[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Quack, Quack, QUACK!

Wake judge rules against teen facing off against NC on climate change


Planned Parenthood Shooting Suspect Made Comment About 'No More Baby Parts'

Team Carson Refutes False Anti-Trump Rove Narrative

5 Devastating Facts About Black-on-Black Crime

I already TOLD you - we are having turkey...


Missouri Dad Drags Teen Daughter from School, Beats Her in Parking Lot for Not Wearing Hijab

Police searching for hooded man over Finsbury Park mosque arson attack

Ex-envoy: Obama brought 'radical Muslim values' into White House

Karl Rove Opens His Rolodex for Ben Carson

Republican Trump drops 12 percentage points in poll: Reuters/Ipsos

Laquan McDonald Was A Ward Of The State But His Family Took Home A $5 Million Settlement

Kremlin says Putin 'fully mobilized' to tackle threat from Turkey

Watch Live: Donald Trump Rally in Sarasota, FL (Noon, (EDT) 11-28-15)

Planned Parenthood Shooter Identified as 57-Year-Old Robert Lewis Dear

Colorado Springs: a playground for pro-life, pro-gun Evangelical Christians

A Bunch Of People Were Shocked At Thanksgiving To Find Out Their Family Supports Donald Trump

That Laquan McDonald Shooting In Chicago: A Counter-Take

Russia just dealt a huge blow to Turkey over its downing of a Russian warplane

White Americans Are The Biggest Terror Threat In The United States

Mom Could Get 30 Days in Jail for Letting 4-Year-Old Play Outside

Dilbert Creator: Trump ‘Invulnerable’ If Beats Disability Flap

Can A Dying Civilization Defeat ISIS and Radical Islam?

The evil satanists/marxists controlled content for over 80 years ... to warp minds (Eastern/tribal) - emasculate/sexxualize children—to destroy virtue formation --- so emotions rule reason.

Appropriations Act Signed Into Law With Important Pro-Second Amendment Provisions

Video of Islamist rebel fighter and his Syrian activist cameraman killed by an Arab Army artillery shell in northern Hama, Syria

polls predict voters will punish the socialists ... taking away their majority in the National Assembly --- since Chavez took power in early 1999.

Active shooter situation reported near Planned Parenthood in Colorado Springs; reports of multiple people shot

The youngest politician in France's far-right Le Pen family is storming ahead in the polls

Donald Trump’s Police State

Chicago gang member charged in murder of 9-year-old Tyshawn Lee as cops eye 2 more suspects

Turkey would have acted differently if it had known jet was Russian: Erdogan

Kremlin says Western powers 'not ready' to work in anti-IS coalition with Russia

Tom Cotton’s Unhinged Syria Policy

The Statue of Liberty Was Originally a Muslim Woman

GOP in panic over Trump

Meet The Man Who Funds ISIS: Bilal Erdogan, The Son Of Turkey's President

Recep Tayyip Erdogan is sabotaging the West's battle to crush ISIS

Safe Zone

DNC - Hamas - isis - black lives matter ... rape - riot - pillage - plunder - sudden jihad syndrome --- what's the difference !

Relatives of Paris massacre vow to boycott day of mourning because France's 'weak' government 'allowed' the terror attack to happen

Pardoned White House Turkey Defects To ISIS

Trunp responds to the HIT piece about the crippled reporter

Teen charged with killing 91-year-old, setting fire to his home

5 Ways to Survive Thanksgiving Dinner Sitting Across From Your Sanctimonious Left-Wing Relatives Who Studied the DNC Talking Points

President Obama Compares Syrian Refugees to Mayflower Pilgrims

Obama plans aggressive regs push in final year

PETA To Be Sued for Theft and Murder of a Family’s Dog

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Mexican Invasion
See other Mexican Invasion Articles

Title: Supreme Court signals support for Arizona immigration law provision
Source: fox news
URL Source: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201 ... ttle-arrives-at-supreme-court/
Published: Apr 25, 2012
Author: staff
Post Date: 2012-04-25 12:56:07 by calcon
Keywords: None
Views: 255

The Supreme Court signaled Wednesday that it might uphold a key element of Arizona's immigration law, as justices across the board suggested the state has a serious problem on its hands and should have some level of sovereignty to address illegal immigration.

The justices appeared to ready to allow a provision requiring police officers to check the immigration status of people they think are in the U.S. illegally.

The justices strongly suggested Wednesday they are not buying the Obama administration's argument that the state exceeded its authority, with Chief Justice John Roberts at one point saying he doesn't think the federal government even wants to know how many illegal immigrants are in the country.

"You can see it's not selling very well," Justice Sonia Sotomayor told Obama administration Solicitor General Donald Verrilli.

Just like the health care overhaul challenge heard earlier this month, Wednesday's hearing on the immigration law drew passionate surrogates from both sides. Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer was loudly booed by the law's opponents in front of the courthouse. She said in a statement Wednesday afternoon that "I am filled with optimism -- the kind that comes with knowing that Arizona's cause is just and its course is true."

While the justices addressed the traffic stop provision Wednesday, it was unclear what the court would do with other aspects of the law that have been put on hold by lower federal courts.

Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, who helped draft the law, voiced optimism in Arizona's chances.

"This was a very good day for Arizona in the Supreme Court today," he told Fox News. "The U.S. Justice Department was on the ropes."

But Brent Wilkes, director for the League of United Latin American Citizens, warned that the law would take a "human toll" on Arizona families if allowed to stand.

"This is really a racial profiling bill," he told Fox News.

The hearing Wednesday morning has implications far beyond Arizona's borders, as several states, including Alabama and South Carolina, have followed in Arizona's footsteps to craft their own immigration enforcement measures.

The Obama administration, which opposes those measures, has argued that the country cannot sustain a patchwork of separate immigration laws.

Verrilli, who is arguing on behalf of the government, said in his brief that the Executive Branch has the power to enforce immigration policy.

"For each state, and each locality, to set its own immigration policy in that fashion would wholly subvert Congress' goal: a single, national approach," he wrote.

But Arizona argued that the current system is broken, and that the state is paying an unfair price for that failure.

"Arizona shoulders a disproportionate burden of the national problem of illegal immigration," attorney Paul Clement argued in his brief. He argued that enforcement attention in California and Texas has turned the Arizona border into a funnel for illegal immigrants, with a third of illegal border crossings occurring there.

The attorney described Arizona's law as a response to an "emergency situation" -- with illegal immigrants soaking up millions of state dollars in health care and education, posing safety risks to ranchers and cutting into the state's job market.

Two of the key statutes, which have been blocked and will be at issue in Wednesday's arguments, are provisions to bar illegal immigrants from seeking a job and to require law enforcement to check the immigration status of anyone they suspect of being in the country illegally in the course of a routine stop.

A ruling from the Supreme Court is likely to come this summer, in the thick of the presidential election year -- it could either bolster what has been a bold move from the Obama administration's Justice Department to intervene in state issues ranging from immigration to voter ID laws, or stop the administration in its tracks and open the floodgates to even more state laws that challenge federal authority.

The immigration case arrives at the high court Wednesday just weeks after the justices heard arguments in the multi-state challenge to the federal health care overhaul.

Democrats on Capitol Hill this week were already scrambling to prepare for the possibility that the high court upholds the immigration law. Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., announced a plan to introduce a bill that would effectively nullify Arizona's law -- though it would stand virtually no chance of passing in the Republican-controlled House.

"Immigration has not and never has been an area where states are able to exercise independent authority," Schumer said Tuesday at a Capitol Hill hearing, where he announced he would introduce the proposal should the Supreme Court "ignore" the "plain and unambiguous statements of congressional intent" and uphold the Arizona law.

But former Arizona state Sen. Russell Pearce, the author of the law, said: "We have a national crisis, and yet everyone wants to ignore that: the cost, the damage, the crime."

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/...reme-court/#ixzz1t4X4lq00

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com