[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Hey Black People! Why Your Waiter Hates You

Bush Republicanism Is Dead and Gone

NATE SILVER: 'We basically got the Republican race wrong'

Tow truck owner said he refused service to woman because she supports Bernie Sanders

Diaper-wetting Cop "Fears For His Life" - Pepper Sprays a Harmless Squirrel

Bill Clinton Battling Brain Damage

Donald Trump Celebrates Cinco De Mayo With A Trump Taco Bowl

this is how We build the wall and secure the borders on day one

Ten reasons why the Trump Train's given the cocky, lazy, PC-crazed Washington elite the spanking it deserves- and left Hillary shaking in her Goldman-financed boots

Jury convicts Ron Paul aides of campaign finance violations (Benton, Tate and Kesari)

Massive Canadian wildfire forces more evacuations; dashcam video shows harrowing escape

Bill de Blasio tells New Yorkers not to eat at ‘anti-LGBT’ Chick-fil-A

Mitt Romney won't attend GOP convention this summer

Federal Spending Bill Appropriates Taxpayer Dollars to Be Used to Spread Pro-GMO Propaganda

Misperceiving Bullshit as Profound Is Associated with Favorable Views of Cruz, Rubio, Trump and Conservatism

This is School in a Police State - Yearbook Photo Prank Lands Teen in Jail with 70 Criminal Charges

It’s the Anniversary of the One School Shooting the Govt Won’t be Ramming Down Your Throat (Kent State)

Romanian hacker Guccifer: I breached Clinton server, 'it was easy'

A Revision on the Bill of Rights, Part III

Presumptive nominee Trump pivots to November after forcing Cruz out of the race: The Donald calls Hillary 'horrible' as he reveals he is shortlisting 'political' contenders to be his VP

Reince Priebus: Today Starts the GOP’s Unification Process

President Donald Trump would name Rudy Giuliani secretary of Homeland Security

So we are down to a one horse race

A Trump-Gingrich Ticket: Brilliant or Crazy?

Hannity.com Poll: Who Should Trump Choose As His Running Mate?

Trump Praises Cruz's Courage: 'Smart Guy'

Trump goes establishment?

John Kasich suspending campaign: Sources

Most Dangerous Stock Market in History

Kasich: Seriously, you guys, I can win this

Canadian Oil Sands Wildfire forces mass evacuation of 80,000 residents

IED Found Under Central Texas Bridge

Judge Orders Mother’s Child to be Snatched Because She Believes in “Chemtrails”

Hollywood Stuntman Claims Cannabis Oil Cured His Stage 4 Cancer

Cruz shocks his supporters with a sudden exit

TED JUST QUIT!!!!!

Trump wins Indiana

IDEO=> Cruz Camp Predicts Trump Landslide in Indiana – May Win 3/4’s of Delegates

Ted Cruz Campaign Staffers Are Reportedly Beginning to Panic

Trump accuses Cruz's father of helping JFK's assassin (lyin' Donald)

Trump Is 'Hillary Clinton With A Penis' (VIDEO)

Cartoonist says his work got him axed

The Real Reason Why A KKK Grand Wizard Endorsed Trump

Enraged Cop Flips Out When Her Car is Towed for Illegal Parking

Obama Administration Set To Give Israel Largest Aid Package In U.S. History

Local Govt Seeks Vengeance Against Red Light Robin Hood for Exposing Deadly Conspiracy

Gallup: Cruz Image Among Republicans Crashes

Experts Warn of Backlash in Donald Trump’s China Trade Policies

The 'founding fathers' of Europe: DNA reveals all Europeans are related to a group that lived around Belgium 35,000 years ago

A New Digital Cash System Was Just Unveiled At A Secret Meeting For Bankers In New York


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Mexican Invasion
See other Mexican Invasion Articles

Title: Supreme Court signals support for Arizona immigration law provision
Source: fox news
URL Source: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201 ... ttle-arrives-at-supreme-court/
Published: Apr 25, 2012
Author: staff
Post Date: 2012-04-25 12:56:07 by calcon
Keywords: None
Views: 286

The Supreme Court signaled Wednesday that it might uphold a key element of Arizona's immigration law, as justices across the board suggested the state has a serious problem on its hands and should have some level of sovereignty to address illegal immigration.

The justices appeared to ready to allow a provision requiring police officers to check the immigration status of people they think are in the U.S. illegally.

The justices strongly suggested Wednesday they are not buying the Obama administration's argument that the state exceeded its authority, with Chief Justice John Roberts at one point saying he doesn't think the federal government even wants to know how many illegal immigrants are in the country.

"You can see it's not selling very well," Justice Sonia Sotomayor told Obama administration Solicitor General Donald Verrilli.

Just like the health care overhaul challenge heard earlier this month, Wednesday's hearing on the immigration law drew passionate surrogates from both sides. Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer was loudly booed by the law's opponents in front of the courthouse. She said in a statement Wednesday afternoon that "I am filled with optimism -- the kind that comes with knowing that Arizona's cause is just and its course is true."

While the justices addressed the traffic stop provision Wednesday, it was unclear what the court would do with other aspects of the law that have been put on hold by lower federal courts.

Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, who helped draft the law, voiced optimism in Arizona's chances.

"This was a very good day for Arizona in the Supreme Court today," he told Fox News. "The U.S. Justice Department was on the ropes."

But Brent Wilkes, director for the League of United Latin American Citizens, warned that the law would take a "human toll" on Arizona families if allowed to stand.

"This is really a racial profiling bill," he told Fox News.

The hearing Wednesday morning has implications far beyond Arizona's borders, as several states, including Alabama and South Carolina, have followed in Arizona's footsteps to craft their own immigration enforcement measures.

The Obama administration, which opposes those measures, has argued that the country cannot sustain a patchwork of separate immigration laws.

Verrilli, who is arguing on behalf of the government, said in his brief that the Executive Branch has the power to enforce immigration policy.

"For each state, and each locality, to set its own immigration policy in that fashion would wholly subvert Congress' goal: a single, national approach," he wrote.

But Arizona argued that the current system is broken, and that the state is paying an unfair price for that failure.

"Arizona shoulders a disproportionate burden of the national problem of illegal immigration," attorney Paul Clement argued in his brief. He argued that enforcement attention in California and Texas has turned the Arizona border into a funnel for illegal immigrants, with a third of illegal border crossings occurring there.

The attorney described Arizona's law as a response to an "emergency situation" -- with illegal immigrants soaking up millions of state dollars in health care and education, posing safety risks to ranchers and cutting into the state's job market.

Two of the key statutes, which have been blocked and will be at issue in Wednesday's arguments, are provisions to bar illegal immigrants from seeking a job and to require law enforcement to check the immigration status of anyone they suspect of being in the country illegally in the course of a routine stop.

A ruling from the Supreme Court is likely to come this summer, in the thick of the presidential election year -- it could either bolster what has been a bold move from the Obama administration's Justice Department to intervene in state issues ranging from immigration to voter ID laws, or stop the administration in its tracks and open the floodgates to even more state laws that challenge federal authority.

The immigration case arrives at the high court Wednesday just weeks after the justices heard arguments in the multi-state challenge to the federal health care overhaul.

Democrats on Capitol Hill this week were already scrambling to prepare for the possibility that the high court upholds the immigration law. Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., announced a plan to introduce a bill that would effectively nullify Arizona's law -- though it would stand virtually no chance of passing in the Republican-controlled House.

"Immigration has not and never has been an area where states are able to exercise independent authority," Schumer said Tuesday at a Capitol Hill hearing, where he announced he would introduce the proposal should the Supreme Court "ignore" the "plain and unambiguous statements of congressional intent" and uphold the Arizona law.

But former Arizona state Sen. Russell Pearce, the author of the law, said: "We have a national crisis, and yet everyone wants to ignore that: the cost, the damage, the crime."

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/...reme-court/#ixzz1t4X4lq00

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com