[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

C3 Corvette Barn Find Represents Awesome Americana at Its Best

Clinton Email Trouble Deepens, Bill Gross Economic Warning, Bathroom Gender Endgame

Does the Libertarian Party Finally Have a Chance?

This asshole Obama is using a scorched earth policy

Cop Snaps, Almost Hits Pedestrian in Crosswalk, Then Attacks Him in a Fit of Road Rage

Cops Have New Reason for Unchecked Corruption — Holding them Accountable Leads to Suicide

Male doctor helps Saudi woman deliver baby - and is then shot by husband

Maybe Trump Knows What He is Doing

In Our Anti-White Age, Trump Is “The Great White Hope”

New York City is about to become a lot more disgusting

6 Giant Corporations Control The Media, And Americans Consume 10 Hours Of ‘Programming’ A Day

'Guccifer' pleads guilty to hacking emails of Hillary, ex-presidents

Over the top: Trump sews up delegates to seal GOP nomination

“Officer of the Year” Sentenced to Life in Prison for Horrifying Child Porn and Abuse

Body Cam Video Released of Cop Who Murdered Innocent Unarmed Man as He Begged for His Life

US GOP Congressman Just Admitted to Breaking the Law to Use Cannabis to Treat Pain

Bill 'Spaceman' Lee running for governor of Vermont and he wants the Expos back

'Stoned' sheep go on 'psychotic rampage' after eating cannabis plants dumped in Welsh village

Clinton Releases Plan to Dissolve U.S. Border Within 100 Days

For John McCain, Donald Trump makes reelection the "race of my life"

What these Cops Did Would Have Gotten a Citizen Killed — Instead they Were Let Go

Dying Vietnam vet asks for final meeting with beloved horses outside hospital

Neo-Nazis Think Taylor Swift Is an ‘Aryan Goddess’

Ryan Puerto Rico ‘Rescue’ Bill Could Be Windfall for Hedge Funds

How Will America Trade With WORTHLESS DOLLARS & NO GOLD? — Bill Holter

The Gov’t War on Everything (They’ve Spit on the Bill of Rights Yet Again)

Trump leaving neocons in dust

Paul Ryan to Endorse Trump, According to Trump Senior Level Campaign Sources

Discovery Documentary: Donald J. Trump's Boeing 757

You Can't Hack Me

All Electronic Assets Wiped Out in Fall Crash

Verdict in case of NY man tried 4 times in wife's death

Feds Slap 70% Tax on Legal Marijuana Businesses

Is Scarborough Shoal Worth a War?

DEA could reclassify marijuana, allowing doctors to conduct more research

Do you think this is a reasonable math prbolem for a 4th grader?

Dick Morris: When Trump Goes After Bill, It ‘Paralyzes’ Hillary

REPORT: Migrants Committing Disproportionately High Crime In Germany While Media And Govt Focus on ‘Far Right’ Thought Crimes

SHOWDOWN: EU Vows To Use New Powers To Block All Elected ‘Far Right’ Populists From Power

Donald Trump Targets Clinton Scandals from 1990s: Whitewater, Vince Foster

How to Pay a Speeding Ticket in a Police State — Like a Boss

Bizarre tale of the Boardwalk babies: How thousands of premature infants were saved from certain death by being part of a Coney Island entertainment sideshow

Clueless Cop Violates Innocent Man’s Rights After Mistaking His Son’s Chex Mix for Weed

It’s On: Sanders already raising $$ for DNC chairwoman’s challenger

First on CNN: Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe under federal investigation for campaign contributions

Elijah Wood says there's a secret pedophile ring in Hollywood and child actors are 'prey'

Disposable Americans: The Numbers are Growing

‘Whoever Loves Austria Is Sh*t’ – Austria’s New President Hates His Own Country

How Many Divisions Has The Beltway Right?

Jewish Fear and Loathing of Donald Trump (4): Neocon Angst About A Fascist America


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Mexican Invasion
See other Mexican Invasion Articles

Title: Supreme Court signals support for Arizona immigration law provision
Source: fox news
URL Source: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201 ... ttle-arrives-at-supreme-court/
Published: Apr 25, 2012
Author: staff
Post Date: 2012-04-25 12:56:07 by calcon
Keywords: None
Views: 292

The Supreme Court signaled Wednesday that it might uphold a key element of Arizona's immigration law, as justices across the board suggested the state has a serious problem on its hands and should have some level of sovereignty to address illegal immigration.

The justices appeared to ready to allow a provision requiring police officers to check the immigration status of people they think are in the U.S. illegally.

The justices strongly suggested Wednesday they are not buying the Obama administration's argument that the state exceeded its authority, with Chief Justice John Roberts at one point saying he doesn't think the federal government even wants to know how many illegal immigrants are in the country.

"You can see it's not selling very well," Justice Sonia Sotomayor told Obama administration Solicitor General Donald Verrilli.

Just like the health care overhaul challenge heard earlier this month, Wednesday's hearing on the immigration law drew passionate surrogates from both sides. Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer was loudly booed by the law's opponents in front of the courthouse. She said in a statement Wednesday afternoon that "I am filled with optimism -- the kind that comes with knowing that Arizona's cause is just and its course is true."

While the justices addressed the traffic stop provision Wednesday, it was unclear what the court would do with other aspects of the law that have been put on hold by lower federal courts.

Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, who helped draft the law, voiced optimism in Arizona's chances.

"This was a very good day for Arizona in the Supreme Court today," he told Fox News. "The U.S. Justice Department was on the ropes."

But Brent Wilkes, director for the League of United Latin American Citizens, warned that the law would take a "human toll" on Arizona families if allowed to stand.

"This is really a racial profiling bill," he told Fox News.

The hearing Wednesday morning has implications far beyond Arizona's borders, as several states, including Alabama and South Carolina, have followed in Arizona's footsteps to craft their own immigration enforcement measures.

The Obama administration, which opposes those measures, has argued that the country cannot sustain a patchwork of separate immigration laws.

Verrilli, who is arguing on behalf of the government, said in his brief that the Executive Branch has the power to enforce immigration policy.

"For each state, and each locality, to set its own immigration policy in that fashion would wholly subvert Congress' goal: a single, national approach," he wrote.

But Arizona argued that the current system is broken, and that the state is paying an unfair price for that failure.

"Arizona shoulders a disproportionate burden of the national problem of illegal immigration," attorney Paul Clement argued in his brief. He argued that enforcement attention in California and Texas has turned the Arizona border into a funnel for illegal immigrants, with a third of illegal border crossings occurring there.

The attorney described Arizona's law as a response to an "emergency situation" -- with illegal immigrants soaking up millions of state dollars in health care and education, posing safety risks to ranchers and cutting into the state's job market.

Two of the key statutes, which have been blocked and will be at issue in Wednesday's arguments, are provisions to bar illegal immigrants from seeking a job and to require law enforcement to check the immigration status of anyone they suspect of being in the country illegally in the course of a routine stop.

A ruling from the Supreme Court is likely to come this summer, in the thick of the presidential election year -- it could either bolster what has been a bold move from the Obama administration's Justice Department to intervene in state issues ranging from immigration to voter ID laws, or stop the administration in its tracks and open the floodgates to even more state laws that challenge federal authority.

The immigration case arrives at the high court Wednesday just weeks after the justices heard arguments in the multi-state challenge to the federal health care overhaul.

Democrats on Capitol Hill this week were already scrambling to prepare for the possibility that the high court upholds the immigration law. Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., announced a plan to introduce a bill that would effectively nullify Arizona's law -- though it would stand virtually no chance of passing in the Republican-controlled House.

"Immigration has not and never has been an area where states are able to exercise independent authority," Schumer said Tuesday at a Capitol Hill hearing, where he announced he would introduce the proposal should the Supreme Court "ignore" the "plain and unambiguous statements of congressional intent" and uphold the Arizona law.

But former Arizona state Sen. Russell Pearce, the author of the law, said: "We have a national crisis, and yet everyone wants to ignore that: the cost, the damage, the crime."

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/...reme-court/#ixzz1t4X4lq00

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com