[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Maine governor says quarantine talks with nurse failed

Reince Priebus And Amnesty–“There You Go Again!”

The Coming November Wars–Fighting Overseas, Amnesty And Possible Rioting At Home

Creepy Scary Halloween Music Thread

Eric Frein, suspect in Pennsylvania trooper ambush, arrested without incident

Rand Paul: ‘The Republican Party brand sucks’

NEW O'KEEFE VIDEO ALLEGEDLY SHOWS DEMOCRATIC POLL WORKERS ASSISTING ILLEGAL, NON-CITIZEN TO VOTE IN NC

A Virus Found In Lakes May Be Literally Changing The Way People Think

Maryland can’t verify vote flips helped Dems

'ATHEIST REPUBLIC' Now Up and Running!

Marine Veteran Complains About Pro-Islam Bias In Daughter's Schoolwork, Gets BANNED From School (Call School and Complain 301-934-1100)

GOP Surrendered On Minority Voter Fraud—In 1982!

Seven Reasons for Opposing Evolution

Should These Cops Be Tried And Executed

GOHMERT RIPS OBAMA ADMIN FOR PUSH TO TREAT EBOLA-INFECTED FOREIGNERS IN US

Ted Cruz Endorses 'Duck Dynasty' Star's Nephew for Congress

Romney, Jeb 'Loom Larger Than The Rest'

Ebola nurse says she'll fight Maine quarantine authority

Minnesota gym bans boys so Muslim girls can play basketball

Blackface Minstrel Show Sand Dance

Lindsey Graham "white men who are in male-only clubs are going to do great in my presidency"

Eric Holder To Ferguson Leakers: ‘Shut Up’ [VIDEO]

Guess How Many Bibles Have Arrived at Office of Houston Mayor After She Subpoenaed Pastors’ Sermons

Boo

GOP’s 2014 White Share: Only Fair So Far

Minnesota Somalis Leave to Join ISIS for Jihad

Father who disappeared in the middle of a Broncos game FOUND safe 112 miles away

Sen. Tom Udall Sponsors Bill 'to Regulate' First Amendment

Democrats Run From Harry Reid

Crowd Begins to File Out While Obama Speaks in Wisconsin

Poster girl for Kurdish freedom fighters in Kobane is 'captured and beheaded by ISIS (Rehana)

Orbital Sciences' Antares rocket explodes seconds after liftoff

Pope Francis says Big Bang theory and evolution 'compatible with divine Creator'

Australia shuts borders to Ebola-affected countries

Ebola can survive on surfaces for almost TWO MONTHS: Tests reveal certain strains survive for weeks when stored at low temperatures

Texas Pastor Issues Warning: American Christians Will Suffer Greatly in Coming Persecution

Criminalizing America – Cultivating a Felon

Terrorism And “THE TRUE BELIEVER”

"It is a faithful saying." — 2 Timothy 2:11

Libertarians May Co-Nominate Rand Paul in 2016

LP's Admitted Sodomy Expert (Meguro) Accuses Two Posters Of Being Homosexuals who "share same s**t-stained white sheets" -- Then Justifies Murder of White Marine

19 Very Surprising Facts About The Messed Up State Of The U.S. Economy

Police Infuriated About New “Cop Detecting” Device That Warns People When a Cop is Near

A Photograph of Your Face in a Jar Makes for a Creepy Halloween Prank

Do People Live Longer among Trees?

Cosmos: A Series Created to Counter Creation

Still Soft after 551 Million Years?

'60 Minutes' Just Broke New Details On The Dallas Ebola Case. Here's What They Revealed.

Free Ebola: Obama Demands End to State Ebola Quarantines

Ted Cruz and Mike Huckabee Are on a Collision Course as Evangelicals Audition 2016 Contenders


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Mexican Invasion
See other Mexican Invasion Articles

Title: Supreme Court signals support for Arizona immigration law provision
Source: fox news
URL Source: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201 ... ttle-arrives-at-supreme-court/
Published: Apr 25, 2012
Author: staff
Post Date: 2012-04-25 12:56:07 by calcon
Keywords: None
Views: 101

The Supreme Court signaled Wednesday that it might uphold a key element of Arizona's immigration law, as justices across the board suggested the state has a serious problem on its hands and should have some level of sovereignty to address illegal immigration.

The justices appeared to ready to allow a provision requiring police officers to check the immigration status of people they think are in the U.S. illegally.

The justices strongly suggested Wednesday they are not buying the Obama administration's argument that the state exceeded its authority, with Chief Justice John Roberts at one point saying he doesn't think the federal government even wants to know how many illegal immigrants are in the country.

"You can see it's not selling very well," Justice Sonia Sotomayor told Obama administration Solicitor General Donald Verrilli.

Just like the health care overhaul challenge heard earlier this month, Wednesday's hearing on the immigration law drew passionate surrogates from both sides. Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer was loudly booed by the law's opponents in front of the courthouse. She said in a statement Wednesday afternoon that "I am filled with optimism -- the kind that comes with knowing that Arizona's cause is just and its course is true."

While the justices addressed the traffic stop provision Wednesday, it was unclear what the court would do with other aspects of the law that have been put on hold by lower federal courts.

Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, who helped draft the law, voiced optimism in Arizona's chances.

"This was a very good day for Arizona in the Supreme Court today," he told Fox News. "The U.S. Justice Department was on the ropes."

But Brent Wilkes, director for the League of United Latin American Citizens, warned that the law would take a "human toll" on Arizona families if allowed to stand.

"This is really a racial profiling bill," he told Fox News.

The hearing Wednesday morning has implications far beyond Arizona's borders, as several states, including Alabama and South Carolina, have followed in Arizona's footsteps to craft their own immigration enforcement measures.

The Obama administration, which opposes those measures, has argued that the country cannot sustain a patchwork of separate immigration laws.

Verrilli, who is arguing on behalf of the government, said in his brief that the Executive Branch has the power to enforce immigration policy.

"For each state, and each locality, to set its own immigration policy in that fashion would wholly subvert Congress' goal: a single, national approach," he wrote.

But Arizona argued that the current system is broken, and that the state is paying an unfair price for that failure.

"Arizona shoulders a disproportionate burden of the national problem of illegal immigration," attorney Paul Clement argued in his brief. He argued that enforcement attention in California and Texas has turned the Arizona border into a funnel for illegal immigrants, with a third of illegal border crossings occurring there.

The attorney described Arizona's law as a response to an "emergency situation" -- with illegal immigrants soaking up millions of state dollars in health care and education, posing safety risks to ranchers and cutting into the state's job market.

Two of the key statutes, which have been blocked and will be at issue in Wednesday's arguments, are provisions to bar illegal immigrants from seeking a job and to require law enforcement to check the immigration status of anyone they suspect of being in the country illegally in the course of a routine stop.

A ruling from the Supreme Court is likely to come this summer, in the thick of the presidential election year -- it could either bolster what has been a bold move from the Obama administration's Justice Department to intervene in state issues ranging from immigration to voter ID laws, or stop the administration in its tracks and open the floodgates to even more state laws that challenge federal authority.

The immigration case arrives at the high court Wednesday just weeks after the justices heard arguments in the multi-state challenge to the federal health care overhaul.

Democrats on Capitol Hill this week were already scrambling to prepare for the possibility that the high court upholds the immigration law. Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., announced a plan to introduce a bill that would effectively nullify Arizona's law -- though it would stand virtually no chance of passing in the Republican-controlled House.

"Immigration has not and never has been an area where states are able to exercise independent authority," Schumer said Tuesday at a Capitol Hill hearing, where he announced he would introduce the proposal should the Supreme Court "ignore" the "plain and unambiguous statements of congressional intent" and uphold the Arizona law.

But former Arizona state Sen. Russell Pearce, the author of the law, said: "We have a national crisis, and yet everyone wants to ignore that: the cost, the damage, the crime."

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/...reme-court/#ixzz1t4X4lq00

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com