[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Trump Is Planning to Send Kill Teams to Mexico to Take Out Cartel Leaders

The Great Falling Away in the Church is Here | Tim Dilena

How Ridiculous? Blade-Less Swiss Army Knife Debuts As Weapon Laws Tighten

Jewish students beaten with sticks at University of Amsterdam

Terrorists shut down Park Avenue.

Police begin arresting democrats outside Met Gala.

The minute the total solar eclipse appeared over US

Three Types Of People To Mark And Avoid In The Church Today

Are The 4 Horsemen Of The Apocalypse About To Appear?

France sends combat troops to Ukraine battlefront

Facts you may not have heard about Muslims in England.

George Washington University raises the Hamas flag. American Flag has been removed.

Alabama students chant Take A Shower to the Hamas terrorists on campus.

In Day of the Lord, 24 Church Elders with Crowns Join Jesus in His Throne

In Day of the Lord, 24 Church Elders with Crowns Join Jesus in His Throne

Deadly Saltwater and Deadly Fresh Water to Increase

Deadly Cancers to soon Become Thing of the Past?

Plague of deadly New Diseases Continues

[FULL VIDEO] Police release bodycam footage of Monroe County District Attorney Sandra Doorley traffi

Police clash with pro-Palestine protesters on Ohio State University campus

Joe Rogan Experience #2138 - Tucker Carlson

Police Dispersing Student Protesters at USC - Breaking News Coverage (College Protests)

What Passover Means For The New Testament Believer

Are We Closer Than Ever To The Next Pandemic?

War in Ukraine Turns on Russia

what happened during total solar eclipse

Israel Attacks Iran, Report Says - LIVE Breaking News Coverage

Earth is Scorched with Heat

Antiwar Activists Chant ‘Death to America’ at Event Featuring Chicago Alderman

Vibe Shift

A stream that makes the pleasant Rain sound.

Older Men - Keep One Foot In The Dark Ages

When You Really Want to Meet the Diversity Requirements

CERN to test world's most powerful particle accelerator during April's solar eclipse

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

The Water Cooler
See other The Water Cooler Articles

Title: Question of the Day. If Congress.....
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Nov 24, 2011
Author: A K A Stone
Post Date: 2011-11-24 21:31:24 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 7331
Comments: 36

If congress is forbidden to make a law. Can they go ahead and make that law anyways?

Very simple question. My 11 year old could get the answer right. Can liberals?

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 36.

#5. To: A K A Stone (#0)

The question isn't what "no law" means. The question is what constitutes speech.

war  posted on  2011-11-25   9:31:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: war (#5)

Let me help you out.

speech (spch) n. 1. a. The faculty or act of speaking. b. The faculty or act of expressing or describing thoughts, feelings, or perceptions by the articulation of words. 2. Something spoken; an utterance. 3. Vocal communication; conversation.

You're welcome. But next time to to the local elementary school and ask one of the fourth graders.

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-11-25   10:27:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: A K A Stone (#6)

When did Exxon ever converse with Shell?

war  posted on  2011-11-25   10:45:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: war A K A Stone (#8)

When did Exxon ever converse with Shell?

Stone would have been a Tory during the Revolution, since it was the only position that supported the Monarchy/East India Co, corporatism is free speech, alliance that existed then.

The founders got rid of that concept and now the dummy TeaBaggers want it back.

mininggold  posted on  2011-11-25   10:53:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: mininggold, war (#9)

The founders got rid of that concept and now the dummy

Liar Liar your pants are on fire!

I've already proved that wrong with the first amendment. If you think they ignored their own first amendment you are going to have to show me some law passed that did as you say. If you do that I will say sorry for calling you a liar. But lying does have a definition. You know it was wars position that corporations didn't exist back then so there was no prohibition. War can correct me if I am not exactly right on what he said.

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-11-25   11:10:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: A K A Stone (#11)

So you agree with NAMBLA's position that it should be able to publish child pornography...

war  posted on  2011-11-28   11:24:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: war (#28)

So you agree with NAMBLA's position that it should be able to publish child pornography...

No. It isn't speech either.

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-11-28   11:27:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: A K A Stone (#29)

It's Press.

Do you even KNOW what's in the first amendment?

war  posted on  2011-11-28   11:40:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: war (#30)

It's Press.

Do you even KNOW what's in the first amendment?

We will just have to disagree on this one. You can support NAMBLA and say they have first amendment rights to publish child porn. I disagree.

The constitution specifically mentioned speech. I would agree that freedom to publish pictures that go along with stories would be covered. Just not in this case. It isn't speech.

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-11-28   11:55:56 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: A K A Stone (#31)

The constitution specifically [mentions] speech.

It also specifically mentions "Press". "Congress shall pass no law abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press..."

How about if I form a religion that worships the killing of the God(s) of other religions?

war  posted on  2011-11-28   12:41:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: war (#34)

An argument could be made as to what you suggest.

Is this in fact an admission by you that sometimes you or others substitute their own sense of right and wrong and call that constitutional?

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-11-28   13:08:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: A K A Stone (#35) (Edited)

An argument could be made as to what you suggest.

A) You've already made the argument..."what does "no law" mean?

B) I'm not "suggesting" anything. Your logic MANDATES that any material is free to be published and the Congress is powerless to stop it. It means that I can start a religion that worships those who laugh at the "false Gods" like the ones in the Hebrew/Christian bible.

NO LAW MEANS NO LAW.

war  posted on  2011-11-28   13:18:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 36.

        There are no replies to Comment # 36.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 36.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com