state has a serious problem on its hands and should have some level of sovereignty to address illegal immigration.

The justices appeared to ready to allow a provision requiring police officers to check the immigration status of people they think are in the U.S. illegally.

The justices strongly suggested Wednesday they are not buying the Obama administration's argument that the state exceeded its authority, with Chief Justice John Roberts at one point saying he doesn't think the federal government even wants to know how many illegal immigrants are in the country.

"You can see it's not selling very well," Justice Sonia Sotomayor told Obama administration Solicitor General Donald Verrilli.

Just like the health care overhaul challenge heard earlier this month, Wednesday's hearing on the immigration law drew passionate surrogates from both sides. Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer was loudly booed by the law's opponents in front of the courthouse. She said in a statement Wednesday afternoon that "I am filled with optimism -- the kind that comes with knowing that Arizona's cause is just and its course is true."

While the justices addressed the traffic stop provision Wednesday, it was unclear what the court would do with other aspects of the law that have been put on hold by lower federal courts.

Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, who helped draft the law, voiced optimism in Arizona's chances.

"This was a very good day for Arizona in the Supreme Court today," he told Fox News. "The U.S. Justice Department was on the ropes."

But Brent Wilkes, director for the League of United Latin American Citizens, warned that the law would take a "human toll" on Arizona families if allowed to stand.

"This is really a racial profiling bill," he told Fox News.

The hearing Wednesday morning has implications far beyond Arizona's borders, as several states, including Alabama and South Carolina, have followed in Arizona's footsteps to craft their own immigration enforcement measures.

The Obama administration, which opposes those measures, has argued that the country cannot sustain a patchwork of separate immigration laws.

Verrilli, who is arguing on behalf of the government, said in his brief that the Executive Branch has the power to enforce immigration policy.

"For each state, and each locality, to set its own immigration policy in that fashion would wholly subvert Congress' goal: a single, national approach," he wrote.

But Arizona argued that the current system is broken, and that the state is paying an unfair price for that failure.

"Arizona shoulders a disproportionate burden of the national problem of illegal immigration," attorney Paul Clement argued in his brief. He argued that enforcement attention in California and Texas has turned the Arizona border into a funnel for illegal immigrants, with a third of illegal border crossings occurring there.

The attorney described Arizona's law as a response to an "emergency situation" -- with illegal immigrants soaking up millions of state dollars in health care and education, posing safety risks to ranchers and cutting into the state's job market.

Two of the key statutes, which have been blocked and will be at issue in Wednesday's arguments, are provisions to bar illegal immigrants from seeking a job and to require law enforcement to check the immigration status of anyone they suspect of being in the country illegally in the course of a routine stop.

A ruling from the Supreme Court is likely to come this summer, in the thick of the presidential election year -- it could either bolster what has been a bold move from the Obama administration's Justice Department to intervene in state issues ranging from immigration to voter ID laws, or stop the administration in its tracks and open the floodgates to even more state laws that challenge federal authority.

The immigration case arrives at the high court Wednesday just weeks after the justices heard arguments in the multi-state challenge to the federal health care overhaul.

Democrats on Capitol Hill this week were already scrambling to prepare for the possibility that the high court upholds the immigration law. Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., announced a plan to introduce a bill that would effectively nullify Arizona's law -- though it would stand virtually no chance of passing in the Republican-controlled House.

"Immigration has not and never has been an area where states are able to exercise independent authority," Schumer said Tuesday at a Capitol Hill hearing, where he announced he would introduce the proposal should the Supreme Court "ignore" the "plain and unambiguous statements of congressional intent" and uphold the Arizona law.

But former Arizona state Sen. Russell Pearce, the author of the law, said: "We have a national crisis, and yet everyone wants to ignore that: the cost, the damage, the crime."

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/...reme-court/#ixzz1t4X4lq00

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com