[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Georgia woman mistakenly jailed for more than a month after cops confused SpaghettiOs for meth

A U-Turn for a Terminal Built in Texas to Import Natural Gas

The American Flag Under Obama

Oklahoma Beheading Suspect Alton Nolen's Mom Responds

James Traficant, convicted ex-congressman, dies

How To Make A Survival Pocket Waterfilter (video)

Astronomy Picture of the Day Earth at Equinox

Russian draft law would allow seizure of foreign property

Home Depot Embraces Sharia Law With Forced ‘Muslim Sensitivity Training’

Video: Israeli drone captures Hamas Forces Having Sex With Goats

Hillary Clinton "“Dear Saul,” she began. “When is that new book [Rules for Radicals] coming out—or has it come and I somehow missed the fulfillment of Revelation?”

Video: GRAPHIC: Mexican Terrorist Cartel Beheads 4 Women In Message To America

Rick Perry Defends In-State Tuition for Illegals, Despite Tough Border Talk

Vile ad bounces off McSally, sticks to Gabby Giffords

Voting “Yes” On Washington’s I-594 Is Choosing To Live As A Slave

Machine Your Own Billet Receivers In Class at CMT Tactical

[Video] NRA’s Colion Noir Calls Out New Jersey on “Ray Rice & Gun Control” (Chris Christie's Gun Control Police State)

When police are standing right there, they will wait for backup and let you die…

What John Quincy Adams Said About Immigration Will Blow Your Mind

Nigel Farage: Stop opposing Vladmir Putin in Ukraine and join forces to defeat Islamic terrorists

G20 nations want Vladimir Putin at summit despite Ukraine tensions

Congressman MIke Turner Betrays Country Votes To Fund ISIS

Fat Dyke Executed In Texas For Starving 9 year old kid (The Dyke Is Dead Hooray))

Gumballs to represent immigration

Terrorist Exchanged For Bowe Bergdahl Now Top ISIS Commander

He's More Powerful Than Ever!

shocking execution of 300 Syrian soldiers, ISIS parade captured Kurds then behead one on video

Samsung SGR-A1 Robot Sentry Shoots Targets from 2 miles away

9 Year Old Boy Slaps His Mom After Finding Her High On Heroine On The Street

Bombshell Emails: White House Coordinated With Department of Labor To Hide Illegal Obama Fundraiser Hilda Solis’ Schedule

President Ronald Reagan Tribute: Rare Footage of Him Speaking the Gospel - Inspirational Videos

Nigel Farage Speaks at Garden Event

World’s first 3D-printed car unveiled in Chicago

Breitbart is here — and his name is Ted Cruz

Scientists turn textbook volcanic eruption theory on its head

Maxine Waters: Americans are Bigots for Opposing Sharia Law

The Witherspoon Institute Public Discourse home | about | archives | contact | support A Tale of Two Fathers: Silas Marner on the True Meaning of Fatherhood

The Illusion of Neutrality The secular state cannot be neutral in matters of religion.

ISIS Strikes Deal With Moderate Syrian Rebels: Reports (You know the ones that Obama is dealing with)

Lod All in all, Is a of low-information, low-IQ, moron. (Posts at freedom4dum explains it all)

Yahoo describes surveillance fight (Obama's Government Threattened Fines of $250,000 per day)

‘Vetted Moderate’ Free Syrian Army Commander Admits Alliance with ISIS, Confirms PJ Media Reporting

Decriminalize, Regulate Heroin, Cocaine, Commission Says

The question is: will Justice Gindburg get a chance to explain her point of view to her Maker? Or, will she just go straight to Hell

Bill Maher absolutely crushes Charlie Rose for comparing Islam to Christianity

Dawkins Becomes a Creationist

The Big Spender

U.S. judge re-sentences Jose Padilla to 21 years on terrorism charges

Chick-fil-A founder S. Truett Cathy has died

Sharpton Feels Up Holder As Jackson Waits His Turn


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Mexican Invasion
See other Mexican Invasion Articles

Title: Supreme Court signals support for Arizona immigration law provision
Source: fox news
URL Source: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201 ... ttle-arrives-at-supreme-court/
Published: Apr 25, 2012
Author: staff
Post Date: 2012-04-25 12:56:07 by calcon
Keywords: None
Views: 95

The Supreme Court signaled Wednesday that it might uphold a key element of Arizona's immigration law, as justices across the board suggested the state has a serious problem on its hands and should have some level of sovereignty to address illegal immigration.

The justices appeared to ready to allow a provision requiring police officers to check the immigration status of people they think are in the U.S. illegally.

The justices strongly suggested Wednesday they are not buying the Obama administration's argument that the state exceeded its authority, with Chief Justice John Roberts at one point saying he doesn't think the federal government even wants to know how many illegal immigrants are in the country.

"You can see it's not selling very well," Justice Sonia Sotomayor told Obama administration Solicitor General Donald Verrilli.

Just like the health care overhaul challenge heard earlier this month, Wednesday's hearing on the immigration law drew passionate surrogates from both sides. Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer was loudly booed by the law's opponents in front of the courthouse. She said in a statement Wednesday afternoon that "I am filled with optimism -- the kind that comes with knowing that Arizona's cause is just and its course is true."

While the justices addressed the traffic stop provision Wednesday, it was unclear what the court would do with other aspects of the law that have been put on hold by lower federal courts.

Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, who helped draft the law, voiced optimism in Arizona's chances.

"This was a very good day for Arizona in the Supreme Court today," he told Fox News. "The U.S. Justice Department was on the ropes."

But Brent Wilkes, director for the League of United Latin American Citizens, warned that the law would take a "human toll" on Arizona families if allowed to stand.

"This is really a racial profiling bill," he told Fox News.

The hearing Wednesday morning has implications far beyond Arizona's borders, as several states, including Alabama and South Carolina, have followed in Arizona's footsteps to craft their own immigration enforcement measures.

The Obama administration, which opposes those measures, has argued that the country cannot sustain a patchwork of separate immigration laws.

Verrilli, who is arguing on behalf of the government, said in his brief that the Executive Branch has the power to enforce immigration policy.

"For each state, and each locality, to set its own immigration policy in that fashion would wholly subvert Congress' goal: a single, national approach," he wrote.

But Arizona argued that the current system is broken, and that the state is paying an unfair price for that failure.

"Arizona shoulders a disproportionate burden of the national problem of illegal immigration," attorney Paul Clement argued in his brief. He argued that enforcement attention in California and Texas has turned the Arizona border into a funnel for illegal immigrants, with a third of illegal border crossings occurring there.

The attorney described Arizona's law as a response to an "emergency situation" -- with illegal immigrants soaking up millions of state dollars in health care and education, posing safety risks to ranchers and cutting into the state's job market.

Two of the key statutes, which have been blocked and will be at issue in Wednesday's arguments, are provisions to bar illegal immigrants from seeking a job and to require law enforcement to check the immigration status of anyone they suspect of being in the country illegally in the course of a routine stop.

A ruling from the Supreme Court is likely to come this summer, in the thick of the presidential election year -- it could either bolster what has been a bold move from the Obama administration's Justice Department to intervene in state issues ranging from immigration to voter ID laws, or stop the administration in its tracks and open the floodgates to even more state laws that challenge federal authority.

The immigration case arrives at the high court Wednesday just weeks after the justices heard arguments in the multi-state challenge to the federal health care overhaul.

Democrats on Capitol Hill this week were already scrambling to prepare for the possibility that the high court upholds the immigration law. Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., announced a plan to introduce a bill that would effectively nullify Arizona's law -- though it would stand virtually no chance of passing in the Republican-controlled House.

"Immigration has not and never has been an area where states are able to exercise independent authority," Schumer said Tuesday at a Capitol Hill hearing, where he announced he would introduce the proposal should the Supreme Court "ignore" the "plain and unambiguous statements of congressional intent" and uphold the Arizona law.

But former Arizona state Sen. Russell Pearce, the author of the law, said: "We have a national crisis, and yet everyone wants to ignore that: the cost, the damage, the crime."

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/...reme-court/#ixzz1t4X4lq00

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com