[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Creationism/Evolution Title: Neanderthal sex boosted immunity in modern humans Mating with Neanderthals and another ancient group called Denisovans introduced genes that help us cope with viruses to this day, they conclude. Previous research had indicated that prehistoric interbreeding led to up to 4% of the modern human genome. The new work identifies stretches of DNA derived from our distant relatives. In the human immune system, the HLA (human leucocyte antigen) family of genes plays an important role in defending against foreign invaders such as viruses. The authors say that the origins of some HLA class 1 genes are proof that our ancient relatives interbred with Neanderthals and Denisovans for a period. At least one variety of HLA gene occurs frequently in present day populations from West Asia, but is rare in Africans. The researchers say that is because after ancient humans left Africa some 65,000 years ago, they started breeding with their more primitive relations in Europe, while those who stayed in Africa did not. "The HLA genes that the Neanderthals and Denisovans had, had been adapted to life in Europe and Asia for several hundred thousand years, whereas the recent migrants from Africa wouldn't have had these genes," said study leader Peter Parham from Stanford University School of Medicine in California. "So getting these genes by mating would have given an advantage to populations that acquired them." When the team looked at a variant of HLA called HLA-B*73 found in modern humans, they found evidence that it came from cross-breeding with Denisovans. Scanty remains While Neanderthal remains have been found in many sites across Europe and Asia, Denisovans are known from only a finger and a tooth unearthed at a single site in Russia, though genetic evidence suggests they ranged further afield. Infographic "Our analysis is all done from one individual, and what's remarkable is how informative that has been and how our data looking at these selected genes is very consistent and complimentary with the whole genome-wide analysis that was previously published," said Professor Parham. A similar scenario was found with HLA gene types in the Neanderthal genome. "We are finding frequencies in Asia and Europe that are far greater than the whole genome estimates of archaic DNA in modern humans, which is 1-6%," said Professor Parham. The scientists estimate that Europeans owe more than half their variants of one class of HLA gene to interbreeding with Neanderthals and Denisovans. Asians owe up to 80%, and Papua New Guineans up to 95%. Uneven exchange Other scientists, while agreeing that humans and other ancients interbred, are less certain about the evidence of impacts on our immune system. "I'm cautious about the conclusions because the HLA system is so variable in living people," commented John Hawks, assistant professor of anthropology at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, US. Denisovan tooth DNA from a tooth (pictured) and a finger bone show the Denisovans were a distinct group "It is difficult to align ancient genes in this part of the genome. "Also, we don't know what the value of these genes really was, although we can hypothesise that they are related to the disease environment in some way." While the genes we received might be helping us stay a step ahead of viruses to this day, the Neanderthals did not do so well out of their encounters with modern human ancestors, disappearing completely some 30,000 years ago. Peter Parham suggested a parallel could be drawn between the events of this period and the European conquest of the Americas. "Initially you have small bands of Europeans exploring, having a difficult time and making friends with the natives; but as they establish themselves, they become less friendly and more likely to take over their resources and eliminate them. "Modern experiences reflect the past, and vice versa." Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest
#1. To: buckeroo (#0)
What it proves is that so called Neanderthals were nothing special and just people. Lots of BS opinion in this article that you have to filter out.
You are making a really interesting point. You are on to something important. Biology has a concept of a species. One of the characteristics of a species is a breeding boundary. Donkeys and horses are different species (in the same family), but they can interbreed. The offspring is called a Mule. Male mules and most female mules are sterile -- they cannot have children. Cows and Buffaloes (beefalo -- good eaten), Lions and tigers, sheep and goats, whales and dolphins, etc. can breed together. Most lot of these "cross breeds" are fertile. Humans, chimps, gorillas, etc. are all in the "primate" family. Can we interbreed? NO. This should tell us that our current classification of species is wrong. Neanderthals have somewhat different shaped skulls than Cro-Magnons (our ancestors). So what? Modern Asians, Caucasians, and Africans also have generally different skull shapes. We have other general differences too. Cro-Magnons and Neanderthals did the nasty. They had kids. We have DNA evidence for this. You put people together and this is what will happen. It's likely that both Neanderthals and Cro-Magnons were simply different races of humans that had different features. The current hierarchy of a species was invented more than a 100 years ago and probably needs to be rethought.
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|